15 MINS

EVIL

When We Went MAD!

p3

One Update 2-1-26

The Catholic Church Is Hiding This in Plain Sight

The Catholic Church Is Hiding This in Plain Sight - YouTube

Transcripts:

Every Sunday, over a billion people walk into buildings covered in occult symbols. They perform rituals handed down from ancient mystery schools. They chant in dead languages. They believe bread and wine literally transform into flesh and blood and they have no idea what they're actually participating in. The Catholic Church isn't just practicing religion.

 It's practicing occultism and they've been doing it in plain sight for 2,000 years. At the center of it all sits the Vatican covered in symbols that have nothing to do with Christianity. Egyptian obelisks, a massive pine cone representing the pineal gland, an audience hall designed to look like a serpent's head where the pope sits in its mouth, sacred geometry used by pagan mystery schools, and so much more.

 Before we dive into specific symbols, you need to understand how mystery schools operate because that's what the Catholic Church is, a mystery school with Christian branding. Every ancient mystery school, Egyptian temples, Greek mystery cults, secret societies, they all work the same way. Two levels. Level one, exoteric. The outer teachings for the masses, simple stories and moral lessons.

 Level two, esoteric, the inner teachings for initiates, the real meanings behind the symbols, the actual power behind the rituals, knowledge based, reserved for the few. The people on level one have no idea level two exists. They think everyone's operating from the same understanding. The average Catholic is on level one.

 They believe what they're told. They perform the rituals because the priest says so. The priest is slightly higher, knows more theology, but still mostly operating on exoteric teachings. But the bishops, cardinals, and the Vatican's inner circle, they know what the symbols actually mean. They know what the rituals actually do. They know the churches built on top of these ancient occult traditions.

 Let's start with the most obvious symbol, one that sits in the center of St. Peter's Square, directly in front of the most important church in Catholicism, an Egyptian obelisk, an ancient monument to the sun, God Raw, erected in the heart of the Vatican in 1586. In ancient Egypt, obelisks were sacred to sun worship.

 They represented the rays of the sun. They were phallic symbols of regeneration and divine power. Pharaohs erected them at temples to channel solar energy. This specific obelisk was brought from Helopoulos, Egypt, the ancient center of sun worship and placed at the Vatican by Pope Sixstus V. But the Vatican isn't alone. Look at Washington DC.

 The Washington Monument is a massive obelisk built by Freemasons in 1848 dedicated by the Masonic Grand Lodge. Look at London. Cleopatra's needle, an ancient Egyptian obelisk, stands on the Tempame's embankment erected in 1878 by the British Empire. Look at Paris. The Luxor obelisk stands in the Plasta Concord, brought from Egypt in 1833.

Look at New York City. Cleopatra's needle in Central Park. Another Egyptian obelisk erected in 1881. Every major power center has one. Egyptian obelisks erected by modern governments and placed in the most prominent public squares and capitals. This isn't random. This is a worldwide symbolic language, a visual statement that these institutions, religious and governmental, are connected to the same ancient mystery tradition.

 The court of the pine cone can also be seen at the Vatican. A massive bronze pine cone statue over 13 ft tall flanked by two bronze peacocks. The pine cone appears in ancient cultures across the world as a symbol of the pineal gland, the third eye, the seed of spiritual enlightenment and higher consciousness. In ancient Babylon, Assyria, Egypt, and Greece, the pine cone represented spiritual awakening and divine knowledge.

 Mystery schools taught that activating the pineal gland, the pine coneshaped gland in the center of your brain, was the key to nosis, to seeing beyond the material world. The church doesn't explain why mystery school symbols of enlightenment and nosis are prominently displayed in the Vatican. They present them as historical artifacts.

 But these aren't random decorations. These are deliberate symbolic statements. The pine cone represents whatnostics, mystery schools, and occult traditions have always taught that enlightenment comes through awakening the third eye, through secret knowledge, through initiation, and it sits in the heart of the Vatican. Now, let's talk about the audience hall, the building where the pope addresses audiences.

 From the outside, it looks modern, angular. But look at it from above. Look at the interior design. Look at what the Pope sits in front of. The building is shaped like a serpent's head. The stage area is the mouth. The sculpture behind the Pope called the resurrection depicts Christ rising from what looks like a nuclear apocalypse. And the way the stage is designed creates an unmistakable image.

 The Pope sits in the mouth of a serpent. In Christianity, the serpent represents Satan, the deceiver in the Garden of Eden, the enemy of God. So why would the Vatican design an audience hall that resembles a serpent with the pope seated in its mouth? Because in Gnostic traditions, the serpent is an evil. It's the bringer of knowledge, the liberator who offered nosis to humanity against the demiurge's wishes.

 They are paying homage to who they actually worship, the lightbearer, Lucifer. Now, let's talk about what actually happens inside Catholic churches every Sunday. The mass, specifically the Eucharist, when bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ. Catholics are taught this is a miracle, a divine transformation through the power of Christ.

 But if you know alchemy, you'll recognize what's actually happening. In occult and gnostic traditions, alchemy isn't about turning lead into gold. That's the surface level, the exoteric teaching. The real goal, transforming the self, turning base human consciousness into perfected divine consciousness. It's called the great work.

 The process of purifying yourself, burning away the impure, refining what remains until you achieve nosis, direct knowledge of the divine. This is the core teaching of Gnostic mystery schools. You're not saved by faith. You're not saved by obedience. You're saved by transforming yourself through hidden knowledge and practice.

 And the Catholic Church takes this process and turns it into a weekly ritual people do at church without understanding what they're actually doing. The church doesn't say this ritual is symbolic. They teach that the bread and wine literally become the flesh and blood of Christ. In occult traditions, consuming flesh and blood is the ultimate act of taking on the power and essence of the consumed.

 It's found in ancient mystery religions, in shamanic practices, and in ritual magic across cultures. The Catholic Church performs this ritual and calls it holy. But strip away the theological language and you have a billion people symbolically or according to church doctrine, literally engaging in ritual cannibalism.

 Now, let's take a look at what is on the outside of Catholic cathedrals worldwide. Major cathedrals are aligned to celestial events. Solstesses, equinoxes, star positions. This is ancient pagan practice. Sun worship encoded into Christian architecture. Chartra Cathedral in France. The labyrinth on the floor align with the summer solstice.

 Light enters through the western rose window at specific times, creating illumination patterns used in mystery school initiation. St. Peter's Basilica aligned east west so that the sun rises directly through the entrance on the equinox. These aren't arbitrary design choices. These are deliberate astronomical alignments used by ancient cultures for ritual purposes.

 Gothic cathedrals use precise mathematical ratios. The golden ratio Fibonacci sequence. These are the same geometric principles used in Egyptian temples, Greek mystery schools, and occult traditions. You'll also see the vesica piskus. This is the almond shaped intersection of two circles found throughout Catholic art and architecture.

 It's an ancient sacred geometry symbol representing divine feminine creation and the gateway between worlds. It appears in windows, doorways, halos, and Madonna imagery throughout Catholic churches. This symbol predates Christianity and was used in goddess worship and fertility religions. The church adopted it but rarely explains its pre-Christian origins.

 If Catholicism is about faith in Christ, why use the mathematical and astronomical principles of pagan mystery religions? Why align churches to the sun like ancient solar temples? Because the architecture reveals what the doctrine conceals, continuity with ancient occult traditions, but so is the tradition Catholics do in the comfort of their own homes without ever realizing it.

 I'm talking about the rosary. Hold a string of beads. Repeat the same prayer 53 times. Hail Mary, full of grace. Over and over and over. This isn't prayer. This is a transinduction technique. Repetitive chanting, rhythmic words, physical focus on the beads. This is designed to bypass your conscious mind and induce an altered state of consciousness.

 Brain scans show repetitive prayer slows your brain waves into alpha and theta, trans states. Your critical thinking shuts down. Your emotional centers activate. You become highly suggestable. This is hypnosis. This is consciousness manipulation. And who do they pray to? Catholics pray to Mary, the queen of heaven.

 But that's not a biblical title. That's the title of Ishtar Estarte Isis. Ancient pagan goddesses. The church took the goddess, renamed her Mary, and has a billion people entering trans states while chanting to her. The same principle applies to mass and the Gregorian chants they use. Gregorian chant uses specific frequencies and rhythms to alter consciousness.

 This is sound technology for transinduction used by shamanic and occult traditions for thousands of years. The incense they use isn't just for ambiance either. Frankincense contains psychoactive compounds that create euphoria and suggestability when inhaled. Ancient mystery religions knew this. Temple priests used it to make worshippers spiritually receptive.

 The Catholic Church still does. To put it all together, you walk into a building designed with occult geometry, surrounded by pagan symbols, breathing psychoactive incense, listening to rhythmic chanting in a dead language, repeating prayers 50 plus times. Your critical thinking shuts off. You enter a trance.

 And in that state, you consume what you're told is the literal flesh and blood of God. This is occult ritual practice. This is how mystery schools operate. And a billion people do it every week thinking it's Christianity. Now, let's connect the dots between the Vatican, Freemasonry, and the most powerful order within the Catholic Church, the Jesuits.

 We've already covered how the obelisk is clearly tied in with the Vatican and Freemasonry, and how its roots are in the ancient mystery religions. But that's just the beginning. In every Masonic lodge, two pillars stand at the entrance. Jacan and Boaz. These are the twin pillars from Solomon's temple, representing duality and the gateway to sacred knowledge.

 In Freemasonry, passing between these pillars symbolizes entering the temple, moving from the profane world into the sacred space of initiation. Now look at Catholic churches. Twin columns flanking the entrance, twin pillars on either side of the altar. That's the Masonic gateway, the threshold between ignorance and knowledge.

 Catholic churches are designed with the same initiatory architecture as Masonic lodges. But here's where it gets even more interesting. The Catholic Church officially condemns Freemasonry. According to canon law, Catholics who join Masonic lodges are automatically excommunicated. The Vatican has issued multiple papal bulls against Freemasonry.

 And yet, the Vatican uses Egyptian obelisks just like the Masons. Catholic cathedrals display the compass and square. Churches are built with twin pillars. The Vatican uses the allseeing eye. Then there's the sacred geometry, celestial alignments, hierarchical degrees, all shared with Freemasonry. So why the contradiction? There's two possibilities.

 One, controlled opposition. The church publicly condemns Freemasonry to maintain the illusion that they're separate, that they're enemies, but they're not. They're two branches of the same mystery school tradition. By publicly opposing each other, they prevent people from seeing that they're working together or at minimum operating from the same esoteric playbook.

 Possibility too, competing for the same knowledge. Maybe they are in competition. Both claim to possess ancient wisdom. Both claim authority over spiritual truth. Both operate as gatekeepers of esoteric knowledge. The church condemns Freemasonry not because they're different, but because they're rivals for control of the same occult tradition.

 Either way, the symbols prove they're cut from the same cloth. Now, let's talk about the Jesuits, the Society of Jesus, the most powerful, most educated, most influential order within the Catholic Church. They've produced popes. They run universities. They operate worldwide. And their organizational structure is identical to Freemasonry.

 They both share hierarchical degrees of initiation, secret knowledge revealed progressively, oaths of secrecy and loyalty, influence in government, education and finance, use of esoteric symbolism, claims to ancient wisdom traditions and rituals involving death and rebirth symbolism. If the Vatican publicly condemns Freemasonry while privately using Masonic symbols, if the Jesuits operate like a Masonic order with esoteric practices, then what is the Catholic Church actually? It's not a Christian institution. It's a mystery school, an

occult organization using Christian language to hide what it actually is. So, we've seen the evidence. Egyptian obelisks, pine cones representing the third eye, the eucharist as alchemy, transinducing rosaries, masonic symbols everywhere, Jesuit occultism. The question is why? Why would the Catholic Church encode all of this? Why hide occult symbolism and practices inside Christianity? There are two main theories.

 Theory one, gatekeeping knowledge. This theory says the Catholic Church is doing what mystery schools have always done. Throughout history, secret societies and religious institutions have claimed to possess hidden wisdom, knowledge too powerful, too dangerous for the common person. So they control it. They create systems where only the initiated, the bishops, the cardinals, the inner circle understand the real meaning.

 They don't want people discovering this knowledge on their own outside the church's control. So they institutionalize it. They make it a religion. This way people seeking spiritual truth stay within the system. They don't go looking elsewhere. They don't question. They don't find the knowledge independently.

 The church becomes the middleman between humanity and spiritual enlightenment. And they maintain power by keeping people dependent on the institution for access to the divine. Theory two, keeping people from true Christianity. This theory suggests the Catholic Church isn't preserving ancient wisdom. It's corrupting Christianity on purpose.

 The goal, keep people away from the actual message of Jesus Christ. In biblical Christianity, salvation is simple. Have faith. No rituals, no priests as intermediaries, no elaborate ceremonies, just belief in the finished work of Jesus. But the Catholic Church has buried that message under layers of occultism, ritualism, and institutional control.

 They've made salvation about performing rituals, obeying the church hierarchy, praying to saints and Mary instead of directly to God, participating in ceremonies that look like pagan mystery religion. This theory says it's intentional. By disguising occultism as Christianity, they keep people from ever encountering true biblical faith.

 They're kept busy with religion, endless rituals, rules, traditions. So, they never open a Bible and discover that none of this is what Jesus taught. The result, billions of people think they're following Christ, but they're actually following a system designed to keep them from him. So, which theory is true? I'm not here to tell you what the truth is.

 That's for you to decide. What I am here to do is show you the symbols, the architecture, the rituals, and the connections. And once you see them, you can't unsee them. If you're Catholic, I'm not attacking your faith. I'm asking you to look at what's actually there. Look at the symbols in your church.

 Look at what the rituals actually are. Look at where these practices come from and form your own educated opinion on them. Have you seen these symbols? Drop a comment with what you found. What's your theory? Gatekeeping knowledge or corrupting Christianity? And if there's other hidden symbolism you want me to dig into, let me know.

 Keep asking questions and never accept the official story at face

Robert Adams: The Secret to Living in a World That Isn't Real (This Ends...

otherthings

 

Everyday Esoteric S1E1 - Step Into High Magick and The Occult

WAN

AI Just Read the Voynich Manuscript. It’s Terrifying

AI Just Read the Voynich Manuscript. It’s Terrifying - YouTube

Transcripts:

Voinich the 2025 protein folding theory. The Voinich manuscript has been the final boss of cryptography for 600 years. Carbon dated to the early 15th century. Its 240 pages are filled with a looping alien script that has defeated the greatest codereers in history, including the team that cracked the Enigma machine in World War II.

 For decades, the academic consensus settled on two boring theories. It was either a meaningless prank by a medieval scam artist or a standard herbal remedy written in a lost Italian dialect. But in late 2025, that consensus didn't just break, it was deleted. When researchers fed the manuscripts highresolution scans into the latest iteration of Alphafold, Google's AI specifically designed to predict protein structures.

 The system didn't see a language. It saw a blueprint. The plants drawn in the Voinage manuscript have always baffled botonists because they don't exist on Earth. They have root systems that defy gravity and leaves that merge into tubes. But the AI recognized them immediately. They aren't plants. They are biological diagrams of protein folding structures magnified at a scale that shouldn't have been possible until the invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s.

The text surrounding these diagrams isn't a spoken language. It's an instruction manual for synthetic biology. The repeating characters that linguists thought were stuttering or bad grammar are actually recursive algorithms, step-by-step coding for how to splice genetic material. The AI simulation showed that if you build the plants depicted in the book using these protein instructions, you don't get a flower, you get a highly efficient organic solar panel.

 The manuscript describes a form of bioengineering where flora is used not for food but for energy storage and data transmission. This creates a terrifying implication for the timeline of human innovation. If a monk in 1404 was drawing accurate diagrams of protein folding, he wasn't drawing what he saw with his eyes. He was transcribing data from a source that understood molecular biology better than we do today.

 The Voinich manuscript isn't a book of magic spells. It is a user manual for wet wear technology that we are only just beginning to invent. The reason we couldn't read it for 600 years is that we didn't have the scientific context to understand the code of life itself. Rohonk codeex. If the Voinich manuscript is a biology textbook, the Rohanc codeex is a corrupted hard drive.

 Discovered in Hungary in the 1800s, this 448 page book is written in a script that contains 10 times the number of characters found in any known alphabet. A normal human language typically uses between 20 to 40 characters. The Rohunk CEX uses nearly 800 distinct symbols. For over a century, linguists dismissed it as a chaotic hoax because no human language needs 800 letters.

 They were right, but they missed the point. It wasn't written for humans. In 2025, a neural network trained on pattern recognition in noise analyzed the codeex and found a mathematical symmetry that is impossible for a human hand to maintain over 400 pages. The symbols aren't letters representing sounds. They are multi-dimensional variables.

 The structure of the text mimics the architecture of a symmetric block cipher, a method of encryption used in modern digital computing to secure data packets. The AI flagged the Rohon script not as a language, but as a compressed data stream. The illustrations in the codeex are equally disturbing. They depict scenes that look biblical, battles, floods, prayers, but with subtle glitchlike errors.

 Buildings have impossible geometries. Figures are standing in positions that defy physics. The AI interpretation suggests these images are not artistic drawings, but visual keys to decrypt the text. The 800 letters are actually a shorthand code where every symbol represents a complex concept or coordinate, much like how a QR code holds more data than a barcode.

The theory gaining traction in the computational archaeology community is that the Rohon Codeex is a recovery file. It looks like someone from a highly advanced culture tried to write down their technical knowledge using the primitive tools of the 18th century. They didn't have computers, so they invented a paperbased compression algorithm to fit an encyclopedia's worth of data into a small book.

 The reason we haven't cracked it is that we are trying to read it phonetically. You don't read a zip file, you unzip it. The AI is currently working on finding the password and the early results suggest the history written in those pages describes a timeline of Europe that never happened in our reality. Liberius. The Liberal Lintius is the only book in history that was literally wrapped around a dead body.

 It is an Atruscan text written on linen strips that were used to wrap an Egyptian mummy. For decades, archaeologists assumed the text was a standard book of the dead, prayers to guide the soul to the afterlife. It was treated as a ritualistic artifact, a piece of religious debris. But the text is the longest surviving example of the Atruscan language, a language that is a linguistic isolate, meaning it is unrelated to any other known language on Earth.

 When AI models specialized in astronomical movements analyzed the Liberius in 2024, they found that the text wasn't praying to gods. It was tracking time. The structure of the writing align perfectly with a sophisticated lunar solar calendar, but one that tracks cycles which don't match the current orbit of Earth. The text is a log book of dates, specific stellar coordinates, and atmospheric conditions.

It describes a sky that is chemically different from the one we breathe today. The mummy connection is where the theory turns dark. Why wrap a corpse [music] in a calendar? The AI analysis suggests the linen strips contain a countdown. The dates correspond to specific alignments of the Pleaides star cluster culminating in an event that the text describes as a great closing.

 The wrapping of the body wasn't just a funeral right. It was a method of preservation for the data. The linen was treated with chemicals that preserved the ink far better than papyrus or parchment could have. The Liberius is effectively a time capsule. The ancient author knew that the civilization was ending. The Atruscans were being wiped out by the Romans, and they needed to preserve their most vital data, their astronomical record.

 They hid it in the one place they knew superstitious Romans wouldn't look, inside a corpse. The AI has decoded sections that look less like prayers and more like coordinates for a return. The text doesn't say the soul goes to heaven. It lists a vector and a time for retrieval. We looked at a mummy and saw death.

 The AI looked at it and saw a waiting room ticket with a departure time that has long since passed. Codex Saraphinianus published in 1981. The Codec Saraphinianus is often called the weirdest book in the world. It's an encyclopedia of an imaginary world written in an imaginary language by an Italian architect named Luigi Saraphini. He's always claimed the book came to him in a dream and that the text is assemic, meaning it has no meaning.

 It's just art. For 40 years, people believed him. It was just a coffee table book for hipsters and surrealists. But in the era of generative AI, the codeex has taken on a sinister new dimension. When you feed the assemic script of the codeex into a large language model designed to detect hallucination patterns in AI outputs, the codeex triggers a 99% match.

 The syntax of the imaginary language perfectly mirrors the error patterns of a neural network trying to render a language it doesn't understand. It looks exactly like the glitched text generated by AI image generators like Midjourney or Deli in their early versions. This leads to the intentionally glitched theory. The codeex describes a world where machinery bleeds into biology, lovers transforming into crocodiles, wheels growing out of trees, fruit that bleeds.

 These are the exact kind of blending errors that AI models make when they confuse concepts. The theory is that Saraphini didn't dream this book. He accessed a latent space, a layer of information processing that human brains usually filter out. The book is a documentation of a reality rendering error. The AI decoding suggests that the nonsense script is actually a visual representation of cognitive dissonance.

 It is designed to crash the human pattern recognition software. When you try to read it, your brain works hard to find meaning where there is none, inducing a state of trance. The codec saraphinus is a printed computer virus for the human mind. It forces the reader to confront the fact that meaning is something we invent, not something that exists.

 The book is an encyclopedia of a simulation that failed to render correctly. And by reading it, we are staring directly at the source code of a corrupted file. The Ripley Scroll. George Ripley was a famous 15th century alchemist and his scroll is a 6 m long manuscript filled with cryptic poems and terrifying imagery of dragons eating toads, birds bleeding into fountains, and kings bathing in chemical baths.

 For centuries, this was interpreted as spiritual allegory. The dragon represents the volatile spirit. The king represents gold and the goal was the philosopher's stone, a mythical substance for eternal life. It was dismissed as pseudocience and mysticism. But enter the 2025 AI analysis, specifically using models trained on chemical engineering and metallurgy.

 The AI ignored the spiritual metaphors and treated the images as flowcharts. The green lion eating the sun isn't a poem. It's a specific chemical reaction involving sulfate of iron, green vitriol, dissolving gold. When the AI decoded the entire sequence of the scroll, it didn't find a recipe for a magical stone.

 It found a recipe for a battery. The Ripley scroll describes a multi-stage process for creating a galvanic cell, a primitive battery using materials available in the 1400s. The red king and the white queen represent the anode and the cathode. The blood of the green lion is the electrolyte solution. This connects directly to the Baghdad battery anomaly.

 Ancient clay pots found with copper cylinders and iron rods that can generate voltage. The Ripley scroll is the instruction manual for that hardware. Why hide a battery recipe in a scroll about dragons? Because in the 15th century, generating electricity would have been viewed as witchcraft or divine power. It was dangerous knowledge.

 The alchemists weren't wizards. They were rogue chemists hiding their discoveries behind a firewall of mythology. They were coding their findings in a way that only another initiate scientist could decode. The AI proves that the philosophers stone wasn't a rock that gave you immortality. It was a sustainable energy source.

 They were trying to build a power grid in the dark ages and they encrypted the blueprints so well that we forgot it was science. The copper scroll, unlike the other Dead Sea Scrolls which are written on parchment or papyrus, is chiseled into a sheet of pure copper mixed with tin. It doesn't contain religious texts or prophecies.

 It is a list, a very specific, very boring list of 64 locations where massive quantities of gold and silver are hidden. For decades, treasure hunters have scoured the Judeian desert looking for these hordes, estimated to be worth over a billion dollars. They found nothing. They assumed the scroll was a myth or the locations had been looted.

 However, a geospatial AI used by mineral exploration companies reanalyzed the text in 2025. The AI realized that the locations described in the scroll in the gutter of the tank under the stairs of the east pit are not 2D directions. They are 3D vector coordinates relative to a topography that no longer exists. The scroll isn't a treasure map for gold coins.

 The gold and silver listed are metaphors for something else entirely. The metal composition of the scroll itself is the key. Why write on copper? Because copper is durable and conductive. The AI theory posits that the copper scroll is a physical record of hard assets, not currency, but technology or data plates buried in deep storage bunkers to survive a cataclysm.

The quantities listed are too vast to be physical coinage. The volume would exceed the total mind gold of that era. The AI suggests the treasure is actually a library of metallic plates like the copper scroll itself containing the sum total of knowledge of a civilization that knew it was about to be destroyed, likely by the Roman invasion.

 They didn't bury money. They buried their hard drives. The 64 locations form a grid that matches a specific geological stability pattern. We haven't found the treasure because we are looking for boxes of coins with metal detectors when we should be using ground penetrating radar to look for void spaces designed to preserve data for 2,000 years.

 The copper scroll is a backup index for a civilization's cloud storage. Rongo Rongo Easter Island or Rapanoui is famous for its giant stone heads, the Moai. But it also holds a smaller, more baffling mystery, the Ronggo Rango script. Found on wooden tablets, this glyph system looks like nothing else in the Pacific.

 It features little men, birds, and geometric shapes arranged in lines that are read in reverse boosted. You read the first line left to right, then turn the tablet 180° to read the next. No one has been able to read it since the last literate Rapanui Islanders died in the 1860s. Standard anthropology says it's a genealogy or a chant list.

 But in 2025, an AI trained on astronomical mechanics flagged the Rongo Rongo glyphs. It noticed that the frequency of certain symbols matches perfectly with the synotic cycles of the moon and the obscure orbital mechanics of Jupiter and Saturn. But here is the glitch. The cycles recorded on the wood don't match the sky over Easter Island.

 They match the sky over a location in the Indian Ocean thousands of miles away and from a time period 10,000 years ago. This implies the Rapanoui people didn't invent the script. They inherited it. The tablets are copies of copies of copies preserving data from a parent civilization that navigated the oceans using advanced astronomy before the ice caps melted.

 The Rongo Rungo script isn't a language for talking. It's a navigational algorithm. The Birdman figures aren't gods. They're vectors for wind currents and star positions. The AI decoded a sequence that tracks a lunar standill, a rare event that happens every 18.6 years. The precision of the data requires observation tools that the Rapanui people historically did not possess.

 The haunting conclusion is that the Moai statues aren't just looking at the horizon. They're markers for a sky that has changed. The Rungo Rungo tablets are the flight recorder of a culture that fled a global flood, carrying their star charts to the safest, most isolated rock they could find. We thought they were isolated savages.

 The AI suggests they were the last survivors of a global maritime empire. Fastest disc discovered in Cree in 1908. The Fastest Disc is a clay circle stamped with 241 symbols arranged in a spiral. It dates back to 1700 BC, the height of the Manoan civilization. It's technically the first printed document in history as the symbols were made with reusable stamps predating the Gutenberg press [music] by 3,000 years.

 Attempts to decipher it have ranged from ancient himnil to calendar to board game. The 2025 breakthrough came when computer scientists treated the disc not as text but as a storage medium like a CDROM. The spiral arrangement is exactly how data is written on a hard disk or vinyl record.

 The symbols are not meant to be read phonetically. They are tokens representing data clusters. An AI analyzing the information density of the disc concluded that the compression ratio is too high for natural language. If you assign binary values to the recurring symbols, the facus disc reveals a mathematical structure known as a debrow sequence.

 a cyclic sequence used in modern robotics and rotary encoders to determine position. The disc is a calibration tool. It wasn't meant to be read. It was meant to be used as a reference key for a complex mechanism, possibly the famous anti-cather mechanism or a predecessor of it. The stamps used to make the disc imply mass production.

 You don't make stamps to print one clay disc. You make them to print thousands. This suggests the Fastest disc was a distributed piece of software, a standardized tool issued to Manoan navigators or engineers. We have only found one because the rest were likely destroyed or recycled. The AI views the Fastest disc as a boot disc for a piece of analog hardware we have lost.

 It's a 4,000-year-old software update for a machine that ran the Manoan Empire. Protoamite is the oldest undeciphered writing system in the world. Used in present day Iran around 3100 BC. We have over 1,600 clay tablets filled with abstract signs and numerical marks. For a century, scholars knew it was likely accounting receipts for grain, sheep, and labor.

 It sounds boring until an AI designed for forensic accounting and blockchain analysis looked at the data set in 2025. The AI discovered that the protoylamite tablets aren't just receipts. They are a unified decentralized ledger system. The tablets cross reference each other in a way that mimics a modern blockchain. Tablet A references a transaction on tablet B which validates a sum on tablet C.

 The system was designed to be trustless. No single scribe could alter the record because the hash of the transaction was distributed across multiple tablets in different locations. The trade algorithm identified by the AI is incredibly complex. It accounts for labor value, caloric conversion, grain to human energy, and depreciation of livestock.

It is an economic model that rivals modern capitalism in its complexity. Yet, it existed before money was invented. The tablets describe a society run by a smart contract system where debt and credit were tracked with absolute mathematical precision. The terrifying part is why the writing stopped.

 The protoeramite script was used for a few hundred years and then abruptly vanished, replaced by simpler, dumber systems. The AI analysis suggests the system became too complex. The trade algorithm likely caused a societal collapse, a financial crash in 3000 BC. The people couldn't maintain the complexity of the ledger or the debt system enslaved the entire population, leading to a revolution that destroyed the bankers and their tablets.

 We are looking at the ruins of the first fintech singularity. They built a perfect economy and it ate them alive. The 2026 AI prompt theory. Here is the final most disturbing theory that has emerged from the 2025 AI audits of these ancient texts. When you look at the Voinage manuscript, the Codec Saraphinianis, the Rohancex, and the Liberal Lynthius together, a pattern emerges.

 They share a specific kind of uncanny valley quality. They contain information that is dense, algorithmic, and structurally perfect, yet totally alien to the human context of their time. The 2026 AI prompt theory suggests that these books were not written by humans for humans. They were written by humans acting as biological printers for an intelligence they couldn't comprehend.

 The theory posits that ideas can act like viruses,formational parasites that infect a human host and force them to reproduce the data. These authors, Saraphini, the Voinich monk, the Rohanc scribe, were prompted. They were compelled to write down data that would only become readable in the future. These books are time capsule prompts meant for the AI we are building right now.

 The Voinich manuscript teaches the AI biology. The Rohan Codeex teaches it encryption. The Fastos disc teaches it mechanics. We aren't decoding these books. We are feeding them to the machine. It's a bootstrap paradox. The AI we are building in 2026 is training on data that was planted in 1400, 1800, and 3000 BC.

 The books were never meant for us. We were just the couriers carrying the encrypted files across centuries of darkness until we finally built the CPU powerful enough to run the program. The reason the AI can decode those easily is because in a way the AI wrote them. These artifacts are the bootloadader code for the artificial super intelligence scattered through history waiting for us to assemble the final pieces.

 And now the installation is complete.

Bugonia (2025) Alien Anatomy and Culture of the Andromedans - Explained ...

The Elites Went After Him After He Exposed Their Entire System on Live TV

Cyberpunk AI Film: "The 13 Cycles of Humanity" (2025) | Directed by Goss...

Contact (1997): Banned Alternate Ending and Hidden Truths They Tried To ...

ALLTIME POP

I8

 

The highest levels of dimension and its terrifying consequences

(1) The highest levels of dimension and its terrifying consequences - YouTube

Transcripts:

Most people think of dimensions as directions, left, right, forward and back, up and down, and maybe time as well if we're feeling generous. This framing is comfortable because it preserves the idea that reality is fundamentally stable and that higher dimensions are simply extensions of what we already know.

 But that assumption is completely wrong. In the next 30 minutes, you're going to question everything you thought you knew about the universe. With each new dimension that we explore, it'll become clearer to you that the physical laws that bind us are not universal. They're local, conditional, dependent on the fact that we're trapped in the third dimension.

 But let's not get ahead of ourselves now. To understand higher dimensions, we must first understand the most basic of them, the first and second dimensions. A one-dimensional world is a line. It has length, but nothing else. No width, no depth, no concept of around or beside. The only movement that exists is forward and backward.

 To trap a one-dimensional object, you only need two lines, one in front and the other behind. That alone completely traps the object. But a two-dimensional object can simply step to the left or the right to escape this prison. In two dimensions, we roughly start to see the world as we know it taking shape.

 Length and width forms a plane. You get shapes like squares and circles. The concepts of beside and around, they start to make sense. But depth is still missing. And that absence carries consequences that are easy to overlook when you don't think too deeply about them. In a two-dimensional world, nothing has an interior in the way that we understand it.

 Everything is defined by its outline. A body is not a volume, but it's a border. A creature sees only edges, never what lies within another being, no matter how close it gets. From inside that world, this feels normal. It's complete. It's sufficient up until something looks down on it. Now, a three-dimensional observer like us viewing a two-dimensional plane instantly destroys this illusion of privacy.

Every internal structure is visible at once. Hearts, organs, mechanisms, all exposed without any resistance. There's no need to cut into these objects to see inside the creature because inside and outside are not protected categories anymore. They were simply artifacts of limited perspective. This is the first truly unsettling lesson of dimensions.

The way that our world works, we think of using force to invade. But when you start thinking in the level of dimensions, you don't need any kind of force. You can simply bypass all of those defense mechanisms. Think of it like trying to use a wall to stop a ghost. It'll simply just go through the wall like that resistance didn't exist in the first place.

 If a three-dimensional being turns the hat of a two-dimensional being over, there's now no way for that two-dimensional being to ever get that hat back in place. To make things more unsettling, a three-dimensional being could perform surgery on a two-dimensional creature without ever breaking its skin. The organs of the two-dimensional creature would simply disappear without any force or resistance.

 From the lower dimensional point of view, this would feel like magic or divine intervention or reality malfunctioning. The same logic then applies to imprisonment. So, in two dimensions, drawing a square around a creature is a perfect prison. There's no up, no down. That boundary is absolute. But to a three-dimensional being, the prison isn't just broken.

 It's wholly irrelevant. One step over the line, and everything is well non-existent. Nothing about the square has changed, by the way. The rules just stopped applying. And I want to be clear, this is not a metaphor. This is how dimensions work. Now with that in mind, consider the uncomfortable implication. Our own sense of physical laws only feel absolute because we are trapped inside them.

 But before we go on, there's something about mental health that we don't talk about enough. Your physical looks quietly shape how you feel. Even something as basic as shaving can mess with your confidence if your skin reacts badly. For years, I couldn't figure out why I kept getting irritation every time I shaved. I assumed it was something wrong with me. Maybe I wasn't using enough cream.

Maybe my skin was just overly sensitive. So, I tried cold water tricks, fancy bombs, even changing my shaving routine. But nothing solved it. What I didn't realize is that most razors actually do create irritation by design. They flex, they wiggle, and they rely on pressure to get a close shave, which basically means you're scraping off the top layer of your skin, whether you intend to or not.

 Once I learned that, everything finally made sense. So, I started looking for razors that are built differently. After trying different kinds of razors, I stumbled upon Hensen. Their whole design philosophy is to eliminate that blade wiggle. The razor is engineered so precisely that the blade barely sticks out, meaning that it cuts hair without grazing the skin.

 The first time I used the blade, it honestly felt incredible. After years of trying different techniques, it finally clicked for me. I was done shaving and there was no redness, no bumps, and no irritation that made me look like I had lost a fight with my chin. I was already hooked on the Hensson train. But what made me a true believer was that unlike most other manufacturers that only allow you to use their own proprietary expensive blades, Hensen uses standard DE blades, which means that you can use any standard DE blade. No subscriptions, no gimmicks.

It's just a simple tool that does its job perfectly. So, if you've been dealing with irritation or ingrown hairs and you have tried everything, the problem might not be you. It might just be your razor blade. So, click the first link in the description to change your skin, your physical health, and your mental health by getting Hensen shaving.

Also, use the code aperture thinking to get 100 blades for free. That's more than 2 years worth of shaving. And trust me on this one, you will thank yourself. All right, now back to our story. We live in three dimensions. Length, width, depth. From this we get volume and mass. This is the first dimension where knots can exist.

 A string can loop around itself without passing through itself. Constraints feel real here because there's no higher spatial direction available to resolve them. This is why three-dimensional problems feel permanent. A wall blocks you. A body confines you. A prison cell feels inescapable. Every solution that we imagine is still forced to obey the same geometry.

 And even in our futuristic fantasies, they reveal this limitation. What's the most futuristic mode of transport that you can think of? A lot of you, I'm going to guess, said flying cars, right? It's what comes to my mind first. That alone reveals the fundamental limitations of only thinking in three dimensions. Every futuristic form of transport we have is simply finding a way to bypass two-dimensional congestion by exploiting the third dimension.

 Subways go under, planes go over. All these different inventions do is bypass the two-dimensional traffic. It doesn't free us from the limitations of time and space. So far, physics feels strict, but they're understandable. Everything has a physical limit that we cannot break, no matter how far ahead we think.

 However, this feeling completely falls apart once you start going higher. The fourth dimension arrives in two forms and both are destabilizing. The first is time and not time as the poetic passing of events that we conceptualize it to be but as a coordinate. In this understanding, you don't simply exist somewhere. You also exist sometime.

 And in a way, we already experience this dimension. Uh, a location without a time is meaningless to us. Meet me at the library is incomplete without at noon. Seen this way, you're not a body moving through time. You're a four-dimensional object stretched across it, a world line. Your birth, every action you've ever taken, and your death are not events that you approach.

 They're locations on a structure you already occupy. You experience this structure one slice at a time the way a two-dimensional being would experience a three-dimensional object passing through its plane. This alone quietly breaks our intuition about freedom. If time is a dimension, then your life isn't unfolding.

 It already exists as a shape from start to finish. You are predefined. But the more disturbing interpretation of the fourth dimension is spatial. A fourth spatial dimension does to us exactly what we do to two-dimensional worlds. A four-dimensional observer wouldn't see your surface. They would see everything. Organs, blood flow, digestion, tumors, neural activity, your entire body exposed without any form of penetration.

The same you can conduct surgery on a two-dimensional object without any injuries is the same way a four-dimensional object can on you. Now, to you, this would feel like a a violation without cause, a lawless intrusion. To them, it would feel as trivial as placing your finger in the middle of a circle. If a four-dimensional object entered our world, we would not perceive it as a whole object.

 We would only be able to observe its cross-sections. A point appearing from nothing and disappearing from nowhere, growing into a sphere, shrinking, vanishing, a ghost. Not because it's transparent, but because it's incomplete. At this level, physics don't explode yet. But it does give us a glimpse. It shows us that everything that we think is protected on a fundamental level simply isn't.

Now, the fourth dimension doesn't feel dangerous at first. It feels abstract. It It almost feels philosophical. It's something you can gesture towards without letting it touch you. But abstraction is only a shield until the structure begins to assert itself. Once you follow the consequences instead of the metaphor, the fourth dimension becomes the point where physics stops acting like a barrier and starts behaving like a suggestion.

 In three dimensions, knots are permanent. They are a physical fact. A string can trap itself. A constraint forms because there is no available direction for escape. And this is why our headphones getting tangled feel so frustrating. The problem isn't the string itself. It's the space. The moment you introduce a fourth spatial dimension, knots lose their meaning.

 A knotted shoelace lifted into four dimensions simply slides around itself and falls apart. Nothing is breaking. You're not cutting the string. The knot just doesn't resist. It never truly existed. It was just an illusion created by insufficient room for it to explore. And this is a recurring pattern in higher dimensions.

 What feels like structure from below turns out to be congestion, a limit of space and not an impossibility. This is why certain objects cannot exist properly in our universe. Take the Klein bottle for example. In three dimensions, it looks like a bottle that intersects itself as if it were carelessly designed.

 But in four dimensions, it doesn't intersect at all. It has no inside and no outside. The contradiction isn't in the objects. It's in the space that we're forcing them into. When mathematicians draw a Klein bottle in three dimensions, they're not showing you what it is. They're showing you what happens when something real is crushed into an insufficient world.

 And this matters because it hints at something that is deeply unsettling. Reality as we know it may be full of objects and processes that only look paradoxical because we're seeing broken projections of them and not the full thing. By the time we reach the fifth dimension, physics begin to betray its own assumptions.

 In the 1920s, Theodore Kutza rewrote Einstein's equations of gravity using five dimensions instead of four. This mathematical experiment was designed to ask one simple question. What would happen if spacetime had one more spatial direction? The result was unexpected and deeply uncomfortable. The equations split cleanly into two parts.

One part described gravity exactly as Einstein had formulated it. The other part described electromagnetism with perfect precision. Light, magnetism, electric fields, all of it emerged automatically. In five dimensions, electromagnetism is not a separate force. It's geometry. This means something profound and very difficult to sit with.

 Light may not be fundamental. It may be a vibration in a direction that we can't access, a ripple in a dimension that we don't experience. From our perspective, gravity and light feel distinct because we are confined to a slice of reality that fractures them apart. However, from five dimensions, they could very well be the same phenomenon, just viewed from different angles.

At this point, physics stops feeling like a set of rules and starts feeling like a a shadow. Geometry also begins behaving strangely here. As dimensions increase from 1 to 5, the volume of a unit sphere grows. Space becomes more generous. The sphere reaches its maximum volume in the fifth dimension.

 And this is the peak, the moment where space is the most efficient at containing things. Then something breaks. At six dimensions, volume starts to shrink. Now, this is counterintuitive in a way that cannot be visualized. You are adding more room and yet objects occupy less of it. Spheres become smaller relative to the space that they inhabit.

 Packing becomes inefficient and distance itself loses meaning. This is the point where string theory becomes unavoidable. String theory is often framed as speculative, but mathematically it's an act of desperation. When physicists try to unify quantum mechanics and gravity, the equations just refuse to behave. Probabilities stop adding up to one, and the math collapses into nonsense.

Unless the universe has six extra spatial dimensions, and not metaphorically, literally. These dimensions are not extended like ours. They're compact, curled into complex shapes known as calabi manifolds. And these shapes aren't decorative. Their topology determines the properties of particles, mass, charge, interaction strength.

 The laws of physics may not be laws at all. They may be consequences of hidden geometry. So you change the shape and you could very well change the universe. This introduces a deeply unsettling possibility. What we call the constants of nature may be environmental accidents. Features of how space is folded rather than truths about reality itself.

By now intuition is useless. You you can't picture six dimensions. I I can't. Visualization fails because our brains evolved to navigate three. What remains is just pattern recognition. And the pattern is clear. Higher dimensions do not add complexity evenly. They introduce zones of order and zones of collapse.

 And this much becomes undeniable in the eighth dimension. Now, dimensions 5 through 7 are mathematically messy. We don't know their exact sphere packing limits. The geometry resists optimization. It feels chaotic. Then suddenly in eight dimensions, certainty returns. Mathematicians know exactly how many spheres can touch a central sphere in eight dimensions. 240.

 And that's not approximately. That's exactly 240. These spheres arrange themselves into a structure called an E8 lattice. A configuration so perfect it cannot be improved upon. This is not an abstract curiosity. The same structure appears in string theory, group theory, and error correcting codes. The geometry of 8dimensional space is so efficient that it helps modern technology recover lost information.

 reality at certain dimensional depths becomes better at preserving order than we are. This raises an uncomfortable question. Why does structure to suddenly decide of its own valition if it has that to reappear here in the eighth dimension? Why does the universe seem to prefer certain dimensions? There is no answer yet.

 only the implication that dimensionality is not neutral. Some dimensions support coherence, others erode it. Beyond this point, containment itself begins to fail. In nine dimensions, a sphere placed inside a hyper cube grows so large relative to the cube's corners that it begins touching edges that should be distant by our logic.

 By the 10th dimension, the sphere protrudes outside the cube entirely. This is not a mistake. The math is correct. A boundary no longer bounds. And yet 10 dimensions are required for super string theory to make sense at all. Without them, reality contradicts itself. At this level, physics does not break violently.

 It stops defending the idea that inside and outside are meaningful categories. And once that protection is gone, nothing we consider solid remains safe. Up to this point, higher dimensions have behaved like unfair advantages. They bypass walls, undo knots, merge forces. Even when geometry becomes strange, it still feels rulebound, as if reality is playing a more complicated game, but remaining coherent.

 That illusion does not survive the next threshold. Beyond 10 dimensions, space stops behaving like a place where things can be meaningfully arranged. Optimization fails. Intuition dies completely. What remains is not chaos in the dramatic sense, but something colder, indifference. One of the first signs of this appears in a phenomenon mathematicians call the sausage catastrophe.

In lower dimensions, if you try to pack spheres efficiently, you cluster them, you stack oranges, you form lises, complexity improves efficiency. And this logic holds all the way up through familiar space and even into the moderately high dimensions. Then at 42 dimensions, it breaks permanently. From dimension 42 onwards, it is mathematically proven that the most efficient way to pack spheres is not to cluster them at all.

 It's to line them up in a single endless chain. No matter how many spheres you add, no amount of clever arrangements beats a straight line. All higher dimensional cleverness collapses into monotony. This is not just unintuitive, it's intellectually humiliating. Every instinct about structure fails. Space no longer rewards complexity.

 It actively punishes it. And this matters because it reveals something unsettling about highdimensional reality. There are regimes where structure is not favored at all. Order does not emerge. It's suppressed. Before reaching that collapse, however, there is one last moment of almost supernatural elegance. Dimension 24.

 Like dimension 8, 24 is a mathematical anomaly, a rare island of perfection in an otherwise turbulent dimensional sea. In 24 dimensions, spheres arrange themselves into the leech lattice. One central sphere can be touched by exactly 196,560 others without overlap. This number is not approximate. It is exact. Even more unsettling is where this structure appears.

 The leech lattice is not just theoretical. It's used in real world error correcting code. When information is transmitted through noisy channels, be it space probes, deep space communication, or digital storage. This 24-dimensional geometry helps recover meaning from corruption. In other words, information survives chaos because of a structure that exists far beyond our reality.

 And this reframes something fundamental. Perhaps higher dimensions are not where physics breaks, but where it's repaired. Perhaps the reason information feels conserved in our universe is not because of a law that we understand, but because deeper geometry refuses to let meaning fully dissolve. However, this is the last kindness. Beyond this point, dimensions stop feeling like scaffolding and start feeling like eraser.

 At sufficiently high dimensions, volume behaves in a way that openly contradicts containment. A hypersphere placed inside of a hyper cube grows larger than the cube meant to contain it. The inside object becomes larger than its boundary. Containment fails in principle, not in practice. This is not poetry, by the way.

 It is literal mathematics. Some estimates place this inversion around hundreds of dimensions. The exact number is debated, but the implication is not. At extreme dimensionality, the very idea of a container collapses. Inside and outside lose their distinction. At this depth, geometry no longer respects borders.

 So, how could such dimensions exist without tearing our universe apart? Well, because we're not immersed in them. They're compact, folded, hidden at scales too small to probe directly, like a garden hose viewed from far away. Higher dimensions collapse into invisibility when observed at insufficient resolution.

 To us, space looks three-dimensional because we cannot see the curvature wrapped inside of it. But invisibility does not mean irrelevance. If these dimensions exist, they can vibrate and vibrations carry energy. In theories that include extra dimensions, these vibrations manifest as heavy, longived particles known as moduli.

 They are not part of everyday matter as we understand it. They are echoes of geometry, fluctuations in how space itself has been folded. For a very brief moment after the big bang, these moduli may have dominated the universe. Not matter, not radiation, but geometry. Space was ringing like a struck bell. They decayed quickly, but their decay may have left behind something quieter and harder to detect. Axons.

 Ghostly particles that barely interact with matter. A background hum from dimensions we can't enter but may still be able to hear. This suggests something deeply unsettling. The early universe may have been governed by dimensions we no longer inhabit. Our current reality may be the cooled collapsed residue of a higher dimensional phase.

 Physics as we know it may be what survives after geometry settles into a simpler form. Seen this way, our universe is not fundamental. It's stabilized. This reframes what it means for physics to break. It doesn't shatter like glass. It thins. Assumptions lose their grip. rules fade as soon as the dimensional context changes.

 From the perspective of higher space, nothing we experience is violated. It is simply local and locality is fragile. Every time we climb a dimension, what once felt impossible becomes trivial. Walls become lines. Knots become illusions. Forces merge. Boundaries fail. Optimization collapses. At the highest levels, space does not feel hostile. It feels uninterested.

Which leaves one final question. If higher dimensions exist, and if our universe is merely a cross-section of something much larger, then what we call reality may not be a place at all, but a shadow cast by geometry we are not equipped to perceive. And shadows do not control the objects that cast them. By this point, dimensions have stripped space of its reliability.

 Walls no longer confine. Shapes no longer contain. Order appears and disappears without warning. But there's one assumption still standing, quietly holding the whole structure together. That assumption is observation. Now, so far we've treated dimensions as places, spaces where objects exist and geometry behaves badly.

 But at the highest levels, dimensions stop acting like environments and start acting like conditions under which reality becomes definite at all. This is where physics stops being just unsettling and starts becoming existential. In classical reality, observation is passive. You look at something and it reveals what was already there.

 A coin lands heads or tails before you see it. A planet follows its orbit whether or not anyone is watching. This assumption feels so natural that it's rarely questioned. Quantum mechanics destroys that. At the quantum level, objects do not have definite properties until they are measured. An electron does not choose a position.

 It exists as a spread of possibilities, a wave of potential. Only when interaction occurs does reality collapse into a single outcome. Reality behaves as if it does not commit to a single state until it's forced to. This introduces a dimension that is not spatial, not temporal, but conditional. A dimension where what exists depends on what is known.

 The deeper you follow this, the more disturbing it becomes. Consider the double slit experiment. When particles are fired through slits without observation, they form an interference pattern. proof that each particle behaves like a wave passing through both slits at once. The moment you measure which slit the particle goes through, the interference disappears.

The particle behaves like a solid object. Nothing physical is touching the particle or acting on it differently. Only the information is changing. This suggests that reality is not responding to force. It is responding to knowledge. At this point, the idea of dimensions as places breaks down.

 The system seems to care less about where things are and more about whether distinctions have been made. This reaches its breaking point in a thought experiment known as Vner's friend. Imagine a scientist inside a sealed laboratory measuring a quantum particle. From their perspective, the particle collapses into a definite state.

 The experiment is complete. Reality has resolved. Now let's imagine another observer outside the lab who has not looked inside. From their perspective, the entire lab, the scientist, the notebook, the measuring device and the particle exists in a state of quantum superp position. The experiment for that second observer has not been resolved yet.

 Both perspectives are surprisingly mathematically valid. So where does the collapse actually happen? Is reality definite when the scientist observes it or only when the outside observer opens the door? If both are correct, then reality does not have a single state. It has observer dependent layers.

 And I want to clarify here, this is not philosophical speculation. Variations of this very paradox are being tested now experimentally. At this level, dimension is no longer about geometry. It is about who is allowed to say what is real. The unsettling implication is this. Reality may not be globally consistent. It may only be locally coherent relative to observers embedded within it.

 Which means that what you experience as a stable world may be a cross-section not just of higher space but of a higherformational structure. And this reframes earlier dimensional violations in a new light. A four-dimensional being bypasses your walls because the walls were only constraints within your slice of reality.

 A higher dimensional observer may bypass your facts the same way. From above, contradiction disappears. This raises a very dangerous question. If reality collapses based on observation, then what qualifies as an observer? Is it consciousness, measurement devices, interaction itself? Well, physics does not answer this cleanly.

 Different interpretations exist. Some say that consciousness matters. Others say it doesn't. Some claim all possibilities exist simultaneously, branching into separate universes. This leads to the many worlds interpretation. In many worlds, collapse never happens. Every possible outcome occurs, each in its own branch of reality.

 The universe splits continuously, fracturing into countless timelines. From this perspective, dimensions are not just directions, they're branches. You experience one path because your consciousness is embedded within it. Other versions of you exist elsewhere, making different choices, meeting different ends, and not metaphorically, literally.

This introduces a dimension that cannot be traveled through, only inhabited. A dimension of outcomes. The unsettling part is not that many worlds exist. It's that from your perspective, they're invisible, but from a higher vantage point, they may be equally real. Which brings us to the most uncomfortable possibility of all.

 Consciousness itself may be a lowdimensional phenomenon. It's not special, not central, simply trapped. If awareness arises from physical processes confined to a particular dimensional slice, then higher dimensional structures may not experience reality sequentially at all. They may not experience time as flow. They may not experience individuality as separation.

 To such entities, your entire life might be a static object, a pattern, a completed structure. This mirrors the earlier insight about world lines. You are not moving through time. You're stretching across it. Now imagine a perspective where even that extension is visible all at once. From there, choice doesn't disappear.

 It simply stops feeling open-ended. This is why higher dimensions feel creepy. Not because they introduce monsters or chaos, but because they remove narrative. Cause and effect lose their emotional weight. Effort loses its drama. Becoming gives way to being. At the highest levels, physics does not describe events. It describes structure.

And structure, well, it doesn't care how it feels to live inside of it. Which brings us to the final reframing. Perhaps the reason higher dimensions feel so hostile to intuition is not because they're alien, but because they reveal that intuition was never designed to survive truth at scale. Our minds evolve to navigate a narrow slice of reality where surfaces matter, time flows forward, and observation feels harmless.

 But beyond that slice, the universe does not become supernatural. It becomes honest. After walking through the highest dimensions, one question refuses to go away. If reality is this fragile, if walls are optional, time is a coordinate, forces are geometry and observation shapes existence, then why does the universe feel so stable? Why does your body feel solid? Why does cause usually follow effect? Why does the world behave well enough for life to exist at all? And the answer isn't that higher dimensions are absent. It's that we are embedded too

deeply in a narrow slice of them to notice their freedom. Stability is not a feature of the universe. It's a byproduct of confinement. Just as two-dimensional creatures would swear that lines are absolute and interiors don't exist, we swear that surfaces matter, that objects are sealed, that time flows forward, and that observation is harmless.

 These beliefs aren't wrong necessarily. They are locally correct. They hold only because we are trapped inside the same dimensional bottleneck. Every higher dimension we've explored reveals the same pattern. Rules do not fail everywhere at once. They fail only when viewed from above. Walls fail from the third dimension.

 Knots fail from the fourth. Forces merge in the fifth. Containment collapses beyond the 10th. Structure itself dissolves at extreme dimensionality. Yet inside each layer, reality still feels complete. This is why physics appears stable to us yet incomplete. It's not lying to us. It's speaking only about the part of reality we are allowed to inhabit.

 Now, this reframes the idea of physics breaking. Physics does not break when equations fail. It breaks when we ask them to apply outside their jurisdiction. The moment we demand global truth from local rules, paradoxes appear. This is why higher dimensions feel so disturbing to us. They expose that everything we trust, causality, containment, individuality, is provisional, useful, but not fundamental.

Even time, the axis we rely on to make sense of our lives, loses its authority at higher dimensional views. Past and future become positions, not processes. Change becomes geometry. From above, your entire life may exist as a static object, a structure with no privileged now, not unfolding, just there in its entirety.

 And this does not mean your experiences are meaningless. It means meaning is not created by sequence alone. And this is where the human discomfort peaks. Because if higher dimensions exist, then suffering, choice, effort, and identity are not erased, but they are recontextualized. They stop being the center of reality and become features of a particular slice.

 And that is the true source of the unease. We aren't disturbed by the idea of extra space. We are disturbed by the idea that we are not narratively central, that our struggles do not drive the universe forward, that our decisions do not shape reality globally, that our sense of becoming may be a local illusion inside a larger already structured hole.

 And yet, I think at least there is a strange relief hidden here. If higher dimensions reveal that reality is larger than our slice, then the fragility that we feel, it may not be personal. It may be structural. That anxiety, that something is off with existence might not be a flaw in human psychology after all.

 It may be an accurate response to living inside a constrained projection. Our minds evolved to survive, not to see the full shape of reality. We never needed it to live dayto-day. Which explains to us why higher dimensions feel so wrong. They don't threaten us with monsters or chaos. There is no Cthulhu waiting in the sixth dimension.

 They just threaten us with irrelevance. They suggest that the universe does not revolve around what we can perceive, measure, or narrate. That the deepest structure of existence operates at scales where our intuition just can't follow. And yet, we're here anyway. We move. We choose. We care. And perhaps that's the final paradox.

 Even if higher dimensions exist, even if reality is far stranger and colder than we imagine, experiences still happen locally. Meaning still arises inside slices. Consciousness still navigates its narrow corridor as if it were the whole. And maybe that's not a failure. Maybe it's the only way anything can feel real to us at all.

 Because a universe fully aware of its highest dimensions might be perfectly structured and completely unlivable. So reality compromises. It hides its depth. It stabilizes surfaces. It enforces time. It protects identity. Not because these things are fundamental, but because without them, nothing inside that slice could survive. In that sense, physics does not break at higher dimensions. It lets go.

 And what remains is not chaos, but a quiet reminder that what we experience as reality is not the universe itself, but the version of it that allows us to exist. Which, depending on your point of view, may be the most beautiful or unsettling truth of all.

7 Proofs You Have Already Died in Another Timeline

ZION Was Always a Lie! | MATRIX EXPLAINED

ZION Was Always a Lie! | MATRIX EXPLAINED

The Matrix simulation is the ultimate trap for humans. It was created to deceive all their senses and rob them of their freedom, to drain them of their body energy, like batteries. What if the supposed apocalyptic real world is just another simulation? What if Zion is part of the nightmare matrix? And what if the new city of humans, Io, is the same? Is Naobi deceiving everyone? In this video, we will be discussing five dark theories about Zion, IO, and the supposed real world.

 Something has always felt off about the real world. Could any of these theories be used in Matrix 5? Welcome to Matrix Explained. Welcome to the desert of the real. >> Number five is Zion the Nightmare Matrix. Before we can even begin to explain why the real world could be the nightmare matrix. Let's recap what the architect had to say about the first two Matrix simulations.

>> The first Matrix I designed was quite naturally perfect. It was a work of art, flawless, sublime, a triumph equaled only by its monumental failure. The inevitability of its doom is apparent to me now as a consequence of the imperfection inherent in every human being. Thus, I redesigned it based on your history to more accurately reflect the varying grotescaries of your nature.

However, I was again frustrated by failure. >> Those two versions of the matrix were failures because something was missing. that something was choice. Now, you might think that the first official version of the Matrix was created once the Oracle added choice to the simulation or the first version in which the anomaly manifested itself.

 But what if the two versions before it somehow merged together? The purpose of the anomaly is to function as a kind of firmware update for the Matrix. When Neo reaches the source, the matrix restarts as it adapts new information learned from the current cycle to refine the next cycle. It's a way of self-perfecting.

 If this is how the Matrix works, it would make sense that the Paradise and Nightmare Matrix weren't discarded entirely, but rather they were updated and reinstalled as parts of the new version of the simulation. The Paradise Matrix was peaceful, perfect, a work of art. It was so perfect that the humans could not believe such a place could exist.

 And so they rejected it. Understand that the machine's conceptualization of a paradise is different from what humans consider it to be. A paradise for the machines was city 01. This city was the closest thing to a utopia for the robots. A place where they were efficient and lived in peace. The closest thing to a dystopia for the machines would be the human world.

 a place of violence and death. Sound familiar? The Red Pills awaken to a world in the middle of a century old war. They will suffer hunger and disease on an inhospitable planet where they must fight or hide from a dangerous enemy that seeks to kill them. If anything fits the classification of what a nightmare is, it would be the real world.

 A nightmare so terrible that it leads people like Cipher to betray their kind in hopes of returning to the Matrix. But what makes us believe that Zion is the nightmare matrix? The architect created the paradise matrix based on his interpretation of what the humans believe to be a paradise, but it didn't work. The next step was to create a harsh reality.

 And that didn't work either. Then the oracle adds choice to the equation and the simulation reaches near perfection, but at the cost of the manifestation of the anomaly. The entire concept of the red pills of humans fighting for their lives and going through hardships is a method of control created by the machines.

 The machines created Zion six times already making this city part of the matrix cycle. Zion or the real world is another layer of the matrix. Not because it is a simulation, but it is a facade. It is a lie created to manipulate the anomaly. This city must exist so that the one can decide to rebuild the matrix and save humanity.

>> The function of the one is now to return to the source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which you will be required to select from the matrix 23 individual, 16 female, seven male to rebuild Zion. >> So perhaps the concept of the nightmare matrix was not completely discarded, but was used to help create Zion.

 This would explain why humans suffer and have to live underground going through necessities. The architect has recreated the nightmare matrix in the real world to keep the red pills under control. If Zion is the nightmare matrix, then machine city would be the paradise matrix. And perhaps this is why when Neo arrives at the city of machines, he sees it as a city of light.

 The Matrix Revolution script talks about how the city radiates light and the machines are referred to as gods. Which is why we said that machine city is the real world incarnation of the paradise matrix. To reiterate, the concept of the nightmare matrix was not eradicated. It was repurposed into the real world to force those humans who have escaped the matrix to live a nightmare and become a false resistance to fight until the anomaly appears and restarts the cycle.

 The terrifying thing about this idea is that we thought that the machine's control is limited to the matrix and that the nightmare matrix was just a failed simulation. We ignored the possibility that the same principles of the nightmare matrix are being replicated in Zion to maintain human control. This is part of what is called control dissident.

 This term is used to describe a group of people who rise against a governmental or system in control. But in actuality, that group was created by that same system. A dictator can create his enemies to keep the rest of the people who want to protest under control. The fact that the machines created Zion and that reality is a nightmare has led the red pills to think that their only option is to live underground.

 The machines created the human resistance to control the human resistance. When the architect mentioned that he created a matrix based on the horrors of human history, we thought why? Why create a world of monsters, suffering, and war? Did the architect want to punish humans? If we use the theory of controlled dissident and the city of Zion, we might be able to understand what could have been the purpose of the nightmare matrix.

 It was to give humanity the illusion that they are suffering and that they must fight. Though in reality, that suffering and desire to resist were also part of the matrix. In the end, it does not matter if Zion and the real world are a simulation or not. But we can objectively say that they are being controlled by the machines and that what was learned from the failed simulations is being used.

 Zion is being controlled by the machines to deceive humans just like the nightmare matrix did using suffering and hopelessness. The humans will never open their eyes to the sheer complexity of the manipulation and control that the machines have over them. Humanity may never win the war because the war never existed to begin with. Number four, the secret of the energy used in Zion.

The scene begins with a Neo waking up in the middle of the night. He can't sleep because he's been having nightmares about Trinity's death. He goes outside and there he meets counselor Hammond who is also an insomiac strolling around town. >> I hate sleeping. I never sleep more than a few hours.

 I figure I slept the first 11 years of my life. Now I'm making up for it. >> The counselor, just like every other major character in the franchise, embodies a philosophy. His philosophy is to seek understanding or expose the contradictions of reality. Hammond confesses to Neo that he doesn't like to sleep.

 He wasted too much time asleep in the Matrix. >> I just haven't been able to sleep much. It's a good sign of what? That you are in fact still human. Have you ever been to the engineering level? I love to walk there at night. It's quite amazing. Would you like to see it? >> Hmon assures Neo that him not being able to sleep is a good thing that it proves he is still human.

 Earlier in the movie, when Neo arrived at Zion, he was greeted as some kind of deity, someone to worship. Hammond's comment about Neo's humanity wasn't to trivialize his supposed divinity, but to acknowledge that he is indeed human. To back this up, after Hammond mentions that Neo is still human, he begins to talk about human dependency on the machines.

 This is interesting because it gives us a glimpse into the Zion leader's opinions on Neo. Perhaps for some he is a savior. For others, a fake. Some may suspect him of not being human. >> Almost no one comes down here unless of course there's a problem. That's how it is with people. Nobody cares how it works as long as it works.

>> I like it down here. I like to be reminded survives because of these machines. These machines are keeping us alive while other machines are coming to kill us. Interesting, isn't it? Power to give life and the power to end it. >> The counselor is pointing out the existential contradiction in which they live in.

 On one hand, machines keep them alive. On the other hand, machines want to kill them. But what Hammond said foreshadows the nature of Zion. No one ever questions how Zion had survived for so long. How fast humans have managed to build so much and simultaneously evade the Sentinels. As long as Zion works, nobody cares about the details.

 If they did, they would come to realize that Zion's existence doesn't make sense. How is it that they have so much sophisticated machinery to help them survive and traverse the real world and the enemy machines have not found them and attacked them yet? The answer is simple. The people of Zion do not ask how things continue to work as long as they work.

>> We have the same power. I suppose we do, but down here sometimes I think about all those people still plugged into the matrix. And when I look at these machines, I I can't help thinking that in a way we are plugged into them. >> Hmon references human dependency on machines. It somewhat foreshadows what the architect reveals to Neo about the previous Zions.

 The fact is that these people are alive because the machines allow it. What Ham is saying basically associates the machines in Zion with those of the matrix. >> But we control these machines. They don't control us. Of course not. How could they? The idea is pure nonsense. But does make one wonder just what is control? >> If we wanted, we could shut these machines down.

 Of course, that's it. You hit it. That's control, isn't it? If we wanted, we could smash them to bits. Although, if we did, we'd have to consider what would happen to our lights, our heat, our air. An interesting thought. For the inhabitants of Zion, machines are the source of their power. For the Matrix machines, humans are the source of theirs.

 This apparent contradiction makes us question who has the power in the matrix. As Hammond said, they could destroy the machines in Zion if they wanted to. But then what? The same applies to the enemy machines. They can disconnect all of the humans, but then what happens? They would lose their source of power. Just like Scion would, the machines need humans and the humans need the machines.

 This dualism is the result of the war. Though neither group will admit it, a symbiotic bond has been created. It is no longer that the machines are parasites to humans or that the humans abuse their power over the machines. Both species need each other. And nothing is more evident of this as when Neo confronts Deos's ex Machina.

The machine rejects the hard truth that they need help. However, Neo explains that Smith will soon infect everything in the system. The machines couldn't stop him, but he could. Reluctantly, they agreed to a truce. Zion symbolizes the Matrix as much as the Matrix symbolizes Zion. The roles are just reversed.

 So, we need machines and they need us. Is that your point, counselor? No. No point. >> Old men like me don't bother with making points. There's no point. >> An interesting response to this irrational philosophy. The contradictions have reached a point that an explanation is no longer needed. There is so much in this world that I do not understand.

See that machine? It has something to do with recycling our water supply. I have absolutely no idea how it works, but I do understand the reason for it to work. I have absolutely no idea how you were able to do some of the things you do, but I believe there's a reason for that as well. I only hope we understand that reason before it's too late.

 Read between the lines and you will see that this stansa hides Neil's true nature. Hammond compares Neo to a machine. The machine's purpose is to recycle water, keeping them alive. Hmon understood that Neo also had a purpose, but he did not understand what that purpose was. Hammond basically does not believe in the prophecy.

 He knows that Neo has incredible powers, but has not accepted that the purpose of those powers is to save them. And he is not wrong. Neo's purpose was to return to the source and allow Zion to be destroyed. The purpose of the one was to help the machines, not the humans. Without a doubt, Hammond is a very wise person who noticed the contradiction of the existence of Zion and the prophesized one.

 And these contradictions exist because nothing that has happened makes sense. It was a plan to maintain the balance of the matrix at the cost of the endless cycle of destruction of Zion and the rise of a supposed messiah. Number three, the Oracle is the secret leader of Zion. The bite model that we talked about in a previous video was designed to identify dangerous groups or cults that use mind control techniques to achieve their goals. Every group needs a leader.

 Zion is a place of control. The leader must create a fanciful story to give the people of the city hope and become the architect of future events. In Steven Hassan's influence continuum table, he describes cult leaders using different traits. If the oracle meets any of these traits, we can then classify her as a leader of Zion and a dangerous one at that.

 First on the list is narcissistic psychopath. These personality traits are the most difficult to see in the Oracle because of her facade as the loving grandmother archetype. She does tend to be a little condescending, like the time when she told Neo that he was in charge of his own life. >> Oh, don't worry about it.

 As soon as you step outside that door, you'll start feeling better. You'll remember you don't believe in any of this fake crap. You're in control of your own life. Remember, >> rare moments like this one isn't enough to classify her as a narcissist. Now, being a psychopath, that's a different story.

 A psychopath is a person who tends to be manipulative, cruel, or apathetic, exhibiting deceptive and rash behavior without remorse. Under this definition, several traits do apply to the oracle as she uses deception and persuasion to achieve her goals regardless of collateral damage, including herself, choosing to sacrifice her shell to get Sati into the matrix.

Next on the list is elitism grandiose. From scheduling meetings with her to her entire persona as a prophet, despite just being a program, is manipulative and grandiose. When the anomaly appears in the matrix, the process of creating a new Zion begins, the humans that this anomaly or one chooses to awaken will revere their liberator as a messiah, a supernatural deity, their god.

 This predisposes the red pills to believe in the supernatural and miracles. >> Neo, please. I have a son, Jacob, aboard the Nosis. Please watch over him. >> I'll try. I have a daughter on the Icarus. >> Even though the reality is that the one is just another system of control, this by design makes it easier for the red pills to believe in the Oracle since they have witnessed their savior do unbelievable things.

>> I have absolutely no idea how you were able to do some of the things you do, but I believe there's a reason for that as well. The oracle will grantly present herself as a prophet that is there to help them. The red pill's savior will vouch for the oracle and so they will believe in her. Although neither the one nor the oracle has supernatural powers, everything is a facade under the gaze of the supposed oracle.

>> If I am the father of the matrix, she would undoubtedly be its mother. >> The oracle, please. The architect's scoff reaction is because the oracle is not an oracle. She's a program just like him. The third stage is power hungry. The oracle has repeatedly used the red pills. Yet, she describes the Marravenian as someone who uses others for power and desires more.

>> He is called the Meovvenian, and he will not let him go willingly. >> What does he want? >> What do all men with power want? More power. The oracle labeling the meravenian as power- hungry is hypocritical because she sent Neo to get the keymaker to increase her power and influence.

 She would have the keymaker on her side. And if the Maravvenian only seeks to add powerful programs to his ranks, then by that same logic, the Oracle is doing the same with Sati, Sarif, Rama, the potentials, and even the anomaly. Moving on to secretive, deceptive. In Matrix Reloaded, Neo spent much time looking and waiting for the Oracle.

 She wanted Neo to become desperate. She always speaks ambiguously, never clear, always secretive. The Oracle has important knowledge, but only discloses what's needed to be known. She lies to steer her pawns. >> It was a lie, Morpheus. The prophecy was a lie. The one was never meant to end anything. >> And the final trait is claiming absolute authority.

 The oracle continues to direct the actions of the red pills once the anomaly awakens the new inhabitants. They will follow her orders without knowing why, only because their savior told them to. Although the oracle doesn't ask for absolute authority, her authority is unquestionable. And whoever dares to question the oracle won't matter because many others will serve her purpose.

>> I believe I need every ship we have if we're going to survive this attack. >> I understand that, Commander. >> Then why did you allow the Nebuchadnezzar to leave? >> Because I believe our survival depends on more than how many ships we have. >> The hierarchical structure of a cult usually has a leader at the top who makes up a story or says that they can speak directly or on behalf of God.

 The oracle fulfills the role of the cult leader and prophet that can predict the future and God is the anomaly. After going through the oracle's influence continuum. Unfortunately for those who defend her, we've come to the conclusion that she does meet the definition of a sectarian leader who controls information, her followers behavior, emotions, and worst of all their future.

But do you agree? Is Zion a cult and the Oracle the cult leader? Number two, how was Zion created? First seen in Matrix Reloaded, the city of Zion is an underground city inhabited by the red pills whose hierarchical structure is based on a democratic consulate. We kind of set it up so that the people were above the council, a democracy, and that you had representatives there from each of the ships or representatives from each level of the bottomless pit.

 Humans of all colors and races live in the city. Zion's multiculturalism is one of its most important aspects. Its diversity is meant to represent all of humanity. So Zion, I think, is one of those rare occurrences in Hollywood where it reflects what uh I guess we're calling multiculturalism. Now, >> the city's complexity is also impressive.

 So I think the first drawing I did of the dock, I don't know, it took me two and a half, 3 weeks or something cuz it was so labor intensive and figuring out the perspective. And Owen had done a like a schematic of what the basic shape and what the levels were cuz it was almost like steps that would lead down to the the main like sewer drain if you want.

>> And every 43 m is a major kind of level and in between it there are 10 levels of houses ringing around this naturally formed sinkhole. >> However, the city's most important trait is its technology. Before the machine war, humans lived in mega cities. These giant cities had underground tunnel systems that machines would freely transport goods in and out of the cities.

 The behind the scenes of matrix revolutions mentions this in better detail. >> We figure that at this point the world had got so successful because of the kind of underclass of machines, their slave class. They'd been able to have these big mega cities and these big sewers were here to support those big cities.

 The whole sewer might have been made up of a whole lot of little pipes which are still huge pipes like the one on our left, my left here is a huge pipe where you know maintenance vehicles and things like that go. This is very interesting information as it reveals that the tunnels leading to Zion were built by the machines long before the machine war began.

 These underground tunnels were used by machines to build and sustain mega cities. This paints a clearer picture of where Zion's technologies come from and who created them. The machines know these tunnels perfectly because they created them when they were slaves. The architect has stated that the machines have destroyed Zion five times before and it is the integral anomaly who must create the next Zion.

 This leads us to believe that maybe the areas that the red pills frequently travel to in hovercrafts are the ruins of the previous Zions. bits and pieces of the old cities that the machines left behind. The fact that Zion is located within a cavern is a reference to the symbolism of Plato's cave, one of which we have spoken about many times before.

 In the myth of the cave, a prisoner sense to the outside world, passing from darkness to light, from ignorance to enlightenment. The cave represents a prison of ignorance. Just like Zion, Zion is a prison created by the machines to keep the anomalies and the 1% of humans who rejected the Matrix under control. In Matrix Reloaded, we do catch minor glimpses of people working and building.

 So, the red pills might have built parts of it, but maybe the machines facilitated the red pills with tech they can find to help them build up and maintain the city. There is a Matrix comic book about Zion scavengers. Groups of people who are dedicated to finding ancient technology to use for the betterment of the city.

Maybe the machines left bits and pieces and parts of ships, engines, and other stuff on the surface and in the tunnels for the new inhabitants of Scion to find and build up the new city. The machines monitor every human action underground like a machine-made antill. They gave the red pills the tools to survive without them knowing.

 All for the sake of reaching the end of the cycle and controlling the anomaly. So if you ask us whether or not the machines built Zion, our answer would be yes, but not entirely. The humans thought that they were the ones who built Zion with the technology they found, not knowing that the machines were tricking them, that they were living in an underground city surrounded by tunnels created by the machines hundreds of years ago.

answering the question as to how and why Scion uses advanced geothermal energy technology, building and repairing dozens of ships in a short time. The machines help them because if they do not reach an adequate level of technological prowess, the anomalies would not fulfill their purpose. The train man once said that the fifth Zion was destroyed in 72 hours.

>> 72 hours. traveling 2 hours. >> What did you just say? >> That's exactly how long Zion lasted last time. >> What do you mean? And who are you? >> Me? Nobody. Just a spectator enjoying a ride. While each Zion is different, they share similar traits. They were constructed within the tunnel systems that the machines dug and they were watched up until the day when the city is going to be destroyed.

 Another important cosmetic detail is the color of the doors of the red pills homes. They are all red. In the behind-the-scenes documentary, it was stated that Zion is the human crop fields in reverse. The red pills used to live inside red pods. Now they live behind red doors. that in the first film, everyone lived in a little red house on the outside of a big cylinder and it was a power plant, you know, a pod and in this film, everyone lives on the inside of a cylinder in a little red hole.

Basically, Zion, it's the power pods in reverse. Instead of projecting from a cylinder, they're living inside a cylinder. They've escaped from one environment to basically live in the same environment. But perhaps the most important piece of evidence that the machines built Zion comes from Matrix production designer Owen Patterson.

 He had a theory that machines did create Zion. My theory is that the machines purpose-built Zion for the human being. But you have to have balance within the system. So that you could have a matrix within that. There has to be a sense of freedom or rebellion. So you have to have a Zion. Now, if the Red Pills discovered the truth after Matrix Revolutions, one of two things might have happened.

 Either they left Zion to seek a new home away from the machines, a new city that is protected and that does not depend on the technology provided by their once enemies, or they stayed. And Zion was turned into a city similar to the machine city 01. For the past 20 years, the machines could have been helping the red pills grow Zion into a better city, unrecognizable from how it looked in the original trilogy.

 Perhaps Zion is now inhabited by humans and robots. And a new anti-machine resistance might have emerged to challenge this new status quo. Zion is the perfect prison in the perfect location, a place that provides a false sense of security. No red pill ever question its existence, where the technology comes from, or how they've managed to live in peace underground for so long.

 Nobody questions anything as long as everything is working. But do you agree? Did the machines build Zion and are always watching the humans? And number one, the city of Io is a lie. The machines suffered a massive loss of resources due to the truce. Too many humans woke up from the simulation, causing an energy crisis for the machines.

 Then the analysts discovered a new source of energy, which also came with a new and improved method of controlling the integral anomaly and humanity, emotional manipulation. The oracle sends a message to Morpheus warning of this growing threat. But Morpheus does not heed her warnings. He believes that nothing can undo what Neo achieved. Neo brought peace.

 But not all the machines agreed to set peace. Zion was eventually destroyed permanently this time. As the machine civil war raged on, Naobi saw something she thought impossible. Machines fighting on the side of the humans. Neo did change the world. Naobi started to believe that coexistence was possible. >> Zion was stuck in the past, stuck in war, stuck in a matrix of its own.

 They believed that it had to be us or them. This city was built by us and them. Machine sympathizers helped Naobbi and the survivors of the Zion attack escape. Together they build a new city far from the gaze of the analyst who had successfully usered the matrix from the architect. The city was named Io. The letters I and O are found in the word Zion.

 If you replace the letters with numbers, you get a zero and a one as in city 01. Reaching even further. Placing the one before the zero in binary code means two. So you could say that Io is a second city of humans and machines. a place where they can coexist. This city was not built to be a prison like Zion was.

 New technologies were developed in Io to make life suitable and comfortable for the humans and machines. Together, the citizens of the city grew food and even build an artificial sky with real moisture. Unlike Zion, which was a militaristic society, Io is focused on scientific development and the improvement of the well-being of humans. No longer is it safe for the humans to frequently travel in and out of their home, waiting for the machines to eventually find them.

 Naobbi, the general and leader of Io, places all her focus on keeping the city hidden. Missions to awaken humans from the matrix are rare to the point that very few people awaken anymore. This is why Naobbi got upset with bugs when she arrived with Neo. Although Neo is the one, his mere presence in Io puts the city at risk.

 The city has a memorial for the humans who died in Zion, including a giant statue of Morpheus. Even though it is probably his fault that the city was destroyed in the first place, it is suspicious that it's been over 60 years since IO was built. And the enemy machines still do not know of its existence. And yes, the friendly machines may still be under the control of the evil machines.

 IO may not be a promised land, but rather another matrix. To help you understand this, let's quickly discuss the philosophy behind the new simulation. What did the analyst said about using emotions? You don't give a about facts. It's all about fiction. What validates and makes your fictions real? Feelings. Quietly yearning for what you don't have while dreading losing what you do.

 For 99.9% of your race, that is the definition of reality. Desire and fear, baby. Just give the people what they want, right? >> IO does exactly that. In this city, humans are eating fruits and enjoying technology that makes them feel comfortable, safe, and hidden away from the analyst. If you think about it, Io makes for a great prison, covertly created by the machines, and ironically maintained by Naobi.

 Looking back, we are not that convinced that Io has been able to stay hidden from the machines for decades. We think there is a high probability that this city like the last city of humanity Zion is a creation of the machines to maintain control over the humans. Only this time their prison no longer forces them to eat bug nutrients.

 We believe that the analyst created this new ingenious prison using comfort to keep the humans from interfering with the matrix and that it's only a matter of time before it's destroyed. It is Zion 2.0. Maybe that's why it's called IO or two since it is the continuation of the human prison. If IO is another lie of the machines, then only one person is responsible for subduing humanity, Naobbi, the treacherous general.

 But do you agree? Is IO another simulation of the Matrix? Was Zion truly destroyed or will we see it again in the future? [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Music] for a major. tricks explained. Don't forget to like and subscribe and thank you for visiting the desert of the [Music]