Illuminati Wiki | Fandom

Illuminati Wiki | Fandom

You are the Mystery: Alchemical Expansion of Sentience/Hu(e)man as Hab(i...

now once more I must ride with my Knights to defend what was and the dream of what could be welcome to the restitut orbit Channel and today we’re going to be exploring the Forbidden land the north polar region and you might be asking well of course it’s a forbidden land because we’re told by scientists and people who’ve actually been there along with this very convincing aerial footage that there is no land at where the North Pole lies or at least where it used to lay because there’s debate about where the actual Magnetic North Pole is but we see that there are wonderful sweeping Vistas and panoramas that show us how incredibly beautiful this land is and yet at the same time we see that this is a tundra or really the very Aid counterpart to a desert in a cold region an area that has no life of any sort nothing grows there because there is no land to support it it this is exactly what we’re told is at the North Pole and in this forbidden polar region if you’re going to reach it you have to travel by ship preferably an ice breaker because you have to travel through a lot of ice if you’re actually going to reach the North Pole and we have many well documented examples of polar explorers trying to reach the Arctic we also have an enor amount of attention that’s focused on the Antarctica especially because of the treaty but in this exploration we’re going to examine the nature of the Arctic we’re also going to look at the previous Maps which seem to depict land at the Arctic and try to posit some theories for why this was depicted in previous Maps what exactly is going on up there what’s the reality of course we’re well assured by the mainstream and they’ve given us very convincing footage that there’s no mountain there at the center of the North Pole but what’s the truth behind it what do we really see when we try to explore it well let’s start with a Google map because that’s what all of us have access to and any one of us can take a look at a Google map and what does it really depict being up there at the North Pole well we’ll see that there’s no actual land masses up there so that seems to conform with exactly what we’re told yet there seems to be some puzzling anomalies for example during the Cold War we’re told that the Arctic or the North Pole was feared as an Avenue of attack H isn’t this interesting and we have this unique little line here that’s always appeared in the Google Maps and there’s been a number of theories for what’s being depicted but perhaps it’s just merely an amalgamation of Google Images trying to show us what’s exactly going on up there yet no land masses and we can see that it’s in an isolated portion of our so-called Globe at least again that’s what’s depicted on Google we also have accounts of a continent there called Arctica but this was well over 2.5 billion years ago that’s a long time I’m always amazed that scientists are able to use their genious techniques and methods to tell us exactly what this land looked like a billion years ago I’m amazed that they can do it even 10,000 years ago but these aren’t things that we should be questioning now let’s take a look at what previous depictions of the Arctic were in the past and in this little document here we see many depictions on how they Illustrated the land in the past and here we even have this odd diagram from Alexander’s time which looks very geometrically precise we also have depictions from Greece which oddly enough show what appears to be a circle or a dis although we’re also told that the Greeks knew that we were on a globe so I’m not sure and again we’re not debating what the actual shape of the land is in this exploration we’re merely looking at how it was depicted over the years what exactly do we have that’s displayed and shown and here we have this globe here that shows that there was a pin in the top of it we’ve always had land though that’s been shown interestingly enough and we’ll be told that the cartographers at the time didn’t didn’t exactly know what they were doing or they didn’t have the real scientifically confirmed observations and data and here we have marot’s famous map which does show land masses around the North Pole and even a magnetic rock or Mountain along with other continents that we may or may not recognize and here is that magnetic rock or Mountain so it seems to show a conflicting account of what’s depicted and what’s really present at the North Pole why exactly would the cartographers and there’s many different examples and many cartographers depict land at the North Pole if there was no land there if it’s just ice and the only thing you’re really going to find is any sort of pressure Hills that are created by the ice there’s no actual land there did the cartographers not know what they were doing or did they decide to take a risk and a chance and get themselves in a lot of trouble of what could potentially be an executable offense because they depicted maps that were incorrect indeed we have numerous accounts of legendary lands that are up at the North Pole lands that we are told in a shirt do not exist and are simply in the imaginations or misinformed impressions of the cartographers and that’s exactly what we’ll be told yet when you look at this document and when you look at many other documents and books from the time you’ll find that the vast majority of the depictions of the North Pole showed there being land there so what exactly was going on with that conversely though according to mainstream accounts these cographs who were so misinformed and didn’t exactly know what they were doing were still able to compose maps that explorers during this time frame the 14th through the 16th century were able to use to effectively navigate lands so again it portrays a conflicted and contradicting picture of the exploration alone of the North Pole and as we look in more recent times because would you be surprised to know that the North Pole was not actually reached by human beings until the 1920s and even those accounts of exploration and individuals actually reaching the North Pole are conflicted and I’ve always found this area to be very intriguing and the other thing is the fact that we only have the North Pole being famous in more recent times in popular culture because of Santa Claus yes that’s how a lot of people know about the North Pole especially in the United States where I grew up is the account of Santa Claus now granted the effect in celebration of Christmas has changed in the United States over years and it seems to go longer and be much more commercial when we look at satellite images of the North Pole because I was trying to get a better look at it we have our typical very unique images that don’t really answer any questions they do reinforce the ocean though that it is nothing but a pack of ice up there and there’s no real land although how exactly can you tell and this official image from Noah has many issues in and of itself and then of course we have these strange weather images that always convey the impression that there’s a strange circular Presence at the North Pole well perhaps that’s just the layout of the land and that’s merely the weather patterns that were going on at the time look this is from no one it’s from the government we know that we can rely on it completely because they would never make misrepresentations towards us although I do have to consider the representations there are many different issues that show that the land seems to be questionable up there the weather patterns are very questionable and even though it’s just ice one of my significant questions with the North Pole is why did we always have such a fixation on it what was always so important about exploring it if there’s really nothing up there but ice and once again we have in these other interesting images from satellite there always seems to be some sort of strange circular pattern up there a very precise Circle at that and we’ll be told that it’s because of some limitation in the equipment or some other sort of anomaly and that when they transpose the interpretations of the data and the Telemetry this is the result that we have so don’t ask any more questions and just accept what we’re given indeed we have many other satellite images that give you the impression that what we’re told about the North Pole is questionable now we could always say that there’s a reason for this this is just simply to keep us pondering and speculating on it and merely to devote our time and trying to figure out exactly what’s going on up there although what I found interesting in more recent years is how there seems to be less and less attention directed towards this area and yet many of the supposed satellite images create more questions and answers and isn’t it interesting how when you look at Google Map you just don’t have a very simple overall image of the North Pole or the polar region it’s forbidden land because there is no land up there but people just want to explore it and go there but remember there’s no land up there there is also a conspiracy theory saying that there’s a hole up there that allows you access to the inner earth and we’re merely sharing all the things that have come across popular culture we’re not embracing any particular Theory during this exploration we’re just looking at all the different perceptions that we have of the North Pole or the Arctic Santa Claus is up there there’s a hole to the Earth well would you be surprised to know that the very first explorer who officially and well documented reached the North Pole r a mson used an Airship to do so and in fact they’re even talking about using airships to reach the North Pole now oh and I will comment that R de mson was Norwegian because it’s a matter of Norwegian national pride that they were the first ones to reach the North Pole now just imagine this jumping on an Airship to be able to reach the North Pole now granted they say they used the Airship to help them Reach it and then it was a land Expedition although there’s a number of difficulties with a land Expedition when you’re going across Frozen ice because there’s really nothing to sustain yourself on Frozen ice with ice packs and that’s all you have for hundreds of miles there’s also the problematic interpretation as to the north magnetic pole the geographic North Pole and the geomagnetic pole H seems to be a lot of conflicting data I mean exactly how am I supposed to use my magnetic compass if I’m going to conduct successful Land Navigation to reach the north magnetic pole or is it g the geographic North Pole or is it the geomagnetic pole which one am I going to I don’t even know consider the recent show from the 201s called The Terror which is a well documented sorry it’s a documented expedition to reach what was called the Northwest Passage led by a British Explorer named Franklin and there were two ships that were involved and the show documents all the difficulties that they had now granted it’s a bit of a fictional account of True Life events or so we’re told the Franklin expedition was stuck in pack Ice north of what is now Canada and they were close to the polar Circle or the Arctic Circle although conflicting accounts you’re not really sure if they’re actually in the Arctic Circle or not and they had all sorts of issues with their compass and the show does a wonderful job of conveying all the dread I mean just think about it if these two guys can’t effectively lead you out of a difficult situation then nobody can and that’s really what the show questions is leadership and the difficulties faced and some individuals understanding that they’re in a land that’s very hostile and is working to kill them and the show very effectively depicts that it also depicts the deteriorating aspects of society and a military chain of command in very difficult conditions because the commander Franklin simply wants to reach the Northwest Passage at all costs but he does have more experienced subordinates who have been involved in other Arctic Expeditions and they understand that the Land There is trying to kill them and again again it begs the question if everyone was aware of this and if they knew this in the 19th century as these well documented Expeditions occurred within then why did they continue about with them why were they so obsessed with trying to find a Northwest Passage well there’s numerous different explanations given it’s for the fame and the glory of reaching a passage and very difficult to explore and Traverse lands or there’s economic reasons or what have you and yet in this particular show the terror you get to see all the difficulties that the crew faced from these two ships as they were stuck in pack ice the ships were unable to sail and they had to come up with other means first to sustain themselves and then to walk across hundreds of miles of this Arctic land although we’re told they weren’t really in the Arctic Circle but they were close to it and again it depends the show also even goes to a little bit of a mythical account of a beast called tumbuk or tumbuk who hunts the crew they encounter an Inuit shot and his daughter and because of a misunderstanding end up unleashing this Beast which also begins to attack and kill the crew including the commander Franklin the rest of the TV series or at least the first season of it revolves around the crew’s attempts to survive they’re being hunted by this Supernatural entity and they’re also facing the difficult environmental conditions that they face in this extreme location that they’re in I think what this really conveys though is that along with the depreciation of a society and a military chain of command and when faced with extreme conditions of survival we also continue to ask the question why was exploring the North Pole so important why was everyone so fixated on this effort if as you see in the background of these two characters there’s really nothing there there’s nothing that anybody would want there’s nothing that anybody would need there’s nothing that anybody in any sort of minded Society that’s based on materialism as we’re reassured by virtually every institution that we have in our society that we’re all about materialism why would people want to go to a place where there’s absolutely no materials there’s nothing of value up there that’s what we’re told and yet the difficulties and the travesties faced by this Expedition shows us that people are willing to put in this kind of effort and this sort of will to reach this location now keep in mind the Franklin Expedition wasn’t even focused on reaching the North Pole it was just trying to find the Northwest Passage the Waterway through the pack ice that’s a shortcut to go from the Atlantic to the Pacific and vice versa and there’s all kinds of account of other ships facing difficulties being stuck in the pack ice there is even one extreme account of an entire crew being frozen on the ship and dying well in the TV series The Terror the crew finds out that there’s no way they’re going to get their ships out of the pack ice they’re being hunted by this Supernatural entity and they have to escape and their only way to escape is to actually prepare an Overland expedition to walk to a nearby base in what is now Canada that’s 800 miles away by the way did you know that our well and famous Admiral Richard E bird was one of the first ones to fly over the North Pole and this was supposedly well documented in the 1920s and this was a well-funded Expedition although more recent questions from other explorers to include the Norwegian Explorer question bird seant data and say that he didn’t actually reach the North Pole he merely got close and that seems to be the recurring theme with a lot of the other Expeditions when it came to reaching the North Pole from the late 19th all the way to the early 20th century is that they didn’t actually reach it and there was was all this scrutiny of all the data and the distances traversed and there were numerous explorers who claimed to have reached it but then they were questioned on it so why is it we show this level of scrutiny with reaching this particular area we have this obsession with reaching this particular area and then we devote all these resources all this time and most importantly all these lives now granted the lives lost and exploring the North Pole certainly pales in comparison to all the conflicts that we have across the land but we always go back to all these conflicting accounts because we’re told that the survivors of the Franklin Expedition simply wandered around in this tunder environment for some as long as years before they all eventually perished and from the official account they just disappeared and historians will tell us that there were other accounts with it although if everybody died and there was nobody survived to to relay an account how can you know exactly what was going on you have some very dramatic images though of the North Pole which give us a conflicting account again with what we’re told is up there now we’ll simply be told well this image isn’t exactly from the North Pole it’s from nearby lands and it’s not the frozen ice that we have although often times we’re given the impression that there’s a different account with it again going back to the old marot map which shows the presence of a magnetic rock at the very center and we know or we’re told remember the difference between what we know and what we’re told is that there is a north magnetic pole up there now did the compasses work on that is the pole drifting because of a factor a factor of change or even just a change in the timeline we’re not really sure we also have strange photos of these explorers who claim to have reached it and yet somehow they seem to have brought rock with them that they could build up this little Monument to put a flag in and of course this will be told to us that no they didn’t actually reach the North Pole they weren’t anywhere close to it and they just wanted to claim that they were for the fame and fortune that came along with it there’s also other depictions though that give you the impression that there’s much more going on in these isolated lands than first meets the eye now when you compare and contrast everything that we’re told so let’s recount so far we have Google images that show us that there’s nothing there there is no land we have older maps that shows us that there is indeed land that there are even accounts of other individuals and species of people we even have the ongoing myth of Santa Claus and of course we’re going to explore the myth of the origins of Santa Claus and know it’s not the happy story that we like to believe this is the book The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus written by El Frank bomb who was also the author of The Wizard of Oz pay no attention to that man behind the curtain this was uh recently adapted into a ranking and bass special in the 1980s that I remember watching and it was very well done and it featured the voice actors from the TV show The Thundercats at the time and it was quite an interesting story because it seemed to have a bit more of an oldw World field to it when it talked about the actual origin of Santa Claus indeed in the story there’s even an account of giants from Tarter that serve an evil force now granted this is Tarter not tartaria but the similarity in wording is quite interesting and also the sort of omnipresent myth that you have that’s conveyed in this world so if you have the means to watch this special and of course I’m talking about the 1980s special I would suggest looking at it and get an idea of what it depicts now back to the North Pole you’re almost kind of surprised that they don’t actually have an image like this and just say yeah there’s actually a pole at the North Pole now of course that’s merely a concept of comedy and we’ll be expected to believe that but yet that’s what’s put in popular perceptions that’s what’s put in our minds so why exactly does that image persist because is it important or isn’t it is there land up there or if it’s just ice sheets then why in the heck did everybody care about getting there so we could say we went to the North Pole of course we were looking for fame and fortune and famous families like the Rockefellers were willing to fund us yes of course it’s always that explanation isn’t it you’d want to go to a very terrifying place where you’ve got decades or over hundreds of years of explorers dying there but we’re going to be the ones to do it we also have the change that we’re always told about the actual amount of ice up there and the amount of pack ice and we’re told that changing conditions in our environment are causing this uh pack ice to either recede or change in its nature and that’s also having an effect of what’s going on up there and you can find no shortage of well documented and scientifically researched articles that’ll tell us all this although again it just becomes hard to actually see for yourself if you’re just any random individual who’s trying to research the North Pole what exactly is going on up there you have a lot of accounts and you have different scientists saying different things you have different political entities saying different things and it’s either used as something to motivate the great exploration in the hearts of people or to convey the concept of concern and fear now I can’t imagine why anybody want to be con conveying concern and fear when it comes to this area there’s even other myths that seem to company the North Pole and what I find interesting when we were looking at that map earlier of all the different depictions of what it looked like over the years is that you go all the way back to the time of Alexander the Great supposedly and they were visualizing what the north pole looked like and again this is what will be told it’s just pack ice that ships have to be specially equipped and they have to have ice breakers if they’re actually going to get through this pack ice and use the proverbial SL actual Northwest Passage and it doesn’t matter how many issues are challenges that these explorers faced over the years and to this day we’re told that this was a very strategic area and in fact during the Cold War there was a concern by both sides the Soviet Union the United States that the other side would use it as a primary axis of advance for land forces yes that was actually a concern or much more likely a ballistic missile attack because a trajectory of a missile being fired over the so-called top of the Earth would be the most expeditious way to lob your ballistic missiles at each other and so therefore there was a great effort at least on the United States side and I’m sure there was a similar effort on the Soviet Union side to build early warning bases ballistic missile early warning bases and we’ll be exploring this effort because it’s quite intriguing the amount of resources that both Nations devoted towards securing this area and indeed admir Richard E Bird’s explorations of both the Arctic and then subsequent Antarctica revolved around concerns about attacks supposedly from these areas although we quickly got a treaty in 1960 in the Antarctica even though we’re told that the Cold War was at its most difficult period because of recent events with Francis Gary Powers in the U2 being shot down now back to the North Pole you have other maps and the National Geographic Society has always been very well affiliated with its Explorations and scientific Publications concerning the North Pole indeed they were the ones who documented Admiral Bird’s little flight up there and then subsequently question that they didn’t verify his data in the 1990s what exactly does it really look like up there though if we simply accept these images then that’s fine then there’s nothing up there it’s merely pack ice and why is everyone so concerned with pack ice or better question why was everyone so concerned in the past with exploring simple pack ice why was it such a big deal to go up here to this pole that’s really just a pin in a map in pack ice just to say that you were at the top of the world the top of the globe or the top of whatever the realm is really shaped like see that’s always the thing it generates more questions than answers because if it’s a globe and if there’s nothing more up there than pack ice then why should anybody care yes of course you can just say Santa Claus is up there and he’s working in his shop with his elves and everyone’s going to get their gifts on time and don’t forget that we’re going to keep celebrating Christmas earlier every single year or I’m sorry the holidays let me make sure I use the proper term now in the United States if you know what I mean mean but it really doesn’t matter because it all comes down to what are the perceptions to the North Pole what do we really see when we go up there and what are we actually trying to explore and here is the most compelling evidence it goes back to the marot map there were too many maps and there were too many illusions that tell us that there was land up there to be ignored now could there be some other explanation for why these map makers depicted land up there and it’s very true that if these mapmakers made mistakes and other explorers came back and said hey look there’s no land up there what do you think would have happened to these map makers they probably would have faced death or much worse at least if we’re to believe the social Moors at the time in Europe and granted this was during the Renaissance although one thing that was not challenged during the Renaissance was the absolute authority of monarchs and do you think a monarch would allow themselves to be made a fool by some cograph that made a mistake no absolutely not we go back to the depiction of Mount miru or the central mountain of the world or the cosmos depending on your vision or view of it or is it really just some sort of central terrain feature in the land that seems to be a theory for what’s being depicted especially in the marot map of the North Pole now of course again this will be dismissed and we’ll be told by our official scientific figures of authority that there’s nothing up there they assure us that it’s just ice and that may well be but there’s too many conflicting accounts to Simply ignore this and we’ve explored the whole concept of Mount miru as the center of cosmology when we looked at the beautiful architecture in Southeast Asia including the Temple of wat Aon which in and of itself the central praying is supposed to be a depiction of this incredible Mountain this incredible Mountain which is at the center of all things is it just simply a mountain or is it a Nexus point of some sort is the real nature of the land really So based upon the shape of it or the actual existence and nature of it often times it seems as though many forces want to compel us to Simply Embrace a belief and simply hold on to that belief no matter what sort of countering evidence that we see how do you know exactly what’s a fact and what’s merely suggested as a fact is there a difference are there any true facts a lot of people have a great deal of difficulty existing in a state of ambiguity and yet at the same time the depictions of this incredible Mountain at the very center of all things the center of the land is the a center of the land whether it’s shaped like a ball a flat or a flat plane or something even else being curved in ways that we don’t understand or ways that we can’t perceive or is it all just talk maybe it is exactly as we see it we just don’t know and I certainly invite you to share in the comments what you think the shape of the land is or what the nature of the land is because it’s a lot more than just considering the shape when we consider the ways that the cosmological example of Mount miru show us us that there is an actual center point of all things is there really a center is there a Nexus is this a location where many different Realms of existence are actually possible or is it simply as we’re told it’s simply a pack of ice that really doesn’t have any importance to it well if it is it certainly does not reflect well on all the effort and all the Expeditions that were launched to actually reach and find the North Pole not to mention all the great difficulty that explorers encountered but really what this revolves is thinking outside of the categorized thinking patterns that we often encounter each day you’re looking at things with a very different perspective you’re starting to open up your mind to different possibilities now a lot of people do not want to do this a lot of people will do anything and everything to resist even trying to consider other possibilities because that’s what we’re supposed to do it should also be noted that there are many appearances of the name Mount Maru and and many different associations with it across the land so it’s so important because it represents the center of all things is the cosmological interpretation at the heart of Buddhism correct I don’t know I really don’t know but I think it’s something important to consider because if there is a center point or Nexus in the land perhaps there is some sort of knowledge that we can glean that can help us in our understanding of our present situation there’s a lot of conflicting theories that this may really be going off into left field and perhaps you may see this exploration as being out there and that’s okay because sometimes you really have to go out there to ponder the possibilities and if you’re not willing to do it then you’re limiting yourself and if you decide to limit yourself well then that’s completely your choice as I’ve always said I’m not here to tell people what to think I’m just here to present alternate forms of perception and this is one of the most radical alternate forms of perception and yet in some strange way shape or form it seems to answer all the conflicting accounts and questions that we have now it could merely be a coincidence but once again that’s a lot of coincidence I leave it to you what do you think what’s really going on up there what’s the real nature of it is it just pack ic

Forbidden Land-North Polar Region

What's inside this crater in Madagascar?

Terrence Howard : One Times One Equals Two – This is the Truth – This is the Light – This is the WAVE – TLC | Obituary Me Out

Terrence Howard : One Times One Equals Two – This is the Truth – This is the Light – This is the WAVE – TLC | Obituary Me Out

 

cautionary note or guidance for us all I encourage you not to become frightened but brace yourselves because the things being discussed within the pages of this book will shake the very Foundation of our understanding of the world everything that you think you know about what you know will be called into question a tidal wave of refreshing truth is being released upon this dark and muddied world you are about to Embark upon a journey into a forbidden subject one that tackles a question in mathematics that has never been asked publicly it is a subject considered so taboo that not one paper or book has been written upon this topic in modernity if the information in this book is is heated then this species called mankind will have the keys necessary for an eternally sustainable existence if not this species will suffer the same fate as the trilobites that crawled across the ocean floor some 500 million years ago Extinction our species will pass away and be remembered only for our ignorance that is of course if our fossils survive L enough for a more advanced race to find them the truth is that everyone is just afraid of this to IPC because of the potential consequences associated with disclosing the true value of the number one also the fears associated with exposing the inconsistencies that govern the current practices of multiplication division and how these are applied to science unfortunately every country in the Civilized world has their economy rooted in the value that has been placed upon the number one and from its valuation the world calculates interest rates salaries tariffs taxes Etc all of these calculations are based upon how the number one is Multiplied and divided as a result the world’s Math Makes dollars but it doesn’t make sense and I think it’s time to start right at the very beginning and walk through walk through this thing so the question for the Church of Truth love and Consciousness and all those listening does a dollar time a dollar equal $1 or does a dollar time a dollar equal $2 I have never seen anywhere in the universe where an action times an action doesn’t have a reaction so now that that’s why we need to discuss this and examine it and how they came up with this strange number that which is illogical because an area a length times a length has to have an area so you can’t have an 1 time one having equaling one one because now what happened to the length times the length it’s the area is no longer in existence Taren starts by posing an intriguing question money can’t be multiplied or can it a penny time a penny equals what since the penny is no longer based upon the hard asset of gold and is now based upon an imaginary value that is equal to a virtual value of the integers or numbers then if follows 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 1 penny according to the rules of current mathematics and multiplication 1 Penny * 1 Penny equals 2 pennies according to the laws of universal mathematics 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 0.001 according to a calculator a penny * a penny 0.01 * 0.01 = 0.001 does a penny * a penny equal 1 Penny based upon the rules of multiplication or does a penny * a penny equal 0.001 based upon our current Decimal System a value so small that there isn’t even a currency circulated for that amount by the US Department of Treasury all calculations shown here are reasonable forms of multiplication but which one remains consistent with observed Universal phenomena how would you like your money calculated a nickel time a nickel equals what a nickel is equivalent to 5 pennies then a nickel time a nickel should also equal a quarter a nickel * a nickel according to the calculator is 05 * 05 equal .25 again a value so small that there is not a currency circulated to represent it how would you like your money calculated a dime time a dime equals what a dime is equivalent to 10 pennies a dime time a dime should be equivalent to 10 pennies * 10 pennies 10 pennies * 10 pennies is equivalent to 100 pennies which is equal to a do but a dime time a dime equals a penny according to a calculator 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.01 how would you like your money calculated what is a quarter * a quarter a quarter is equal to 25 pennies therefore a quar * A4 equal 25 pennies * 25 pennies which equal 6 25 pennies which is $6.25 yet A4 time a quarter according to the calculator is 0625 .25 * .25 = 0625 how would you like your money calculated allow me to Enlighten you if 4 over2 is the inverse operation of 2 * 2 equaling 4 then it would naturally follow that 2 / 1 or 2 over one is the inverse operation of 1 * 1 equaling 2 so let’s talk about this what does your common sense tell you about these two scenarios what do they have in common and what are their differences division the number four is divided by two twice and the truth is the number two is divided by one twice the proof of that if you had2 dolls and split it between two people you would have to give each person in $1 in order for it to be even in addition 2 + 2 = 4 and 1 + 1 = 2 subtraction 4 - 2 = 2 and 2 - 1 = 1 multiplication 2 * 2 = 4 and 1 * 1 = 1 does that make sense to anybody there does that seem like it’s following any similar line of of congruency I mean and you see where the mistake has occurred both of these scenarios are identical in every way the only difference exists in dimension alone if they add subtract and divide according to the same ratio then they must also multiply according to the same ratio plain and simple if 2 over 1 is inconsistent with 1 * 1 equaling 1 although 4 over two is consistent with 2 * 2 equaling 4 then it should follow that 22 = 4 which it does and 1^2 = 2 yet the math and scientific Community tells us that common sense and logic are wrong in this case because of a product of an arbitrary convention called the identity property let’s discuss in mathematics an identity element or neutral element is a special elements such as zero in the set of all integers under addition or one in the set of positive integers under multiplication with a special set of powers that enables it the ability to defy the laws of physics on two of its primary founding assumptions first of all concerning the number one in the case of one times itself or any other number or variable the end product is that same number or variable and that any number multiplied by a zero equals a z as a result of this arbitrary rule we are left with two false statements two unnatural scenarios that makes it necessary for the fundamental laws of physics concerning action and necessary reaction and the laws concerning the conservation of energy to be suspended in order for this identity rule to exist 1 * 1 equaling 1 is Paramount to an action time action without a reaction in mathematics an identity element or neutral element is a special type of element of a set with with respect to a binary operation on the set which leaves other elements unchanged when combined with them like a ghost or a shadowy influence upon nothing at all yet it Alters the natural course of any number it supposedly encounters therefore in the case of one it is left without a mate an equal and oppositely balanced condition because it remains unchanged when other ones are combined or attempt to Simply multiply a state of existence that is impossible in this Universe of equilibrium because the rule of nature is to First divide accumulated matter by the process of radiation and expansion which is the work of magnetism and then to multiply that which has been divided through the process of centripetal gravitative contraction which is the office of electricity secondly on the identity of zero in multiplication any number multiplied by zero will become a zero product first thing in order to multiply something by something else they must be dimensionally equal then how do you make something dimensionally equal to nothing the laws of conservation of energy might as well pack up and move away because how can a something multiplied by nothing cause the something to disappear remember energy cannot be created or destroyed yet in the case of multiplication a process by which all things continue to exist and propagate their existence zero behaves as a black hole of the number system that gobbles down anything that comes near it a concept that doesn’t exist except in outdated science fiction novels how in the world have these two false statements been positioned as the unquestionable god rules of mathematics for the last 6,000 years How Deeply has this lie been interwoven into the very DNA of our approach to mathematics a false Axiom presented by an individual whose thoughts and ideologies have crafted our misinterpretation of the universe which makes that person possibly the most influential person throughout all of history we will now allow nature and the testimony of universal phenomenon to answer these questions as we put this concept of the identity element to the test with 1 * 1 equaling 1 and the future of mathematics weighing in the balance 1 * 1 equals 1 or so we’ve been taught we were taught around this very impressionable time that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny were also real yet over the next few years we ultimately came to terms with the fact that our trimes were far too narrow for a jolly old fellow to climb down the assertion that 1 * 1 equals 1 was implanted in our minds at a young impressionable age a time when questioning the accuracy of what we’re taught is and typical as adults however our beliefs need to be grounded in strong convincing arguments backed by natural phenomena concrete evidence and irrefutable facts every adult holds responsibility for their beliefs and the ideas they spread into the world especially those that significantly impact our understanding of the universe therefore Terence boldly challenges the long-held belief that 1 * 1 equals 1 proposing instead that 1 * 1 = 2 this assertion is based on the premise the multiplication inherently means an increase in number or quantity if the result doesn’t show an increase it defies the fundamental concept of multiplication this is the Undisputed definition of the word to multiply Terren Howard suggests that merely redefining multiplication or questioning the identity element in mathematics might not be enough to sway deeply rooted beliefs he recognizes the challenge in altering a philosophy so integral to our world economy pondering what it would take to Enlighten this generation and steer them away from a path potentially misguided for over 6,000 years Terrence points out that multiplication governed by the commutative and associative laws essentially involves adding a number to itself as indicated by another number he argues that by these laws 1 * 1 should logically equal two challenging the conventional identity property which he sees as suspending fundamental Laws of Motion he invites us to consider what’s more plausible questioning observable physical phenomena or an arbitrary mathematical rule intriguingly Terren notes that throughout history no great thinker or Observer of natural phenomena has ever reported 1 Time 1 equating to one so suggesting that nature doesn’t conform to human mathematics he finds it surprising that no one has publicly challenged this notion before as it seems to have been ingrained in our minds from an early age before we could discern truth from fiction Terrence Howard prompts us to question the fundamental principle of mathematics how did we come to believe that an action times an action equals a non-reaction he speculates on the potential repercussions in the mathematical and scientific community if the identity element were proven false questioning the stability of Institutions built upon this foundational belief the number one is the very first quantity of any measurable space the lowest Cardinal number because half of two is one also it encompasses all of the total potential energy within the entirety of what we call Visible matter in astrophysics this is expressed in the notion of The Singularity where everything is compressed and represented within the quantity of the number one singular now there are many within the scientific community that would say you cannot equate numerical values to physical occurrences this is what doctor Neil degrass Tyson told me they assert that the use of mathematics is more of a tool for measurement and not the measurement itself the assertation is that the term Singularity is not a literal term but more of a concept and cannot be viewed as a quantity to be perfectly honest the entire notion of a singularity where all matter collapses upon itself and all the laws of physics breaks down is inconsistent with natural phenomena and lives more in the realm of Science Fiction than reality yet many within the field of astrophysics firmly ascribe to this imaginative mathematical impossibility what is this thing called one and how can it or the concept of it be shrouded in so much mystery and controversy the number one actually has the same foundational and patriarchal relationship with all other numbers that are descended from it just as the element hydrogen has with all other elements that occur after it it just so happens to be the most abundant element within the known universe in view of this relationship let’s compare our number sequence to the periodic table and the elements that make it up in his insightful discussion on the periodic table of elements Taran how delves into the foundational similarities between the structure of the universe and our mathematical systems he begins with a profound statement in our number system all the numbers have something in common every number following the number one is a product of the number one this assertion sets the stage for a compelling analogy between the Simplicity and complexity of the universe’s building blocks and the fundamental principles of mathematics look at what teren says here about the human body and cells as an analogy for understanding complex systems from simple Origins this perspective is crucial because it encapsulates the essence of how complex forms emerge from simple Beginnings just as the human body a complex organism is composed of trillions of cells each serving different functions yet originating from a common cellular structure the universe’s elements share a similar pattern of complexity from Simplicity Terren takes us further into the atomic level explaining that atoms the basic units of chemical elements consist of protons electrons and neutrons he highlights a crucial point every single element within the visible Universe has a common ancestry with the element hydrogen this statement is pivotal because it echoes his earlier point about the number one’s role in mathematics just as all numbers derive from one all elements can trace their lineage back to hydrogen the simplest element the periodic table teren explained ples is not just a static chart of elements but a dynamic predictor of atomic structures based on conditions such as motion and pressure he uses the formation of ice as a metaphor to elucidate how conditions affect the state of matter much like how environmental factors determine the state and behavior of elements like hydrogen terrence’s exploration of hydrogen’s behavior under various conditions across the solar system serves as a master class in the adaptability and transformation of elements he says Under The Limited influence of lower pressures from the Sun in a more vacuous environment hydrogen atoms expand and become more tenuous in their configurations this adaptability is a testament to the universal principle of change based on environmental conditions a principle that applies both to the cosmos and to the foundational rules of mathematics now consider terrence’s critique of the identity property in mathematics which posits that high hydrogen multiplied by hydrogen would only yield hydrogen contradicting the observable universe where elements combine and transform this according to Terren illustrates a fundamental disconnect between mathematical principles and natural phenomena challenging the notion that 1 * 1 equal 1 when in fact nature demonstrates that combining elements or numbers can yield new complex outcomes terence’s discussions on diatomic hydrogen H2 being the product of two hydrogen atoms H * H = H2 not merely adding but combining to form a new entity is particularly enlightening it underscores his argument that the Universe operates on principles of combination and transformation principles that are mathematical systems should reflect to accurately describe the natural world in essence Terrence Howard invites us to reconsider our understanding of the universe’s Fabric and the mathematical laws we used to describe it he argues for a model that Embraces the complexity and dynamism of nature suggesting that just as elements like hydrogen can combine and transform under varying conditions our mathematical principles must also be adaptable and reflective of the universe’s inherent complexity this journey towards understanding the true nature of things as teren suggests is not just a scientific or mathematical Endeavor but a profound EXP ation of the fundamental truths that govern our existence in this intriguing exploration teren delves into the fascinating realm of light and perception challenging our understanding of the universe and the mathematical principles we hold as truths let’s break down his thought-provoking insights and see how they align with our agreement on his perspective teren starts with the simple question posed about the equation 1 * 1 = 1 drawing an analogy with a mirror to elucidate his point he says my second grade teacher told our class that we should imagine that you looking at the number one in the mirror this analogy sets the stage for a deeper discussion on the nature of light and perception urging us to question our fundamental understanding of multiplication and reflection look at what tan says about light light is an effect of electromagnetic radiation that falls within a particular portion of the electr magnetic Spectrum he simplifies this complex phenomenon to its Essence light enables us to see yet our perception of it is incredibly limited covering only about 0.35% of the electromagnetic spectrum this Revelation is startling as it metaphorically renders Humanity almost blind in the Universal context depending heavily on a minuscule fraction of the spectrum for our understanding of the world around us terrence’s discussion extends to the limitations of human perception and the implications for our comprehension of the universe consequently how much can we trust her view of her world and of the universe as a whole based upon this limited Vision he asks challenging the reliability of conclusions drawn from our constrained sensory experiences this skepticism extends to the mathematical equations we use to define and understand our reality including the fundamental equation eal MC 2 which he interprets as illustrating that all things are light everything just happens to be light existing under different motion and pressure conditions mass and energy are both are different manifestations of the same thing a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind furthermore the equation E is equal m c² in which energy is put equal to mass multiplied with the square of the velocity of light show that very small amount of mass may be converted into a very large amount of energy and with the Earth the mass and energy were in fact equivalent according to the formula mentioned before this was demonstrated by KRA and walon in 1932 experimentally one of the most compelling points Terrence makes is about the crystallization of matter from light under varying conditions of pressure and motion he explains this occurs because light waves exert enormous pressure waves upon everything it encounters which ultimately freeze and crystallize into every form of visible matter depending upon the pressure and motion conditions of that system this perspective fascinatingly parallels the behavior of water under different temperatures and states underscoring the transformative power of environmental conditions on matter perhaps the most revolutionary idea Terren presents is the notion that light which many organisms consume directly or indirectly for energy might itself be alive therefore it is reasonable to conclude that since so many organisms feed directly from light then perhaps light itself is also alive this thought invites us to Ponder the intrinsic nature of light and its role in the universe challenging the boundaries between living and non-living entities when discussing how light interacts with mirrors teren provides a compelling argument for re-evaluating our understanding of multiplication in order for us to see the number one in front of a mirror we need to employ the use of light well how does light interact with a mirror if we were to place a candle in front of a mirror and used a light sensor the measurement of light observed will be more than the light produced by one candle this observation that a mirror reflecting light creates an effect greater than the single Source serves as a metaphor for rethinking 1 * 1 equals 1 through this lens teren suggests that 1 * 1 indeed equals more than just one urging a reconsideration of how we perceive and calculate the fundamental principles of our universe Terence Howard’s exploration into the nature of light and perception is not just an academic exercise but a profound invitation to rethink the way we understand the universe and the mathematical laws we assume to govern it his insights challenge us to expand our perspective beyond the limitations of our sensory experiences and the traditional Frameworks of Science and Mathematics in his exploration of sound and its wave Dynamics teren Howard delves into the profound interconnectedness of sound light and the fabric of the universe he challenges conventional scientific perspectives with compelling arguments inviting us to reconsider how we perceive and understand the natural world Terrence introduces the concept with a powerful quote attributed to Pythagoras a rock is nothing but Frozen music this idea that a rock is essentially compressed sound waves with mass weight and dimension sets a tone of Wonder and curiosity it suggests that every everything around us no matter how solid or innert it appears is imbued with a kind of vibrational energy or music reflect on what Taren says about the nature of sound if we say aloud 1 time one we have created two separate and distinct waveforms he posits that these frequencies Traverse the universe touching everything in their path and altering every structure within both the visible and invisible Realms this perspective underscores the idea of universal connectivity how a single vibration can resonate and adjust the balance across the cosmos requiring potentially eons for the universe to equalize to new conditions terrence’s analogy of dropping a pebble into a lake to illustrate Soundwave Dynamics vividly captures the essence of vibrational impact just as ripples in a lake interact with their environment soundwaves or our voices in the Lake of the universe perpetuate endlessly influencing and being infu infuenced by The Cosmic fabric challenging a statement by Dr Neil degrass Tyson Terren argues against the notion that sound cannot travel through the vacuum of space He suggests that space is not a vacuum but is filled with the most wonderful vibrating pre-atomic geometry this assertion is crucial for understanding terence’s Viewpoint that all things in the universe are interconnected contradicting the idea of isolated systems Terren intriguingly proposes that sound and and light are fundamentally similar differing only in their wave frequencies this concept is beautifully illustrated by his explanation of converting sound frequencies to reveal their color within the visible light spectrum like Einstein said everything is relative teren notes emphasizing the interconnectedness and relativity of all phenomena in discussing the propagation of sound through space Terence critiques The Limited vision of modern science which fails to recognize the field nature of what is perceived as a vacuum he uses the example of a Geer counter to illustrate that space far from being empty teams with subatomic particles and radiation thereby facilitating the transmission of sound as variations in electromagnetic fields terence’s exploration culminates in the assertion that by simply uttering 1 Time 1 we generate two distinct waveforms that will resonate through the universe for billions of years this idea not only challenges our understanding of sound and light but also invites us to contemplate the lasting impact of our actions and words on the cosmos then again it could be argued that we are only thinking or imagining 1 time one if so let us now consider how thoughts are formed in the mind and let’s examine the hidden processes by which our brains do this thing called thinking as information is funneled into the brain through various receptors located on the human body and are analyzed as thoughts they are reborn as newly formatted electrical impulses these impulses are different from the state by which they entered your sensory organs because now they have been transmuted by your brain’s narcissistic editorial process it interprets all things according to its own image thoughts are generated inside a neuron As Told by modern science as an electrical impulse a frequency that travels along the Axion where it encounters a neural transmission fluid after which it is converted into Electro SL chemical energy afterwards it is carried through that fluid on a wave in its chemical State until it reaches the dendrites of a neighboring neuron where it converts again into electrical energy within this process of electrical energy being converted into chemical energy and Back Again into electrical energy a measurable wave field is generated and with each conversion that wave field intensifies the simple Act of thinking or imagining 1 Time 1 creates a large enough impulse that it can be measured through eegs electroencephalograms eegs are measurements of voltage fluctuations from Electric wave motions within the neurons of the brain brain wave frequency is measured in Hertz in the same manner that musical tones are measured therefore if you think 1 Time 1 you have created two separate wave forms two separate songs of continually converting energy that travels from the brain through the skull and out into the universe where it can be interpreted by simple electronic measuring and monitoring devices those two thoughts about the multiplication of those two numbers creates two separate wave fields that will transfer their wave amplitude upon everything in existence until time indefinite therefore even the act of thinking 1 * 1 creates at least two equal and opposite consequences each of them will have both a positive charge and a negative discharge which in turn will have at the very least two separate and distinct consequences that will double into four and then 8 16 32 64 Etc do you see my point everything is affected by everything else there aren’t any isolated states of being where anything exists within a vacuum without the consequence of multi-dimensional chain reactions likewise even the act of thinking 1 Time 1 the consequence is equal at least two if we were to take into consideration Newton’s third law of motion which states for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction for if 1 * 1 ever equaled just one then two forces or substances will have interacted without any reaction therefore either Newton’s third law is fundamentally flawed or 1 * 1 must equal at the very least two I’d like for you to take partic particular interest in Newton’s ideas concerning mass and its attraction to other objects of mass Within These Concepts rest another obvious proof of 1 * 1 equal 2 in nature gravity which directly correlates to the mass of an object as taught by modern science is represented through values in our current number system examine for instance the tedious process of collecting data and the arduous task of processing that data do you recall how the human mind collects widths of information from multiple forms of stimuli it is initially routed from the sensory organ to the thalamus where it is converted into electrical impulses those impulses are then converted into chemical structures that represent the data remember that a chemical is composed of elements and each element has a particular mass and mass is determined through a consideration of force in Newtonian terms f is equal to ma nevertheless if one mass time 1 Mass equals only one mass then there wouldn’t be any such thing as the electrical effects that have been labeled as gravity to initially accumulate the matter into a mass in fact it would create the opposite effect of gravity for every Mass would effectively repel every other Mass our universe would never come into fruition therefore in order for there to be the effect of gravity 1 * 1 must equal at least two finally I believe it is important that we drive the point home that there is a deliberate untruth woven throughout the fabric of our mathematics and is embedded within the programs that run our calculators computers and our smartphones if you were to input the number two into your calculator and ask for its square root you will receive the answer that we’ve mentioned numerous times before 1.414 213 562 37395 5 if you square that number x s the calculator will tell you the answer is 2 but if you add that number to itself or multiply it by two the result is 1.41 421 356 237 3095 plus 1.414 213 562 37395 equals 2.82 1842 7124 474 6190 surprisingly if you Cube this result of the square < TK of 2 1.414 213 562 37395 cubed according to the calculator you’ll get 2.82 8427 1247 4619 now wait a minute that’s the same number that you get by adding the number to itself 1.4 41421 3562 37395 plus 1.414 213 562 37395 equal 2.82 8427 1247 46190 how is it possible for a number whether rational or irrational to have the same exact value when being added to itself or being multiplied by two as it does when that number is cubed the only other number in like manner is zero because it is a non-number can this be a mistake the truth is 1 * 1 = 2 and 1 * 1al Ling one isn’t multiplication it’s a fabrication which is also known as a mathematical fallacy Howard identifies irrationality a condition where numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions as a significant flaw within mathematics this flaw as highlighted by wildberger suggests a dissonance in mathematics that many practitioners choose to ignore despite its profound implications Howard’s discussion extends Beyond a mere acknowledgement of this issue venturing into the consequences of irrational numbers like pi and the square < TK of two especially when applied to Natural phenomena these numbers essential to the Pythagorean theorem and the Cal calculation of a circle circumference exemplify the clash between mathematical constructs and the observable universe’s realities at the heart of Howard’s critique is the contention that ukian geometry and its derivatives rooted in the concept of straight lines and perfect shapes like the platonic solids failed to capture the universe’s inherently curved nature he argues that Reliance on these linear models has led to a stalemate of reasoning where the tools we use to describe the universe no longer align with its true structure the universe Howard posits is a living and breathing entity characterized by cycles of expansion and contraction that cannot be accurately represented by Static linear mathematical models Howard advocates for a paradigm shift in how we approach mathematics and its application to the physical sciences He suggests that the natural world with its regular and predictable Cycles should dictate our mathematical models rather than abstract constructs that fail to mirror reality this approach necessitates abandoning the notion of straight lines and embracing the curvature that define space and time the all shape and tetr Terian wave state as introduced by Howard offer alternative models that better reflect the universe’s curved and dynamic nature the call to redefine our mathematical understanding of the universe has far-reaching implications it challenges centuries of scientific thought and practice re requiring a re-evaluation of everything from the fundamental laws of physics to the Technologies we develop and rely on Howard’s critique extends to the educational system which perpetuates these outdated models and the broader scientific Community which has been slow to recognize and address these foundational issues Howard’s analysis grounded in the discrepancies between ukan geometry and the universe’s true nature invites us to reconsider our approach to understanding the C MOS by embracing a model of the universe that accounts for its inherent curvature and dynamism we can unlock a more accurate and holistic understanding of reality this shift while challenging holds the promise of aligning our scientific Pursuits with the natural laws that govern the universe leading to new discoveries and advancements in our quests to comprehend the cosmos in the condition of one Terrence Howard embarks on a philosophical and scientific exploration of the concept of one delving into its structure and significance in the universe he intertwines Concepts from physics mathematics and metaphysics to present a nuanced understanding of one as both the cumulative product of all things and the smallest reflection of the whole Terren Begins by referencing Albert Einstein’s concept of a quanta or Quantum situating his discussion within the realm of multi-dimensional space/time he asserts that to perceive or measure the three known Dimensions height width and depth a separate and distinct dimensional plane of observation is necessary thus Terren argues there are at the very least four necessary dimensions for anything to exist within the visible Universe this perspective challenges the traditional three-dimensional Viewpoint and suggests a more complex structure of existence consider what Taren says about the nature of light light was the fastest known substance within the visible Universe until Berkland currents indicated that information in the electric currents traveled at speeds far superior to light he uses this to segue into a discussion on how light due to the curvature of space/time ultimately curves back onto its original position completing a circuit this understanding of light leads to the concept of the all shape which Terren believes is the proper geometric representation of the reflection of one terrence’s concept of the all shape is particularly intriguing he describes it as the system created where four expanding spheres intersect forming a structure he calls a tetran wave state this structure according to teren represents the interconnected nature of all things within the universe furthermore teren discusses how all visible matter in the universe occurs within the confines of the vesap piscus of interacting and intersecting planes he emphasizes all things are one this statement encapsulates the essence of his argument that at the core of all things the laws governing the simplest element hydrogen dictate the geometry of its byproducts and shapes which are all interconnected in his examination of matter Terren notes that all matter is both expanding and Contracting as per a universal prime directive of existence he elaborates all matter must be congruent with all other matter meaning everything has a common denominator and can be reduced to its lowest term this idea of congruence and commonality leads to his assertion that the common factor or Quant of our universe is the structure of one understanding this structure He suggests unifies all things through his unique lens Terence invites us to view the universe not as a collection of disperate parts but as a cohesive whole where every element every wave and every particle is intrinsically connected to form the singular reality of one this exploration is not just a scientific or mathematical analysis it’s a philosophical reflection on the unity and interconnectedness of all existence one we know the definition alone that to multiply means to make many or manifold to actually in increased in number or quantity therefore it must increase in size and quantity or it is not multiplication consequently 1 * 1 = 1 could never be a part of the multiplication table because it fails to satisfy the definition of the term to multiply so by definition alone we have clear and rational proof that 1 * 1 can never equal just 1 we also know that 1 * 1 equaling 1 is a false answer because the associative and commutative laws were not properly followed which left an unfinished and unbalanced equation also the identity property has thus been shown to be based upon an uninformed biased and arbitrary preconception that has no relative value in light of observed natural phenomena two although it is an acceptable phenomenon in the mathematic Community for the square root of a number less than one when added to itself to be greater than the initial number squared we are discussing the number two and its square root when added to itself should never exceed the initial number for that would be highly irregular and completely unacceptable even in the loosefitting constraints of the laws of our current system of mathematics this anomal is not acceptable for anything that exists within the physical universe beyond our flawed system of mathematics meaning that no other system or organism within our known universe behaves as our numeric system where one is massless weightless without Spin and lacking of any measurable effects when it interacts with itself or any other number that is derived from it this ultimately prevents the square root of two from having the natural and logical answer of one remember an object must be equal to the sum of its parts it cannot be greater than nor less than itself this is just simple Common Sense therefore the square root of Any Given number when added to itself should should never exceed the initial number if it does then we have overreached and the true square root of that number has failed to be satisfied three Newton’s uncontested third law states every action has an equal and opposite reaction therefore 1 * 1 equaling 1 is a violation of every natural law regarding cause and effect within the known universe consequently 1 * 1 must equal at the very least two for four the Pythagorean theorem postulates that a^ 2 + b^2 = c^2 this unfortunately Corners mathematics into a stalemate of short-sighted reasoning because the side and the diagonal of The Square become incommensurable if both sides are positive integers five ukian geometry gave birth to the platonic solids which were constructed with straight intersecting lines that do not exist in our universe of curved space/time attempting to describe our world and the underlying structure of the universe by straight lines seems as feudal an attempt as someone trying to capture the complexities of the entire human anatomy with stick figures it produces only a crude depiction of the true reality remember all energy in the universe is expressed in motion and all motion is expressed in waves and all waves are a function of a Vortex a spinning whirlpool and all Vortex functions are curved there are no straight lines in the Universe therefore there aren’t any straight lines in Universal mathematics so there you have it five logic provoking reliable witnesses that testify to the unreasonable and illogically flawed basis that governs man’s thinking upon these matters and is also the foundation of our system of multiplication money can’t be multiplied or can it money can be multiplied by a number but can it be multiplied by its self Terrence Howard critically examines the transition from a gold-based monetary system to a Fiat system exploring its implications on the nature of money and its multiplication his analysis touches on both the mathematical and conceptual aspects of currency challenging the traditional Notions of value and multiplication in the context of modern economics Taran starts by posing an intriguing question money can’t be multiplied or can it he then delves into the foundational principles of mathematics reminding us that everything has a common denominator and can be reduced to its lowest terms this approach He suggests should apply to money as well arguing that if the monetary value can be made equal to the number it’s being multiplied by then theoretically money can be multiplied look at what teren says about the nature of money in the modern economy our paper money isn’t a convenient representation of anything except that of a very vivid imagination because our currency is no more valuable than the paper that it is printed upon this statement highlights the Crux of his argument about the Fiat system the US dollar once anchored to the gold standard offered a tangible value however Post Its Detachment from gold it became a virtual entity susceptible to manipulation and devoid of a solid backing Terren explains the historical context of the shift citing President Franklin D Roosevelt’s 1933 mandate and President Nixon’s 197 1 decision to officially take the US off the gold standard he illustrates how these actions led to a global shift towards fak currencies essentially transforming them into digital markers in a binary system devoid of intrinsic value this transformation according to teren has profound implications when the world governments ceased to base their currencies upon hard assets at that moment all currency became nothing more than virtual digital markers he argued that in such a system money becomes an abstract concept easily manipulated and multiplied within the confines of a computer program much like imaginary numbers in mathematics Terren also touches on the concept of fractionalization in currency highlighting how the value of a dollar can vary based on its subdivision into smaller units like quarters or pennies this variability He suggests further complicates the notion of a stable unified value for money this is a call to reexamine our understanding of value currency and the principles of multiplication in the context of a global economy that has moved away from tangible assets through this exploration Terence challenges us to rethink the nature of money and its role in our society highlighting the complexities and potential pitfalls of a system increasingly detached from physical reality now that I’ve explained one way that money can be multiplied and some historical examples would you like like to see what could be possibly taking place behind the hidden walls of the financial World a penny time a penny equals what since the penny is no longer based upon the hard asset of gold and is now based upon an imaginary value that is equal to a virtual value of the integers or numbers then it follows 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 1 penny according to the rules of current mathematics and multiplication 1 Penny * 1 Penny equals 2 pennies according to the laws of universal mathematics 1 Penny * 1 Penny equal 0.00001 according to a calculator a penny * a penny 0.01 * 0.01 equal 0.00001 does a penny * a penny equal one penny based upon the rules of multiplication or does a penny * a penny equal 0.00001 based upon our current Decimal System a value so small that there isn’t even a currency circulated for that amount by the US Department of Treasury all calculation shown here are reasonable forms of multiplication but which one remains consistent with observed Universal phenomena how would you like your money calculated a nickel time a nickel equals what a nickel is equivalent to 5 pennies then a nickel time a nickel should also equal a quarter a nickel times a nickel according to the calculator is 0 5 * 05 = .25 again a value so small that there is not a currency circulated to represent it how would you like your money calculated a dime time a dime equals what a dime is the equivalent to 10 pennies a dime time a dime should be equivalent to 10 pennies * 10 pennies 10 pennies * 10 pennies is equivalent to 100 pennies which is equal to a do but a dime times a dime equals a penny according to a calculator 0.10 * 0.10 = 0.01 how would you like your money calculated what is a quarter * a quarter a quarter is equal to 25 pennies therefore A4 * A4 equal 25 pennies * 25 pennies which equals 625 pennies which is $6.25 yet a quarter * a quarter according to the calculator is 0625 .25 * .25 = 0625 how would you like your money calculated as you can clearly see for all of our unfortunate lives and for most of Mankind’s chaotic existence upon this planet under the false Banner of a civilized society we’ve been if I may borrow a phrase or two from the legendary civil rights leader Malcolm X we’ve been misled bamboozled we’ve been had Hoodwinked conned taken advantage of Taken for a ride around the proverbial block taken to the cleaners and we’ve been taken to the bank literally the British just so happen to have a phrase that they used to describe someone who is short-sighted and a tad bit slow when it comes to finances they call it being Pennywise and pound foolish unfortunately that describes 99.9% of the past and present populations of the world nevertheless the proverbial buck stops here all pun intended

LEAKED Aliens Photos You Need To See Before They're Deleted!

Terrence Howard Drops Hidden Knowledge (the audience is speechless)

Terrence Howard Just Exposed the Entire System (Watch Before It Gets Del...

🙀