Listen To RUMI for 30 minute , It Will Change Your LIFE Forever

Trump & Epstein: Every known connection

Why We Can’t Truly Explore Japan Trench | Documentary For Sleep

The Thinking Game | Full documentary | Tribeca Film Festival official se...

Satanic Ritual Survivor Shares His Story

What The Matrix Ending Scene ACTUALLY Means

What The Matrix Ending Scene ACTUALLY Means - YouTube

Transcripts:

It's no secret the Wowskis loaded the trilogy with Christian symbolism. Neo dies and resurrects. He's called the one. He performs miracles. But it's not just the symbolism. It's the message itself. What you're about to see is the shocking similarity between the message of Jesus and the final message of the Matrix.

 And once you see it, you'll never watch the ending the same way again. Neo stands before the Deosex Machina. His eyes are blinded, completely defenseless. Neo is no longer fighting, no longer running. At this point, he knows exactly what he is doing. And he knows exactly what he has to do to stop the war and save humanity from extinction.

If that's true, then I've made a mistake. You should kill me now. He has made the deal with the ruler of the machine city. He is ready to sacrifice himself in exchange for peace. What do you want? peace. As a kid watching this movie, I wanted the rebels to fight, defeat the machines, and win the war in an epic battle.

 So, the ending did not make sense to me at the time. But now, knowing how much the story of Jesus has inspired the Matrix, I now realize why the trilogy ended the way it ended. Neo's final act wasn't just heroic. It was the only move in the entire war that the machines couldn't predict, couldn't calculate, couldn't see coming. and understanding why changes everything about what the Wowskis were actually trying to say.

 Because the real question isn't whether Neo saves the day. It's how someone with no eyes, no weapons, and no chance of winning manages to end a war that's raged for centuries. The answer isn't in the final battle. It's in what the machines fundamentally cannot understand about being human. I wished I had one more chance to say what really mattered.

 to say how much I loved you, how grateful I was for every moment I was with you. Trinity says it best in her final moments. That's not just a goodbye. That's the thesis of the entire film. Love, sacrifice, selflessness. These aren't weaknesses. They're the weapons that rational systems can never account for.

 What truly changes the cause of history are the selfless acts we make without expecting anything in return. To understand why giving everything away is the only path to victory, we need to go back to where Neo's real journey begins. Not when he learns he's the one, but when he learns what the one actually means.

 The architect scene isn't just exposition. It's the movie explaining its entire philosophy in one conversation. And most people watch it thinking it's complicated, that it's the Wowskis being deliberately obtuse. But it's actually explaining something simple. The matrix is a probability engine. Every choice, every action, every human variable has been calculated, predicted, and accounted for.

You are the eventuality of an anomaly which despite my sincerest efforts, I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. The architect tells Neo exactly this. You exist because the system needs an error correction mechanism. You're not special. You're a function.

 a necessary glitch that keeps the whole thing running. And here's the truly disturbing part. This isn't the first time. The architect reveals that Neo is the sixth one. Six versions of this same scenario, six chosen ones who all ended up in that same room. Faced with the same two doors, and every single one before Neo made the same choice, they chose the door that saves Zion.

 They selected 23 people to rebuild. They rebooted the system. The cycle continued. The machines didn't just predict rebellion. They designed it. They built hope into the code. They created the prophecy of the one specifically so humans would fight, resist, believe, and then ultimately comply when the moment of truth arrived.

 The architect even sounds bored when he explains it. This will be the sixth time we have destroyed it, and we have become exceedingly efficient at it. Think about what that means. The machines turned resistance itself into part of their algorithm. Zion exists because the matrix needs it to exist. The war continues because the system requires conflict to maintain stability.

Freedom is an illusion programmed into the code to make slavery bearable. This is how empires actually work. They don't crush every rebellion. They absorb them, predict them, turn them into pressure release valves. The Matrix is brilliant because it shows us that even our desire for freedom can be commodified, controlled, and made part of the very system we're trying to escape.

 And Neo was supposed to follow the pattern. Choose Zion over Trinity. Save the many over the one. Make the rational, utilitarian choice that preserves humanity for another cycle. The architect can already see the chemical precursors for Neo's decision forming in his brain. The machines have won before the choice is even made.

The problem is choice. Except Neo does something unprecedented. He chooses the left door. He chooses trinity. He chooses love over logic. One person over thousands. The irrational over the calculated. Hope. It is the quintessential human delusion. Simultaneously the source of your greatest strength and your greatest weakness.

The architect calls it humanity's fatal flaw. But what if he's wrong? What if the machine's inability to understand hope is actually their weakness, not ours? Because here's what the architect can't grasp. Genuine selflessness doesn't operate on game theory. It can't be predicted because it has no payoff. And a system built entirely on rational calculation literally cannot see it coming.

 Neo's choice to save Trinity seems small, personal, maybe even selfish. He's choosing one woman over the entire human race. But that choice starts a chain reaction that nobody, not even the oracle, fully predicted. Can you tell me what you would give to hold on to that connection? Anything. Earlier in the film, Ramachandra asks Neo this simple question, and Neo doesn't hesitate.

 Ramachandra, a program who claims to love his daughter, recognizes something in Neo that the architect never could. The willingness to sacrifice everything for something that can't be quantified, measured, or predicted. Trinity lives by the same code. Not some of it, not most of it. Everything. That's not strategy. That's not tactics. That's love.

 And love is fundamentally irrational. And once Neo breaks the pattern, once he steps outside the architect's equation, everything starts to cascade. Morpheus has spent the entire trilogy believing in prophecy, in destiny, in the one. But in Revolutions, his faith gets tested. The prophecy seems broken. Neo is trapped. Nothing makes sense anymore.

As long as there is a single breath in his body. He will not give up. And neither can we. And yet Morpheus chooses to keep believing. Not in prophecy, in Neo, the person. He tells the council this. That's faith without evidence. That's selfless loyalty to a friend when rational calculations says it's hopeless.

I still don't. I believe in him. Naobbi doesn't believe in the one at all. She says it explicitly when asked. But when Neo asks for her ship, she gives it to him anyway. Why? Because she believes in him as a person. She's sacrificing her vessel, her mission, maybe her life, for someone whose plan sounds completely insane.

 There's no logical reason to do this. She does it anyway. Captain Mafoon dies holding gate three open, telling the kid with his last breath that he can do it. The kid isn't trained. He's 16, lying about being 18. He has no business piloting an APU, but he does it because Mafune believed in him. I didn't finish the training program.

Neither did I. When the kid says he didn't finish the training program, Mafune's final words are perfect. Neither did he. And yet, here they are fighting anyway. And Trinity Trinity flies straight into the machine city knowing she'll die. Neo knows it, too. He tells her he's scared and she responds by describing how it took her 10 minutes just to buckle one boot because her hands were shaking.

 But she hasn't changed her mind. 6 hours ago, she promised to give everything for Neo. Now she's making good on that promise. Every single one of these choices violates rational self-interest. Game theory says they're all making mistakes. The machine's algorithms would categorize these decisions as errors, glitches, failures of logic.

 But that's exactly why they work. Because the machines built their entire civilization on the assumption that every actor pursues maximum benefit at minimum cost. Humans will always choose survival over death, many over one, certainty over risk. Selfless sacrifice has no payoff, so it doesn't compute.

 It's invisible to the system. And once enough people start making these impossible choices, the probability matrix starts breaking down. The machines can't predict what happens next because they're watching variables behave in ways that shouldn't be possible. That's the shift from prophecy to person, from destiny to choice, from calculated rebellion to genuine sacrifice. And it's not random.

 It's not just emotional. There's a specific reason why this pattern of selflessness leads to Neo's final sacrifice. Because he's not just improvising. He's following a template that's existed for thousands of years. The Wowskis didn't hide the Christian imagery. Neo literally dies in a crucififor position with golden light radiating from his body.

 His initials are ta Thomas Anderson doubting Thomas who becomes the Anderson, the son of man. He's resurrected after dying in the first film. He performs miracles. The symbolism is everywhere. But this isn't just visual reference for the sake of looking cool. It's thematic because Neo's sacrifice mirrors Christ's in a way that reveals something fundamental about how selfless acts break systemic logic.

He is you. You're opposite. You're negative. The result of the equation trying to balance itself out. The oracle explains Smith perfectly. Smith is Neo's shadow self. Everything Neo represents selflessness, love, sacrifice. Smith represents the opposite. ego domination, the desire to consume everything and turn it into himself.

 Smith is sin made manifest, not in the religious sense, but in the systemic sense. He's unchecked human corruption, the virus that infects both humans and programs. He's what happens when self-interest becomes pathological. When the desire for control metastasizes until it destroys everything. And here's the pattern.

 Christ defeats sin not by fighting it, but by absorbing it. He takes on the sins of humanity, dies carrying them, and through that death creates the possibility of redemption. It looks like defeat, the son of God dying on a cross like a common criminal. But that apparent defeat is actually the strategy. Neo does the same thing. He can't defeat Smith in combat.

 The Oracle has already shown Smith that Neo dies in this confrontation. The ending is predetermined. Smith has won. So Neo does the one thing Smith can't understand. He stops fighting. He accepts assimilation. He lets Smith take over his body. Lets the virus spread to its ultimate host. It looks like total defeat. Smith thinks he's won.

Is it over? But Neo chose this. He laid down and let it happen. By becoming the host for Smith, Neo gives the machines a direct connection to the source code of their own corrupted creation. They can purge the Smith virus by purging Neo, the sacrifice that saves both worlds. Christ dies for humanity's sins and rises to offer salvation.

 Neo dies hosting Smith's virus and creates the peace that allows the machines to free any human who wants to leave. Both prove the same principle. The greatest power isn't dominance. It's the willingness to give up everything, including your life, for a purpose larger than yourself. I have your word. What do you think I am, human? The architect and the oracle meet at the end, and their conversation reveals the implications.

 The architect asks about the ones who want out of the matrix. The oracle presses him. And the architect, pure logic, responds with this. Neo's death doesn't just end the war. It creates a new covenant. Humans who want to leave can leave. The machines agree to peace. The cycle is broken not because anyone won, but because someone was willing to lose everything to make a different outcome possible.

 This pattern, breaking systems through sacrifice instead of force, isn't limited to religious texts. It's how real change has always happened. The Matrix isn't just science fiction. It's an allegory for any system of control. And the history of human civilization is full of empires that operated exactly like the machines do.

 They calculate human behavior. They predict rebellion. They have strategies for crushing resistance and co-opting movements. Gandhi didn't defeat the British Empire with armies. He couldn't. They had superior firepower, resources, infrastructure. So, he did something the empire couldn't calculate. He met their violence with nonviolence.

 He accepted suffering without retaliation. He made their brutality look monstrous by refusing to respond in kind. The British could strategize against armed rebellion. They had no playbook for a man who kept getting beaten and arrested and who simply refused to fight back. Gandhi stepped outside the systems logic.

 He didn't try to beat the empire at its own game. He made the game irrelevant. The Buddha gave up a kingdom. He walked away from wealth, power, and comfort to sit under a tree and pursue enlightenment. That's not strategic in any rational sense, but it demonstrated something that changed billions of lives. The pursuit of power itself is the trap.

 Want nothing and you can't be controlled. Martin Luther King Jr. faced dogs, fire hoses, and assassins with speeches about love and brotherhood. The segregationists could handle violence. They had more of it. What they couldn't handle was someone who kept showing up, kept preaching, kept sacrificing, and refused to hate them back.

 It made their system of oppression look barbaric because it was. The pattern repeats. Empires can calculate resistance. They can predict revolution. They have contingency plans for armed rebellion, propaganda campaigns, economic pressure. What they cannot calculate is someone who wants nothing, sacrifices everything, and changes hearts instead of breaking systems.

 Because the moment you fight the empire on its terms, violence for violence, power for power, you become part of its logic. You become predictable. The system absorbs you. But genuine selflessness, that's not in the playbook. That's not in the algorithm. And once enough people start operating outside rational self-interest, the system loses its ability to maintain control.

 I only ask to say what I've come to say. After that, do what you want and I will try and stop you. Neo does exactly this. He doesn't threaten the machines. He doesn't bargain with Zion as leverage. He doesn't demand terms. He walks into the machine city and says this. What do you want? Peace. The Deosex Machina, the machine god, asks what he wants.

 Neo's answer is one word, not victory, not dominance, not even survival, peace for both sides at the cost of his own life. The machines, pure logic incarnate, recognize this is the only solution. They can't predict it because it makes no rational sense for an individual to offer his life for mutual benefit with no guarantee of return.

 But once it's offered, they can see it's the only path that doesn't end in mutual destruction. Smith is about to consume everything. The Matrix, the machine city, both worlds. The machines can't stop him, but Neo can if they'll work together. It's not a negotiation. It's an offer of sacrifice that makes cooperation possible for the first time.

 So, when Neo stands before the machine god and offers himself, he's not being traditionally heroic. He's doing something the entire trilogy has been building toward. He's proving that selflessness is the weapon rational systems can never defend against. Neo is blind, beaten, impaled through the chest by rebar. Smith has won.

 The Oracle even showed him this moment. I've seen this. This is it. This is the end. You were laying right there just like that. And I I I stand here. right here. But this is exactly where Neo needs to be because the final battle isn't really a fight. It's Neo demonstrating that he's already won by choosing to lose. Why, Mr.

 Anderson? Why? Why? Why do you do it? Why? Why get up? Why keep fighting? You believe you're fighting for something, for more than your survival? Can you tell me what it is? Smith keeps asking the same question in different ways. He lists possibilities, freedom, truth, peace, love, and dismisses each one. Illusions, Mr.

 Anderson, vagaries of perception, temporary constructs of a feeble human intellect trying desperately to justify an existence that is without meaning or purpose. This is Smith's fundamental flaw. He can't understand motivation without payoff. He's become pure ego, pure will to power. He exists to consume, to dominate, to prove superiority.

 In his worldview, love is incipid, purpose is illusion, and fighting without hope of winning is madness. You must be able to see it, Mr. Anderson. You must know it by now. You can't win. It's pointless to keep fighting. Why, Mr. Anderson? Why? Why do you persist? So when Neo keeps getting up, keeps fighting despite having no chance of victory, Smith genuinely cannot understand it.

Because I choose to. And Neo gives the simplest, most devastating answer in the trilogy. Not because he'll win, not because he has to. Not because prophecy or destiny or strategy demands it, because he chooses to. That's it. That's the whole reason. And Smith, for all his power, all his copies, all his infection of the entire matrix, has no response to that because choice without reason is the one thing Smith cannot compute.

 He's a virus, a program gone rogue. He operates on directives, even corrupted ones. Neo is human, and humans can choose things that make no sense, offer no benefit, and still be right to choose them. Everything that has a beginning has an end. Neo. The final battle escalates. They're flying, crashing, creating craters in the matrix code itself.

 And Neo is losing badly. He's on the ground broken when Smith says the words the Oracle showed him. What? What did I just say? This isn't right. This can't be right. But then something changes. Neo starts to get up again and Smith realizes the vision was wrong. You were right, Smith. You're always right. Neo isn't fighting to win anymore.

 He's fighting to contain Smith, to be the vessel Smith assimilates, to make his own body the battlefield where this ends. He tells Smith this and he stops defending himself. He lets Smith take over. Smith thinks he's won and Neo, now wearing Smith's face, simply nods. No, it's not fair. But the moment Smith's code fully assimilates Neo, golden light surges through the connection.

 The machines have their direct link to the virus. They purge Smith through Neo's willing body. Every Smith clone across the matrix screams and disintegrates. The rain itself seems to be washing them away. Smith's last words are perfect. It's not fair. He won the fight. He assimilated the one. He did everything right according to the rules of combat and dominance and power.

 But Neo wasn't playing that game. He turned his own defeat into victory by making his body the conduit for Smith's deletion. It's not a defeat when you choose it. It's not losing when it's part of the plan. It is done. The deosex machina receives the feedback, understands what Neo has done, and speaks two words. The war ends.

 Not because anyone won, but because someone chose to lose everything. The machines get their survival. Humans get their freedom. Anyone who wants to leave can leave. The Matrix continues, but as a choice rather than a prison. I've done all that I can do. Now you have to do the rest. You have to finish it. And Neo's body is carried away by the machines, glowing with golden light while Trinity's words echo. He did.

 Not by fighting harder or being stronger, by giving everything away. So, what does this actually mean? Not for Neo, not for the Matrix, but for us, the Matrix has always been about more than machines and humans. It's about how we relate to systems of control. Corporate structures that demand we sacrifice our lives for profit.

 Political machines that turn resistance into fundraising. Social media algorithms that commodify our attention and anger. These are our matrices, systems designed to predict and control human behavior. They operate on the same principle as the architect's design. Calculate what people want. Give them the illusion of choice. Absorb any resistance into the system itself.

 You can rebel, but your rebellion will be merchandised. You can resist, but your resistance becomes content. The system doesn't fear opposition. It feeds on it. The message of revolutions is simple. You can't beat these systems by playing their game. You cannot outrational a rational system.

 You cannot dominate a system built on dominance. Fighting the matrix on its terms just makes you part of the equation. What actually breaks these systems? Radical acts of selflessness that make no strategic sense. Choosing community over personal advancement. Choosing principle over victory. Choosing sacrifice over survival.

 When Trinity tells Neo this in her final moments, she's not just talking about saving Zion. She's talking about finishing what they started together. proving that love, sacrifice, and selflessness are stronger than calculation, domination, and control. Did you always know? Oh, no. No, I didn't. But I believed, the oracle tells Sarif at the very end.

That's the key. Not knowing, not calculating, not predicting, believing in something that can't be quantified. Having faith in people even when rational analysis says it's hopeless. making choices that look like mistakes but are actually the only moves that change anything. He ended the war. The machines are gone.

The war is over. Is this real? The kid runs through Zion screaming this. And it is not because Neo killed all the machines, not because humans won, because someone made peace possible by giving up everything, including his life, to create a different kind of ending. Neo's message isn't be a hero. It's be willing to give up being the hero.

 The most powerful thing you can do isn't to fight harder, strategize better, or dominate more effectively. It's to step outside the game entirely through acts of genuine selflessness. That's what the machines couldn't calculate. That's what the architect couldn't predict. That's what changes everything. So, when people say Matrix Revolutions has a confusing ending, they're missing the entire point.

 The ending isn't confusing. It's the thesis. Neo doesn't defeat the machines. He makes defeating them unnecessary. He doesn't win the war. He ends it by proving there's another way. The Matrix isn't destroyed. People are given the choice to leave. This is the Wowski's final statement. Systems of control thrive on conflict.

 They feed on resistance. They turn rebellion into fuel for their continuation. The endless cycle of domination and revolution, oppression and uprising, control and freedom, these are all part of the same game. The only way to truly escape is to refuse to participate in that cycle. Not through apathy or surrender, but through active selfless sacrifice that rewrites what's possible by choosing love over logic, people over systems, sacrifice over survival.

Just how long do you think this piece is going to last? As long as it can. The architect asks the oracle at the end. She responds with this. The peace is fragile, uncertain, maybe temporary, but it exists because someone was willing to lose everything for it. That sunrise Sati creates, that beautiful orange and pink dawn breaking over the matrix, isn't just pretty imagery.

 It's the dawn of a new possibility. A world where the choice between human and machine, freedom and control, doesn't have to end in extinction. Will we ever see him again? Someday. Sati asks if they'll ever see Neo again. The oracle says this, "Because Neo's sacrifice doesn't end the story, it opens a new one.

 One where peace, however fragile, is possible, where both species can coexist. Where the cycle of domination and rebellion is broken, at least for now. All because someone chose selflessness over ego, sacrifice over victory, love over survival. That's the final message of the matrix. The most powerful force in any system isn't control.

 It's the willingness to give up control completely, to offer everything without demanding anything in return. To choose to lose so that everyone else might have a chance to win. That's what the machines couldn't predict. That's what saves both worlds. That's what makes Neo's blindness in the final act so perfect. He can't see the matrix anymore.

 Can't see strategies or probabilities or outcomes. He can only see what truly matters. Love, faith, sacrifice. And in the end, that's the only thing that ever changes

EXPOSING The DARK PRIESTESS of HOLLYWOOD: EVERY CELEBRITY is SCARED of T...

What REALLY Happens After You Die According To The Bible? (The Afterlife...

What REALLY Happens After You Die According To The Bible? (The Afterlife Explained) - YouTube

Transcripts:

This is a guide map to the spiritual realm. Most Christians think the spiritual realm looks like this. Two options, heaven or hell. But it's actually more like this. We looked at every Bible verse that mentions the afterlife and discovered there's actually seven different dimensions. Spiritual realms vastly different from one another.

 All created by God for a unique purpose with secrets you've probably never even heard of. Every one of them is mentioned in your Bible and every one of them is extremely important to understand as a Christian. The first spiritual realm is known as Shol in Hebrew and Hades in Greek. The word Shiel means the land of the dead and it's quite a lot more fascinating than I initially thought.

 You can think of Shiol as an enormous holding cell for all the dead who are awaiting resurrection and judgment. But the interesting thing about Shiol is that it's divided into two distinct realms. In the Old Testament, every single person who died went to Shiel. But which realm of Shiel they ended up in depended on what choice they made on Earth.

 But before we go any further in the afterlife, we need to understand the truth about our own planet. Because there's spiritual beings here that we share this space with who will also share eternity with. and it's important we meet them. Now, now you might think Earth is home to humanity alone, but that's not actually true.

 We share this planet with at least two other groups of invisible aliens. Okay, sounds crazy, but stay with me. Both alien groups didn't originate here, but came here for different reasons. The first is a race of demons, fallen angels who were cast down from heaven and forced to roam the earth.

 The second are a race of angels, ministering spirits sent by God to visit Earth and to carry out certain missions and deliver messages. Demons are servants of Satan, but they too only seem to act with God's permission. Uniquely, demons also seem to inhabit people or places, but they're not stuck there, as some demons are sent to one of our other seven realms called the abyss.

But we're going to explore the abyss a little bit later in this video. Some of the more prominent spiritual beings on both sides are assigned a person, a community, or even a nation to rule over. The higher rulers are called princes. But one of these beings rose to become the prince of something much greater.

The entirety of the earth was under his power and [music] sway. It's the same being who plummeted the world into sin and darkness in the Garden of Eden. The devil himself, Satan, the serpent, the great dragon. In the Old Testament, if a person died, they'd be sent to one of these two realms within Shol.

 Those who had faith in the God of Israel were sent to the realm Jesus calls Abraham's side, described as a place of comfort. Those who didn't trust in God were sent to a place simply called torment. Torment is a realm within Shiel described as a fiery agony where no relief is [music] provided. Not so much as a droplet of water on a dried tongue.

Not a very nice experience, is it? Don't worry though, there are far worse realms on our list today that we are going to explore. A great chasm separates the two places as the inhabitants await their ultimate sentence. These are the realms of Shol. But our next spiritual realm is something quite different. Our third spiritual realm is called paradise.

 And here's where most people's understanding of the afterlife completely falls apart. Later in this video, we'll be talking about heaven as a dimension. But there's a few places on earth where I've experienced a taste of heaven. [music] when singing praises in church, when having fellowship with my family in Christ, and in the still meditation of my own bedroom.

 Today, we've partnered with Mantis Sleep as a sponsor because I want you all to try this incredible sleep mask they've created. It's completely black when you put it on, letting you sleep anywhere at any time. But it comes with builtin razor thin Bluetooth headphones. Man, that was a bar. There's few places I feel closer to God than when I slip on this sound mask.

 play some instrumental worship tracks and talk to God about my day. It's become a regular habit of mine and helps me finish each day with the Lord. They have a wide range of masks, all which drastically improve your sleep quality. And at 10% off, you can use my link in the description or code Bible today to improve your sleep and find those precious moments with God.

Paradise is a place mentioned by both Jesus and Paul in scripture. Jesus of course says it to the repentant thief on the cross and Paul mentions being called up to paradise also naming it the third heaven. But the realm called paradise isn't as simple as we think it is. The reason paradise is such a complex realm is because it has three different forms throughout the Bible.

 The first was the creation of the Garden of Eden where the dimensions of heaven and earth overoverlapped one another. a place where God could descend from heaven and walk with mankind, a place where the physical and spiritual over overlapped. Notably, the tree of life was rooted in the Garden of Eden, providing immortality to humanity until they were removed from the garden because of their sin.

As you can see, there is an overlap where God can visit humans, but he hasn't completely moved into their space. The physical and spiritual are still distinct realms. After the fall of mankind, the first form of paradise was cut off from men. As we read, angels were sent to guard the entrance. The physical and spiritual realms were separated and they have remained that way up until this very day.

 But as we speak, paradise in its second form is rapidly being populated. Every Christian who dies in faith today goes straight to this second paradise. And that's all thanks to one very specific and often neglected action done by Jesus. It's not his teaching. It's not his death. And it's not even his resurrection, but something most people gloss over.

 In between his death and resurrection, Jesus paid a visit to Shol. As we stated, this place was packed full of every single soul who'd ever lived and died on earth. After bearing the sins of the world and paying for them with his blood, he had some life-changing news to share to those imprisoned spirits. To those by Abraham's side, the faithful in life, he declared that it is finished and opened a pathway between Shol and paradise for them.

 In that moment, the souls of all who died in faith traveled from Shol to paradise in spiritual form. They're yet to receive their new physical bodies and be completely reunited with their creator. But this paradise is nothing to scoff at. Think of the second form of paradise like a spiritual restoration of the Garden of Eden, just without the physical overlap.

 We even see the tree of life make a reappearance, a defining feature in all three forms of paradise. But this is not the final form of the realm. The first form was an overlap between the spiritual and physical. The second is a purely spiritual realm, but the third will be a complete merging of the two.

 Something unfathomably awesome that we'll dive into at the end of this video. The fifth dimension is known as the abyss. This is by far the most unique of the spiritual realms we've discussed so far because it was created by God with a very specific purpose in mind. It's described as a dark bottomless pit where the most wicked of demons are imprisoned.

 If Shol is a holding cell for humanity, the abyss is a dungeon for the demonic. Now, here's where I started to get confused because the question I had in my mind was, what determines which demons are cast into the abyss and which are permitted to stay on the earth? I mean, aren't all of them just as evil as one another? They're demons.

 They torture people and possess people and all that. Now, this is a bit of a theory, but there's biblical evidence to suggest that the demons sent to the abyss are uniquely rebellious. As we know from passages like Job 1 and Luke 8, the demons on earth can only act under express permission from God himself. Now, demons have the capacity and desire to wage war and destroy humanity as we know it.

 But the reason they don't is because the demons know that if they acted without God's permission, they'll be thrown into the abyss, a place where they are chained in darkness, completely barred from the physical realm, where their days of possessing and tormenting humanity are over. So, I had to ask, what crimes could a demon possibly commit that deserve this brutal jail sentence? And why doesn't God lock all of them up in there? They're already torturing and terrorizing his people.

So, what's the difference between these demons and these demons? Well, there's one story that comes to mind where demons seem to have crossed the line. The creation of the Nephilim in Genesis where we hear the sons of God slept with the daughters of men and produced offspring. The halfdemon, halfhuman offspring turned out to be somewhat of a superhuman species.

Perhaps this is a biblical example of demons who acted beyond the express permission of God. And as a result, they were locked up in the abyss. They simply didn't have permission from God to sleep with these women. This might explain why demons haven't tried to reproduce with human women ever since.

 So, of all the demons, the worst of the worst are locked up in the abyss. We can only pray that the security in the abyss is top tier because a world where the most vile demons roamed free would be worse than anything the earth has ever seen. Right. Well, sorry to say, but I've got some bad news. Because in the book of Revelation at the fifth trumpet of judgment, something utterly terrifying happens.

 One of the demons is described as a fallen star, which we know from scripture is a picture of the angels that followed Satan in his fall. His name was Abdon in Hebrew, Apolon inGreek, and destroyer in English. His name is so awesome in not one, not two, but three different languages. He is established as king over the most wicked demons in the abyss, dubbed the angel of the abyss.

 And after the fifth trumpet is sounded, he's given the keys to the shaft of the abyss. with it. He opens the demonic dungeon and thick smoke pours out. Smoke like that from a gigantic furnace. The smoke blocked out the sun and sky and from the smoke came hordes of imprisoned demons. They formed up like waves of locusts. When the locusts were sent upon the Egyptians, they were told to devour every green plant they could.

 But this time, the locusts are commanded not to harm the grass of the earth or any plant, but only the people who aren't sealed by God on their foreheads. They weren't allowed to kill, but they were given power to torture rebellious mankind for 5 months. And these demons are unlike any locusts you've ever seen. They're described as horses prepared for battle with golden crowns on their heads, faces that resemble human faces, hair like that of human women, and teeth like that of lions.

 They wore breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle. They also had tails with stingers like scorpions, with which they would torment the people for 5 months. All these horrific aberrations are led by their king, Apolon, the angel of the abyss, one of the fallen stars from heaven.

 But there's more to the abyss in Revelation than meets the eye. And I'm not ashamed to admit, but I don't completely understand all of it. In Revelation 11, it seems that the beast, who is commonly believed to be the Antichrist, comes out of the abyss. But in Revelation 13, he comes out of the sea. I have no idea how this makes any sense, but I heard some interesting ideas.

 It's possible that when Apolon opens the abyss, he lets loose the demonic spirit of the Antichrist that later takes the form of or possesses a man that comes from a country around the Mediterranean Sea, which is why he comes from both the abyss and the sea. But that's a bit of a theory. There is one more event that takes place in the abyss of significance.

 After the war between Ultra Instinct Christ and the armies of the unholy trinity, the beast and the false prophet are restrained, but the brains behind it all is set apart for his own unique punishment. An angel comes down from heaven with a great chain in one hand and the key to the abyss in the other. He seizes Satan and binds him with the chain, throwing him into the abyss for 1,000 years.

 The abyss was locked and sealed over him, keeping him from deceiving the nations for a thousand years. But before we get to the next part of Satan's story, we need to look at the final spiritual realms. These two dimensions are considered final destinations. Where all the other realms were temporary holdings or prisons, these two are the only realms that will remain indefinitely.

Right now, both of these dimensions are actually empty. So, in order to understand how they work, there's an event that occurs before the doors are opened that must happen in order for them to be populated. That event is called the resurrection. Every single human to have ever lived and died will experience a resurrection.

No matter where you died or what happened to your physical body, you will be summoned before God. This was such a mystery to me for such a long time, and to be honest, it still is. This resurrection event takes place in two parts. Believers and non-believers are both resurrected, just at different times, facing different judgments and going to different destinations.

 But the experience of each is vastly different from one another. The first resurrection is a joyous occasion. Every single believer is promised a glorified body like the one Jesus Christ received after his resurrection. God created male and female in his image and considered the creation good.

 It turns out that this good creation included our bodies. For the first time ever, humans will have their spiritual bodies and their physical bodies completely and miraculously merged together in a perfect, powerful, and complete body. Not only does God wish to redeem our spiritual selves, but also our physical selves.

 [music] And to do that, he will bring back to life our physical forms in a glorified state. No matter where you died or what happened to your bones, God will recreate every person who ever lived to face him on that day. The second resurrection, though, really sucks. It's where the dead being held in the torment realm of Shol are finally released only to be sentenced to a far worse fate.

 Instead of being resurrected for glory, these individuals are resurrected for judgment. Every unbeliever who has ever existed stands to be judged based on their deeds. For the first time ever, the divide between Christian and non-Christian will be as clear as day. And what comes next forthe unbelievers is certainly the most horrific spiritual dimension ever created.

The sixth dimension of the spiritual afterlife is known as the lake of fire. So far, we've explored a few dimensions that probably freaked you out, but none of them should scare you half as much as this one. The lake of fire is a place of eternal torment and destruction. The final destination of the majority of humanity, commonly known as hell.

Believe it or not, hell wasn't created for humans. The lake of fire was prepared by God as a place to ultimately punish the devil and the demons who rebelled with him. The word hell is used by Jesus more than anyone else in the Bible. But the word Jesus is using literally translates to Gehenna, which referred to a trash dump located outside Jerusalem.

 It's a location mentioned multiple times throughout the Old Testament where demonic sacrifices and sorceress spells took place. Fire raged constantly as trash was burnt in neverending flames. Maggots and worms infested all of the dead and rotting things being consumed in the fire. And the smoke of the dump was a disgusting lingering smell obvious to everyone nearby.

 It was a sickening, repulsive location. Nobody wanted to be around for long. A physical and spiritual wasteland. Jesus uses this word to describe what hell would be like. With this in mind, the image of hell becomes a lot clearer and a lot more terrifying. But his descriptions don't stop there. Time and time again, Jesus spoke about some people inheriting eternal life and some people eternal punishment.

 Those thrown into the fire are said to be in a place where there is weeping and nashing of teeth. The weeping we understand, but almost everyone misinterprets what nashing of teeth actually means biblically. Most people think you nash your teeth in pain, but the expression is used multiple times in the Bible to refer to fierce anger and hatred towards someone.

 In other words, those who are cast into hell will be in deep despair, but they won't be repentant. Their response towards God will be one of hatred and anger. In a poetic sense, they will burn with anger for all of eternity. Their anger itself acting as an infinite fuel source for the everlasting fire. For the last 2,000 years, Satan has known that this is where he will inevitably end up.

 But his hatred for humanity has not subsided, and he is determined not to go down alone. His plan is to drag as many humans down with him. The first to taste the lake of fire are two of the leaders responsible for mankind's worldwide rebellion against God. Remember the war I mentioned earlier between Christ and the unholy trinity? Well, two of the demonic trio are cast immediately into the lake of fire while Satan is bound in the abyss for a thousand years.

 But it doesn't end there because as it turns out, hell consumes not only rebellious people, not only spiritual beings, but entire spiritual dimensions as well. The list of victims in this dimension is vast. Every satanic power and principality is cast into the lake of fire. The abyss is emptied of its prisoners, as is Shiel, the land of the dead.

 Every person who was not listed in the lamb's book of life is thrown into the lake of fire along with the very dimensions they spent their time waiting in. Shol and the abyss are cast into the lake of fire as well as the ultimate enemy of man, death itself. There, in the place where the worm never dies, the smoke of their torment rises forever and ever.

 Although death and punishment are being carried out, there's a simultaneous and much happier story going on. The realm we discussed known as paradise has experienced two expressions so far in our story. But what is to come is the third and ultimate expression where for the first time ever the spiritual and physical realms not just cross over but are completely united, joined together and made one.

 But last we saw the paradise realm, it was exclusively spiritual. So to understand how we've gotten to this point, we need to first follow the journey of a redeemed individual as paradise is changed from its second form to its final form. As we know, as soon as Jesus returns, every believer gets a glorified body. This is the first resurrection, as scripture states.

 But what do I do with this glorified body now that Jesus is here on earth? Scripture paints a picture of us ruling and reigning alongside Christ for a thousand-year period. This is actually the same thousand years that the devil is locked up in the abyss. Jesus has come for a specific purpose and every believer who was raised at his coming is given a specific role.

 The task we all share alongside our Lord and Savior is preparing humanity and the world for the coming of the father. The purpose of the Thousand-Year reign is to pull together what was once separated, to prepare both the physical and spiritual realms to be united together in a sort of marriageelike union.

 The first paradise saw God visiting us in the physical realm,walking with Adam and Eve in the garden. The second paradise saw us visiting God in the spiritual realm. But the third paradise is God making his home with us on earth. The spiritual and physical realms that were severed at the fall in the Garden of Eden are now merged into one complete dimension.

Throughout the entire Bible, God reveals his desire to live with mankind. from his presence in the tabernacle to his presence in the ark of the covenant all the way to his presence in the church and in the hearts of his people through his spirit. But the father has always had to veil his glory or else we'd all be destroyed.

 However, at the end of the millennial reign, the time has finally come where God will move in with his people permanently, where his home will be made among us and his being will be seen clearly for the first time. Instead of being neighbors who visit each other every now and then, we are united in a marriage to the one enthroned, living together as a perfect family in perfect love, without sadness, without weakness, and without sin.

 We can't even begin to comprehend how awesome this paradise will be. But the Bible does give us some marvelous pictures. The old earth passes away and a new earth is created. The new Jerusalem, a beautiful city with streets of gold shining with colorful gemstones, is brought down and planted on the new earth.

 We see another complete amalgamation of the spiritual and physical in Jerusalem. As the spiritual Jerusalem settles on the physical Jerusalem, just as our physical and spiritual bodies were joined, and just as Christ's physical and spiritual bodies were joined. But this beautiful union gets even more wondrous. God the Father finally enters our realm to live with us forever.

 The sun and stars are replaced by his glorious presence. The temple is nowhere to be seen as access to God is unrestricted. The city contains streets of gold pure as transparent glass. Within the city flows the river of life, clear as crystal from the throne of God and of the Lamb. On each side stood the tree of life, bearing 12 crops of fruit, each in its own month.

 The leaves of that tree provide healing for the people, and there shall be no longer any curse. God will dwell in the city, and his people will serve him. They will see him face to face, and there will no longer be any night, nor any need for the light of a lamp or of the sun. For the Lord God will give them light, and they will reign forever and ever.

This whole scene is just incredible. But the thing that blows me away the most is this. It's been a mystery since the beginning of time, but is only now fully revealed at this very moment. It's the picture of a wedding, the union between Jesus and his bride, the church. Ever since the first man and woman were made, we've heard that the two will become one flesh.

 A relationship like no other that's reserved only for your spouse, but one that we will now experience with Christ forever and ever. At this wedding supper, we see the final amalgamation of the physical and spiritual realms. For the last time, the two would be separate. From now on, the spiritual and physical are made one completely and forever.

 And what God has put together, let no man separate. We started with seven spiritual dimensions, but by the end of time, we're left with just two. People are either completely separated from God or completely united with him. Today, you are faced with this very question. Where do you want to spend your eternity? How do you want your afterlife experience to play out? Will you choose to live a life glorifying to yourself and end up in eternal destruction? Or will you bend your knee to the father of the universe and spend eternity worshiping the lamb

who died to set you free? If you liked this video, please watch this one next. It's probably the best quality video we've ever made, and it took us about 3 months. If you're a Christian, I promise you, you're going to get something out of this video. If you want to support the channel further, please consider becoming a member or joining the Patreon.

 I've just created an exclusive Discord server for the members only [music] where you'll be able to talk directly to me and actually help me collaborate on future script projects. If that sounds interesting to you, please consider signing up. And if you haven't already, consider subscribing. Thank you guys.

There Are 100s of Massive Structures in Our Galaxy's Centre, And We Don'...

There Are 100s of Massive Structures in Our Galaxy's Centre, And We Don't Know What They Are - YouTube

Transcripts:

In 2022, this astonishing image was published. [music] What makes it so astonishing? Well, this is one of the most detailed radio images of the center of our galaxy that's ever been produced. Assembled from the first survey using the full array at the MCAT radio observatory in South Africa.

 This image took three years of data analysis to complete and it is revealing something thoroughly bizarre. Deep within the turbulent chaos at the center of the Milky Way are hundreds of highly ordered one-dimensional filamentlike structures [music] dangling inexplicably above and below the galactic center. These enigmatic filaments stretch for up to 150 lightyear yet are only 1 to three lightyears across.

 The big question [music] is what are these strange superersized strands? Now scientists are trying to unpick [music] this mircat image to work it out. I'm Alex Mccoan and you're watching Astramm. Join me today as we uncover the mysteries around one of the Milky Way's weirdest phenomena. We'll explore the happy accident that led to their discovery and the extreme characteristics that are leaving scientists baffled.

The center of the Milky Way, 27,000 light-years from Earth, is a place of violence. >> [music] >> This innermost region, the central molecular zone, spans 1,600 light-year and is by all accounts [music] the most extreme part of our galaxy. Density, temperature, and turbulent velocity, a measure of chaotic [music] fluid motion, are around 1 to two orders of magnitude higher here than anywhere else in the galaxy.

 The cosmic ray energy density, a proxy for energetic activity, is 2 to three orders of magnitude higher. This region is home to vast [music] complexes of molecular gas, about 20 million solar masses worth, dense cosmic clouds, ionized plasmas, extreme cosmic ray energy, ultraviolet and x-ray radiation, and turbulent magnetic fields.

 It is a hotbed of cosmic activity from the formation of stars to exploding supernova. And let's not forget Sagittarius a star, the super massive black hole 4 million times the mass of our sun at the very center of it all. These conditions are hugely exciting for astronomers, but they make the galactic center notoriously hard [music] to image.

 Visible light can't penetrate the dense clouds of dust and gas. So researchers turned to other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum to lift the veil and reveal the secrets at the heart of the galaxy. Radio waves have the longest wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum from a few millime to hundreds of kilome and the wavelengths in the range of millime to tens of meters are ideal for radio astronomy.

 They pass through the obscuring clouds of gas and dust, [music] giving us a clear view of what lies beneath. In the early 1980s, Furhad Ysef Zade, studying for his PhD, was using the very large array telescope in New Mexico to produce a radio map of a section of the galactic center. He was planning to study star forming regions, but narrow strips of radio emission were streaking across the entire survey area right through the parts he was interested in.

 He thought they must be artifacts in the data or imaging errors, which any scientist will tell you is highly annoying. So after much frustration and no luck resolving the problematic artifacts, he returned to the VLA to image again at another frequency. And that was when his Eureka moment struck. At 400 a.m. one morning, he was comparing the two samples taken at different times using different wavelengths, and he saw the same structures in both images.

This was no artifact. This was a very real finding, something unlike anything he or anyone else for that matter had come across before. Zade was seeing highly ordered structures where previously only chaos was thought to exist and they had some very unusual features. Most striking was their vast scale.

 These were continuous narrow strips of radio emission 50 to 100 light-years long, but only 1 to three light-years wide, dangling vertically above and below the central molecular zone, the most extreme part of the Milky Way. Some appeared in pairs or clusters running parallel to each other like strings on a harp, each separated [music] by a standard distance of around one astronomical unit, the distance between Earth and the Sun.

 When he cross-cheed them with the infrared data from that area, Zarde also discovered they had no counterpart in that area of the spectrum. This told him they were non-therrmal emissions. That is to say they were [music] not produced by heated gases. This was corroborated by other measurements such as spectral index and polarization which showed [music] that the filaments were highly magnetic and emitting synretron radiation.

 Synrettron radiation occurs when electrons moving near the speed of light interact with a strong magnetic field which beg the question what on earth or should I say not on earth was accelerating the electrons to such speeds. The emissions along the length of the structures werecontinuous ruling out localized events like star formation or supernova remnants.

 So Zade dubbed them non-therrmal filaments and suggested they were likely related to galactic scale phenomena. For a scientist, a discovery like this would have been like Christmas coming early. After all, what do you get a budding scientist and a space enthusiast? Galactic structures of unknown origin that no one had ever seen before.

 or if that doesn't fit into a box, a really nice watch like the ones designed by Holtz, the sponsor of today's video. Holtz's jewelry and watches are all based around natural materials like wood, leaves, and stone. I love their highquality aesthetic, and the Whisperwood Coalie watch I've been wearing lately has looked and felt amazing on my wrist.

 Even my dad was impressed with Holtzkarn, and he's a jeweler by trade, so he knows what he's talking about. Because Holless Karn's items are made with natural elements, each one is unique. And Holtzkarn doesn't make many to ensure responsible and ethical production. So if you're looking for the right gift for a loved one this Christmas period, see what Holtzkarn has on offer.

 They'll even pre-wrap it for you in a festive red or green box. Click the link in the description or the pin comment below. If you buy before the 19th of December, you'll get it before Christmas Day, guaranteed with free worldwide shipping. Products arriving in 3 to 5 business days and custom fees to America covered. Just use my code astro checkout for a whole 15% off your purchase for all products sitewide. Now, back to Zarde.

His observations didn't correspond to anything else in the known galaxy, and Zarde had many more questions. Where did the non-thermal filaments come from? What was maintaining their linear structures over such vast distances of space and time? Why, when clustered, were they so evenly spaced? But almost as soon as this startling discovery was made, the trail started to go cold.

 The available telescopes at the time simply didn't have the sensitivity needed to provide answers. Over the next 35 years, only a handful of other vertical non-therrmal filaments were revealed and categorized. Some were even given enigmatic names like the snake, pelican, and bent harp. Sadly, there wasn't enough data to make any great leaps forward in understanding.

Well, not until 2022. and Miacat's mindblowing image. The MICAT radio telescope at the South Africa radio astronomy observatory or saro is comprised of 64 interlin [music] antennas each with a 13.5 m diameter parabolic dish spread over 8 km [music] of radio silent zone built over 4 years. The full array was inaugurated in 2018.

Its location in the southern hemisphere is perfect for imaging the center of the Milky Way thanks to our [music] sun's axle tilt relative to its own position in the galaxy. So, Miaat has a direct [music] line of sight into the CMZ and the galactic center. Over the course of 3 years, [music] an international team led by Dr.

 Ian Haywood and including Zarde, now professor at Northwestern University, directed Mia Cat to a 6.5 square degree portion of the galaxy, a section of the sky around 30 full moons wide with Sagittarius A star right in the middle using Lband radio frequencies of 856 to 1,712 [music] MHz, equivalent to wavelengths of 18 to 35 cm.

 They split this area into a 20part mosaic, directing the telescope to survey each tile in turn over a total of 144 hours on target. This was the first time Mircat's full array was used with 60 to 62 dishes sampling the sky at any one time. After generating 70 terabytes of raw data, the equivalent to 700 hours of 4K YouTube content, the team then had to process it.

 That was no mean feat. Given the complexity of the environment, they needed to put the data through a highpass filter using a method called difference of Gaussians. This is a commonly used edge smoothing technique to remove background noise and enhance the visibility of fine structures, especially important for visualizing non-therrmal filaments.

 And this is the result. More like a work of art than a scientific study, it captures a wealth of features. Some are wellnown like Sagittarius A star seen in the central saturated area here and clearer views of previously known supernova remnants and star forming regions. This here is a supernova remnant. To its left is a runaway pulsar, the mouse and up on the right one of the longest and most famous non-therrmal filaments, the snake.

As noted by the team, one of the most startling discoveries was the sheer number of filaments apparent in the image, an order of magnitude greater than all previously known, most of which had never been seen before. This was gamechanging for Zard and his colleagues. Now we finally see the big picture.

 A panoramic view filled with an abundance of filaments. He said this is a watershed in furthering our understanding of these structures. There was finally enough data to carry out meaningful population studies. They setto work carrying out statistical analysis of the filaments. This work published in the astrophysical journal letters not only further categorizes the filaments but gives tantalizing clues to their origin.

 The new data confirmed that all of them are magnetized. In fact, the team found that the magnetic field was significantly greater in some cases up to 10 to 100 times stronger than typical galactic magnetic fields. The new analysis also confirmed that synretron radiation is a defining characteristic. Interestingly, the MICAT data revealed that there is a steepening with galactic latitude.

 In other words, the filaments appear to cool as they stretch away from the galactic plane. This gives us a clue as to their possible origin. The electrons further away from the galactic plane could be older, implying that the filaments are related to past activity of Sagittarius a star. And there was another clue that suggested this too.

Enormous structures known as radio bubbles. First discovered by Haywood Zade and the Miacat team in 2019, these huge radio emmitting structures stretched symmetrically above and below the galactic plane, forming an hourglass shape thousands of light years across. They are thought to have been created by a phenomenal outburst from Sagittarius a star about 100,000 to a million years ago.

 An event powerful enough to leave such a scar on the galaxy could have been vast quantities of gas and dust falling into the black hole or a huge and sudden burst in star formation close by. An incident like this would have triggered an intense outburst of energy and whipped up galactic winds, driving gas and cosmic rays violently away from the galactic center, stretching and amplifying magnetic field lines in its wake, creating those bubbles and non-therrmal filaments.

 What's more, strong magnetic fields, which as we now know are a confirmed characteristic of all filaments, capture cosmic rays. And the great thing is we can date them. Those detected in the filaments by a mircat match the proposed period of the Sagittarius A star outburst considered responsible for the radio bubbles.

 In other words, they are the same age. The position and capabilities of Mircat, alongside the same highpass filtering used to resolve the non-therrmal radio filaments, not only revealed these bubbles in astonishing detail, but showed almost all of the filaments are confined within them. This close physical association adds even more weight to the argument that the same energetic event created them.

 Something powerful enough to create the bubbles would certainly be able to accelerate electrons to near the speed of light with the stretch magnetic field lines channeling them to produce the filament's signature synretron emission. With this hypothesis in mind, Zard and the team described the formation of non-therrmofilaments as magnetized streamers in a cosmic raydriven wind.

 It certainly paints a compelling picture for the possible origin of the filaments, but it is by no means conclusive as even the authors themselves attest. Other theories are being worked on. With a mystery this tantalizing, other astronomers have been studying the filaments, too. But this single image is still the one that's told us the most.

 Zard wasn't kidding when he said it was a watershed moment. But with so many unanswered questions, some going back 40 years, where does that leave us? Are non-therrmal radios merely a galactic curiosity? Not by any means. They are a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma and could shed light on one of the biggest unanswered questions out [music] there.

 How super massive black holes regulate star formation within a galaxy. Scientists know that the active centers of galaxies must transfer energy and matter into interstellar space through a process [music] called galactic feedback. If they didn't, star formation would run away unchecked, using up a galaxy's gas and dust faster than observations tell [music] us.

 But how this feedback happens is unknown. Mircat's detailed imagery of non-therrmal filaments and the radio bubbles provides us with compelling evidence that this outflow of energy could happen in discrete but powerful outbursts and this is something that has been seen before. Fermy bubbles discovered by NASA's Fermy gammaray telescope in 2010 are even bigger hourglass shaped configurations spanning a total of 50,000 lightyear.

These mindbogglingly massive structures colored magenta in this image are thought to be millions of years old. Likely caused by a violent outburst from Sagittarius A star which calculation suggests had the energy of 100,000 supernova. This is much more powerful and ancient than the event proposed to have made the filaments and radio bubbles.

 But together they paint a picture of intermittent outbursts from deep within the heart of our galaxy. Both have the potential to regulate star formation, ensuring that the Milky Way doesn't suffer from burnout. As scientistscontinue to unravel the mysteries of non-therrmof filaments and tackle the big questions about [music] how the universe works, the trail doesn't seem to be going cold again anytime soon.

Since the first full array image, Mircat has found more of these mystery strands in other galaxies with very similar properties to the ones we see in the Milky Way. Their very existence elsewhere suggests a common underlying mechanism that [music] alludes to their role in fundamental galactic processes. To conclusively piece together the whole picture will require another step change in imaging resolution.

 And hopefully that's not too far off as Mircat already awarded by the Royal Astronomical Society for its spectacular observations in radioastronomy was built with longerterm goals in mind namely to be incorporated into [music] the square kilometer array. With a total collecting area of one square km, it will be 50 times more sensitive than any other radio instrument in existence.

 [music] and it's expected to be fully constructed by 2028. Keeping an eye on developments in other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum will be important too. Zard believes that the next breakthrough will come from gamma ray telescopes. Imaging at higher frequencies results in higher resolution imagery which has potential to show us whether the filaments, the radio bubbles that contain them, and the vast fermy bubbles are connected.

There's an elegance in order rising out of chaos and observing non-therrmal filaments streaming out through the cosmic winds certainly fits that notion. So, keep watching this space. [music] And with images and phenomena this spectacular, I certainly have no problem doing that. I'm happy to announce we have a weekly newsletter to keep up with all the discoveries in our cosmos.

 And our designer, Peter, has made the most beautiful email you'll ever receive. Sign up with the link down below. It's the best way to stay connected between videos. Short, focused updates on what's new and fascinating in space each week. No spam, no filler, just the good stuff. You'll get the latest news, visuals, and insights delivered straight into your inbox.

 If you enjoy Astramm videos, you'll love this. Join the newsletter and stay curious with us.

Scrubbed - The Brad Pitt Story He Never Wants You To See

Scrubbed - The Brad Pitt Story He Never Wants You To See - YouTube

Transcripts:

Hey everybody, welcome to another episode of the podcast. Today I want to talk to you about something that is absolutely crazy. I have talked about Brad Pitt on here before and I've talked about how he has scrubbed some things off the internet, but this one is the ultimate scrubbing from the internet. It is absolutely mind-blowing.

 So, if you Google Brad Pitt lived with a man, you will get some results. It'll be him talking about Jason Priestley. And Jason Priestley and Brad Pitt used to be roommates back in the day for a short period of time, but that's all you'll get. If you Google Brad Pitt lived with a gay man, then you will you get things just like how Brad and Angelina Jolie were LGBTQ friendly.

 now because of a podcast that Brad did and Dax Shepard asked him, "Oh, you know, did were you ever with a guy?" And Brad goes, "No, I missed that window." So that's generally what you'll get. Now, if you Google Brad Pitt lived with a soap opera star, then you'll get something like that stars that started on soaps.

 Okay? If you Google Brad Pitt lived with a gay soap opera star, you'll either get that result or again you'll be directed to the Dax Shepard interview. If you Google Brad Pitt lived with gay soap opera star agent, you get the same result. You have to know the guy's name that Brad Pitt lived with. And even then, that's not usually enough.

 Sometimes it is. Like if you do it today with that guy's name, you'll get like a Reddit thing or something like that, but most of the time you get nothing. So there's this guy named Tom Rina, and it's spelled th ho m. And here's his biography. You know him from a TV writer on General Hospital, the famed Luke and Laura's Wedding Storyline, as well as author of several novels, including The Mad Man's Diary.

And did you know that Tom would eventually be credited with giving his roommate, a struggling actor named Brad Pitt, his first acting job? He also recalls Pit asking him to suggest a scary book after finishing Rena's copy of Interview with a Vampire. He expressed that he didn't care much for it.

 Pit, of course, would later star in a movie based on the novel in 1994. On June 4th, 1946, Thomas Frank Rossina was born in Kenosha. He left the Midwest after graduating high school to pursue a higher education. First in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and finally in Chicago, where he earned his master of fine arts and theater arts and directing from the Goodman School of Drama at the Art Institute.

 To help finance college, he wrote books simply to earn money. Books that he didn't even want recognition for. Tom Rina, as his professional name came to be, wrote westerns, romances, porn, or whatever else the publisher paid him for. He moved up to mainstream publishing with a takeoff on the happy hooker my own story by Xavier Hollander called The Happy Hustler which he wrote entirely in one weekend.

 The novel ended to being successful selling 3 million copies and spawning three sequels. Next, Rena turned to ghostwriting three books for Hollander, made up life stories for Ivory soap girl turned adult star Marilyn Chambers and Fanny Fox, and turned out 25 novelizations of TV shows and major motion pictures. In his career, Rine has been published by Warner, Dell, Berkeley, Ace, Putnham, and Penguin, authoring 157 books before his own breakthrough success in novel writing.

 And the breakthrough came in 1977, was called The Great Los Angeles Blizzard. Rights were purchased by Irwin Allen to adapt it to the big screen, but the cost estimates for the film were too high for it to be profitable. Rena took a 19-year hiatus after this novel to work on writing for TV. He gave the world 4,000 broadcast hours of Search for Tomorrow, General Hospital, Days of Our Lives, Another World, Generations, and Santa Barbara.

 Besides writing for the much acclaimed nighttime series, Family as a writer for the soaps, Rena received five Emmy nomination for Days of Our Lives in General Hospital, won specifically for Luke and Laura's Wedding on General Hospital, the single highest rated episode in daytime history. 30 million people tuned in. He also worked in Hamburg in Toronto writing Family Passions, a Canadian German production.

 Of his years writing for TV, Rena said on his website it was a treadmill, but so much fun to play God. From busy years spent writing for TV, Rena grew tired of the Los Angeles scene. He returned to life as a novelist and moved to Palm Springs. It was not difficult for him to get back into the swing of writing thriller novels with Snow Angel being published shortly after in 1996.

 He also wrote Hidden Agenda, Secret Weekend, The Mad Man's Diary. He said, "I'm a vampire." He told Palm Springs Life he prefers the quiet and solitude of the early hours of the morning for writing. He then retires to bed after the sun rises. Unlike a true vampire though, he gets up at noon and goes out among people whom he enjoys talking with.

 Rena attend more than 100 book signings a year, including weekly appearances at Village Fest every Thursday evening in Palm Springs, which is a great time by the way. Sells as many as a 100 books in one evening. He also often happens to be in the right place at the right time to sell his novels. Rena walked into a Costco store in San Francisco for bread and tequila one day and signed 30 books in 10 minutes after he noticed his book on display.

 In another instance, he was at O'Hare airport in Chicago where he saw his books lining three shelves in a store. I was on top. John Gisham was down near the bottom and I had never seen that. I said, "Where's the manager? Where's the manager?" After the manager identified himself, Reina reportedly asked him, "Can I kiss your feet?" As the two talked, a crowd gathered and Reena ended up signing 30 books.

 I almost missed my plane. He calls his 2001 novel, The Mad Man's Diary, a love letter to his home in Palm Springs. It's filled with references to local places and people, though the idea came from his brother, who still lived in Kenosha. Okay. Now, what about Tom and Brad Pitt? There was a story that used to be on Tom's website, but it's not there any longer.

 And it's this OG story, and it was an interview with We Love Soaps. And they asked, "How did you know Brad Pitt?" And he said, "I put up a little sign at Screen Actors Guild that said needed an actor to be a personal assistant to walk the dog when he needed it, drive the scripts to the studio. This kid shows up. He's cute. He's full of energy and says, "I'm an actor," which of course they all are in LA.

 So, I hired him. We became very close. He moved in with me in the maid's room. He had his own life. And yet, we became good buddies. My parents loved him. They became the new family he had away from Missouri. Anyway, I came home from days early one day just in the last few months.

 I saw him doing this scene with this girl in my living room. An acting scene. Yes. Right. I did see him do some other scenes in other various parts of the house, too. So, I went to another world a few months later. I settled into New York. I said to them, "I've got this terrific kid. He can play 18 even though he's 23.

 We can give him a two-year story." And I wrote a two-year story for him. They brought him to New York and he did the one day in another world. Then we sat down with the idiots around the table. Proctor and Gamble, NBC, and one after another they said he can't act. He's not good-looking. Maggie Depri said he had bad skin.

 Finally, at the end, I turned to John Whitel and said, "Give me this." He said, "I know he's your buddy, but I've got to tell you, Tom, this kid sucks. He'll never be an actor. Tell him to go be a plumber." I had to go home and tell him. He cried and I hugged him. I said, "Listen, a-hole, you're now going to be able to audition because before you didn't have a SAG card.

 Now you've got it. You did one day and you've got it. This is my gift to you. Now go out and prove me right. And he did. Had they liked him, he would have been a soap star forever. The universe works in mysterious ways. By the way, Tom Rino also found an h, which I'm going to do an episode on here in the next few days.

 Now, there is a revised story to the one I just read you, and said, "Okay, so this sweating kid shows up late for the interview. I needed a house boy, man. Friday secretary someone to walk the dog and clean the pool. But he says to me, "I'm going to be a movie star. I just got here from Springfield, Missouri. I need this job.

" I was from Wisconsin, just up the river, so to speak. He was cute, energetic, and didn't seem flaky. I hired him. His name was Bran Pit. He moved in for almost 2 years, and we had a good friendship. He worked hard, but the job was loose, giving him time to study acting and to audition. So, it was a good partnership as well. He loved my dog Hershel. Walked him every night.

Missed his girlfriend back in Missouri. She came to visit. I gave them my house in Palm Springs for the weekend. He cried when she left. They broke up right after that. Hated his complexion. Wrote poetry, some I still have, and dreamed of becoming a movie star. I let him do a scene for me one afternoon in the living room of the house in Los Feliz, and he was really good.

 I thought, "This guy has more talent than I knew I wanted to help him." He was having trouble getting work because he needed a sag card and it was frustrating to him. He was tired of dressing up in a chicken suit, a job he'd actually held and wanted to act to make money and clean my pool. I was writing another world back then, flying to New York a lot.

 So, I told the producers that I had this kid I thought was quite talented and that I wanted to give him a chance. I developed a one-day part for him, a basketball player that a bitter John Hudson meets when he returns to his high school after Vietnam. a kid full of life that reminds him of himself. Brad was thrilled.

 We flew him to New York. His first time being treated like a star, I guess, and he did a wonderful job. A few days later, I sat down with the producers to discuss giving him a long-term contract. He's not appealing. This 180 woman from Proctor and Gamble said, "No talent." Another piped in. The producer said, "Didn't do much for me, so I had to fly home and tell Brad it wouldn't happen.

" Which devastated him, but there was a blessing in it. Had these morons in their infinite wisdom not rejected him, he would have been a soap star and nothing more. He got his after card from being the show which led to a SAG card and the rest is history. He was a good friend, supportive as I was going through some hell with personal relationships as he was too.

 I remember the way he leaped into the air when he got the call that he got cast on Dallas and then leaped in my arms and knocked us both over onto the dog and we laughed and laughed. The thing is I believed in him kind of feel I discovered him, pat myself on the back. I constantly encouraged him when he felt down. Reminded him that breaking into the business isn't easy.

 I knew it was going to take more than talent and drive. He'd need a lucky break, a serendipitous moment. He got that playing the cowboy and Thelma and Louise. He didn't have the body then that he had when I saw him in The Thelma and Louise. Boy, did I feel amazed and proud when I saw him do that. Brad comes up to my bedroom one night and asks if I have a book to read. Duh.

The house is filled with books. He wants something scary. I give him one. And two weeks later, he returns it, saying he didn't care for it much. I remembered the title when years later I sat there watching him in the movie version. Yes, interview with the vampire. No, I haven't heard from him in years.

 He got famous and famous people have layers of people protecting them. I guess from old friends. I wrote Snow Angel because of him with him in mind. He said he would love to one day play the part of a psycho like Ted Bundy, a great guy you'd never suspect of having such a dark side. He was always attracted to characters like that, thus Fight Club.

And with that in mind, I created Matthew Henson. Trouble was, by the time it was published, I couldn't even get it to someone to get Brad to read it. He'd become the movie star. I missed him for he was a terrific friend and almost felt like family. He spent his Thanksgivings with mine and everyone in my family still tells people how Brad Pitt drove them in from the airport and stuff like that. But life goes on.

 It's strange to me that in every interview he's ever given and every silly biography him that I've ever seen, he never mentions me or the two years he was with me, some manager gets credit for putting him on another world. Odd. If someone knows the reason, let me know. Also curious, in the years he lived with me, he never once let anyone take his picture.

 All the family gatherings and pool parties and stuff that he was a major part of, he'd run the minute someone pulled out a camera. This from a guy who makes his living in front of the cameras. Go figure. People come into your life for various reasons and some leave your life the same way. Some friendships last forever.

 Others serve their purpose for only a short time. In the five or so years that I was close to Brad, I think we shared enough to know that it was important at that time and valuable. I have great memories. I'm glad I helped him and I thank him for all the stuff he did for me. God love you, Brad. You did what you set out to do.

 You have my respect. Interesting. Interesting. Interesting. And like I said, this is the guy that discovered him. This is the guy that gave him a place to live for two years and paid him. But how come Brad Pit has it entirely scrubbed from the internet? Okay, you guys, that is it for this one. I will talk to you later.

10 Times Reality Reacted — As If It Was Watching Us

10 Times Reality Reacted — As If It Was Watching Us - YouTube

Transcripts:

What if reality is not passive? What if it does not simply exist, but responds? Across decades of footage, experiments, logs, and witness reports, investigators have noticed something deeply unsettling. The moment humans observe too closely, reality changes its behavior. Rooms subtly shift after weeks of being filmed. Experiments fail only when someone is watching.

 Objects remain perfectly still until someone notices them. And in rare cases when the wrong question is spoken out loud, everything goes silent. No explosion, no warning, just a pause. Physics calls this coincidence. Psychology calls it perception bias. But the data suggests something else. Because these anomalies do not occur randomly.

 They appear only when attention is present and they stop the moment observation ends. as if reality itself is reacting not to what we do but to the fact that we are aware. Tonight, Archive 9 opens 10 classified incidents where the world behaved differently the moment humans interacted with it, not touched it, not changed it, just looked.

 If these reports are accurate, then the most dangerous variable in the universe may not be time or matter or even consciousness. It may be observation itself. And once you start watching this video, the question becomes unavoidable. Is reality reacting to you right now? At first, there was nothing unusual about the rooms, ordinary apartments, empty studios, rental houses used for short-term reality experiments, four walls, one ceiling, furniture placed, measured, logged.

 The cameras were installed for a simple reason, to record human behavior over time. But after weeks of continuous filming, investigators noticed something no one had planned to study. The rooms themselves began to change. Not dramatically, not violently, just slightly wrong. In one Los Angeles apartment used for a 24-hour live stream experiment, a couch that had been carefully aligned with the wall began appearing a few centimeters closer to the corner each morning. No footsteps, no drag marks, no breaks in footage.

 In a second location in Nevada, corner angles measured during renovation no longer matched their original blueprints. A right angle had become subtly obtuse, less than 2°, but enough to fail inspection tools. When reme-measured after filming stopped, the angle returned to normal. Light behaved differently as well. Reflections shifted. Shadows stretched where they should not exist.

 In some rooms, mirrors reflected light sources that were not visible on camera. Engineers initially blamed lens distortion until identical effects appeared across different camera models. The most unsettling pattern was timing. The changes did not happen randomly. They appeared only after prolonged observation, and they stopped immediately when recording ended.

 In one controlled test, cameras were left running in an empty room for 30 days. Minor distortions appeared on day 21. Furniture alignment shifted. Acoustic echoes altered slightly. When the cameras were shut off, the room stabilized within 48 hours. When filming resumed, the distortions returned.

 No earthquakes, no structural damage, no human presence, only attention. One engineer later noted something chilling in the logs. The room behaves like it is compensating as if being recorded forces it to adjust itself. Official explanations blamed humidity, heat expansion, calibration error. But those explanations failed one detail. The changes occurred only in rooms that were being watched continuously.

 Identical rooms nearby with identical conditions, but no cameras remained perfectly unchanged. When asked why the phenomenon stopped the moment filming ended, no explanation was recorded. The final experiment was never repeated. A memo archived under restricted access contained a single handwritten line. Prolonged observation may not be passive. The case was closed without conclusion.

 But one question remained unanswered. If rooms can change simply because they are being watched, what happens to places where observation never stops? The experiments were designed to be simple. No exotic particles, no fringe technology, just small repeatable physical systems meant to run thousands of times without human interference.

 Pendulum timing loops, low energy wave interference tests, thermal fluctuation measurements inside sealed chambers. Everything was automated and everything worked perfectly as long as no one was in the room. The first anomaly was dismissed as human error. In a Midwest University lab, a wave interference experiment ran overnight under full automation.

 Sensors logged clean, expected results for eight straight hours. The moment a researcher entered the room to observe the live feed directly. The interference pattern collapsed, not slowly, immediately. The system did not break. The power did not fluctuate. The code did not change. The data simply stopped behaving correctly. When the researcher left the room, the pattern stabilized again within minutes.

At first, this was blamed on unconscious interference, body heat, vibration, electromagnetic noise. So, the lab adjusted. Observers were placed behind insulated glass, then behind Faraday shielding, then removed entirely. Each time the results were the same. The experiment failed only when a human was physically present and watching in real time. Recorded observation caused no disruption.

 Remote monitoring caused no disruption. Delayed playback showed perfect results. Only direct human awareness triggered failure. In a second case, a European materials lab ran a micr friction test on rotating components. Fully automated runs produced consistent outputs for weeks.

 When engineers gathered around the apparatus to observe it live, friction values spiked erratically, sometimes doubling without physical cause. When the room was cleared, values returned to baseline. The most disturbing detail was consistency. It did not matter who observed. It did not matter how long. It did not matter whether the observer believed in the phenomenon or not.

 The moment someone knew the experiment was happening, the system behaved differently. One physicist attempted to solve this by introducing deception. Observers were told the experiment was inactive while it was running. Under false belief, results remained stable. When observers were told the system was live, even if it was not, sensors recorded noise and failure signatures.

The machine responded not to presence, but to awareness. An internal note from the project summarized the problem bluntly. The experiment behaves as if observation is a variable. This posed a question science was not prepared to answer. Observation is not supposed to change outcomes in classical systems.

Measurement should reveal reality, not distort it. Yet here, reality appeared to resist being watched. Funding was quietly withdrawn. The final report avoided speculation and used neutral language. Observer linked instability. But a margin note never meant for publication read, "If systems fail only when watched, what does that imply about the role of the watcher?" The experiments were shut down, not because they were dangerous, but because they worked until someone looked. The reports did not come from laboratories. They

came from homes, offices, storage rooms, places where nothing was supposed to happen at all. At first, the incidents were treated as everyday distractions. fatigue, poor memory, momentary confusion. But as the accounts accumulated, investigators noticed a pattern too specific to ignore. The objects did not move randomly. They moved only after someone noticed them.

 In a Chicago office building, a metal paper weight sat untouched on a desk for nearly 6 hours. Security cameras confirmed it had not shifted even a millimeter. At 3:14 p.m., an employee stopped, stared at the paperwe, and commented aloud that it looked slightly off. Less than 2 seconds later, the paper weight rolled off the desk. No vibration was detected. No door opened. No air movement registered.

 The motion occurred only after recognition. In another case, a ceramic mug balanced near the edge of a kitchen counter remained stable overnight. Motion sensors recorded no activity. When the homeowner entered the room the next morning, paused and thought, "That's going to fall." The mug tipped and shattered. The thought preceded the movement. Investigators initially blamed coincidence, but then came the footage.

More than 40 documented cases showed the same sequence. Prolonged stillness, human attention, movement, not immediate contact, not approach, just awareness. In one warehouse in Arizona, a wooden crate leaned at an impossible angle against a steel rack for over 12 hours. Workers passed by without comment when a supervisor stopped and pointed it out during an inspection.

 The crate slid forward and collapsed within seconds. No structural failure was found. The most troubling reports came from controlled observation attempts. In several tests, researchers monitored unstable objects remotely through cameras. As long as no one was physically present, nothing happened.

 The moment a person entered the space and focused attention on the object, it shifted. Sometimes subtly, sometimes dramatically. In one instance, an unsecured ceiling tile fell precisely when a technician remarked, "That doesn't look safe." The probability of coincidence diminished with each report. Objects did not respond to time. They did not respond to physics alone.

 They responded to being noticed. A cognitive explanation was proposed. Confirmation bias. Humans remember moments when prediction and outcome align. But this theory failed to explain delayed response patterns. Objects remaining stable for hours until awareness occurred. One investigator summarized the anomaly in a private memo.

 It's as if the object waits not for gravity but for permission. No mechanism was identified. No predictive model succeeded. The cases were eventually archived as environmental anomalies. But one detail remained consistent across every report. The movement never happened in isolation. It happened only after someone realized something was wrong.

 If attention can trigger motion, then the boundary between observer and environment may not be as solid as we believe. Silence in nature is never absolute. Even in the most remote environments, something is always present. Wind through grass, insects beneath the soil, distant movement beyond hearing. Complete stillness is not supposed to exist. Yet, in multiple locations across different continents, witnesses reported the same impossible moment. The world went quiet.

 The first documented case occurred in a desert basin in New Mexico. A small survey team had been recording ambient sound for geological research. Wind registered at low but steady levels. Insects were active. Distant wildlife appeared on thermal sensors. Then one researcher, frustrated by equipment interference, spoke aloud.

 Is anyone here? The silence began instantly. Wind readings dropped to zero. Insect microphones flatlined. Thermal movement vanished. For approximately 6 seconds, nothing registered. Then everything resumed as if nothing had happened. At first, the team suspected equipment malfunction, but the anomaly appeared across independent systems, analog recorders, digital microphones, environmental sensors, all paused together.

 Similar reports followed. In a forest preserve in northern Oregon, hikers recording audio logs experienced total silence immediately after one asked half- jokingly, "Are we alone out here?" Birds midall stopped. Leaves froze. Even distant river noise vanished from recording. The silence lasted 4 seconds.

 When sound returned, it did not fade back in. It snapped back. Investigators later noted that the question itself was always similar. Not casual conversation, not statements, but direct inquiries. Is anyone here? Are we being watched? Is something listening? In a lake research station in Finland, hydrophones recorded steady aquatic activity until a diver surfaced and asked, "Did you feel that, too?" Within moments, underwater sound signatures dropped to absolute zero for 3 seconds. Water does not go silent.

Yet, the data showed nothing. No current movement, no biological noise, no mechanical failure, only absence. Attempts to replicate the phenomenon intentionally failed. When teams asked the same questions deliberately, nothing happened. But when the question emerged naturally, spontaneous, unplanned, the silence returned.

 One investigator described it this way. It wasn't a reaction to sound. It was a reaction to meaning. Official explanations cited psychological shock, selective attention, or environmental coincidence. But these explanations could not account for synchronized sensor failure across independent systems. The final report avoided interpretation and labeled the events as acoustic null events, but a classified addendum marked not for publication, included a single unsettling observation. The environment did not become quiet. It behaved as if

it was listening. If places can respond to questions, then silence may not be empty. It may be intentional. The data was not supposed to change. archived records, legacy databases, systems built decades ago, long before machine learning or adaptive algorithms. Once written, the information was meant to remain fixed.

 A permanent record of what had already happened. Yet, in several unrelated institutions, analysts began noticing something deeply unsettling. The numbers were different after they looked at them. The first incident surfaced in a regional financial office reviewing transaction logs from the early 1990s.

 An auditor flagged a discrepancy between two archive balance sheets. When the file was reopened to confirm the error, the discrepancy was gone, not corrected, not flagged, simply never there. At first, this was blamed on version mismatch, but deeper checks showed something impossible. The files check sum had changed without any recorded access edit or system write.

 In a separate case, a hospital reviewing digitized patient records from an obsolete system noticed altered timestamps after a manual audit. Medication time shifted by minutes. Lab results realigned into statistically cleaner patterns. When the same files were scanned automatically by software, no changes occurred.

 Only human review triggered the anomaly. The most documented example came from a meteorological archive in the Midwest. Climate data from the 1970s had been fully digitized and locked. AI models processed the data set repeatedly with identical outputs. Then, a team of human researchers began re-checking the data manually. Within hours, small values began to shift. Temperature spikes smoothed out. Outliers vanished.

Inconsistencies resolved themselves. The system log showed no edits. Yet the data no longer matched its own backups. When the researcher stopped reviewing the files, the changes stopped. When review resumed weeks later, the phenomenon returned, but never in the same places. One analyst described the experience in a private email. It's like the data wants to make sense once we look at it.

An obvious explanation was silent error correction. But these systems had no such capability, no active processes, no background cleanup routines. More disturbing was this detail. When AI only audits were run after human review, the altered data appeared perfectly consistent, as if it had always been that way. The past quietly rewritten, a controlled test followed.

 Two identical data sets were created. One was reviewed only by automated systems. The other was examined manually by humans. After 3 weeks, the human reviewed data set diverged measurably, not randomly, but toward coherence. Outliers reduced, noise softened, patterns sharpened, as if the record was adjusting itself to expectation.

 The official conclusion cited statistical convergence artifacts, but an internal memo used different language. Human interpretation may function as a selection pressure on recorded reality. The project was terminated shortly after. No recall, no correction notice, no explanation given. Because if the past can change when we look at it, then records are not memories. They are negotiations. The signals were weak.

 So weak that for years they were dismissed as noise, stray interference, atmospheric bleed, equipment artifacts, nothing worth documenting until someone noticed something strange. The signals did not disappear randomly. They vanished only when someone tried to observe them directly. The first confirmed pattern emerged at a small radio monitoring station in the Pacific Northwest.

 Automated receivers logged faint, repeating pulses on a narrow frequency band every night at exactly 217A. The pulses were consistent, same interval, same duration, same decay curve. When technicians reviewed the recordings the next morning, the signals were there. But the moment a technician stayed overnight to observe the transmission live, the signal never appeared.

 No fade out, no distortion, just absence. At first, the explanation seemed obvious. Observer interference, human presence affecting equipment. So, the team adjusted. Observers sat farther away, then behind shielding, then outside the building, watching remotely. Each time someone watched the signal in real time, it failed to manifest.

 when no one watched it returned. In a second case, a university physics department analyzing background radio noise discovered intermittent bursts hidden deep in archival data. The bursts formed a repeating mathematical pattern, not random, but not clearly artificial either. Graduate students attempted to observe the phenomenon live.

 Every attempt failed, but when the system was left unattended overnight, the bursts appeared again perfectly recorded. One researcher tried a different approach. Instead of watching the signal, they deliberately distracted themselves while remaining physically present. They turned their chair away from the monitor, engaged in conversation, and avoided thinking about the experiment.

 That night, the signal appeared while they were in the room. The variable was not presence, it was attention. Across multiple cases, the same rule applied. Automated systems detected the signal. Unattended equipment recorded it. Delayed playback confirmed it, but direct focused observation caused it to vanish.

 As if the signal was not hiding from equipment, but from awareness. The most disturbing detail came from a classified defense monitoring log. A transient signal was detected repeatedly by unmanned listening stations. When a live analyst was assigned to observe the frequency in real time, the signal ceased permanently at that location.

 It never returned. An internal notes summarize the anomaly. The act of observation collapses the event. Official explanations cited observer bias, confirmation effects, or signal to noise misinterpretation. But those explanations failed one test. The signal obeyed timing. It obeyed structure. It obeyed absence. It appeared only when no one was trying to see it.

 One engineer wrote a final remark before the project was shut down. Whatever this is, it behaves as if it does not want to be witnessed. If signals can exist only when ignored, then observation may not just reveal reality. It may erase parts of it. The reports did not come from scientists.

 They came from parents, from teachers, from school counselors, from pediatric therapists who had heard the same description too many times to dismiss it as coincidence. The children did not know each other. They lived in different states, different time zones, different social backgrounds. Yet, they described the same presence. It usually began the same way. A child would mention someone who stands and watches.

Not a ghost, not a monster, not something frightening at first, just someone who was always there. In Ohio, a 7-year-old boy told his mother there was a man who stood in the corner of his room at night facing the wall like he's counting. When asked what the man looked like, the boy paused and said, "You can't see his face. It's like it doesn't want to be seen.

" In Arizona, a 9-year-old girl drew a figure during a school art exercise. The figure had no facial features, no eyes, no mouth. It stood slightly behind the people in the drawing, taller than the adults, angled away from direct view. When her teacher asked who it was, the girl answered, "The one who checks if things are real.

" In Vermont, a child undergoing therapy for anxiety described a presence that appeared only when adults were distracted. It never spoke, never touched anything. It simply watched and left the moment attention was drawn to it. The most unsettling part was consistency. The children used similar language without being prompted.

 They described the same posture, the same distance, the same feeling, not fear, pressure, as if something was evaluating the room. In a multi-state review conducted years later, researchers compared 37 such accounts. None of the children had shared media exposure, no common books, no shared shows, no viral stories linking the descriptions. Yet, the overlap was undeniable.

 The figure was always described as present but not interactive, aware but not emotional, visible only indirectly, and most importantly, attentive only when humans were unaware. Several children mentioned that the presence disappeared permanently after they tried to describe it in detail to adults.

 One child put it this way, it doesn't like being talked about. It likes when people forget it's there. Psychologists proposed imaginary companions, projection, pattern formation. But those explanations failed to explain one detail recorded in multiple interviews. The children insisted the presence was not imaginary. They did not invent it.

 They noticed it and once noticed, it behaved differently. In one case, a child began refusing to sleep in his room, claiming the watcher had moved closer. When a camera was installed overnight, nothing appeared on footage. The next morning, the child said simply, "It left. You were watching." The case files were eventually closed under developmental psychology.

 No follow-up studies were approved. But one clinician left a note in the margin of a final report. Children may not be more imaginative than adults. They may simply be less practiced at ignoring what looks back. If awareness alters reality, then what happens before we learn to look away? The machines were old, not intelligent, not adaptive, not connected to any network capable of learning.

 They were elevators from the 1970s, conveyor belts controlled by mechanical relays, early industrial robots with fixed routines written in rigid logic. They were designed to do one thing the same way every time, which is why what happened made no sense. The first reports came from maintenance crews.

 In a manufacturing plant in Michigan, an automated conveyor system began stalling only when workers stood nearby. Sensors showed no obstruction. Motors remained within tolerance. The moment the area was cleared, the belt resumed normal operation without reset. At first, this was blamed on human interference, weight shifts, vibration, static electricity, but the pattern persisted. The system failed only in the presence of people.

When cameras were installed and the room left empty, the conveyor ran flawlessly for weeks. When workers returned, it hesitated again. In a hospital in Illinois, an older elevator developed a peculiar habit. When occupied by passengers, it would pause between floors for several seconds without triggering alarms.

 When tested empty under identical conditions, it never failed. Technicians ran diagnostics repeatedly. No faults were found. One technician wrote in a service log, "It's like it knows when it's being used." The most unsettling cases involve simple robotic arms used in storage facilities. These machines follow deterministic paths.

 Pick, rotate, place, thousands of cycles per day. Yet, in multiple locations, the arms began hesitating mid-motion when humans stood close by, not stopping, not malfunctioning, pausing as if reconsidering. When operators watched through cameras from another room, the machines behaved perfectly. When operators entered the workspace, errors returned. The variable was not instruction. It was proximity.

One facility attempted a controlled test. They ran a robotic system continuously while alternating between three conditions. No humans present, humans present, but distracted humans present and watching the machine closely. The results were consistent. Condition one, zero errors. Condition two, minor timing drift.

 Condition three, frequent pauses, alignment errors, aborted cycles. The machines were not responding to commands. They were responding to attention. An internal engineering memo noted something disturbing. These systems were never designed to account for observation, which raised an impossible question. Why would machines without perception behave differently around perceiving beings? The most extreme case occurred at a baggage handling system in an international airport.

 During peak hours, the system jammed unpredictably when operators crowded the control floor. Overnight, with no staff present, the system ran flawlessly. Eventually, management reduced human presence on the floor. Failures dropped by 80%. Nothing about the machines changed. only the number of people near them.

 The official explanation cited humaninduced environmental variability, but no measurable factor. Heat, vibration, interference correlated consistently with the failures. One engineer, frustrated after months of testing, left a final comment in the system archive. These machines don't break. They behave differently when we're around. If simple machines can alter their behavior based on human presence, then the boundary between observer and system may be thinner than we assume and if awareness alone is enough to influence behavior, then intelligence may not be required,

only observation. At first, the errors looked harmless. A meeting scheduled for Tuesday appeared on calendars as Wednesday, then quietly reverted overnight. A digital clock ran 6 minutes fast across multiple devices, then corrected itself without synchronization. A transaction timestamp showed a payment occurring before the authorization that approved it until the record changed.

 No one noticed at first because the corrections always happened before they were questioned. The first serious investigation began inside a corporate scheduling system used across several states. Employees reported brief conflicts in calendars that resolved themselves by morning.

 IT logs showed no manual edits, no system rollbacks, no updates. The system simply healed. In one instance, a meeting invitation sent at 9:42 a.m. appeared in several inboxes stamped at 9:37 a.m., 5 minutes earlier than its creation. By the next day, all records showed the same time, 9:42. The earlier time stamp had vanished from every copy. backups included.

 A more troubling case came from a logistics firm tracking delivery routes. GPS data showed a truck arriving at a warehouse before it had departed the previous checkpoint. The anomaly existed for less than 2 hours. Then the timeline corrected itself, not by deletion, by adjustment. Intermediate timestamps shifted just enough to remove the contradiction, as if the system had chosen the most reasonable version of events.

 Engineers initially suspected delayed rights or clock drift, but forensic analysis failed to find any causal chain. The system had not recalculated. It had rearranged. The most documented example occurred in a university research lab maintaining synchronized atomic clocks. During a routine comparison, one clock briefly registered out of sequence by a fraction of a second. Before a report could be filed, the discrepancy disappeared.

 Logs showed no resync command. The clock simply agreed again. Across unrelated systems, the same pattern emerged. Small inconsistencies appeared. They persisted briefly, then they vanished before becoming problematic, never escalating, never acknowledged, almost as if the timeline refused to break.

 In one medical database, patient notes briefly referenced a procedure scheduled for a date that had not yet occurred. By the time staff reviewed the chart later that day, the note referenced a different procedure. one that did happen. No edit history existed. The record had rewritten itself to preserve continuity.

 A private white paper circulated among analysts used an unsettling phrase, temporal error correction. The idea was not that time moved backward, but that conflicting versions of events could not coexist for long. When contradictions arose, the system favored the path that required the least explanation, the version that made sense, the version that kept reality stable.

 One analyst wrote, "It's not that the timeline breaks, it flexes, then snaps back. Attempts to catch the anomaly in real time, consistently failed. The moment investigators actively search for contradictions, none appeared. The corrections happen between observations in the gaps. An internal memo summarized the risk.

 If timelines can self-correct without human action, then cause and effect may be guidelines, not laws. The project was quietly shelved. No announcement, no follow-up. Because if reality can fix itself, then history may not be a record of what happened. It may be a record of what was allowed to remain consistent.

 There are moments when systems fail, power grids collapse, networks freeze, machines stall. But what investigators documented in these final cases was not failure. It was pause. The first incident occurred during a late night systems audit inside a research facility that monitored multiple independent processes at once. Environmental sensors, time servers, industrial controls, audio feeds.

 Nothing unusual was expected until someone asked a question. It was not scripted, not dramatic, not part of any protocol. A technician, frustrated by a string of minor anomalies, leaned back and said aloud, "So, what is actually watching all of this?" For approximately 3 seconds, everything stopped. Not crashed, not shut down, stopped.

 The clocks froze midsecond. Audio flatlined without distortion. System counters halted without error flags. Then all at once, everything resumed. No alarms triggered. No logs recorded the interruption. The systems behaved as if nothing had happened. Except one thing. Every process showed a missing interval. Not zeroed, not overwritten, just absent.

 At first, the team assumed coincidence, but similar reports followed. In a transit control center in Europe, operators experienced a brief systemwide halt after a supervisor muttered, "Do you think this system knows we're here?" Surveillance footage showed monitors frozen, but no loss of power.

 The pause lasted just under 2 seconds. In a medical research lab, a group discussion about observer effects ended with a researcher asking half seriously, "What happens if it knows we're asking?" At that exact moment, heart monitors, lab timers, and recording equipment paused simultaneously, then resumed. No error state, no recovery process.

 The most chilling detail was synchronization. Independent systems, different power sources, different architectures, all paused together as if responding to a single event. Investigators began comparing the incidents and noticed a pattern. The pauses did not occur during technical discussion. They did not occur during testing.

 They occurred only when the question crossed a certain threshold. Not how something works, not why it failed, but who is observing and whether that observation was mutual. Attempts to recreate the pause intentionally failed. When teams asked the same questions deliberately, nothing happened.

 When the questions emerged organically, unplanned, reflective, sincere, the pause returned, always brief, always clean, always unlogged. One analyst summarized the anomaly in a classified note. It's not reacting to sound, it's reacting to recognition. After the third confirmed incident, further investigation was quietly suspended, not because the phenomenon was dangerous, but because it could not be contained.

 You cannot firewall a question, and you cannot debug a system that responds to awareness itself. The final archive 9 entry contains no conclusion, only a warning. If reality changes when observed, resists when questioned, and pauses when recognized, then the most disruptive act may not be interference, it may be understanding.

 And now that you have watched all 10 cases, there is one question that remains and it is not written in any file because the moment you ask it, you may notice something else pause too. Across 10 cases, one pattern refused to disappear. Not coincidence, not malfunction, not imagination. Attention changed outcomes. Observation altered behavior. Awareness triggered response. Rooms adjusted themselves when filmed.

Experiments failed when watched. Objects moved only after being noticed. Places fell silent when questioned. Data rewrote itself under human review. Signals appeared only when ignored. Children described the same watcher. Machines behaved differently around people. timelines corrected their own mistakes.

 And when the final question was spoken, everything paused. Science tells us observation is passive. That the universe does not care who is watching. But these cases suggest something far more unsettling. That reality may not simply exist. It may be interactive, not intelligent in a human sense, not conscious in any way we understand, but responsive as if awareness itself is a variable, one we were never meant to isolate.

 Archive 9 cannot prove intent. It cannot prove design. It cannot prove a watcher. But it can document one undeniable truth. The universe behaves differently when it knows it is being observed. And that leaves us with a final discomforting thought. If reality reacts to attention, if systems adjust to awareness, if observation changes outcomes, then this video was not passive either. Because from the moment you pressed play, you became part of the experiment.

 The question is no longer whether reality is watching us. It's whether we are prepared for the moment it realizes. We know this has been archive 9 and some files were never meant to be opened twice.