Featured Post

intr0

 


Search This Blog

Monday

True Earth: The Abridged Guide

True Earth: The Abridged Guide - YouTube

Transcripts:
Righty ho. So, um I'll get straight into it then uh if I can. Sorry. So, as just just starting off the the whole thing about this uh this topic is you are you when you get into it, you are up against the world and the world is basically saying you are, you know, you're wrong, but you know, you have to have kind of have to have a bit of courage to stand up against people.
 um and stand in your conviction because you know this is this is what it's like you know you know you're standing up against the crowd saying yeah all of you you're all wrong but um but you know where I am at the moment that's exactly how I feel I don't care if everybody thinks I'm wrong I I've actually seen all this for my for myself so you know I know you know deep in my heart that I'm I'm on the right track here so the thing about this is that we're looking at two polar opposites um sort of two arguments here you know globe earth and and flat earth
but on the surface they look exactly the same right just like this image right you can't tell whether the train's coming out of the tunnel going into it okay there's not enough information there's three frames of information being repeated there's you can't tell which is which. You have to look at something um external so that you can figure out which way it is.
 So just like if you're on on on a train and there's a train next to you and one of the train starts moving initially you can't tell which one's moving right unless you look at something external like a a post right you can tell which which is moving. So this is this is exactly what the flat earth's like.
 It's it's um two polar opposites, but they look identical, right? Um one of the things you have to also be aware of, and I'll stop this for a second, um is how easy it is to to be fooled, especially by two-dimensional media. Yeah. So, um photographs and video, you have to um pay close attention. So, let me let me play this. All right.
 So, we went into looking at that video um with a a certain mindset because we all know what a room looks like. Yeah. Um and it blinded us to certain things that would have given the game away. Um like the difference in color in the cups and uh there's a black rectangle underneath that the the chair and the strange angles of the picture on the wall, right? we kind of ignored that and we saw what we wanted to see until each one of those is is is was kind of dispelled.
Right? So, um so again, we we can't trust two-dimensional media. Um and you know, especially now with with AI, literally anything can be produced for us. So, this is a story we're told. We live on a spherical earth and it's rotating rotating at a thousand miles an hour um on a 23.4 degree tilt and uh we're orbiting a star 93 million miles away uh at 18.5 miles/s.
Um I'm saying it in those terms because when I was searching that's what I found. Um, and we're moving at, you know, the sun's moving at 480,000 miles an hour and, uh, the galaxy itself is moving at 1.3 million miles per hour. Yeah. And it's all supposedly held together by gravity. Here's the thing.
 When you start looking into all the the the figures um associated with the with this model, you keep seeing a certain number. And uh you know anybody who's been uh looking at uh you know truth um over the last few years will will recognize this number as a calling card of a you know a kind of luciferian brotherhood that have um have taken over this world essentially.
 So when you look at what the curvature um of the earth over 10 miles is you'll find it's 66.6 ft. Yeah. Um, the Earth is tilted at 23.4. I always thought it was 23 and A2, but when I looked further into it, it was actually 23.4, but that's 66.6 degrees away from the horizontal. Yeah. Um, 18.5 miles/s works out at 66 thou,600 miles an hour.
 They usually say they usually round it up to 67,000 miles an hour. But this is why I found 18.5 m per per second. Um when Newton discovered gravity, it was in 1666. Yeah. And the force of gravity is 666 newtons. And I said there's so much more. Every everywhere you look about this model, you'll find that you know this this number keeps coming up.
 And um yeah, it's as I said, it's a uh it's a calling card for this the the people who are the architects of this model. So how do we know what the shape of the earth is? Well, you know, our senses literally tell us we live on a flat non-rotating earth. That's it. It's what our senses tell us, right? So, you know, you can go go down to the beach, you know, what you see is a flat horizon.
Yeah. Um, you don't feel any motion. And we've got very very sensitive um senses, especially for acceleration, but we don't we don't feel any motion whatsoever. And um our intuition tells us, you know, there is only one direction for down. It is kind of counterintuitive to know that um down is according to this model down is also that way and that way and that way and all sorts of other directions but um but our intuition tells us down is only onedirection and um none of us have been to space as you know we're we're just being
told via two-dimensional media that there is space and there are people up there right and there's no way you can prove any of this model. Um I think it was um I think it was even Einstein who said um there is no test that can show the motion of the earth. Right? Um there is no there is no way of proving any of this that we've been told.
So how we believe or come to believe this is that we were taught right from the very earliest um times of our lives when we were unable to um analyze information as it came into us. We were told you know here's a globe this is where you live on this globe. And um you know our minds at that time couldn't really question it.
 It was um okay because before the age of six or seven everything you learn becomes the absolute truth. Yeah you know your absolute bedrock of your your reality and um and this is why you know basically one of the very first things they do is get that globe out right. Um when you funny enough when you look at the bottom of those globes it actually says globes are not meant for educational purposes but only for decorative purposes.
So it kind of tells you, lets you know, lets you in on the secret there. So um after school, right, you just get relentless programming. Everywhere you look, you see the globe. You see, um it reinforcing this idea you live on this globe, right? And it it doesn't stop. So this is um this is a choice. You know, we know what we experience every every time we look, but they're trying to make us believe that we live on this spinning water ball, right? This this which really if you step back doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Um now, this
is just my view. You know, everyone's free to have their own view, but to me, um the the picture on the left makes more sense to me. So, this is a model that the mainstream says that we we believe in that we're on um you know, us flat earthers think we're on this uh pancake um floating in in space and uh there's an edge that we can fall off of, right? Um on the contrary, um what what we actually believe is more like a lake.
 If you imagine a large circular lake with with um with the shoreline the the bank of the lake being the edge um and uh there's islands in that lake which are the the continents. Um so just as you see the edge of a lake there, the edge of our world is is what they call the an antarctic um the Antarctic shelf which is the highest continent on Earth, right? Which when you approach it, it's a I think it's a 200 foot wall of ice that you have to scale.
 And then there's something like 300 miles of of Arctic desert or Antarctic desert uh which gets colder and colder and colder. Um and then beyond that um very very few people know what's beyond that. In fact um Captain Cook 1773 he actually um sailed around Antarctica to try and find an inlet. Um um and he ended up sailing for 60,000 miles over three years.
 Right now the the circumference at the equator is 24,91 miles. So, how can he he sail all the way around Antarctica and sail um you know almost three times um the the distance of the circumference, right? If again if it's a um a flat um you know lake then that's easy because obviously the uh the edge of the lake is is uh is a lot further round than the center ring of that lake.
 Um but on a on a on a ball impossible and the idea that um you know we are in an enclosed system with a firmament above us um where the stars are are kept well it can't it's not that um extraordinary since if you've ever gone to a planetarium I mean I remember going to a planetarium in in the states and it was a huge thing um and when They projected the stars up there.
 It see they seem to um they seem to sort of have winds in there and uh and they made it sound like you're outside and it felt like you were outside and you know in the in the world but literally you were in an enclosed system with stars being projected um over you. Um so it's it's not that much of a stretch really.
So um I'm I'm actually in this this presentation just going to talk about three different aspects of the flat earth because I could there's so much I could talk about you know I'll just have to limit it. So I'm going to be talking about the curvature um and part two will be the motion of the earth and I think part three I can't remember because I cut out a lot of stuff.
 Um part three will be about space. So part one curvature um because the earth is you know 24,91 miles um around right the curvature um has a very particular um amount of curvature. It's 8 in per mile squared roughly and that only really works for um a quarter of the earth. But you know for our purposes it's a it's a very good rule of thumb.
 But it the point is that the earth should have a physical barrier, right? Um so the further you look the more this physical barrier will obscure what you're you're looking at. So this is how I got into it. So when I saw this uh experiment on um on onYouTube had nothing to do with flat earth but it told me this 8 in per mile squared um distance to calculate how much curvatures should obscure a landmark.
 So, I went down to uh Plymouth down to Plymouth Hoe and um I knew that the Edeststone Lighthouse was uh I thought it was 12 miles. It was about 13 and a half miles away from Plymouth Hoe. So, um I got my zoom camera and I was um about 30 feet um around about 30 feet up from the uh the the actual water and I zoomed in on the on the lighthouse.
 Now according to um the earth curve calculator um I should have lost the first 32 ft of that lighthouse. So the first 32 feet of that lighthouse should have been obscured by the physical curve of the earth. Okay. Um so I zoomed in on it and um I could see where the water met the rocks.
 Actually, the in this picture it's high tide, but when it's low tide, you can actually see the rocks that the plinth is standing on. I could see where the water was splashing up against the rocks, even though I should have missed the first 32 ft of that um of that lighthouse. But more than that, I could see the horizon behind right behind the uh the the the lighthouse where the horizon should have been.
 Um well it should have been um six miles u bef in front of the uh in front of the lighthouse. The horizon was way behind that lighthouse. So so that's what that's what launched me into this because um if if I couldn't detect curvature there's only um two explanations. either the earth is much much much bigger than they've uh told us it is or it's a flat earth.
 So um from there I've been doing experiments all around the world to to figure out which one it has to be. So um just on the same sort of note um this picture was taken um from Bologin um at the White Cliffs Adobe and again you aren't supposed to be able to see the White Cliffs do from um from the loin because uh can't remember how it is.
 I think it's uh I can't see it anyway, but it's literally the top of the cliffs is below the uh the the mountain that should be hidden by curvature. Yeah. So, so you shouldn't be able to, but um on on good days, you can see the white cliffs do from Bloin. And um likewise, there's been a couple of clear days. Now, I live on the south coast um near Brighton, and on a couple of clear days, you can actually see France.
 Um, again, you're not supposed to be able to see it. We're also told that the uh the size and shape of the earth was proven to us 2,000 years ago by a guy called Eratinis, right? Who did an experiment with, uh, with, you know, two sticks. So um in one place I think is Alexandria he had a stick in the ground and at a certain time like midday in Alexandria the um the stick in the ground cast no shadow.
 So the the sun was directly overhead, but 400 miles away um exactly the same same time, a stick in the ground cast a shadow and he was able to um work out how much the earth curved. But the problem there is that it assumes that the lights coming in from the sun is parallel as it should be. If the if the sun is 93 million miles away, all the light re received by Earth should be coming down parallel um kind of like this at the top.
 But that's not what we see, is it? We never see light coming down like that. We always see light coming down at angles basically going towards where the light is. Yes, some of that when it's uh you know directly in front of us is actually perspective. But you know when the when the sun's in front of us, we can see light coming down at all angles.
 So it's not just perspective, right? So, um, so essentially turns out if you if the sun was 3,000 miles away and 32 miles across on a flat Earth, you'd get exactly the same results as asini's got. Right? So, um, again, it's like that train I I mentioned at the beginning that, you know, they're identical, right? You've got an identical explanation for both, right? But it's just an external um you have to look at something external to to be able to figure out which one's right.
Um and the external thing here is light. The way the light rece is received on earth as we as we see yeah we see through experience light does not come down parallel. It always comes down at angles. So um so it tells me that this is the the truth because otherwise because Ratoscinis didn't take um you know um diverging light into into account with his calculations right that means the earth must have been way way smaller you know according to his calculations right just put these things together um another thing is that uh if if the
earth, you know, is a is a globe. And since the earth is like 70% water, then the the the water must be curved as well. But um here I'm showing you a picture of Lake Bal. Now Lake Bal, it's in Siberia and I think it's um might get these numbers wrong, 163 miles long. All right. And um every every winter it freezes over, right? And so when it freezes over, literally the whole lake is frozen over, but it is absolutely flat over that um 163 miles. Now, thereshould be a hump in the water.
 If it was a globe, there should be a hump in the water. And I'm again I I'm doing this from memory now. Um, I think it's it should be something like five miles high. Um, but but literally you can see the reflection in that in that frozen ice and it's it's a flat reflection because if there's any distortion in a mirror, you notice it, you see it.
Okay, but you know, you you cannot you cannot see that um any distortion in that reflection. There's also a place in Bolivia called Salado Yu Yuni which is a um a salt flat essentially and it's 80 miles long. Um now when it rains there literally that whole salt flat is covered with about an inch of water and it forms again a perfect mirror.
 No distortion whatsoever. It's it's so such a perfect distortion or a lack of distortion that people who who go there say it's like walking in the clouds because you know you can't tell where where the land and the the air you know land ends and the air begins. Yeah. Um so we we see no evidence of curvature whatsoever.
So there are people who say oh I've seen the curvature myself. Right. um especially from an aircraft, right? So they say, "Well, I looked out the window and I could see curvature." Well, um what they're not taking into account is the uh the aircraft body is curved. So the windows are curved and also in there's a there's a um an internal window which is pressurized as well.
 Um so that kind of ends up bulging outwards as well. So when you look at this this picture taken from the the window, you can see that the wing is is curved when it shouldn't be curved like that as well. And sometimes you can actually see curvature um from out the window while the plane's on the ground as well.
 So So no, you don't see curvature um from from the plane. Um there was this uh um Red Bull um atmospheric jump um from this guy called Felix Balgardner a few years ago. Um and this was what was shown to to the viewers. Um he was 128,000 ft up. Uh I think that's nearly 24 miles. Um and yes, he said I can see the curvature. Okay.
 Um but be below him is New Mexico where he took off. So that's that's like um we we must live in planet New Mexico because New Mexico has taken up most of the earth there. Yeah. So um oh can you says can you see curvature from 128,000 ft? Right. This is from um Neil deGrasse Tyson who's commenting about this jump. And that dude who jumped out of a perfectly good balloon, um, what's his say? Felix. Felix Bumgardner.
 Uh, he would have been about 2 mm above the surface of this globe. That's his edge of space jump. Now, you know, I don't it's f he wants to I don't have a problem if he does it, but the the honesty of it would greatly diminish what I think people thought he was actually doing. And not only that, they made sure to photograph him standing there with a really wide angle lens which curves horizontal lines.
>> So, in the photo, you see this curvature of Earth's surface, and he said, "Wow, he's in space. Look at that." No, he's not at that height. You don't see you don't see the curvature of the earth if you are 2 mm above this beach ball. You just don't that stuff is flat. Nice.
 Nice admission from Neil Degrass Tyson there. But you can see he's telling you that is a wide angle lens making that curvature. There was no curvature. In fact, the um internal camera that um when the door opened, you could see that the horizon was flat. Um from that camera, this is the oldest proof, the oldest proof that um you know that the the Earth is a globe.
 Let me go back to it. >> If you send a ship straight to the horizon, >> eventually it begins to disappear until it's no longer visible beyond your horizon. Right. >> And you should ask yourself what kind of surface would produce that result. >> So right there you know on one hand he says that you cannot detect any curvature from 24 miles up yet you can see a ship go over that curvature from from standing on the ground.
 There's a little bit of a disconnect there. But um you know one of the problems there is that you know when you're if you're a six-foot person your horizon is three miles away. Okay. So somebody six foot their horizon so where that that uh curvature sort of blocks your view is three miles. So that ship is disappearing three miles away. Okay.
But the point is when you look to your left, you can see for three miles. Um if you look to your right, you can see for three miles. So somehow there's no curvature um sort of left or right, but yes, there is a curvature right in front of you. So do we live on a cylinder? You know, it doesn't make sense until you know we uh we came well we got hold of this camera, the the Nikon Coolpix.
 It was a P900, but there's a P1000 now. Um, which is the flat earth camera of choice because it's got an amazing zoom on it. Um, and uh, what we find, and here, here's a little experiment. Piece of wood there, and uh, it's perfectly flat. There's a boat on the end of it.
 And,um, we can zoom in and well, when we start, we can't see the boat because it's obscured by the flat board. But when we zoom in, it comes back just like um it it works in real life. Yeah. So, let me just play that bit again. So, we're just zooming along that board and there's a boat at the end. And this is what it looks like from the camera.
 So, don't know if you can see my pointer. Um we're looking we're going to zoom in on this plank here. Um and the boat comes into view. And as I said, it's exactly the same as we see down here on this in this picture as we zoom into an empty horizon and a boat comes back from over the curve. Yeah.
 So what we find is that um you know when a boat we can actually see with our naked eye a boat seemingly go over the curve, but then we whip out our zoom camera and zoom in and the boat comes back and we can stay at that level of zoom and watch the boat again go over the horizon and then zoom in some more and it comes back and it keeps coming back to the to the limit of the zoom of our camera.
 So there is no curvature that we can detect. Um funny enough, Nikon suddenly decided right on February 29th last year um to discontinue uh selling these cameras, right? Because they were actually making a lot of money out of us because we were buying buying these cameras left, right, and center. Right.
 Turns out same day NASA signs an agreement with Nikon um for to develop their Arteimus camera which is a lucrative contract. So I can almost guarantee that that NASA said we'll give you this this contract. You just have to stop selling these cameras. Right? So a common argument that comes back from people is that when we say when we point out that look we can see things that are way further than the the the curvature of the earth they say oh it's refraction you idiot. Yeah refraction.
Well the thing is about refraction is um what refraction does is it inverts an image or it squashes it or it expands it. But it doesn't take something from behind an obstacle and bring it um in front of it. Um most people are familiar with refraction like on a hot day when they look up the road and they see a car coming and it looks like the car is coming at you through water, but there's no water.
 It's literally reflecting the bottom of the car and the sky. So it looks like it's water, but no, that's that's what refraction is. As shown here and in countless examples, refraction is real. It compresses. It stretches. It distorts. It obscures and miragages. You can see it with your own eyes. But the globe propagandists have hijacked the term refraction and took this observable reality and deceptively changed refraction into an imaginary earth curvature removing device.
>> So there it is. You can see the refraction as the the temperature and humidity goes up and down by it literally it just distorts the image. It doesn't bring things beyond beyond the curve. Um so I I was on um the salt flats at um in Utah um Bonavville Salt Flats and I took this picture and um it looks like you know land floating in the sky doesn't it? Um, but really what's h happening here is that there's a band of reflection.
 So the heated air is is is actually reflecting the sky, what's what's above it, and it's literally hiding the actual horizon. So the horizon is is somewhere in that band of reflection. It's not the bottom of that that uh refle that reflection. That's a a false horizon. The horizon is somewhere in that reflection, right? So, it's just literally inverting it.
 And um I'm not going to play this all all of this because it's a few minutes, but this is um just just watching a boat going out to sea. And as as it uh as the boat goes out to sea um and it gets smaller, that reflection that band of reflection gets bigger relative to the boat. So you can see right now um maybe you can see that band of reflection where it's making those circles.
 All right. And um as as it goes further, you'll just see that that band gets bigger and that reflection gets bigger. Now you can see the contents of the boat being reflected now. Um eventually should I play the whole lot? I don't know. Should I play? Let it go for a minute. >> Yeah. >> All right.
 All right. So you can see now that uh you can see the inter inside of the boat now being reflected. Um eventually all you'll see is the the pilot and you'll see um a double image of that pilot. Um so it's just like a mast when they say the mast um goes down last as the boat goes over the horizon. Well, yeah, it is. But what you're seeing is like a reflect um the mast and its reflection, right? the rest of the boat is being hidden by that that band of reflection um because of the humidity of the of the water.
So, you can see now that um it's pretty much most of the boat's gone. All that can be seen now is the is the top of the boat and um and the the pilot standing on top. And before it disappears, literally, you'll just see you just see the pilot. But so this is how it works.
And you can see that the bottom of that reflection that isn't the horizon. The the waves are too big and some of the water is like floating above the water line there. So yeah. Anyway, so moving on. Um again, we've got lots of experiments. I'm not going to talk too much about this, but there's um a place where there we found like three oil rigs.
 Um, and well, I've only got two of them here, but um, one six six milesi away, one n miles away. We put the camera right close to the water about a foot above the water and where the horizon should have been at 1.2 miles. But yet, we can see both oil rigs and and the horizon line behind the furthest oil rig.
 Again, it it shows that um it's not refraction. Refraction, you can't do that. There's no mechanism at all that can bring um bring objects um beyond the horizon right um you know symmetrically so that it looks like it's on a flat earth um again one of the things that people say again for about this curvature is that when you see something like this where um this is across Lake Michigan um and uh again you're not supposed to be able to see any of that city, but um you can see the top of that city.
 The bottom of the buildings seem to be cut off. So people look at that and say, "Oh, it's it's it's it's got to be it's got to be a curved earth." Okay. But yeah, this is the way we see we see in a kind of pyramid shape. Yeah. Um so when we look at at say say a room say a long corridor perhaps um the walls um start to merge inwards to the center and the floor and the ceiling sort of merge into the to the center as well and um there's a point called we call the vanishing point where we literally can't see anything beyond that point. Um we have a a limit
to our eyesight. is an angular resolution of 0.02 degrees. So anything so um anything that we we're looking at that's going away from us if the angle of between the ground our eye and the top of that object is less than 0.02 of a degree we can't see it. Yeah. So um I took this picture again on the Bonavville Salt Flats and my friend is is about a mile away. Um I can't see.
Yeah. So she's about a mile away from me. Um now these structures, this is like salt in the foreground. They're about an inch about an inch sort of little lumps about an inch an inch tall as you can see. And as it as it goes into the middle ground, right, that those those details start to fade. They get smaller and smaller.
 So, um, when you get to sort of the beginning of the the the, uh, background here, you can't see those structures at all. That means that those little structures have hit that 0.02 limit. Okay? So, um you can't really see um my friend here um in any detail, but you would see that the bottom of her feet would have disappeared because um the you know her toes are about well just under an inch.
So, she her toes would not be able to be uh be viewed at that point. And I can actually show you how that works. So, camera's on the floor. Um, and this guy's going to walk away. >> Audio jungle. Now, as he's walking away, he's starting to see that the bottom of his feet are disappearing. Audio jungle. >> Well, now his ankles have gone.
>> Audio jungle. >> So, now we're coming out to his knees. >> Audio jungle. Okay. And in a in a minute, >> he's going to get to the end and he's actually going to disappear beyond the curve of the football pitch. >> Audio jungle. Audio jungle. >> All right. So now his whole waist is gone and now he's going to dip down >> audio jump >> and completely disappear. Okay.
 Now I've heard people stop this now. I've heard people say, "Oh yeah, they they curve football pitches to drain it." Uh they curve them sideways. They don't curve them long ways. Yeah, that would affect the game. Um but you can do this on a on a long um warehouse floor and get exactly the same results. Yeah. Um it's got nothing to do with curvature.
 It literally is angular res angular resolution. And this is this is how it works. Yeah. And and this also um uh speaks to this idea that um it must be a curved earth because if you um if you see something disappear over the curvature, if you stand up or get higher, it comes back into view. Well, that works on a flat earth, too.
 And it again, it comes down to angular resolution. Um, so you know the an object here when you're sitting down 24 degrees as as soon as it goes further away the uh that angle gets smaller and smaller until it hits the 0.02. But again if you stand up that angle you know opens up. So now it's uh it comes within your limit within the 0.
02 degree limit. So no mystery um quite simple. Um, another thing people say, if the earth is flat, I should be able to see Mount Everest from here. Yeah. Um, does it sound it sound reasonable? Well, I I don't think so because, you know, um the air isn't perfectly transparent and we see that, you know, it's especially with, you know, on a morning where there's mist and stuff, you can see that um the things in the foreground are niceand sharp and uh and you know, um the contrast is is very high, but as you go further, the um air starts to have an
effect and uh and everything gets washed out. Um, and you don't know what is between. If you're looking, you know, maybe a thousand miles away, trying to look at something a thousand miles away, you don't know what is between you and that. Could be rain, could be sle, could be snow, could be mist, fog, whatever.
All right. Um, sometimes you can't even see 100 yards. So, so no, you're not going to be able to see um Mount Everest from from anywhere. But here's the thing. Um, if you have a a digital camera, all right, um, you can there's these new cameras have um have an infrared um, filter on them.
 Okay, to stop infrared light messing up your pictures, right? If you take that infrared um, filter out, now your camera um, registered registers infrared light. Okay. um an infrared light cuts through atmospheric effects. So, here's a picture of I think it's Santa Monica um across the water and um it's taken with an ordinary camera, but uh this guy Jay Tolen Media, he basically then takes the same picture um with his uh infrared camera and now a mountain, Mount St.
 Justinto 123 miles beyond that that uh city now comes into view. It cuts through all that atmosphere. Yeah. And again, you're not supposed to be able to see that mountain, you know, if if the earth was curved. I can't remember how much curvish should be with that, but um but yeah, you wouldn't be able to see that anyway. Um another really interesting one, this photo was taken from a mountain in Wales, Yura, I think it's called.
 Um and and it's taken from the top of that uh that mountain. uh and the height was taken into consideration, but you can see on the horizon um the Alps. You can actually identify all of the mountains um of the Alps um from this picture now. But the Alps are 700 miles away from Wales. 700 miles. which means the tops of those mountains should be 50 miles below the horizon.
 There is no way any way that uh that any atmospheric effect can can bring something from 50 miles behind the curve right into view. Right? So again, this the evidence just keeps stacking up for this. Um, another question. Well, how does the sun set on on a on a flat earth? Well, again, this is just like the uh experiment with a guy walking away, right? That's the sun he's moving back.
And you can see as the sun moves back, it gets lower and lower in the sky. Um, one of the things that isn't shown here though that happens in in um in real reality is there's atmospheric lensing which makes the makes the sun look bigger as it goes further away because it's going through um miles of atmosphere.
 All right, but you can see now the sun in this case is is setting on the horizon. Okay, and there it's gone. All right, again this is on a on a totally flat surface. All right, we can we can replicate what we see in the sky. And here we go. The sun looks like it's being cut in half by the by the horizon. All right, but you can whip out your P900 and zoom in.
And no, it's not being cut in half by the horizon. It's literally still over the horizon. All right. It's just again, it's just perspective. All right. Um, on the same topic, you know, we see on the right here, this is what we see when when the sun's setting, right? We can see the light from the sun literally come all the way down to your feet.
Again, that can only happen on a flat surface. Yeah. on a curved surface, the light would actually be on the other side of the curve and maybe right at the um on the zenith of that curve um where where you know it reflects off the top of that curve, but you would never see the light literally coming all the way down to your feet.
Um also watch how the sun sets here. Notice that the light goes with the sun. It literally is following the sun. Okay. Um, so as it as it shrinks, the light follows the sun. Hang on. Is this gonna shrink? Okay. So yeah, you can see that the light is is literally um is like a ball around the sun and it's as the sun goes away, the the light goes with it in in a ball as it were.
 But if if we were observing the sunset on a uh on a um a ball earth, okay? Um we we should see the whole horizon sort of um get get sort of uh darker all at once uniformly because you know literally the sun is lighting up the whole side of the earth right as it goes away. We should see the whole um the whole horizon just just get darker and darker slowly all at once.
 But we see that the light goes with the sun. It's the sun that's moving around us, taking the light with it, not um you know, we're not going around the sun. Again, it's a one of those train things, but the the way the light moves is the external thing that tells us it's one, not the other. Um this is the other thing that people say.
 If the Earth is flat, then it should be daytime all the time because you've got a bright white light source above a flat tabletop, for instance. Andso the whole tabletop should be lit up. Well, now I totally understand why it seems that you should be able to see a big bright shining light hovering above a flat Earth from anywhere on that Earth.
But in the flat Earth model, the known Earth is approximately 20,000 mi across. The Sun is about 34 miles across and about 3,100 mi high. So to put that in perspective, imagine a table 2 m wide in a completely dark room and you're holding a a small but very bright light bulb 3.
4 mm across and you were holding it about 31 cm above the table. What you'd see is a circular pool of light directly on the table, you know, beneath the light bulb, but on the other side of the table it would be in darkness. Now, it seems to our mind that um if you were on the other side of the table, you would see the light because it's, you know, above the above the table.
 But that's not true because on that part of the table, it's in darkness, meaning that the light isn't physically reaching that part of the tabletop. Now, paint a flat earth map to scale on the tabletop so that Europe is directly underneath the light bulb and Australia would be in darkness. And even though you could argue that you could put your eye not right right next to the edge of the tabletop and still see the light.
 Well, let's say the pupil of your eye is about 1 cm above the tabletop. At that scale, your viewpoint is 100 miles above the flat earth. And yes, in that case, you would still see the light. This model actually matches observation. In 2014, an amateur rocketry team in New Mexico launched the Go Fast rocket 73.1 miles into the air.
 But when a flat Earth researcher called Reffy studied the footage, he noticed that the moon was visible. But when he checked on time and date.com, he found that the moon was actually above Australia at that time. So it would have been impossible to see it if it was on the other side of a globe, but absolutely visible across the other side of a plane from 73 miles up.
In this in this case, we got um like some ev actual evidence of what I I'm just saying here that you know if you're in a completely dark room and you've got a light bulb next to a wall, okay, it will throw a pool of light um near on the wall near to that light bulb, but the light will drop off according to the inverse square rule, right? It'll drop off pretty quickly.
 And so you know um that area quite a bit away from that light bulb is in complete darkness. So yes as that as that light source moves around the uh the the flat wall it will illuminate different parts of the wall and and so um where that light is is uh is midday wherever that light is. Okay. So as it travels around midday moves with it.
So surely pilots would know if the earth is flat. Um now um here's the thing. If you're flying um a plane at um um you know straight and level flight over a curved surface, what's going to happen is um you're going to gain altitude. you're gonna start flying up into the, you know, fly up into the towards space actually, right? Um unless you dip your nose down to keep around that curve, right? Um but here's um here's the RAF doing these low flying um exercises.
They're 75 um foot up and they're going at 1200 1250 miles an hour, which means they have to correct for um 45 45 ft every 30 seconds. Okay? Now, if you're having to do that and flying um you know, 45 feet above the ground, all right, you're you're likely to be dead, right? they're not they're not taking curvature into account because there is no curvature.
Right? So, um also planes actually fly at a a three degrees nose up altitude, right? But they've got to again if they're if they're um having to correct for 45 miles every hour in this case because of the way the planes fly at different um speeds um they're going to have to correct for 45 miles every hour if they're going about 600 miles an hour. Okay.
 And they've got their nose up three degrees. How do they correct for for that? They literally have to be diving for most of that uh most of that trip. So when a plane flies in straight and level flight, it is a balance of of all these forces, right? So thrust and drag and lift and weight and um the the plane can be trimmed up so that he can the the pilot can take his hands off the controls and a plane will fly straight and level. Okay.
 Um so if there's any kind of dipping or any correction has to be made it's not only one thing that changes as I said it's a balance if um if the air speed or if the uh okay the um attitude indicator so if he starts to dip the nose down right then the air speed will go up the altimeter will start going down right and the vertical air speed indicator will start uh going up as well or going down.
 So if they make any changes, it's not one thing that changes. It's like um at least four things have um change all at once. So it's it's a complex dance, right? When it's flying straight and level, all of those are balanced and all stay the same. Okay? So So no, there is no umthere is no uh uh compensating for a curved earth.
Uh I'm going to I'm going to sort of skip past that. And and so um they've also got this uh in in a plane. They've got a um uh let me go back here a second. So this is the altitude indicator, the artificial horizon. Okay. It's a gyroscope. Literally the um behind that gauge is uh a gyroscope that's spun up before the plane takes off so it can get a reference to the ground. Okay? But here's the thing.
 if it's spun up at the beginning here before um the flight before the plane takes off. All right, a gyroscope will stay in its orientation. So, you can spin up the gyroscope and keep it on a on a on a surface and then tilt the surface and the gyroscope will stay in its same orientation. Okay? And that's what happens in a plane.
 The the plane spins up its gyroscope. Okay? and then it takes off and as it if it goes over a curve the gyroscope will stay upright. Okay. So as it goes over the curve the um artificial horizon should appear to roll backwards as it goes over the curve of the earth but it doesn't.
 And I I ask pilots every time I fly um I get I sort of give them gotcha questions actually. I asked them if they ever have to uh um adjust the artificial horizon in mid-flight and they say, "No, no, no, we don't." And then I I explain this to them and then they go, "Oh, yeah, but we have to adjust the artificial horizon.
" But you just said you didn't. So, yeah, I I end up catching them out every time. Um so, I'm go past there. Um very quickly, they also have to calculate this thing called top of descent. So um because planes have to have um for safety a 3deree glide slope when they come down to land they have to be at 3°. So it's a nice gentle slope.
 So they literally have to use a bit of trigonometry right to work out um how far how look how far away from the uh airport they have to start their descent. Okay. Because it's a triangle. Yeah. So the angle is three degrees. They know how high they they are. They have to calculate how far away they have to to start their descent. Okay.
 Um so that's all very well, but if they're on a curved earth, right? Um at 37,000 ft, it's 133 miles, but it'll end up nearly two miles above the runway if it was a curved earth, right? Which isn't what happens. So again, all I'm I'm throwing all this at you because um again, we're we've got this model that is identical on both sides and I'm showing you external things that show it's one, not the other. Okay.
 Um and again, pilots, as I say, they do know it's a um it's a flat earth because um more and more of them are actually admitting it when we ask them. >> Can I talk to the pilot, please? >> Right here. You're the pilot. >> Hi. >> How long have you been flying for? >> Uh like for Delta 21 years, but maybe like 30 something. >> I want to know um because they say the pilots know a lot.
 Do you think the earth is flat or no? >> I know it's flat. >> You know it's flat. How long have you been flying for? You said >> over 30 years. >> And when people when you tell people that, do they think you're like crazy or no? >> Only one person. >> Only one person. >> Yeah. You're recording. So, um there's lots and lots of videos now of pilots actually coming out and saying, you know, um the earth is flat.
They won't do it publicly. Um there was a woman pilot um for KM who publicly said, "Yeah, um I've been flying for for 20 years now and I know the earth is flat." And she was immediately grounded. Um you know, so you come out in public and say say what you think, you know, you're you're out of a job. Okay.
 So, that's why you're not getting people out in the public saying it. They don't mind saying it to us, you know, because uh TV cameras aren't there. Um but um but yeah, they they are now coming out in droves and saying, "Yeah, it's flat." Um okay, so I'll move on to uh motion. All right.
 Um so the thing about uh you know the this heliocentric versus geocentric they're exactly the same model. They look exactly the same. You know if you if you look at the one on the on on the left which is the uh the heliocentric which is what we're told is happening. Well it looks identical to the geocentric. It's just uh what which where your focus is. Yeah.
 In the in the geocentric, you're focusing on the earth, but it's exactly the same as the uh as the geocentric uh heliocentric. All right. Again, it's that train situation. Yeah, that's what I said. Um and uh yeah, George Ellis, the uh the cosm cosmologist basically said that they're identical. You can't you cannot um you cannot sort of uh prove it either way based on observations.
Uh so they say that motion of the stars proves that the earth is rotating. Yeah. So if you put a time-lapse camera um at the north star Polaris, you'll see that all the stars, all of them turn around the Polaris in perfect circles. That's because they say the Earth is um is rotating at 1,000 miles an hour um around the axis of Polaris.
But the earth is um is is also umorbiting the sun 67,000 times faster than that. Okay. And um and the sun is also moving 600,000 times um in a different direction, right? Dragging the earth and all the all the planets with it um you know at 600,000 miles an hour. Okay. So how do we get this? How do we get the stars making these perfect circles if um that's only a thousand miles um of of an hour of motion and the the Earth is moving at 67,000 miles and being dragged by the sun at is it 480,000 miles and uh and so on and so on, right?
That there's no explanation for that. Um so again the the earth is uh the earth's tilt is pointing at polaris right um but if it moves if the earth moves any small change all right it won't be pointing at polaris anymore okay we're we're moving around a sun which is dragging us along and the sun is actually going um in a a corkcrew pattern as well dragging us along with it but Yet with all that motion, our um our pole um supposed pole always lines up with Polaris. Okay.
 In fact, um the Georgia Guidestones in in America had a um it used to have a hole drilled through it so that um on a on a certain um night of the year, you could look through that hole and Polaris would always be centered in um on that hole. I think sorry any night of the year actually any night of the year you could look through that hole and Polaris will be perfectly centered right it never changes okay there's no explanation why that is also look at the uh look at the constellations well this is uh again one of the most
famous constellations the big dipper um now all the stars yeah they they make that pattern the big dipper but that's only from from Earth because all these stars are actually different distances away and they're moving in different directions. Some of them uh the ones colored in red are moving are moving away from us, right? The ones in green are moving towards us. Okay.
 Um so even if we were stationary looking up at these stars, eventually these stars are going to start moving apart or changing shape. Okay. Um but we're moving as well um relative to these stars. So how are we seeing these constellations that stay the same over thousands and thousands of years? We as we move I don't know if you can see it there t you can see the stars are moving as we move.
 It's called stellar parallax. Um we should see stellar parallax. As we move the star should move relative to us. Okay. And I think I've got so here are the constellations and this is just uh uh simulating our yearly move movement around the sun. But as the as the sun moves as well uh I think we're going to get there.
 As the sun moves as well, we should see that the actual constellation should move out of place because the stars are all different distances away from us. Yeah. There's no ex there's no reason in this in this model why we should see the same constellations you know for thousands and thousands of years. Um this is something else some people say to us.
 Of course you don't see you don't feel the uh the rotation of the earth. It only does one revolution per day. Well that does sound like it's um you know it's not moving very fast. you know, 24,91 miles um you know, per 24 hours. It doesn't sound very fast at all. So, think of it this way. If you're on one of these roundabouts, okay, and you know, roundabouts 8 foot um 8 foot across and it's moving round once every 24 hours, it will be moving at 316 of an inch every minute.
 So, you wouldn't even notice it moving. Now, you'd have to look really carefully to see it moving. Okay. Um, let's then imagine that that roundabout was one mile wide. Okay. Now, on the edge of that that um roundabout, it's now moving at 690 ft an hour, which is 2.2 in a second. You'll see it moving very slowly. Okay.
 Um, but now let's imagine that this uh this roundabout is if it's 283 miles wide, it would be 37 miles uh miles an hour, which is 50 54 feet a second, right? You'd be you'd be flung off at that speed, right? Um I I put that that speed in there because that's exactly the speed that the gravitron goes around. Has everybody been on a gravitron at the fairground? No. Okay. All right.
 Well, that you >> and it >> Yeah, you it goes round round. You're on the inside and as it goes round, you're stuck to the outside and you can actually um like clamber up and go upside down or whatever because you're pinned to the wall. Okay, that's only 37 miles an hour, right? And if you were on the outside of that, of course, you'd be flung off. Okay.
So, if that um that roundabout was 8,000 mi wide, now it's moving at um 1,037 mph and you knowif per second, you'd absolutely be flung off that earth. Yeah. And you can see, but at any time if you could manage to hang on to it, you could run into the center and uh once you get like four feet from the from the middle, you're still only going at 316 of a um an an inch every every hour. Yeah.
 So, so yes, it's it's a fallacy. They're trying they're appealing to your um your uhyour ignorance of of how speed works. Yeah. Um, so, so yes, also this is what happens if you got like a a um a foam ball that's soaked in water. As it spins, the water starts to collect at the uh at the at the equator. Okay, so you can see the the water shooting off as it spins at the equator of the spin.
So why is there any land at the equator? Because as the as the earth spins the water which readily moves should actually collect at the poles collect at the poles collect at the equator. So there shouldn't be any land at the equator. And you can't say that oh the equator is higher up than most of the places on earth.
 No actually um the Danakill desert for instance in Africa is um is one of the lowest points on earth yet it's totally dry. So why if the earth is spinning is is there land at the equator? Again I've asked this question to uh Neil deGrasse Tyson and he refuses to answer me. Um, another thing people say is that, well, you know, when you're moving at a constant speed, you won't feel the motion, right? Just like if you're on a train and the train's going at 40 miles an hour, 50 miles an hour, right? You don't notice any actual motion. If it
was nice and smooth and there's no bumps, you wouldn't know you were moving. Yeah, that's absolutely true. Yeah. It doesn't matter what speed you're going at. you're going in a straight line at a constant speed, you will not notice the motion. However, if you go in a circle, that is uh that's acceleration at in different directions.
 Okay? Just like if you're going in a car at a constant speed, right? You would not feel anything. If you're going straight line in a in a car at constant speed, you won't feel anything. You could do you could juggle in the back. Yeah. and you wouldn't notice anything. But as soon as that car goes around a a bend, right, you get thrown to one side and you there's no way you're juggling. Yeah.
Because motion in a circle is acceleration and we feel acceleration. We feel acceleration. The slightest bit of acceleration. So motion in a circle is acceleration and we would feel it. Here's an example. So, it's going in a straight line, constant velocity. Do you think they felt that? Yeah.
 As soon as they went away from that con that that straight line, yeah, they were thrown to one side because motion in a in a curve is acceleration in different directions. Yeah. Um, another proof apparently that we're moving, this is from the 1800s, was a guy called Leon Fukult, um, Fukult's pendulum. He actually did an experiment with a gyroscope where um he summized that if you if you set a gyroscope spinning again it will stay in its orientation but as the earth moved it should move as well.
 It should uh stay the same and uh for from our perspective it would look like the gyroscope is moving by itself. It should move 15 degrees every uh every hour or so. Yeah. Um and he did this experiment with a hand um powered gyroscope. So it was like a string that he pulled and spun up the gyroscope. And he claimed to detect the Earth's rotation.
But we've done the same experiment. >> Let's start the clock. >> But with a precision gyroscope, right? Precision gyroscope in a uh in a plane with a plane's um um at was it? I can't remember what it's called. It's a It's a um direction finder or something. Can't remember. But we've left left it for to run for 10 minutes or so and it doesn't move at all.
 So we don't detect we can't detect the Earth's motion with a precision gyroscope. Yet somehow um Leon Fult managed to do it with a handspun gyroscope. So no, we've we've done the experiments. We can't detect it. Also, um, Earth without the it's water apparently looks like this. Yeah. So, it's um it's not a smooth billyard ball.
All right. And and also it's got, you know, millions of tons of water, you know, sloshing around on it. So, how does it rotate smoothly? Anyone who's um ever had to have their um tires balanced knows that if the weight on on that um wheel is is unbalanced in any way, that wheel's going to be shaking as it as it hits a speed. Yeah.
 Why why is the is is this somehow managing to uh to spin, you know, nice and smoothly? Yeah. There's uh no explanation for that. Okay. Um very quickly there's lots of experiments that have shown that the earth is stationary but uh nobody's is nobody um in the scientific community is actually told about them.
 These these experiments have just been just been squashed. Okay. Um in fact the cosmic microwave background radiation proves that not only is the earth not not moving but it proves that earth is the center of everything. Okay they did this experiment four times and got the same result every time but they're not they don't talk about it.
You know it's not it's not mentioned. Um in fact there's a a documentary called the principle that you can find. Um, and it's it's somebody who who basically got all these scientists and got them to to admit to this. Um, but they didn't realize they were on a on a documentarytalking about um the earth being, you know, the center of the universe and all that. But there you go.
Ah, >> now I'm going to discuss how we would look for a new law. In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we guess it. Then we com don't laugh. That's the really true. Then we compute the consequences of the guess to see what if this is right. If this law that we guessed is right, we see what it would imply.
 And then we compare those computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or experience. Compare it directly with observation to see if it if it works. If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn't make a difference how beautiful your guess is. It doesn't make any difference how smart you are who made the guess or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it's wrong. That's all there is to it. >> Yeah. This is my favorite physicist um Richard Fineman and he he does a whole lecture and he said basically says you know um you can have all these amazing theories um all you like but if it disagrees with experiment or you know your experience then it's wrong doesn't matter who who came up with a theory if it doesn't match what you can see and experiment with it's wrong okay and what I've shown you everything um disagrees with the theories that we've been
presented with. So, final section, space, the fictional frontier. Okay. Um so, there's no sound to this. Uh I can't find the sound. I think they took it off deliberately, but this is the first first man's space um first man venture into space. It was a a balloon, a helium balloon with this capsule attached to it.
 I think it was 1948. And they they went up um and I can't remember how far they went up. Um but they went up and they show they sent back a picture a picture of space and uh we'll see what that looks like. Now remember, um 1948, nobody had ever seen space before. Okay? They got no idea what it looks like. And this is the very first um images shown.
And I'm going to have to try and stop it at the right moment. So, I'm going up. And this is space. Let me let me go back a second. I want you to see. Look at Look at the moon. I'll try and stop it. Look at the moon. You see the cresant moon and uh and the star in the middle of it there. Okay.
 Literally, this is this is what they they palmed off to people as space back in 1948 because again, nobody had seen it before, right? Um so like a simple question would be can you see stars in space? So NASA, can you see stars in space? >> So you can see the stars. >> Oh, yeah. >> You know, and pretty much all the time you can see the stars.
>> It's It's not void. I mean, it's black, but there's all kinds of little polka dots. >> There's all the There's all the stars there. And the cool thing is about you can see it during the day. >> Yeah, you can. And there's more than stars. You can see planets. You can see moons. >> You you see the ga the gas melanin clouds up.
>> Okay. So, you can see stars from space. And when you're when you're in space and you're looking into deep space and you're on the sun side of the orbit, uh the sunlight washes out all the starlight. So you can't see any stars just like here on Earth. But then when you look out into deep space away from the sun, it's the darkest black you can imagine, right? And so what happens is you really lose your depth perception.
You can't tell if something's close by or far away. >> Okay? So you can't see stars from space. >> You see lots of points and you see lots of points and that literally millions of them. uh you know there's you know the thing about Carl Sean billions of billions of there really are billions and billions of stars and you can see them in fact they're so numerous it's very difficult to pick out the constellations you and I see here on the ground >> okay so you can see stars from space >> the sky is uh deep black uh when viewed
from the moon as it is when viewed from uh cis lunar space the space between the earth and the moon The uh the earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen although there've been some reports of seeing planets. I myself did not see planets from the surface but I suspect they might uh be visible.
>> Okay, listen. So you cannot see stars from space. That's the final answer. And we have to realize that in space without the intervening atmosphere, the heavens are 10 times as bright, stars 10 times as numerous, uh because there's no uh atmosphere to block block the light. >> Look, I'm going to ask this question one more time.
 Can you or can you not see stars in space? >> We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the moon by eye without looking through the optics. Uh, I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the Sonar Curler what what stars we could see. >> I don't remember seeing any. >> They can't even remember seeing stars.
They can't remember if they saw stars when they went to space. Yo, I went to Disney World when I was six and I remember what my favorite ride was. They went to space and don't remember if they saw stars in the sky. So yeah, I'm crazy because I don't believe what NASA is saying. >> Now, interestingly, let's see if I can find it. Interestingly, um, when Michael Collins over there said, um, I don't remember seeing any stars, right? You see Neil Armstrong, you know, get really uncomfortable because Michael Collins was the one who stayed in the command module. He went
around the dark side of the moon, right? So in the dark on the dark side of the moon which was shielded from the sun, he should have had the most spectacular view of stars. All right, because there's no sunlight or anything blocking his way, right? But he says he don't doesn't remember seeing any stars whatsoever.
 Um that was a big big mistake. Um um also here we go. Somebody else saying who says, "I've seen the space shuttle launch into space, you idiot." Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, >> this is a shot of um of a space shuttle launch from an aircraft. Okay. >> And you can can you see it? It's in the the little bright lights in the center there.
>> Um >> how fast. >> Now, this is interesting because right here is where the space shuttle crosses the horizon. Which means at that point since we know that the plane is 35,000 ft, we know that that shuttle was 7 mi high. Okay. So I actually extrapolated from that um image. Um so we know know it's seven miles high when it crosses the horizon.
 So I I extrapolated the the the height and then I put I actually just followed the uh path of that um of that shuttle. Okay. And I noticed that it actually always curves under 70 miles. Curves under 70 miles. Um, and every launch, every launch flies under that 70 mile limit. Okay. Now, >> our mission as >> I've already played this actually.
 I've already played this. Um, this was that go fast rocket, right? And I'm going to advance it. Now, if you remember um from earlier, it was it was going up and it was spinning wildly as it was going up really quickly. So, I'm going to start it from near the end. Right. So, it's it's near it's near up it's uh it's maximum height which is about 73 miles up.
Watch what happens. So remember, it's going spinning wildly and it's going up really quickly and all of a sudden it hits something and stops rotating, stops going any higher and just starts moving down or or falling down. Yeah. Um there seems to be a barrier a barrier at about 75 miles up, right? Um which means uh let's go back a second.
 which means all of these space shots, right, all curve under that 70 mi, 75 mile limit, okay? Because they know they can't go any higher. Um, which leads also to this idea. Okay, if as they say we there is no solid barrier between us and space, well, how can this be? How can you have a an an area which is pressurized next to a a vacuum? Yeah, we know that if uh if you know you have a pressurized um container and you open it next to a vacuum, right, the the air pressure will equalize into the vacuum, right? Um they say that it's gravity holding the uh the
the air to the to the to the to the earth. But you know at the top of the the the pressure there the vacuum will be acting on it with the maximum strength. It should start pulling the the topmost molecules of air out into space. And now there's a new topmost layer which will then be pulled out into space and so on until there's no more air left.
This is how strong the vacuum is. And that is just a relatively weak vacuum up against um you know normal air pressure. Okay. It's it's a massive amount of power. Okay. Um it NASA has a vacuum chamber which simulates 10^ the minus 6 to which is the measurement of vacuum. But note it's got it's got 8 foot of concrete and and like I think about um two foot of steel to to manage to contain a vacuum of 10 theus 6 tall.
 Um now space is 10 the minus17 tall I think it is. Um so so so orders of magnitude much more powerful than 10 ft of concrete and uh and 2 feet of of steel can handle. Okay. Yet somehow this space suit was able to protect a man from that that level of vacuum. Yeah. Um, it's cloth and rubber spacuit. All right. Um, so this is the only guy who's um who's ever um actually tested um a space suit in a vacuum. Okay.
>> They all do. Um and Jim was at a vacuum in the space suit. With all the air sucked out, all that protected him was his pressurized suit. Then something happened. >> I heard over the headset that he was losing suit pressure. >> The tube pressurizing his suit had become disconnected. >> He was in serious danger.
It was just happening so fast, you know, trying to get the chamber back to a safe pressure and Jim to a safe pressure inside the suit. As I stumble backwards, I could feel the slime on my tongue starting to bubble just before I went unconscious. That's kind of the last thing I remember. So, the only time a space suit has beentested, right, the guy almost died because uh and and it wasn't a hose pipe got disconnected, right? Literally, they were testing the suit and it nearly killed him, right? They never tested a
space suit after that ever again. Which if it failed then they would have test they would have test it because they were going to send people up in space, weren't they? Yeah. But they never tested the spaceac suit ever again. >> They all do. >> So I noticed this uh this little codpiece thing on um on Neil Armstrong's spaceacuit. Yeah.
 I was thinking what what what's that? So it's like you know um attached by a few poppers there. Right. So, um, I did a bit of searching for more images of the of his spacuit, and guess what I found? Under that codpiece is a zip so that they could go to the toilet. So, this is this is a joke, you know. The suit was there just to fool us, right? That there's no way a zip can protect from the vacuum of space. Yeah.
 It's just it's just absolutely ridiculous. And that codpiece was there to hide it so you wouldn't know cuz these acts. Yeah. While they're in that suit, they'd have to go to the toilet somehow. Yeah. So, um, very quickly look at satellites as well. So, um, this is a kind of average size of a satellite.
 You can see with the guy there next to it, um, uh, how how big it is. But it's essentially the size of a jet engine on an aircraft. And this is a jet engine. This is an aircraft from um 35,000 ft. Now I'm I'm zoomed into it. So that's me zooming into it. And you can and the size of that jet there is um you know the the actual engine on that jet is a you know it's a pin prick really.
 Um but that's only at seven miles up. Okay. They're trying to tell you that um these are satellites moving across the sky in the night sky. Um and yet these satellites are anywhere from uh 100 sorry uh 200 odd miles up to um 12 or 1400 miles away. Yeah. Um and yet it's the size of a you know a jet engine on a on a 747. Yeah.
 There's no way you should be able to see it. Um, so the other thing is is notice again I'll just go back. Notice that um you see it's lit up continuously. See you you know it's not sparkling or anything. It's just a light that's moving slowly across the sky. But the the satellite itself isn't a smooth ball. It's it's got jagged edges. has got um bits where the light will catch just like the mirror ball there.
It should catch the light every now and again as it's moving along the sky and it should be flashing and and going dark and what have you what have you just like the mirror ball there. But how does how does an irregularly shaped object catch and reflect the light constantly like that? Yeah.
 Um the other thing is that on this image here the sun is on this side of the earth. Okay. And so it's lighting up that half of the earth. This half is is in darkness because it's nighttime. And uh here it's like midnight. Okay. So over here is midday. Over here is midnight. Okay. Now, you can lie in a in a field at midnight and look up at the sky and you can see these lights moving slowly across the sky and they we're told that they are they are satellites.
But here's the thing, they are literally in the Earth's shadow. Where are they getting the light, right? Because the whole Earth is literally in shadow there. yet you can look up and see, you know, supposedly the reflected light from the sun bouncing back down on you. There's there's no way.
 And and these are through um Earth orbits, low Earth orbit here where the ISS is and then um the limit which is 1,200 miles, right? So anything in here in this shadow, you wouldn't be able to see because satellites don't have lights on them, right? So how are you seeing these things? There's supposedly something like 50,000 satellites up in in space. Yeah.
 Um but no, at no time do you see satellites move across the face of the moon? Okay. You should see little points of light just whizzing across the moon, you know, because the moon is in between the satellites and us. We don't see it. Yeah. So, I'm just going to show you a satellite deployment, right? And see if you can spot something.
>> Our first task, of course, was to to deploy Telat. Uh, it was a nighttime deploy. And so, this is a TV picture, nighttime TV picture of the deploy. Looks uh uh more or less like in the day, you just can't see it too. >> Did you catch that? >> Well, I'll slow it down in a sec. Hang on. We are that is just a a quick scenes of life in orbit.
 Our first task of course was to to deploy teles. Uh it was a nighttime deploy and so this is a TV picture nighttime TV picture of the deploy looks uh uh >> can you see that it's a wire >> going up on a wire looks more or less like in the day you just can't see it too well. Okay. And they cut they cut away from it very quickly. Yeah. So it's all theater.
It's, you know, it's wires and and models and everything. Yeah. It's it's a joke. >> Um it turns out that NASA is the uh world's biggest consumer of helium inthe world. And they're literally launching satellites on balloons from Antarctica. So they launch these balloons from Antarctica.
 These balloons go up into the jetream and they literally follow the jetream around the earth. Okay. Um, and sometimes they crash and when they crash they're still attached to the balloons. So this is one that crashed in Africa and you can still see the balloon that it's attached to. Yeah. Um, so yeah. Um, so they show you this this orbital pattern, right? This weird kind of looping pattern that uh not only the ISS but all the satellites seem to go around.
 Okay, but this is an artifact of this type of map, this flat map, right? If you um trace the the path of the um of these satellites right on the map, you get this strange kind of uh sine wave. But on a flat Oh, so and there you go on a on a globe. That's that's where that's actually where the jetream goes. That's how the jetream looks or the northern jetream.
 There's also a southern one, but that's southern or northern jetream literally does that looping pattern. So that's what I'm saying. They launch these balloons into the jetream and they follow the jetream. But when you look at the jetream on a flat map, circles, right? So as I said, that that looping pattern is when you try and take that flat map and then wrap it around a ball.
That's when you get that looping pattern. But on a flat earth, it's literally circles. So they put these um these uh sataloons into the into the jetream and they just start just going round and round the earth like that. And same with the ones in the northern hemisphere. Okay. So um a very quick look at the uh the international space station.
So the the films so-called film the uh space station. Yeah. transiting the moon. Every now and again they'll say, "Look at the moon. You'll see the you'll see the ISS go past it, but um the ISS is the same size as a jumbo jet." Okay. Um and it's supposedly at 253 miles um away from the Earth.
 Yet a jumbo jet flies past the moon and it's around around about the same size. Yeah. Even though the jumbo jet is about seven miles high. Yeah. No, something stinks, doesn't it? I'm um I'm gonna skip this. This is going for uh Oh, no. I might as well say say this. Yeah. So, the ISS is supposedly orbiting the Earth. Okay.
 And um this idea of orbits is essentially um this object is going so fast and it's it's trying to fall to the earth but as it's going so fast um the earth is curving away from it. So it keeps missing the earth as it's falling. That's the idea. Okay. So, it's it's it's like there is gravity still, but literally the the speed it's going is is keeping it in in in orbit.
 And it's kind of like, you know, if you've got um if you got like a pale of water on a string and you're spinning it very fast. Yeah. The water is going to uh stay in the bucket. All right. But here's the thing. If if that was happening like the the ISS was spinning around the Earth like that, the astronauts would be a red stain on the side of the uh spacecraft that either that or they'd be pinned to the side of the spacecraft. Centrifugal force.
 Yeah, they're just ignoring that. But there you go. Also, you we've got an analog of the ISS on Earth um in a submarine. A submarine is in a harsh environment. Okay, which uh there where there's no air. Okay. Um and yet all the serviceable parts of that submarine, every part that might need to be fixed is on the inside of the submarine.
 So, but unfortunately, you know, when they create created the ISS, they put all the stuff that needs to be fixed on the outside, which doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Yeah. because they have to keep doing these space walks to fix things outside. How does that work? Nobody nobody can explain that to explain that to me in any with any sense.
And and how would you design a spacecraft like this? It it's just like no, you're in a in the most hostile environment ever, right? Where you can't make any mistakes and you're in an environment like this. No, it doesn't make sense at all whatsoever. Um >> I often I think I think that as well, you know, when you go to the um natural history museum and they show you this same the same display that's been like there since the 60s or wherever of that one space shuttle which is so tiny it looks like a tent and it's all broken
and it's got bits of foil around and I think that's supposed to have gone to the moon like it's like a toy. Yeah, it is. It's really um the the uh Luna Lander looks like it's something um a bunch of kids put together with old scraps, you know. >> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And the thing is people fall for it, don't they? I mean, I fell for it at one time, but I look at it again. I bizarre.
>> Well, this is the thing. It was meant to fool the people from 1969 >> who'd never seen anything like this before. Okay. >> Right. Um, now we've we've been able to go back and look at it and we've got a different sensibility now. We we've, youknow, we understand a bit more and you we can look and go, "Wow, that that doesn't make sense. That can't work.
" You know, they they say the Luna, the walls of it were as thick as um thick um aluminium foil. So, so heavyduty, you know, um aluminium foil, so you could poke your finger through it. How does that hold in air pressure? All right. So against that 10^ the minus7 to again no. Um so if you look at so spend any time looking at the international space station you're going to start seeing errors.
 Uh you're going to see problems. Um, so this one is actually from um looking at the uh the Chinese space station because they they've got into the act as well, right? So every time that we see where they do their tricks with water, okay, water always forms a sphere. Okay, now you can put it in something, it'll always try and form a sphere. Okay.
 But um when we look at the Chinese uh space station, they end up having a glass of water on a counter and that glass of water had a flat top which means it was acting under gravity or you know this idea they're not in space because that that water in that in that glass should have formed a sphere and maybe even floated out of there.
Yeah. Um, but no, that was one of one of their mistakes. Uh, see if you can spot this mistake. >> 2008 was the year. >> It was very quick, so you might not have seen it. Look again. >> 2008. >> Something drops down. >> You see in the background while they're floating around in the foreground. Yeah. Water drips off the ceiling.
They couldn't help that. They couldn't stop that. But uh it happened in the background. Yeah. Um this guy as well. >> So he un he unscrews something and a screw drops to the floor even though he's floating to get there. Yeah. He unscrews something and it drops to the floor and he's scrabbling around on the floor looking for it. Yeah.
 Again, you you look at their um their footage and you just keep seeing the mistakes. Here's another one. Watch. This is them doing CGI. >> Ah, yeah. >> Very bad CGI. >> Yeah. >> And again, the more you look, the more you'll find. The more you'll find. And this is another one where they switched off the video layer too quickly.
Uh we did it. And now >> thank you very much again. Thank you for your time. Have a good flight and many more exciting experiments on the orbit. >> Now let's switch off the foreground layer. Watch this. Notice the stuff in the background isn't changing. >> This is Houston ACR. That concludes the event >> and they switch away from it very quickly.
 So those things that started to smear were um on a foreground layer. So um and when they when the broadcast they thought the broadcast had ended, they switched off that layer and it all started to to go funny, but the background layer didn't change. Yeah. >> Um and here's here's them a few astronauts doing their little hand signal. Yeah. Again, this is all this is all by the same same group of uh Luciferians.
So, last last bit. Why would they want to hide the flat earth? Why would they do this? Well, if you believe um in the in the ball earth theory, what comes along with it is the theory of evolution and the big bang theory. Yeah. You put all that together and you get this idea that we are a a a tiny blob of goo that's crawling around on a speck of dust in this infinite void with trillions and trillions of other specks of dust and maybe billions and billions of other blobs of goo.
 You know, there's nothing special about us, right? Um nothing special about us whatsoever. You know, we're insignificant and unimportant. There is no creator, right? Everything about us came about by accident, right? That you know there there is nothing special about you. Okay, that's the message that that gives that we're in a uncaring accidental infinite and purposeless universe. Yeah.
 Um and so essentially if we've been inculcated with that idea, right, powerful people on on earth can tell us what to do, right? Because we're psychologically weakened by this. You know, people with power on this earth can literally give us a purpose. And what's the purpose they give us? Um people might disagree with this but um the purpose of given us is get good grades at school, get a good job, buy lots of meaningless stuff, buy bigger, faster meaningless stuff, um retire and then die.
That's it. That's a grand purpose they've given us for our lives. Yeah. But if you know that this is a created place, you would know that there is a creator, right? that there is a purpose to your life, right? That that you are important. Yeah. If this is the universe, then every life here is important, is sacred, that would change your perspective on this world.
 Um so yeah, they want you to believe that this is a cold, harsh, survivalbased dog eat dog world, but that's just an illusion. Yeah. Um, if we're in this closed system, that means every drop of water that's ever been here is still here. Every every urg of energy that's been expended is stillhere. It doesn't leave, right? There there's always going to be abundance here. There's never going to be lack.
Um, lack is is literally just an illusion. So yeah, the earth is abundant and uh this universe is was created for you and it's here designed to sustain you. So shouldn't be any fear about living this world. So that's it. Hope that was useful. >> Oh that was that was brilliant. Yeah. Um I before I forget I want to mention have you read 1984 Dave? >> Yeah.
 So, in that they do allude to being stuck in a dome. >> They also say that uh yeah, the stars aren't millions of miles away. They're just miles away. >> Yeah. I couldn't believe it when I I had to read it back again to to see it. >> Yeah. So, it's funny because now that um you know, I'm coming into the whole flat earth stuff because it's true.
 They say when you get into it, you can't go back. And I'm beginning to sort of see it everywhere really. Um, >> yeah. It's fascinating, isn't it? Yeah. >> Well, that's what happens because, you know, once you once you start thinking along these lines, >> you start looking at the world differently. And so you start questioning, you know, things that you've just accepted, you know, you just start looking, hang on, I wonder if that, and if you go and look into it, you start to find that.
 And and this is what I found. I would ask authority. I would ask the experts and I would get answers that I knew were wrong. And it's like, well, hang on a minute. That's wrong. And I I can go to a book and go and find and look it up and say, yeah, it says here it's wrong. you know what he told me. So it was like they're they were trying to to trying to dispel what I'm saying and they're saying anything to try and and get rid of what I'm saying.
 And you know I'm before I started this this journey. I was I was one of science's biggest fanboys. I' I'd listen to science lectures, you know, while I worked all the time because I loved it so much. Um, but but this made me realize that that I've been lied to and they were continuing to lie to me and trying to gaslight me to believe that I know nothing nothing about anything.
 But yeah, anyway, soon as you start asking authority and experts, you find that they're not going to tell you the truth. >> And you're entitled to anyway compile things together and believe whatever you want without needing to be criticized for it. I mean, you know, we're all entitled to be able to have our own view, but it's really weird how it's that is really pushed down, I think, more than even all the alien stuff.
 Okay, all that alien stuff's out there. It's all phenomenal. It's all become commercial now anyway, right? But the flat earth stuff is like real holy grail. No one's going to go there. Uh, it's so bizarre. One of the slides I took out was um the reason why you can't find um proper flat earth stuff on on social media anymore because YouTube made a policy, you know, especially for flat earth content.
 So that if you look for it, you'll find authoritative um answers. You'll find the mainstream view that flat earth isn't real. >> I don't really need to hear what you're trying to provide. I want to know how you're dealing with all these conspiracy theorists on your platform. >> So the the first way is by demoting lowquality content and promoting more authoritative content.
 And the second is by providing more transparency for users. So, we're introducing boxes that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual, such as searching for the earth is flat on YouTube, where you see a lot of >> your response is to put a box saying, "Nope, the earth is not flat.
" >> Correct. >> Okay. >> All right. And even if you knew the the name of the of the video you're looking for, all right, you can put in um one of my videos, the biggest lie of all. You put D Murphy 25, you know, the channel name, and search for it. You won't find my video till about the 10th page. Okay? You'll just get lots of mainstream views saying, "No, Flat Earth doesn't exist.
" It's um there's a reason for it. I think they're, you know, they've they're setting us up for the alien invasion. >> That's what's being set up right now. >> Um, and they have to have people believe it because, um, as Ronald Reagan said, all right, an alien invasion is what will will get everybody together to demand a one world government.
All right. And that's that's obviously their goal. and um they're setting us up for this this this um fake alien invasion. But if you know that the earth's flat and there isn't space out there, you're not going to be fooled by it, >> right? >> So that's why they need people to believe in the B ball earth. H. So, it's it's really interesting because all the um uh have you ever heard of uh Thorhan? Um and these um Ven Venian from Venus, you know, the fact that they'd come over and stuff in the 1940s and met with the governmentand everything. So, all it's gone. Oh, I
was just going to say, so part of um because I've been researching a lot of other stuff. I'm not just flat earth, >> but um I found that uh this aliens aren't aliens at all. They've always been here. They they're demonic, not not alien. Okay. And um the whole Roswell thing. So Roswell is what kicked off, you know, aliens into the public consciousness. Okay.
>> Yeah. But you'll find that um who's behind Roswell was a guy called Jack Parsons and Elron Hubard who were disciples of Alistister Crowley who was the you know the most wicked man alive. He called himself the beast 666. Um and he was opening portals to these for these demons to come in. and he wrote a book and um in the book he drew one of these demons and a demon looks exactly like what we would call an alien gray.
So Jack Parsons and Elrod Hubbed um took over um Al Crowley's work when he died and apparently they opened a portal and they couldn't close it again and that was just before Roswell. Right. So, um, uh, there's a guy called Jack Valet who, um, was a was like the top UFO researcher. Um, if you ever saw Close Encounters with Third Kind, right? The Frenchman in um, in that film was was supposed to be Jack Valet, okay? He's this top UFO researcher.
 and he concluded that these these UFOs aren't physical, they're demonic and spiritual, right? Um so so that's what's going on that they it's a it's an invasion from um more of a celestial invasion rather than a um an alien one. And uh they've always been here. They keep renaming themselves. You know, they've been called demons, jin genies, um nature spirits, um you name it.
 Now they could being called aliens. >> Yeah. No, I mean, so two two things there. Um, one is I when when I saw the footage of this supposed president of Venus come over who actually just looked like a human in a suit. I'm thinking, could that be on the other side of the Antarctic wall? I mean, could it be that they, you know, they've got civilizations there and so rather than it being out of space, it's just actually on another side of this earth, you know, behind the wall perhaps.
But also um interesting you've just said about portal portals because you're the third reference to portals that I've had all weekend. I don't know if you know about the um what happened in Tulus in or in Paris when they had a parade with Black Lilith and um oh my goodness it was on Thanksgiving's day.
 They had a public parade of the black Lilith and uh what is it? One of those minotaurs massively created like it was a a public opera sort of thing. >> Oh, this is a scorpion woman and yeah, I saw that. >> And apparently incantations um and spellwork going on there. Um, and they're now, I mean, people saying that Paris is the head of the is the head of Satan.
 Basically, it's the headquarters is France. Um, and they're opening up portals >> actually. Um, not far is that area because first of all, um, Paris used to be the prime meridian. Um, Greenwich is now, but it was called the Devil's Line um, back then. Um and not far from there is um Leon. Now I always thought Leon meant lion. Yeah. But it actually short for Apolon.
Okay. Now um near Leon and Leon and um and Geneva, that kind of area. Yeah. That's where CERN is. >> Yeah. >> Okay. And um right in the middle of CERN is a temple of Apolon. Okay. And the um book of Revelations, which I don't have much uh regard for to be honest. Um it basically says that the the the bottomless pit will be opened where um a polyon will come out of it.
The destroyer. All right. Now CERN is around that area. All right. Encompasses that area. Uh outside of CERN is uh is Shiva, the Indian version of the the destroyer coming through a portal. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Um and the the guys at CERN have said now now that they've found the Higs Boson. Yeah.
 Now they're trying to open a portal to a different universe as they keep saying that. >> Yeah. It's like you know the Gothard tunnel >> as well. I saw that. >> Yeah. I mean that was bizarre. Um it's Yeah. Do you know the Do you know Thoth? The book of Thoth? >> Yes. >> So they talk about uh portals. He talks about portals in there. >> Well, talk about more than that.
 Um if you've looked at tablet 8, it tells of and I think this was an event that happened before. It tells of of these um reptilian um people who who have technology that um make them look like humans and they cre crept themselves into positions of power. >> Darkness. Yeah. >> Yeah. And it says there was a very enigmatic line in it.
 It said um only about only by sound can their faces be seen. >> Right? So there's this particular sound that reveals their their true um appearance. Um and it goes on to say that the one of the masters of this time um found a a word a sound a word that would you know reveal their their their faces essentially and and it says something like um serpent headed when the glamour is lifted.
 right >> now. Interestingly, um as I was I was reading this overagain, um I came across this idea about um all the bells being removed um from the earth. So over the last um century, they've literally removed bells. There used to be huge bells, you know, literally there were bells in every town, right? And I realized that, okay, if if if these creatures and and the the tablet basically says these creatures were defeated, but they're going to come back, right? So, if they're going to come back, wouldn't it be prudent for
humanity to have some way of detecting them? It turns out, I think, that these bells emit a frequency that reveal these the faces of these these things. So that's why slowly they got rid of these bells from from from everywhere, right? And and so that they couldn't be revealed. And now they're taking over.
 They're we're right back there again where these creatures have taken over the positions of power in this world. I know it sounds really conspiracy theory and everything. >> No, no, don't worry. It's that's all I mean where that's where I am anyway and the also you know with the the music haven't they've they've changed that the um >> the frequency >> what is it the official the official line the music that you know so none of that we're not hearing correctly and I it's just every the whole frequency is down isn't it it's not where it should
be um >> this world is very very different to to the way people perceive it. We've been We're living in Disneyland. Yeah. The the people um in control have constructed this place that looks a certain way on the surface, but you go below the surface, you'll see it's very very different. >> They show you that in the um opening ceremony of the Gothard tunnel.
 There's a bit where they bring in a circus literally >> and it's like they're just falling man. and and there's actually a pope uh run in that ceremony with 666 on his um hat. It's just I mean it's all in front of your eyes, isn't it? When you know it and you just realize how blatant it is now. >> Yeah. >> Um it's crazy stuff.
>> I think it's I think it's the most exciting video game that anybody could play. Yeah. Um, I was just listening to somebody who was saying that, you know, why why is the world so horrible? Why is the world, you know, why is it so difficult to to live in this world? Well, nobody wants to play a game that's uh there's there's no there's no fun to it.
 I mean, the game of snakes and ladders isn't fun without the snakes. You know, if you play snakes and ladders and you you take one move and you're right to the end, there's no fun. Yeah. There has to be challenge. There has to be adversity. Yeah. Um and you know, we're not we're not really these bodies. Yeah.
 This is just the the avatar that we're using to play the game. Yeah. Um so we're we think we're we're these bodies, so we're taking it too seriously. Yeah. Um this is this is an amazing game. Doesn't matter how dark it gets, it's it's still an amazing game. And when you know you're eternal, it, you know, it makes it better. >> Well, that that's the problem we have in this world.
 There are there are um people or um beings here who aren't eternal. They're not going to make it past this. Um and they know it. So, so you know, they're they're inflicting their pain on us essentially. I'm sorry to interrupt but may I may I ask so uh I'm just I've just been thinking >> okay then >> sorry go ahead >> yes so if there is no space uh so do we not have other planets as well like Mercury Venus Jupiter Pluto >> no um just think of those names that you're you're reciting. Yeah.
 They're the names of gods. The the gods um are actually the fallen angels. And angels in the Old Testament are are connected to stars. They're stars. All right? And there were a certain class of star of of angel called the watcher angels. So they were they stayed close to us to watch over us. Yeah.
 So they are the the stars that wander in a different pattern to all the other stars that all move around together. Yeah. So there was seven seven I can't remember it was seven. There were certain number of stars that uh would would would move differently to all the others and they were closer to us. All right. And um they're not planets.
 They're not rocky places that you can go to. They're lights in the sky and we can simulate that with um something called sonol luminescence. Have you heard of it? >> I have I think. >> Right. So if you get like a glass container, right, full of water and you pass ultra ultrasound into it a certain frequency, all of a sudden the um it creates bubbles that get created and and then destroyed very very fast.
 so fast that it generates a massive amount of heat and light. So you end up with a what they call a star in a jar >> and it looks exactly like a star sitting in the middle of this water. All right. Sonoluminescence it's called. Um so yeah the these these planets and stars they're just lights in the sky. >> So how do you view uh what's your opinion of astrology then?>> Astrology? Well, again, that's a the study of the movements of these these um heavenly bodies.
 My view is that um I I want nothing to do with it because um the book of Enoch basically tells us that um that we're not supposed to do that. We're not supposed to to divine by the stars. Um so I don't do it. So I don't have any I don't talk about it at all. >> Okay. Thank you. Okay. >> Thank you so much, Dave. Yeah, I thought that was a brilliant presentation.
 I really enjoyed it. Um, it really you've just given me more and more and more evidence as to why I think the Earth is flat. Uh, really more and more. Yeah. All this stuff makes sense because I guess when we, you know, growing up thinking it's a globe, you take it for granted that all the facts are correct because nobody really goes to check all these facts.
But when you've sort of proven them the other way around. Um, also, you know, I do remember growing up or sometimes look when you look at very old maps, the world is flat and I remember seeing like other places, you know, existing on a map on a flat earth. I don't know. It's just in a memory that I do have.
 So I always sort of wondered and then you've got Guliver's travels and all that business, you know, like there are other places going on. It's just bizarre. >> Well, um, you know, the map that we we're all used to is actually called the Maka projection. Okay. Um, so the shapes of the continents that we're all, you know, familiar with, they they literally come from this one particular map.
 It's called a mic projection. The actual shapes and sizes of the continents are very different from that map, right? That map is just a a navigational aid to for going east and west. Yeah. For sailors, the uh like Africa is way way bigger than they they it's shown on that map. And it's longer as well.
 Um and you can literally fit Europe, America, China um and probably more into Africa. Okay. Um, but all the depictions of the Earth show the Maka map. They don't show what the Earth looks like. And we've got no idea what's actually on the Earth because, you know, we've not been able to travel there and we're only trusting what the system is telling us is is there.
 So, there could be whole other continents and we wouldn't know about it. Yeah. They patrol the sea. um you're not allowed to go to Antarctica um because they they patrol the sea and uh there were two people actually just recently um there's there's a video you can go and watch on YouTube of a a bunch of Australian fishermen.
 Um they're in this boat and they think they say let's go out to the ice shelf. And so they they head off to the ice shelf and all of a sudden a warship appears and tells them to turn back. Right. Yeah, I find that bizarre. Why on earth can't we go to Antar I do find that really weird like you know as a free citizen of the of the earth why can't I travel to Antarctica like what why you know it's >> because the answers are there one way the other the answers are there >> bizarre >> Dave thank you so much thanks for your time I've really appreciate it um I will
send you a copy of this Zoom link um then you can use it any way you


SONGWRITER DEMO

INTERESTORNADO

INTERESTORNADO
Michael's Interests
Esotericism & Spirituality
Technology & Futurism
Culture & Theories
Creative Pursuits
Hermeticism
Artificial Intelligence
Mythology
YouTube
Tarot
AI Art
Mystery Schools
Music Production
The Singularity
YouTube Content Creation
Songwriting
Futurism
Flat Earth
Archivist
Sci-Fi
Conspiracy Theory/Truth Movement
Simulation Theory
Holographic Universe
Alternate History
Jewish Mysticism
Gnosticism
Google/Alphabet
Moonshots
Algorithmicism/Rhyme Poetics

map of the esoteric

Esotericism Mind Map Exploring the Vast World of Esotericism Esotericism, often shrouded in mystery and intrigue, encompasses a wide array of spiritual and philosophical traditions that seek to delve into the hidden knowledge and deeper meanings of existence. It's a journey of self-discovery, spiritual growth, and the exploration of the interconnectedness of all things. This mind map offers a glimpse into the vast landscape of esotericism, highlighting some of its major branches and key concepts. From Western traditions like Hermeticism and Kabbalah to Eastern philosophies like Hinduism and Taoism, each path offers unique insights and practices for those seeking a deeper understanding of themselves and the universe. Whether you're drawn to the symbolism of alchemy, the mystical teachings of Gnosticism, or the transformative practices of yoga and meditation, esotericism invites you to embark on a journey of exploration and self-discovery. It's a path that encourages questioning, critical thinking, and direct personal experience, ultimately leading to a greater sense of meaning, purpose, and connection to the world around us.

😭

Welcome to "The Chronically Online Algorithm" 1. Introduction: Your Guide to a Digital Wonderland Welcome to "πŸ‘¨πŸ»‍πŸš€The Chronically Online AlgorithmπŸ‘½". From its header—a chaotic tapestry of emoticons and symbols—to its relentless posting schedule, the blog is a direct reflection of a mind processing a constant, high-volume stream of digital information. At first glance, it might seem like an indecipherable storm of links, videos, and cultural artifacts. Think of it as a living archive or a public digital scrapbook, charting a journey through a universe of interconnected ideas that span from ancient mysticism to cutting-edge technology and political commentary. The purpose of this primer is to act as your guide. We will map out the main recurring themes that form the intellectual backbone of the blog, helping you navigate its vast and eclectic collection of content and find the topics that spark your own curiosity. 2. The Core Themes: A Map of the Territory While the blog's content is incredibly diverse, it consistently revolves around a few central pillars of interest. These pillars are drawn from the author's "INTERESTORNADO," a list that reveals a deep fascination with hidden systems, alternative knowledge, and the future of humanity. This guide will introduce you to the three major themes that anchor the blog's explorations: * Esotericism & Spirituality * Conspiracy & Alternative Theories * Technology & Futurism Let's begin our journey by exploring the first and most prominent theme: the search for hidden spiritual knowledge. 3. Theme 1: Esotericism & The Search for Hidden Knowledge A significant portion of the blog is dedicated to Esotericism, which refers to spiritual traditions that explore hidden knowledge and the deeper, unseen meanings of existence. It is a path of self-discovery that encourages questioning and direct personal experience. The blog itself offers a concise definition in its "map of the esoteric" section: Esotericism, often shrouded in mystery and intrigue, encompasses a wide array of spiritual and philosophical traditions that seek to delve into the hidden knowledge and deeper meanings of existence. It's a journey of self-discovery, spiritual growth, and the exploration of the interconnectedness of all things. The blog explores this theme through a variety of specific traditions. Among the many mentioned in the author's interests, a few key examples stand out: * Gnosticism * Hermeticism * Tarot Gnosticism, in particular, is a recurring topic. It represents an ancient spiritual movement focused on achieving salvation through direct, personal knowledge (gnosis) of the divine. A tangible example of the content you can expect is the post linking to the YouTube video, "Gnostic Immortality: You’ll NEVER Experience Death & Why They Buried It (full guide)". This focus on questioning established spiritual history provides a natural bridge to the blog's tendency to question the official narratives of our modern world. 4. Theme 2: Conspiracy & Alternative Theories - Questioning the Narrative Flowing from its interest in hidden spiritual knowledge, the blog also encourages a deep skepticism of official stories in the material world. This is captured by the "Conspiracy Theory/Truth Movement" interest, which drives an exploration of alternative viewpoints on politics, hidden history, and unconventional science. The content in this area is broad, serving as a repository for information that challenges mainstream perspectives. The following table highlights the breadth of this theme with specific examples found on the blog: Topic Area Example Blog Post/Interest Political & Economic Power "Who Owns America? Bernie Sanders Says the Quiet Part Out Loud" Geopolitical Analysis ""Something UGLY Is About To Hit America..." | Whitney Webb" Unconventional World Models "Flat Earth" from the interest list This commitment to unearthing alternative information is further reflected in the site's organization, with content frequently categorized under labels like TRUTH and nwo. Just as the blog questions the past and present, it also speculates intensely about the future, particularly the role technology will play in shaping it. 5. Theme 3: Technology & Futurism - The Dawn of a New Era The blog is deeply fascinated with the future, especially the transformative power of technology and artificial intelligence, as outlined in the "Technology & Futurism" interest category. It tracks the development of concepts that are poised to reshape human existence. Here are three of the most significant futuristic concepts explored: * Artificial Intelligence: The development of smart machines that can think and learn, a topic explored through interests like "AI Art". * The Singularity: A hypothetical future point where technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization. * Simulation Theory: The philosophical idea that our perceived reality might be an artificial simulation, much like a highly advanced computer program. Even within this high-tech focus, the blog maintains a sense of humor. In one chat snippet, an LLM (Large Language Model) is asked about the weather, to which it humorously replies, "I do not have access to the governments weapons, including weather modification." This blend of serious inquiry and playful commentary is central to how the blog connects its wide-ranging interests. 6. Putting It All Together: The "Chronically Online" Worldview So, what is the connecting thread between ancient Gnosticism, modern geopolitical analysis, and future AI? The blog is built on a foundational curiosity about hidden systems. It investigates the unseen forces that shape our world, whether they are: * Spiritual and metaphysical (Esotericism) * Societal and political (Conspiracies) * Technological and computational (AI & Futurism) This is a space where a deep-dive analysis by geopolitical journalist Whitney Webb can appear on the same day as a video titled "15 Minutes of Celebrities Meeting Old Friends From Their Past." The underlying philosophy is that both are data points in the vast, interconnected information stream. It is a truly "chronically online" worldview, where everything is a potential clue to understanding the larger systems at play. 7. How to Start Your Exploration For a new reader, the sheer volume of content can be overwhelming. Be prepared for the scale: the blog archives show thousands of posts per year (with over 2,600 in the first ten months of 2025 alone), making the navigation tools essential. Here are a few recommended starting points to begin your own journey of discovery: 1. Browse the Labels: The sidebar features a "Labels" section, the perfect way to find posts on specific topics. Look for tags like TRUTH and matrix for thematic content, but also explore more personal and humorous labels like fuckinghilarious!!!, labelwhore, or holyshitspirit to get a feel for the blog's unfiltered personality. 2. Check the Popular Posts: This section gives you a snapshot of what content is currently resonating most with other readers. It’s an excellent way to discover some of the blog's most compelling or timely finds. 3. Explore the Pages: The list of "Pages" at the top of the blog contains more permanent, curated collections of information. Look for descriptive pages like "libraries system esoterica" for curated resources, or more mysterious pages like OPERATIONNOITAREPO and COCTEAUTWINS=NAME that reflect the blog's scrapbook-like nature. Now it's your turn. Dive in, follow the threads that intrigue you, and embrace the journey of discovery that "The Chronically Online Algorithm" has to offer.