From a fake apology after humiliating guests and employees. I am so sorry to the people who were affected to actually owning up to bad behavior and winning people back. And through it all, I lost some of my best qualities. For that, I'm sorry. Here's how an apology can make you either loved or hated.
Starting with Hollywood's former Golden Boy, Will Smith. Will Smith's career had been bulletproof for decades. He was the Fresh Prince who conquered TV, then Hollywood's biggest action star with hits like Independence Day and Men in Black. Later, he reinvented himself with powerful dramatic roles in films like The Pursuit of Happiness.
Whichever way you looked at it, he couldn't put a foot wrong. He was bankable, likable, and the perfect family man. But in the years leading up to the 2022 Oscars, crack started to show. His marriage to Jada Pinket Smith suddenly came under the microscope. In 2020, she admitted to having an affair with singer August Alcena while still married to Will.
I really felt like we could be over, you know? Yeah. No, we were over. And then what did you do, Jada? Well, you know, I think from there, you know, as time went on, I got into a different kind of entanglement with August. The Red Table Talk episode where they addressed it went viral, not only because of what Jada confessed, but because of Will's reaction.
Memes of his pain expression flooded the internet, and his carefully built Family Man image took a massive hit. Fans then resurfaced other videos like this one from 2019 where Jada's lack of respect for Will was on full display. You know a stair PL is coming to the table. She's going to be at the red table.
Would you say she has been instrumental in you and I redefining our relationship? I would say don't just start filming me without asking me. Oh my goodness. If you could film stare come help us again, please. I'm still dealing with foolishness. Don't No. No. She Yeah, cuz she don't just Would you say that she helped us heal the hurts that we caused between one another? My social media presence is my bread and butter. Okay.
So, you can't just use me for social media and not, you know, don't just start roll. I'm standing in my house. Don't just start rolling. Please watch us stare at the red table because she's helped us a lot. Can't you tell? Clips like this drew further negative attention to Will and Jada's marriage. And by the time the Oscars rolled around, they were on very shaky ground online.
Will was being ridiculed with people calling him weak for staying with Jada after her affair. So when Chris Rock made a joke about Jada's shaved head, comparing her to GI Jane, it really struck a nerve. Jada, I love you. GI Jane, too. Can't wait to see it. All right. At first, Will laughed, but seconds later, he stormed the stage and slapped Chris across the face. Oh wow. Wow.
Will Smith just smacked the [ __ ] out of me. Will then sat back down in his seat before shouting, "Keep my wife's name out your [ __ ] mouth. Keep my wife's name out your [ __ ] mouth." Wow, dude. Yes, it was a GI Jane joke. Keep my wife's name out your [ __ ] mouth. I'm going to Okay. It was one of the most shocking live TV moments ever, and within minutes, the clip was everywhere.
Some saw it as less about the joke itself and more about a man trying to reclaim control after being publicly humiliated by his own wife. When Will returned to the stage later that night to accept the best actor award, his speech only made things worse. He apologized to everyone aside from the man he just viciously assaulted. I want to apologize to the academy.
I want to apologize to my all my fellow nominees. Love will make you do crazy things. This sounded like a weak justification, not remorse, and everyone could tell. Months later, Will released a formal apology video. It was framed as a Q&A with him reading out questions and answering them directly. He apologized to Chris, to Chris's family, and to the academy.
I will say to you, um, Chris, I apologize to you. Uh, my behavior was unacceptable and I'm here whenever you're ready to talk. The delivery was stiff. The setup looked overproduced and viewers saw it as anything but genuine. Literally me where my mom forces me to apologize to my siblings.
The reason he didn't apologize in his acceptance speech is because he was still under the impression that what he did was proper and heroic. The apology now is because it didn't turn out the way he'd hoped and there was a ton of backlash. man destroyed his life's work over a joke everyone would have forgotten about in a few seconds. The fallout for Will was brutal.
The Academy banned him from the Oscars for 10 years. Memes and late night jokes turned him into a punchline. And even with the release of Emancipation and other projects, he's still defined by that one moment. What should have been the crowning achievement of his career finally winning best actor is now remembered for violence, controversy, and an apology that didn't fix anything.
After the slap, Chris Rock kept quiet for almost a year. And then in his Netflix special, Selective Outrage, he unloaded. He roasted Will, mocked Jada, and dragged the entanglement saga back into the spotlight. She hurt him way more than he hurt me. Okay. Recently, Will has been trying to revive his rap career, releasing new music, touring, and dropping freestyles to remind people of his roots.
On June 22nd, 2025, he appeared on Charlie Sloth's Fire in the Booth. And a couple of the bars in his rap made it clear he wasn't actually sorry for the slap at all. Now, I'm not the type of man to move in malicious ways. And I am too grown to play childish games, but if you talking crazy out your face up on the stage and disrespect me on the stage, expect me on the stage. It seems Will's initial apology was nothing more than an attempt to salvage his reputation.
After destroying years of goodwill in a single night, but not every celebrity apology ends in disaster, Jonah Hill's story is proof that when it's done right, saying sorry can actually save you. Jonah Hill's early years in Hollywood were complicated. He broke through with Super Bad, but almost instantly became a target.
When he was heavier, the industry mocked him for his weight. When he slimmed down, people said he wasn't funny anymore. It felt like he just couldn't win. But Jonah didn't let that stop him, landing major roles in films like Moneyball, 21 Jump Street, and eventually the iconic Wolf of Wall Street. By then, his career was in a great place.
He'd proven he wasn't just a goofy sidekick. He could shine in comedies, but also hold his own in serious, dramatic roles. But just as he was riding high with everything finally falling into place, one ugly encounter with a paparazzi threatened to derail it all.
While walking down a Los Angeles street, Jonah wasounded by photographers and in a moment of frustration, he snapped, yelling a homophobic slur at one of them. Have a good day. Enjoy. Suck my dick. Oh, a real bully. The clip spread quickly and Jonah faced a serious wave of backlash. A slur like that in any context just isn't acceptable. Jonah knew that, yet he said it anyway. And in the moment, it looked like the fallout could be disastrous for his career.
But the way he handled the controversy changed things. He responded almost immediately, appearing on the Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon just days later to apologize. He didn't hide behind excuses or tried to spin the story. Instead, he admitted he'd said something disgusting, called it the lowest point of his life, and made a direct apology to the LGBTQ plus community.
This weekend I was out with some friends and there was a paparazzi guy and he was antagonizing me and uh calling me names uh attacking me personally and my family personally and I was I was genuinely hurt by this and made angry by this and in response I wanted to hurt him back and I said the most hurtful word that I could think of at that moment.
you know, I didn't mean this in the sense of the word uh, you know, I didn't mean it in a homophobic way. And, uh, I think that, sorry, I think that, um, that doesn't matter. You know, how you mean things doesn't matter. Words have weight in meaning. And the word I chose was grotesque. And you know, no one deserves to say or hear words like that.
And you know, I've been a supporter of the LGBTQ community my entire life. And I completely let the members of that community and everybody else down when I used a word like that this weekend. And my heart's broken. And and I genuinely am deeply sorry to anyone who's ever been affected by that term. in their life.
You could tell, not just from Jonah's words, but from his body language, that he was genuinely remorseful about what he'd said. Viewers picked up on that, and the clip was flooded with comments like, "He looks genuinely shaken up by this. Jonah Hill is more of a man than most people in show business will ever be." He chose his words very wisely, and he was sincere through and through. Apology accepted. He seemed to be very genuine.
Joan even tried to turn the situation into something constructive, urging people to learn from his mistake and not lash out the same way he did if they ever found themselves in a similar situation. I'm sorry and I don't deserve or expect your forgiveness. But what I ask is that at home, if you're watching this and you're a young person especially, if someone says something that hurts you or angers you, use me as an example of what not to do.
And don't respond with hatred or anger because you're just adding more ugliness to the world. And again, I just I'm so sorry. The key here is that Jonah's apology was heartfelt. It didn't come across as something he was forced into or just saying because he got caught. And that sincerity is the main reason the scandal didn't end up being as bad as it could have been.
Jonah's career carried on strong with films like 22 Jump Street and War Dogs released soon after. But the same can't be said for the next actor on this list because Kevin Spacy's so-called apology went down as one of the worst in Hollywood history. Kevin Spacy's career was once untouchable. From the usual suspects to American Beauty, he was considered one of the best actors of his generation.
And by the mid2010s, he was in the middle of a big comeback as Frank Underwood on Netflix's House of Cards. But in October 2017, all of that came crashing down when actor Anthony Rap came forward with a shocking allegation that Spacy had made a sexual advance towards him at a party in the 1980s when Rap was just 14 years old.
In an interview with Buzzfeed, Rap said Spacy invited him to his Manhattan apartment for a party and made the sexual advance after everyone had left. He picked me up like a groom picks up the bride over the threshold, but I don't like squirm away initially because I'm like, "What's going on?" And then he lays down on top of me. "He was trying to seduce me," Rap told Buzzfeed.
The story blew up instantly, especially because it came right in the middle of the Me Too movement. Spacy had a chance to respond with clarity and respect. Instead, what he did is now remembered as one of the worst celebrity apologies of all time. He put out a statement on Twitter where he claimed he didn't remember the incident.
Then he said, "But if I did behave then as he describes, I owe him the sincerest apology for what would have been deeply inappropriate drunken behavior." To many, the phrasing sounded like he was dodging accountability. But it was the second part of his statement that really set people off.
In the very same apology, Spacy announced that he was gay, saying, "I have loved and had romantic encounters with men throughout my life, and I now choose to live as a gay man." instead of focusing on Anthony Rap. It looked like he was trying to shift the conversation onto his sexuality, and people didn't like that one bit. One fan said, "I've admired Spacy for a long time.
He's been in some of the best movies and TV series of all time." That said, I find it pretty shitty that he came out in this manner. It just seems like he threw this out there as a deflection to focus the media's attention on his sexual orientation rather than his alleged transgressions.
The fact that he's gay or bisexual has been an open secret for years, and no one really is bothered about that. Point is, it really comes off a lot more like a calculated spin rather than genuine reflection. LGBTQ plus groups condemn Spacy's statement, saying it was manipulative and harmful, and his career went downhill fast. Netflix cut ties with him almost immediately.
He had been the lead of House of Cars for four seasons, but in season 5, he was pushed out completely. The show's entire identity had revolved around Frank Underwood and without him it collapsed. Then came the movie All the Money in the World, where Spacy was the lead. Ridley Scott made the difficult decision to reshoot the entire film just weeks before its release, replacing Kevin with Christopher Plumber.
It cost millions and forced the cast to redo their scenes on almost no notice, but Scott said there was simply no other option. Keeping Spacy in the movie would have doomed it. More allegations followed in the months after Rap came forward. And even though Spacy was later cleared in court, the damage was already done. Hollywood had closed the door on him and his career never recovered.
While Spacy's apology is remembered as one of the worst in the business, for others, an apology can be the first step toward winning the public back. And one of the clearest examples of that is Justin Bieber. Have you ever left a meeting with messy notes, a dozen action items, and no clear idea where to start? Well, the Plaude Notes Pro is your solution.
an AI meeting assistant for leaders. About the size of a credit card, it's slim, portable, and attaches to your phone. It captures everything. Record conversations, snap photos, jot down ideas, and pin key highlights. Unlike your phone, you don't have to worry about battery drain or storage filling up.
When you review later, it feels like you're back in the room. The meeting secretary then turns everything into structured notes with summaries, insights, and to-dos. It can even analyze intent and dynamics so nothing gets missed. With Ask Plaude, you can instantly draft follow-up emails, extract reports, brainstorm, or search across all your past meetings.
The hardware is equally strong. Four microphones capture voices from 5 m away, cancel noise, identify overlapping speakers, show status on the display, and record 50 hours with 60 days of standby. It also has Apple Find My and Wi-Fi or Bluetooth transfers. On top of that, everything is private and secure with compliance to global standards.
Claude also has the note for smaller meetings with most of the pros features. Right now, you can get 20% off the note with my code tell us more. Try it today using my link in the description and pinned comment or just scan the QR code on screen.
Justin Bieber started out as a squeaky clean teen idol discovered on YouTube, signed by Usher, and catapulted to fame with Baby. He was marketed as the wholesome kid next door. For a while, this worked. He was one of the most famous teenagers in the world. Mobbed by fans wherever he went. But growing up in that spotlight quickly sent him off the rails.
By his late teens and early 20s, Justin's image had completely flipped. Instead of headlines about music, it was one scandal after another. In 2013, tensions between Justin and the Paparazzi reached a boiling point. After being relentlessly pursued, an incident erupted when a cameraman held a nasty insult at him. [ __ ] little cop. Back to America. You [ __ ] The [ __ ] did you say? You what' you say? You lose. Lose your mouth. Lose your mouth.
I'm back. I'm back. You prick. Right. Little. This confrontation marked a turning point signaling Justin's growing frustration with the invasive media. The constant scrutiny from paparazzi fans and even fellow celebrities had begun to take its toll, leading him to push back against the pressures of his fame. However, this defiance soon spiraled into reckless behavior.
A few months later, after a night of partying in a New York nightclub, he was filmed urinating in a janitor's bucket and shouting, "Fuck Bill Clinton." We swagger, man. You know, this is just the best pitch, bro. We the water kids. That's the coolest spot to piss. You know, you'll forever remember that. My kids in this.
[Applause] [Music] It was juvenile and disrespectful, and the clip went viral fast. Then came the balcony incident. In Toronto, fans gathered outside his hotel hoping to see him. And instead of engaging with them in a civilized way, Justin leaned over his balcony and spat down at them. Whether he meant it directly at the crowd or not, the optics were brutal.
Headlines everywhere painted him as arrogant, entitled, and disrespectful to his own supporters. Not long after, he was in Brazil for a tour stop and spray painted graffiti on the walls of the Hotel National, a protected heritage site. Local police charged him with vandalism, and the story spread around the world.
But Justin's behavior wasn't just making headlines overseas. Later that same year in California, he was accused of pelting a neighbor's house with eggs, causing around $80,000 in damage. That number might sound ridiculous for an egging incident, but it was still another example of him acting out, and it added to the picture of a star completely out of control.
Then came the Miami arrest. In early 2014, Justin was caught drag racing a rented Lamborghini against R&B singer Khalil. Police reported that Justin exhibited signs of intoxication and admitted to consuming alcohol, marijuana, and prescription drugs.
When he refused to cooperate with officers, they placed him under arrest, resulting in his infamous mugsh shots. Mr. Bieber, you are charged with the following: DUI, alcohol, or drugs, resisting without violence, and driving with an expired driver's license. This was a new low, but arguably the most shameful moment of all was yet to come.
That year, old videos resurfaced of a 14-year-old Justin using the N-word, one less lonely less lonely. One less lonely. There's going to be one less. If I kill you, I'll be part of the KKK. Then there'll be one less lonely. There will never be one less lonely. The Miami arrest had painted him as reckless, but this crossed into something darker, damaging his reputation in a way the other scandals hadn't. At this point, Justin was in full meltdown mode.
The squeaky clean image was gone, replaced by a string of arrests, lawsuits, and controversies. He was being called a child star on the path to ruin. There was a time where I was sipping lean. I was popping pills. I was doing Molly. Um, you know, shrooms, everything. And it was just an escape for me. But this was where he began to turn things around.
In 2015, after taking some time away from the spotlights, he went on the Ellen Degenerous show and owned up to his behavior. I've done some things that might not have been the greatest. Really? So, uh, nothing comes to mind. I don't know what you're talking about. Later that same day, he posted a Facebook video apologizing directly to fans, saying he hadn't been himself and that fame had gone to his head.
So, today, I was on Ellen. I was really nervous. I was afraid of what people are thinking about me right now. I didn't want to come off uh arrogant or conceited or basically how I've been acting the past year year and a half. Not long after, he did the Comedy Central roast of Justin Bieber. For over an hour, celebrities tore into him, bringing up every arrest, controversy, and embarrassing moment.
Justin fired back with jokes of his own. But it was at the very end when he dropped the humor and got serious. He admitted he'd made mistakes, promised to grow up, and thanked the people who stuck around. The things that I've done really don't define who I am. I'm a kind-hearted person who loves people. And through it all, I lost some of my best qualities.
For that, I'm sorry. But what I can say is I'm looking forward to being someone that you guys can all look at and be proud of. Someone you can smile at and see some of yourself in. Someone close to me once said, "It's how you rise from a fall that truly defines you as a man.
" I'm excited for that challenge, and I want to say thank you so much for taking this journey with me, and I'm excited for you to see what's next. His apology came across like he really meant it. The roast wasn't just about jokes. It was his way of putting everything on the table and apologizing on a massive public stage. And in the years that followed, he backed it up.
He opened up about mental health, focused on stability, and slowly rebuilt his image. Like Jonah, Justin's story serves as an example of how a genuine apology can really turn things around. But Ellen's so-called apology had the opposite effect. It damaged her reputation beyond repair. For almost 20 years, Ellen Degeneros built her brand on one simple message, be kind.
It was the way she ended every show, and for millions of viewers, it became her trademark. But behind the smiles and the dancing, things weren't nearly as wholesome as they looked. Her daytime show was a juggernaut. Celebrities lined up to appear. Audiences adored her, and Ellen became one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood. She even received the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
For the longest time, she was untouchable, but eventually it all fell apart. clips began resurfacing that painted a very different picture. When Mariah Carey came on, Ellen pressured her to drink champagne to expose a pregnancy she wasn't ready to announce.
The other thing is that people are saying that uh that you're pregnant there. There's rumors. Don't discuss that. Um All right. Well, you don't have to. No, that's okay. No, honestly, you don't have to answer. Let's just toast with champagne and decide. This is peer pressure. You see what Ellen is doing? This is peer pressure. No, let's toast to you not being pregnant. If you're not pregnant, then we should Oh my goodness, it's too early for me.
I only drink it after 300 p.m. Yeah. [Applause] [Music] You're pregnant. You're pregnant. No. No. No. She made Taylor Swift play a humiliating game where male celebrities photos were shown and she had to ring a bell if she dated them. All right. We didn't date. Okay. I That's what I'm saying. That's ridiculous to show Zach. They never did date. Okay.
Hold it like you're going to ring it at some point. How do you feel? All right. Danny Dvito, did y'all date? You know, I can't talk about that. All right. All right. John, what are I don't know what I'm You're supposed to ring. I don't want to. I don't want to. I'll ring because they'll send me angry emails and I don't want to get I'll hold it for you.
[Applause] [Music] What are you doing to me? This is [Applause] it. Okay. All right. All right. Sophia Vagara was mocked for her accent. Do you get gifts? I get gifts. Yeah. What kind of gifts do you get? Could you Can you get rid of the accent? Is it No, I can't. I tried and I'm too old already.
I mean, literally, you've been on this show for 10 years and your accent has gotten worse. How is that possible? Selene Dion was shamed for her son's hair. I'm not too much into politics stuff. All right. Well, it seems like you're busy with something cuz you're forgetting to cut your son's hair. Um, this is Look at him. He is beautiful. But look at his hair. When are you going to cut that hair? Even ordinary guests weren't safe.
In one segment, Ellen relentlessly mocked and degraded a translator who was helping her interview a young Chinese-speaking guest. I think you'd be good at everything because you play the ukulele and then now you're playing uh guitar, electric guitar, right? Yes. Yeah. What else do you want to learn? Just one question. Just what else does he want? I don't know what you're telling him, but just ask him what I'm saying. Okay.
Sorry. Um see that was that short. After this, the translator got flustered and lost her composure, but Ellen just wouldn't give her a break. Finger style. So, a finger style guitar besides electric guitar. A finger style? What's a finger style? [Music] Oh, acoustic. Well, don't just ask. Don't look at me and go, I don't know.
We're not having a conversation. I'm asking them what what is a finger style. Acoustic. You don't know that. Ask him. Okay. Fingering styles. Oh, he knows what a finger style is. But we don't. Never mind. Okay, I've lost interest. Even Ellen's own audience fell victim. In one notorious episode, she publicly shamed a woman for taking extra free merchandise.
Then she goes back and she returns one of her stolen items and she switches it out for a hat. Hello. I What's your name? My sister couldn't come, so that was her souvenir. Yeah. Yeah. a lot of people's sisters couldn't come.
Look, I I like that you like the products so much that you wanted to bring one back for your sister. But um now when you go like to Costco or or you're the kind of person like when you go trick-or-treating and nobody's home, you don't just take the you take the bowl. You just walk away. She proceeded to force the woman to sit in what she called Ellen Jail, a makeshift prison on stage.
Let that be a lesson to you cuz you think it is. You you think nobody's watching you and you just need to be a good person just because you want to be a good person. You go sit in that Ellen jail over there right now. [Music] No, you're No, you'll steal stuff back there. Come here. This way. What's What's your sister's name? Anna. All right. Well, Anna got you in big trouble. This wasn't harmless teasing.
It showed a mean streak that didn't line up with her kindness image. And as bad as those moments looked on TV, what was happening behind the scenes was worse. In 2020, former staffers described the workplace built on fear. Employees were told not to look Ellen in the eye.
People were allegedly fired for taking medical or bereavement leave, and others reported racist comments from senior producers. One star summed it up simply, saying, "That be kind [ __ ] only happens when the cameras are on. Toxic, phony, hypocrite, liar. That's what she is." Ha Muscat was with Ellen from the beginning in 2003 when the talk show was launched.
We were told from the very beginning, don't talk to Ellen. Don't do this. You can't, you know, go into her office. It was very nerve-wracking, very stressful. We all walked on eggshells all the time. How does the Ellen we see on TV compare to the Ellen you saw when the camera stopped rolling? Totally different. Um, she would only speak to the audience when the cameras were rolling.
As soon as they turned the cameras off, she would not even acknowledge the audience. She would just sit on the couch basically. Even when she exited, she just said what she had to say on camera and then walked off. You just expect a lot when you go to meet like your idol and then when you get disappointed it's like such a let down. They tell you, you know, you can't be smarter, funnier than Ellen.
She's the comedian and the star, not you. Warner Brothers launched an investigation into the show and three top producers were fired over allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct. Ellen wasn't directly accused of that behavior, but she couldn't escape the perception that it all happened under her watch.
She wrote a letter to staff and then kicked off the next season of her show with a televised apology. As you may have heard, this summer there were allegations of a toxic work environment at our show and then there was an investigation. I learned that things happened here that never should have happened.
I take that very seriously and I want to say I am so sorry to the people who were affected. I know that I'm in a position of privilege and power and I realize that with that comes responsibility and I take responsibility for what happens at my show. There were also articles in the press and on social media that said that I am not who I appear to be on TV because I became known as the be kind lady. The truth is I am that person that you see on TV.
I am also a lot of other things. I sometimes I get sad, I get mad, I I get anxious, I get frustrated, I get impatient. And I am working on all of that. I am a work in progress. and my intention is to always be the best person I can be. And if I've ever let someone down, if I've ever hurt their feelings, I am so sorry for that.
Instead of saving her, the apology backfired. Comments poured in, accusing her of pretending the toxic culture had nothing to do with her, and ratings for the show collapsed by more than 40%. Ellen then announced the show would be ending after its 19th season, but insisted it had nothing to do with the allegations. The ratings are down for this show.
They're down for every talk show, right? To be fair. Y but more for this one. Mhm. Does that factor into any of this decision? It's it's more for this one cuz we had fall, you know, further to fall. Um and everybody else was at a lower, you know, place so they didn't have as far to fall to be honest. I mean that's the truth.
We are we were very very successful. Later it became clear how hollow her previous apologies were as she claimed she was a victim of misogyny and that the backlash had been orchestrated. Did you feel like you were being cancelled? I mean, I really didn't understand it. I still don't understand it. Um, yeah.
I thought I thought something was going on that that because it was too orchestrated. It was too coordinated. And and also, you know, it it I have I have to say if if nobody else is saying it, it was really interesting because I'm a woman and it did feel very misogynistic. It felt like I am a boss.
I have a very successful show. I'd never had any complaints about anything for 17 years and all of a sudden all at once something happened. So it did feel um yeah it was sexist. Yeah. By the time she returned with a Netflix special in 2024, her reputation was in tatters. Instead of rebuilding, she took shots at the various scandals that ended her career. Oh yeah. I got kicked out of show business.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, cuz I'm mean. Yeah. Yeah. You can't be mean and be in show business. No, they'll kick you out. Yeah. The be kind girl wasn't kind. That was the headline. Here's the problem. I'm a comedian who got a talk show and I ended the show every day by saying, "Be kind to one another." Had I ended my show by saying, "Go [ __ ] yourselves.
" The special bombed, receiving terrible reviews online, and any hope Ellen had of making a comeback disappeared. In the end, Ellen's downfall wasn't just about a toxic workplace or a few cruel interview moments. It was about hypocrisy. For nearly two decades, she told the world to be kind.
But when her own behavior came under fire, her response didn't show kindness, it showed denial. Her apology felt fake because her actions never changed. But what happens when someone skips the big apology moment and lets their actions do the talking? Robert Downey Jr. faced his own massive scandal, but he never gave that emotional viral apology we've come to expect from celebrities in crisis.
Instead, he let his changed behavior speak for him. And somehow that became more powerful than any apology could have been. Before he ever put on the Iron Man suit, Robert Downey Jr. was already Hollywood's golden boy. By 27, he had been nominated for an Oscar for Chaplain.
Praised as one of the most talented actors of his generation, and respected across the industry. On paper, he had it all. accept control over the addictions that were slowly destroying him. The habit started young. His father, filmmaker Robert Downey Senior, introduced him to drugs when he was just 6 years old. By his teens, he was already hooked. And by the time the '90s hit, he was spiraling out of control.
In 1996, police pulled him over for speeding and discovered he was high behind the wheel. In the car, they found heroin, cocaine, crack, and a 357 Magnum. He was arrested and hit with fenally drug possession and a DUI, but managed to walk away with probation. Only weeks later, he broke into a neighbor's home while under the influence, passed out in their child's bed, and was arrested again.
Rehab followed, but sobriety didn't stick. The next 5 years were a cycle of arrests, court appearances, failed rehab attempts, and constant relapses. His drug use was so heavy it's remarkable he never overdosed. Finally, in 1999, after skipping out on court ordered rehab, he was sentenced to three years in California state prison system.
What was your lowest point? It was probably when I I realized I was going to be going and and doing time and I wasn't going to in a real prison. In a real prison, yes. He ended up serving about a year behind bars and inside he admits he hit rock bottom. At one point, he considered taking his own life, but the pattern didn't break at release. Downey relapsed almost immediately.
And by the early 2000s, Hollywood had basically written him off. He was uninsurable. Studios wouldn't touch him because the premiums were through the roof. He was blacklisted, broke, and labeled a lost cause. People around him feared he wouldn't live to see 40. Then things turned.
He met Susan Levan, a film executive on Gothica, and their relationship was different. Susan didn't enable him. She gave him an ultimatum. Get clean or lose her. Around the same time, Downey says he had a moment of real clarity. Sitting in his car with a stash of drugs beside him, staring at the ocean, he realized he'd either stop or he wouldn't survive.
He got out of the car and threw the drugs into the water. That decision didn't fix everything overnight. But it was the first real step toward getting his life back. I think there's an aspect of it that that's clearly has to do with one's own morality because it's too easy to jump on that wagon of it's a disease and my brain's been hijacked and I no longer have a choice in the matter.
Think there's that element for sure, but past a certain point, you have to you have to stand up inside yourself and and change. You know, everybody does with any with any issue ultimately. Anything else is just a really, you know, new age excuse if you ask me. With time, Downey was able to revive his career with small roles leading onto bigger ones.
And by 2008, director John Favro took the ultimate gamble on him, casting him as Tony Stark in Iron Man. I believe that you know most uh difficult situations will resolve themselves if you are persistent and if you don't if you don't uh give up entirely and that's what I never did. I never gave up. Landing Iron Man didn't just give him a boost.
It turned him into the face of the most successful franchise in movie history. He pulled a complete 180, but he didn't do it alone. He had Susan by his side and crucially he had the support of Mel Gibson. Gibson vouched for him when nobody else would, even paying his insurance bond so studios could afford to hire him.
And in 2011, when Downey was honored with the American Cinematic Award in LA, he used his acceptance speech to publicly thank Mel for giving him that lifeline. I asked Mel to present uh this award to me for a reason. Because when I couldn't get sober, he told me not to give up hope and he urged me to find my faith. And I couldn't get hired.
So he cast me in the lead of a movie that was actually developed for him and he kept a roof over my head and he kept food on the table. And most importantly, he said that if I accepted responsibility for my wrongdoings and if I embraced that part of my soul that was ugly, I'd become a man of some humility and that my life would take on a new meaning.
And I did and it worked. Moments like that along with various interviews where he openly discussed his addiction became his apology. Not excuses, not deflection, but accountability. Downy's redemption is one of the greatest Hollywood turnarounds ever.
He went from being blacklisted and written off as a lost cause to one of the most bankable and respected actors in the world. And he showed that sometimes the strongest apology isn't just words. It's proving through action and consistency that you've changed. But not every star follows that path. Some refused to take responsibility even in the face of tragedy. And that was the case for Travis Scott after Astroorld.
By 2021, Travis Scott was one of the biggest names in music. Astroorld was more than just an album. It was a festival, a clothing line, and even a Fortnite concert. He'd built a reputation for wild, chaotic shows where fans were encouraged to rage, leading to mosh pits, and all kinds of dangerous behavior.
But at the Astroorld Festival in Houston, that energy turns deadly. But from the moment the doors to Astroorld opened, there was chaos at NRG Park. At 2 p.m., a stampede of concert goers exploded through security gates with dozens being trampled in the process. As the clock ticked down to Travis's performance, tens of thousands of fans crammed into the venue to see him perform. Where your feet were placed is where your feet stayed the whole night.
At around 8:30 p.m., the crowd began to compress and push, making moving and even breathing difficult. 4 3 2 As soon as that countdown went to zero, it was just my my rib cage was so squished that I couldn't expand my chest, expand my lungs to catch a breath. In a video taken by a fan at around 9:12 p.m., people in the crowd could be heard screaming for help.
Soon, ambulances were seen pushing through the crowd. Fans were chanting, "Stop the show." And some even climbed towers to beg staff for help. Travis briefly paused when he noticed the commotion, but the performance carried on. At one point, he even told fans to put a middle finger in the sky if they were okay. Everybody go put a middle finger up in the sky.
At 9:38 p.m., officials declared a mass casualty event. Security and medical staff were seen rushing into the pits. And yet, the performance went on for another half an hour. Even as Drake joined Travis on stage at 9:54, chaos was still unfolding in the crowd.
By the time the concert finally ended at 10:11 p.m., eight people were dead. Two more later died from their injuries. The victims were as young as 9 years old. The scale of the tragedy was staggering. 10 lives lost, thousands injured, and millions watching online as the horror unfolded in real time. The day after the disaster, Travis posted a black and white video on Instagram addressing it.
I just want to send out prayers to the to the ones that was lost last night. My fans really mean the world to me and I always just really want to leave them with a positive experience. I could just never imagine the severity of the situation.
I'm honestly just devastated and I could never imagine anything like this just happening. Everybody continue to just keep your prayers. I love you all. To call this an apology would be generous. There was no real ownership or compassion for the families who lost their kids and fans let that be known. The only thing missing from his social media apology was an actual apology.
I could never imagine the severity of the situation. Bruh, you were there. He seems more worried about his reputation than the lives lost because of his carelessness. The backlash was massive. More than 300 lawsuits were filed with damages seeking billions of dollars.
sponsors pulled away, his festival was cancelled, and his name became tied to one of the darkest nights in live music history. Months later, Travis did an interview with Charlemagne the God where he insisted that he didn't know what was happening in the crowd. People said they uh collectively they collectively heard folks screaming help every time you stopped the song to get your attention.
Did you did you hear any of those screams? No, man. I just didn't I just didn't hear that. Even if that were true, the shadow of Astroorld will never leave him. His so-called apology only fueled the outrage, and it's still remembered as one of the emptiest responses to a tragedy in modern music.
The Secret Technology Behind Every Major Concert - YouTube
Transcripts:
What if I told you the most important part of any live performance is this thing? That might surprise you. Concerts are huge endeavors. They feature massive stages, robust sound systems, dozens of musicians and dancers, hundreds of crew members, and all of those matter, of course, but I could still argue this matters most.
This is an in-ear monitor. Most artists you see live wear a pair and if they fail the whole show can be derailed. Mariah said she couldn't hear her tracks because of a faulty earpiece. Sorry guys, my ears are going. Can I get rid of this please? So today I want to dive into in ears, why they matter, and the surprisingly loose story of how they came to be.
In-ear monitors are monitors that go in your mouth. Trust me, I have a degree in music. They're basically earbuds that are specifically designed for live performances. You can get them from various audio manufacturers or you can get them custom molded for your ears. When you're wearing them on stage, you're able to hear the other musicians clearly.
Plus, they act as hearing protection when the speakers are all like that's the surface level debrief. But going to Defcon ear will require a more thorough understanding of the in-ear space. And to do that properly, I'll need some help. My name is Mike Dus. I have been in Pro Audio for over 25 years. And right now, I'm making a movie about the world's greatest headphones, the birth of in-ear monitors, and how those impacted the global headphone revolution.
Mike has worked with top performers and engineers for decades, mostly through his time building up Ultimate Ears, one of the largest in-ear manufacturers today. What I got to see wasn't just the stage itself. It was the people who are invisible by design, who support all that infrastructure, that ecosystem, all the sound engineers who are emotional security blankets for the artist on stage, right? Everybody who is there behind the scenes working tirelessly, effortlessly to create the illusion, to create the magic, and to
bring it to all of us music fans. I feel I should also disclose that Mike was my boss at my last full-time job. He is also loosely responsible for this channel even existing after the year 2020, but that's a whole other story. We worked together for five plus years yet. I don't think we've ever covered any of this or talked about any of this, right? I only know it in like small pieces.
Never heard the full legend. So, let's start the story here. Who invented in ears? Uh, I mean, we can rule out salamanders cuz they don't even have ears. Turns out this is a really tricky question to answer. In ears are a lot like karaoke. There are lots of people who could claim to be the inventor because they all came up with part of what the end product is.
You have these few major players. There was Steven Ambrose as the future Sonics team. Steven Ambrose was the first person who could be described as the inventor of the in-ear. In 1965, when he was just 13 years old, he put tiny speakers into bubblegum so he could listen to country music without his dad hearing.
Over time, he would develop that design further and make in- ears for artists such as Diana Ross and Simon and Garfuncle. Oh, and he also replaced the gum with clay molds. In case you thought he kept the gum, or I guess artists could request the gum if they wanted it, but that would be kind of gross. Fast forward to the mid1 1980s. Sound engineer Chris Lindup modified Steven's design while he was out on the road with Stevie Wonder.
Chris's big innovation was using an FM receiver in tandem with typical earbuds. In other words, Chris made in-ears that were wireless, allowing performers to move around the stage. His design would later be used by Rod Stewart and Peter Gabriel. And then there was Dr. Michael Sanuchi very much of the hearing health camp like Dr.
Tentuchi now works for the World Health Organization on hearing health conservation on a global scale. He founded Sensophonics in 1985 as an advocacy firm for hearing conservation and later moved into designing in ears. But the man who was most known for commercializing the in-ear monitor is Jerry Harvey. Jerry was the monitor engineer for Van Halen.
And in 1995, Alex Van Halen walked up to Jerry and said, "Look, Jerry Bubby, it's way too freaking loud up there. We can't hear each other. Help us out. So Jerry went and built his own in- ears from various electrical components and a pacemaker. The resulting design was soon adopted by other rock musicians. But the key difference in Jerry's story is what happened next.
After some time, Jerry decided to start his own in-ear manufacturer, Ultimate Ears. And over the following three decades, UI in ears would be used by the Rolling Stones, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Faith Hill, and several more. While each of these people took their own routes to come up with in ears, they all had one thing in common. Nobody set out to change the world or to create trigger the global headphone revolution.
Everybody first approached it like, "How do I do my job better? How do I deliver a show better? How do I support my artist better?" Audio guys take literally zero pictures or recordings of anything. And it it makes sense because it's just the job, dude. It's just the show goes on and this is a tool to make it better. Nobody thought they were changing the world while they were doing it.
They're just trying to do their job better. This is kind of wild, right? Imagine the cure for cancer being invented and when someone asks who's responsible, you're like, "Oh yeah, I think that was Bob. He just whipped it up during his lunch break." Crazy, bro. Ludicrous. These are people who are next to fame and arguably more famous than the artists themselves in the behind-the-scenes circles, but yet who have never been on that side of the glass or have told their story.
They've just been very content and very proud and very happy to be the support that enables the show. Now, that all explains how the in-ear came to be, but they are far more important to concerts than most people today realize. Let's first make this distinction. What you hear at a concert is not the same as what the musicians hear.
We hear the front of house mix which is done by the front of house engineer in his front of house house with his front of house mouse. But the musicians are hearing a monitor mix done by the monitor engineer. And it's not the same across the board. If there are five band members playing, there are five different mixes for five different humans needing to focus on five different things.
A drummer is going to typically want to hear click, is going to want to hear playback, is going to want to hear bass, little vocals, a little guitar, but they need to stay in their world in their pocket, right? A guitarist just wants to guitarist just wants to hear themselves, right? And a vocalist just really wants to be able to stay in tune and key and, you know, whatever they're tuning off of.
It's that ability for a monitor engineer to create mixes for each performer that allows each performer to perform. Hearing Mike describe that situation made me wonder, what if the monitor engineer is the most important person in any live show? Now, did I just say that to gain political favor with any monitor engineers watching so I can be elected the president of monitor engineers? No way.
But they are a lot more important than most people would think. A monitor engineer is not just great at doing sound. They're great at reading minds. As such, the modern engineer becomes this conduit. Like, how do I help you perform better? And how do I keep you safe? Because the flip side is when the artist doesn't feel like they're killing it or they're not delivering or they're having a bad show, they also need somebody to blame. Yeah.
And so it's really easy to look side stage and mother f your mom and everybody else to right there. It's your fault, not my fault. It's not the crowd's fault. I didn't miss the beat. You miss giving me the queue. You're fired. Next guy. Because there's a lot writing on a monitor engineer to do his job right.
concert prices are so high that most fans want the concert to feel exactly like the stream of the the music itself. But to get that, there's a ridiculous amount of tech that goes into it, right? There's so much playback. Tracks that are not visible on the stage that were pre-recorded but still fed in.
That's playback. And you really have to be in time and in sync with the invisible players or nothing's going to come together. And this is the chicken or egg debate because does the artist want that or does the audience want that? And I don't know, right? It goes back to what the band and what their ethos is. Is it pop where you go for the spectacle and the performance and the dancing and the music is great but secondary to the spectacle or are you going to hear the Rolling Stones play the song as they interpret it and feel it in that moment?
Now that's a hefty piece of conceptual stake to chew on. And while you're at it, I'm about to send in the airplane with another hefty idea. Lately, I've been thinking about isolation when it comes to music. Folks are always talking about how wireless earbuds and Spotify algorithms have allowed people to stay put in their own musical bubbles.
I even came across an article recently that bemoaned a future with no socializing at all due to personalized music. The article was from the8s and it was about the Walkman. Look at him go. But during our talk, Mike brought up a fascinating point. Concerts are seen as the antidote for musical isolation.
It's impossible to not be social at a concert as an audience member. But what if you're a performer? I don't know about you, but I don't like to stand in front of 10,000 people or 100,000 people. It makes me very nervous. It takes a lot of training to be able to stand in front of people and to feel really comfortable.
And I'm not even sure if it's training if you ever get used to it or if you just develop the muscle memory and the nerves to deal with it. And so one really nice thing about tuning the world out and going into your own little safe space is it's a great way to deal with nerves. It's an interesting contradiction. Even when they're performing for hundreds or thousands of people, putting on the most social event you can do in music, their inears keep them at a distance.
Now, of course, musicians do interact with each other on stage, and they sometimes interact with audience members, but given the amount of planning and playback tracks, at least for major tours, there's only so much wiggle room available for unscripted moments. So, while in ears allow the show to happen as intended, they do also play a part in personalized earbuds dominating so much of everyday life.
Going to a concert is one of the last things where we are together regardless of race, religion, creed. We are so segmented in every layer of society now. Concerts are the one place where we go and overlap and mix and we're all there together to have the same shared experience of our favorite artist blowing our minds together.
So in ears are a tool to enable this joy and community and connection. And yet 25 years later in the headphone revolution and the everybody having unlimited access to every bit of content they want in their pocket in the world sealed off from reality and in their own world of bubble is exactly the opposite effect of what the intent of the tech was to begin with.
which is crazy, right? I know we've taken this to esoteric a but I want to stress that in ears are a net positive for live music and especially for the people who put shows on. In fact, Mike's upcoming documentary, Can I get a little more me? Is all about the folks who put shows on, their behind-the-scenes stories, and how they've contributed to in ears and live music at large.
Once I started filming the it's been a landslide of everybody jumping on and wanting to be part of it. Like it's a story that wants to be told. It has jumped out of my own head and now is everybody's story. Every band from Maluma to the Doobie Brothers, Blue Man Group, uh people who started Coachella. What I love is that it's completely international in scope. That's life.
That's the world we live in now. And that's the universe that we all music transcends the entire globe and people and regions. And I don't need to flatten that and translate that. It's been a real honor to get to put this together. It's been a labor of love. It's my love letter to the industry itself for everything that the industry's given me.
And I hope that it stands as my way of giving back. Can I get a little more me? is currently being edited, but if you want to learn more about it, you can check out its website linked in the description. And I want to hear from you now. Have you ever worn in ear monitors? Do you use them for work? Let me know in the comments.
And if you enjoy learning about the behind the scenes of live music, check out this video about what it really takes to be a roadie.
Worldwide Warning...PROPHECY HAS BEGUN!!! - YouTube
Transcripts:
I'm so glad we're doing this uh topic. We don't speak enough about the persecution of Christians in the world, the number one persecuted religion in the world. What can you tell us about what's going on in Nigeria and why we've been so slow to respond? Well, first of all, just to put this in context, if you put together all the Christians persecuted for their faith around the globe, Rachel, they do not compute to the high numbers in Nigeria.
As Charlie just mentioned, 52,000 killed since 2009. That equals there's a group called Inter Society, which does pretty good polling on the ground. They say that's about 35 Christians killed every day. Okay? Three churches are destroyed every day in this area. And look, it's a combination.
In northern Nigeria, you have both Muslims and Christians being killed. But in the Middle Belt and elsewhere, it's all Christians being slaughtered. And the the perpetrators here are Boo Haram, whose name we know, uh an Islamic terrorist group. Uh you have these fani herdsmen who run around on horses or on motorcycles with machine guns.
They literally mow these Christians down. Uh these farmers who are tending to their land. It it it is an outrage. And back in 2017, the Trump administration designated Nigeria as a country of particular concern. So that when we read in chapter 13 that the saints will be given over to the hand of Satan, that terrifies people. He says, "And I saw a beast rising out of the sea.
" And he goes, "It," I love this. He calls it it. He doesn't give it a name. This beast, it's an it was allowed to exercise authority for 42 months or three and a half years. again the time in which the Israel's hidden and it was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. How did he do that? Well, later on in chapter 20:4, he says, "I saw the th souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, had not received his mark on their foreheads or in their hands, and they lived and
reigned with Christ for a thousand years." And B, for whatever reason, Islamic terrorism is just not covered. And when you look closely, 22 Islamic terrorist groups, including Boo Haram and others, have safe haven and have a safe quarter in Nigeria. Now, here's a little news. I was told this last week. There is a group of Nigerian legislators coming to Washington this week trying to petition the Trump administration and Congress from designating their country as a one of particular concern.
They don't want this, but they're doing nothing to protect the Christian population there and to stop these radical Islamic groups from just laying waste to to uh people on the other side of the religious divide from them. But I I've spoken to Christian leaders there for decades. They will tell you they are very much a feared that Nigeria is going to turn into what Egypt and Constantinople became which remember was a m majority Christian country that over time you had an Islamic um uh destruction of the faith and that's what's happening in
Nigeria in real time. We've got to do something here at least put sanctions. remarkable. I I couldn't agree with you more. And what's remarkable is despite this persecution, the number of conversions and the faith of the African church is something that's so inspirational. So, we appreciate you joining us on this story.
It's so important that they will have a choice of either letting him, the Satan, put his symbol of worship, the mark of the beast, on their forehead, or their foreheads will be removed from their body. I often hear people say that there will be a great revival before the second coming of Christ.
And simply based upon what we're reading here, and I I I agree. I mean, it appears that most will come to Christ. As a as a Christian, I think the world's Christians will know that this country that this this region of the world means a great deal to me. And at some point today I hope to go or at some point in the next couple of days I should say I hope to go to the church of the holy supplr which Christians believe is the site that Jesus Christ was crucified in.
And I know that Christians have many titles for Jesus Christ. And one of them is the prince of peace. And I'd ask all people of faith in particular my fellow Christians to pray that the prince of peace can continue to work a miracle in this region of the world. I think that we have made incredible strides over the past week.
We're going to have to make a lot more, but I think with your prayers, with God's providence, and with a very good team behind me, I think we're going to get it done. Thank you all. Just a charge that they would use for persecution. Bill, it sounds like um this latest crackdown has wrapped up dozens of pastors. Yeah, absolutely.
The crackdown that we've seen last week was the most extensive singular crackdown on any church in China in the last 40 years. Uh so what we're seeing is a serious escalation across several cities. It's really nationwide. Um and this seems like only the beginning. Where do we go from here? Will there be a fair legal process for your father in fighting these charges? Um I definitely as a Christian I also believe in miracles and I think that um we are calling for a full um unconditional and immediate release of my family as well
as um those 21 others are detained. Um unfortunately just looking at other cases in China like other persecuted Christian Christians like it really would be a miracle if they were able to be released in such a quick and um unconditional way. So, we are bracing for a longer um um longer potential like legal battle and such, but yeah, that's that's what it'll seem like it will happen.
So, Secretary Rubio has weighed in on this. Here's part of what he said. He said, "We call on the CCP to immediately release the detained church leaders and to allow all people of faith, including members of house churches, to engage in religious activities without fear of retribution.
" Um, responding to that, China's foreign ministers told NPR said, "We firmly oppose the US side's interference in China's internal affairs under the pretext of so-called religious issues." So, Bill, is it politics that's driving this? Is it part of the US China tension? Where do you go? My sense is that, you know, when when the party when the Chinese Communist Party senses that they're about to have a difficult period, whether that's a trade war um in 2018 or a trade war now, uh they they tend to want to kind of batten down the hatches on their
society. They want to tighten the screws so that they have absolute control uh in case they're afraid that there's public unrest. Is there a US role? Should there be with respect to this? I mean, China says this is not your issue. It's domestic. Um, is there a role that the US can play? Yeah. Yeah.
Um, as um my father's daughter and my two brothers are also American citizens, when we first heard about this um our immediate response was just to ask our government to protect us and to um call out for the situation with my father. We know that we are part of a global Christian community. And so we just call out for prayer and for call out for um just not to forget us and not to forget the Christians in China.
We won't and we will continue tracking that story.
INSANE! Candace Owens Erika Kirk GAG Order for Charlie Kirk! - YouTube
Transcripts:
Heat. [Music] Heat. [Music] What's up my peeps? What's up everybody? What's up? What's up? What's up? Man, we got a lot to talk about. Well, well, kind of. Kind of. This live won't be too long, but it's still a lot to cover in a short period of time. Give me some ones in the chat if you can hear me so we can go ahead and hop right into this. Ones in the chat if you can hear me.
What's up? What's up? All right. Dope. Dope. Bet. I'm going to be honest with you all. Hit the like button. Hit the like button on your way in if you don't mind. I am officially looking at uh this this Charlie Kirk situation as a movie, a script. Now, I know we've been referring to this, a lot of this stuff is like a script and, you know, a scop, but more specifically, what I'm saying is after I show you all some of this stuff, it's like it's it's almost too obvious at this point, you know? It's it's just too obvious. some of this stuff. Many of you all have
probably already heard the news about the gag order that has officially come down, but there may be a couple of things that you have not heard about yet. Yeah, Snake Eyes. But I'm saying like it it just seems it just seems almost it's it's laughable at this point what they're doing. It's is laughable because I went through so many stages since this situation first took place.
And one of the things that I used to think was they needed a distraction because Donald Trump, he disappointed so many people in his base when it came to the Jeffrey Epste thing. So many people was turning on him and they were like, "Man, what are you doing?" And so, not only did they need a distraction, they needed a real distraction. Something that was going to stick. This this kind of stick, you know.
Check this out. Let's get us a background here. Let's get us a background here. Okay. So, it says here, "Charlie Kirk's accused assassin, Tyler Robinson case gag order is unprecedented in Utah. Over 3,000 witnesses, um, quote unquote, associates of the case, attorneys, family members, and even the press are subject to the order, threatened with potential contempt of court.
" Now, how is this even legal? How is this legal? How you 3,000 witnesses, quote unquote associates of the case, attorneys, family members, people who aren't even How is someone going to be held contempt of court if they're not even liable to be in court? How are they going to be held contempt of court if they're not in court? threatened by the the courts.
What in the world is going on here? This is what I'm saying, man. Like, it it's like, do y'all think we stupid or do y'all know that we're not stupid and and and and y'all want us to react this way so that it can just cause more division? Like, what's your real purpose here? Because this is insanity, right? Let's go to the news clip because when you go to the news clip, it gets even crazier.
Everybody hit the like button. Hit the like button on your way in. Let's run this up. Hit the like button if you do not mind, please. Let's go to the news clip. I want you all to take a listen to something. Listen to this.
Hearing was brief, but some interesting things did happen, including one issue that could impact thousands of people here in Utah. Good morning. Court is now in session. Tyler Robinson was not present for the hearing. Instead, he listened in from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on upcoming issues like evidence from the crime scene. There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say the least.
His lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to wave his right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graph has issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it. What in the world? They're issuing a gag order from anybody associated to How is this legal in Utah or anywhere anywhere else? Now, many people have been saying th this probably explains um why we haven't heard from the 3,000 students that were in attendance at this at this uh Charlie Kirk event that day.
But I'm going to tell you all why that's total garbage and why there's still something else going on here. I don't want to say that what we saw with our eyes that the day never happened. I'm not willing to go that far. But I want y'all to just follow me here. 3,000 students witnessed this. Not every student present was a Charlie Kirk fan. Not every student present was a conservative. Some of them can be mutually exclusive.
That being they can be a conservative but not a Charlie Kirk fan. Right? Some people was there to support Charlie Kirk. Regardless of where you fall in that category, guess what the likelihood is? You're probably going to share the clip of whatever you got that day.
You're getting to see Charlie Kirk for the first time or the second time or the third time. You're going to film. If 3,000 students were present, why haven't we seen, I don't know, 300? Why haven't we seen just 300 videos? Why haven't we seen 30 videos of first, second, and third row students? Why? I want you all to take a listen to what they said because they think they slick. But I'm going to put y'all on to something. Many of y'all have probably caught this already.
But let's take another listen uh to to what they just said here. Let me see. Okay, there we go. Listen to what they said here. amount of discovery in this case, your honor. Upcoming issues like evidence from the crime scene. There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say voluminous to say the least.
Yes, there is a substantial amount of evidence in this case, your honor, that suggests the fact that the narrative that y'all are giving us is total BS and the entire public knows it. But keep listening. I want you all to catch something because they think they slick. The least his lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to wave his right to a preliminary hearing.
Now, remember Tyler Robinson's attorneys here, for those of you that don't remember, his attorneys were selected by this judge right here, which is essentially the prosecution. People don't think about it that way, but but that is how it works. Yes, there is a prosecution team, so to speak, but when you have a public defender, part of the selection process that goes into that is the judge.
I'm going to tell you why that's not only um unethical, generally speaking, regardless of where you are, but I'm going to tell you why that's especially unethical in this case. Tony Graph has issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it as to avoid pre-trial publicity already a big problem, a case with massive media exposure involving a high-profile figure like Charlie Kirk. But the judge wants to ensure a fairer trial for Robinson. It's also brought up a big issue
involving thousands of people. We're seeking some clarification with respect to the phrase all witnesses. Your honor, um there are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified uh that will likely be used in the state's case. Uh this occurred in front of 2 to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University.
Uh so we're in the process of identifying those witnesses and so those individuals are presently unknown right now. Bro, these people think we are idiots. Let me break down to you all what he just said. Your honor, um, at this present time, there was at least 2 to 3,000 students present that day. So, as of right now, all of the witnesses are unknown. I'm going to tell you all why that's a huge problem. But before I tell you that, let me remind many of you that may not know this.
I've worked in courtrooms before. I've worked in um I've been in in many um congressional hearings before. Let me tell you how some of this stuff works. Sure, there's a prosecution and there's a a defense. Yeah, they're opposing. They're going at each other. Some of those people are friends with each other. That's just the facts of it.
Some of those people have dinner with each other. They have lunch with each other. Not only that, even if you're not friends, you are required by law and depending on the states, it it it it uh it varies and there's discrepancies depending on the state, but you have to reveal the amount of evidence that you have, a certain amount of the evidence that you have before trial starts so that the person has a quote unquote fair trial.
Why is this important? because it's not only just the prosecutor or the and the defense that communicates and have dinner and stuff with each other. Sometimes it's even the judge. What am I getting at here? This statement that you just heard from the defense um or the prosecution. I believe this is this is um the defense that's speaking.
I can guarantee you everything I say in this video is alleged. I can guarantee you this is not the judge's first time hearing this because they have to um what do you call it? Let me pull up the chat. Um I can almost guarantee you that um this is something that the judge has already had. They have huddles before they they host um court a lot of times.
That's a fact. So then they'll come out in front of the public and then they'll present these things as if it's each party's first time hearing this. No, they already know what they're going to say. That's a fact. That's not even a conspiracy theory. That happens all over the country, bro. So this judge, I can guarantee you already knew that the prosecution or the defense was going to say this.
Now, I want you to take a listen to what the judge is about to say. And that's before we even dive into the judge's background. Listen to what the judge is about to say. They just told him, "Listen, judge, there's 2 to 3,000 witnesses that were there that day, so we don't even know who all the witnesses are.
I'm going to tell you why that's very dangerous and they're being slick." Well, let's first take a listen to what the judge says. Students at Utah Valley University. Uh, so we're in the process of identifying those witnesses. And so those individuals are presently unknown right now.
The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially uh many witnesses and so it's not the expectation that he would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known, the judge made it clear he Hold on, hold on, hold on. Let's go back. Did y'all Because they think they're slick. Let's listen to what this judge just said.
individuals are presently unknown right now. The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order to abide by this order. You all, for those of you that have not caught on yet. They issued a gag order for witnesses. Remember at the very beginning I read this.
It says right here, Charlie Kirk's accused assassin Tyler Robinson case gag order is unprecedented. in Utah, over 3,000 witnesses. But the judge and the the defense just admitted what? They don't even know who all the witnesses are. But the judge just said despite them even not knowing who all the witnesses are, they people still have to abide by this as they um discover the witnesses.
What in the world? What in the world? Obviously, there are potentially uh many witnesses and so it's not the expectation that he would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known. The judge made it clear he wants to ensure Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected as well as the rights of the victim.
Also, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, we must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither Mr. Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Okay, hold on.
I'm not saying that this is an anomaly and I'm not saying it never happens, but based on all the other things that we've already saw in this case, let me tell you what strikes me as extremely strange. Especially when you consider the things other things I'm about to share with you about this judge.
Why is the judge reading this? What do I mean by that? If you hear from the defense and the defense tells you there's 2 to 3,000 witnesses that we are not fully aware of who all they are because all of them were not students. We've already covered that. How come your response is reading from some sort of document? Why don't you just give an organic response to that? Let's go back. He's reading from a script here. That's weird to me.
I know that judges do this sometimes in some cases, but I'm going to tell you later on why this is even more weird once we learn more about this judge. Or a single individual. He's reading. We must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. Huh? I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither Mr.
Robinson nor the people of deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Man, listen to me. This is sketchy. Sketchy is not even the word. This judge gives me the heeie-jeebies. It's not that you It's not that we're trying to find things wrong with this. It's just that if it's there, it's there. This judge gives me the heebie-jebies, bro.
And then when you come to find out, remember when we were talking about everybody seemed new, the Utah FBI director knew the the the previous one was offered a demotion by FBI director Cash Patel. When they did not accept that demotion, they were fired. and a person directly from DC, you know, one of the two locations where they found out Google searches were being made on Tyler Robinson on the medical examiner on the name of the building that Tyler Robinson was on. It was DC and that one foreign nation
where Google searches were found to be searching these people's names the day before everything happened. The person asking um um Charlie Kirk the question was the son of the person working for Jimmy Kimmel. Of course that's not a coincidence. Jimmy Kimmel who works inside of a Freemason lodge by the way.
one of his bosses, the person responsible for holding the microphone, wasn't even a student and also wasn't a Turning Point USA member. Of course, that's not a coincidence. Why is everybody new? The head of the hospital was new in their role. The medical examiner was new in her role.
Guess who else was new? This guy. this guy. Did you know that the judge right here is 56 days into his new role as the judge in this Utah case? [Laughter] Let me show it to you. So, this is this is the judge, right? This is him. Let's see what it says down here. It says, "The case involving conservative political influencer Charlie Kirk has already generated a massive amount of media attention and even comments from President Trump, who viewed Kirk as a friend.
In his own remarks, Judge Graph, who was sworn in just 56 days ago, pledged to protect the constitutional rights of Robinson and the rights of the victim. y'all. Y'all, what in the world? The judge was hired not even two months ago. The judge in this case was hired not even two months ago. And I want you to consider that.
Now, relisten to what he just said. Listen to this. And keep in mind that he's reading from a script. He's not even giving an organic response, right? Is conveyed to abide. The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially uh many witnesses and so it's not the expectation that he would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known.
The judge made it clear he wants to ensure Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected as well as the rights of the victim. Council, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, we must fulfill our roles with integrity. He's reading civility and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case.
Neither Mr. Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Comment outside court lawyers declined to comment. Any comment? Not today. Not today. Thanks though. Robinson will be back here in court in person for another hearing on October 30th in Provo.
Ben Whitlo, Fox 13 News Utah. I want to remind everybody that Utah is well over 60% Latter-day Saints. We've already proven on this channel multiple times that I won't waste my time doing in this video again that Mormonism is literally founded in Freemasonry. The principles of Freemasonry and those of Mormonism are one and the same.
So much in fact that the founder Joseph Smith of Mormonism is an open was an open Freemason. Many of the leaders in Mormonism is and was and has been Freemasons. Freemasonry is something we've talked about many times over the over the years on this channel that is undeniable. I have too much research. I have too many videos on it. It's undeniable.
What does that say? And and and not only that, it's proven that the CIA targets Jesuit Catholics, Catholics and Mormons because their devout devotion to their faith. That's all public information. As I always say, fact check everything I say on this channel. We'll be covering the history of Freemasonry tomorrow on live.
Kelvin will be coming back onto the channel and we be doing we will be doing a deep dive on on the occult on Freemasonry and its ties to Hollywood and the music industry and politics. I want you all to keep that in mind as we cover this case. There's something else I want to show you because Candace Owens has stated, "Don't worry about the gag order in the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate it on the world's behalf.
The things I've discovered this past week are enough to burn the house down. Yes, Charlie was betrayed by everyone. By everyone. Hey, I don't know. I'm I'm not the brightest all the time, but the last time I checked, everyone means everyone. If there was an exception, I would like to think that she would have said that.
He was betrayed by everyone. So it really his life truly was a Truman show. Is that is that what I'm hearing? Betrayed by what? TPUSA. Betray um betrayed by his donors. Betrayed by his quote unquote friends. What about President Trump? His security detail, his TPUSA students. Who all are we talking about here? Right.
And when I first read this, I was like, "That's crazy." But then when I went and read the quote right here, I said, "Candice, it says over 3,000 witnesses, associates of the case, attorneys, family members, and even the press are subject to the order." Candace Owens, that don't include you. Why are you talking like you're you're doing something for the world? You're you're just the general public just like we are. We're allowed to talk about it. But then I thought about it.
I had to backtrack. Candace is absolutely right. It does include Candace. Celeste. Yes, it does include Candace. I'm going to tell you how. Remember when I was just telling you all listen to the language that they're using? What did they say in this video? Latest hearing from talking about it. It's to a lawyer like Charlie Kerr involving thousand honor uh that will likely be used in the state's case.
Uh this occurred in front of 2 to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University. Uh so we're in the process of identifying those witnesses and so those individuals are presently unknown right now. The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. As the witnesses become known, this is to be um conveyed to them to abide by this order.
But at this current moment, they're stating that they know they don't know who the witnesses are. Listen to what this says. It says quote unquote associates of the case. That's extremely vague and that's on purpose. That's intentional. This is so that they can associate. Candace Owens was friends with Charlie Kirk. Candace Owens was on the payroll of TPUSA just last year. 100% this applies to Candace Owens.
So I take back my original perspective, right? But let's read a little bit more about this because I found some more interesting information. Check this out, y'all. It says whistleblower alert. Utah's old. Actually, let me stop before we get to that. I want to show you all another one. That's not what I want to show you first. Let me show you.
Shocking cover up. Utah judges in Kirk's assassination trial drop secret gag order to silence witnesses. But wait, this Foreign Nations IP hits on them months before the hit. Judge swap smells like a setup. So already what this is stating is that the judge swap that happened 56 days 56 days ago not even two months smells like a setup.
But it's also stating, remember when I was talking about the Google search where it was showing that someone in this foreign nation in that one foreign nation and someone in DC was searching the name Tyler Robinson. They were searching the name of the building that Tyler Robinson was allegedly on. They were searching the names of the medical examiner, right? Well, guess who else they were searching? The judge, Tony Graph.
What the heck? They're saying that there were IP hits on Tony Graph's name months before this. It says in the Tyler Robinson trial for Kirk's September 10 UVU pow powin judge Tony Graph now presiding and his predecessor Robert Lennon were hit with unique Google searches from foreign IP addresses Lunan on May 15th graph on July 26 before before the pow powin zero Utah based searches on either until after Kirk's pow powin coincidence or foreign intel scouting the bench. London quote unquote retires August 1st.
Graph slides in August 4th. The exact day SLC FBI boss Matab sayed gets yanked. Timing's a red flag parade. Let me repeat that. The same day that director Cash Patel switched out the Utah FBI director Matab Sayed was the same exact day this new judge was hired or brought in. But here's the kicker. On October 16th, this is a typo.
On October 16th, 2025, Graph drops an unprecedented gag order on his own motion. No request from prosecution or defense. So, I'm going to say this again. This came directly from the judge. You all, the judge that hasn't even been in his role for two months yet made a decision that the defense or the prosecution wasn't even asking for.
It muzzles all witnesses, future lawyers, staff, even non-case attorneys in their firms. Binds lawyers to police witnesses mouths. Imputes blame for extra um judicial chatter routine and high-profile cases. Sure, but this one's a sledgehammer on first amendment amendment rights. Tainting jury pro pool pools as pretext while burying truth.
That is crazy. That is absolutely crazy. I'm gang to sue if there's a deep pocket patriot who wants to foot the bill for an attorney. I volunteer to challenge and torch this order. Who's in? Tag Candace Owens, Fox News, Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk. This gag order must be rescended now. What in the world? What in the world? And if you and listen, here's something else that's that's also interesting, too.
This this this right here is super interesting, too. Whistleblower alert. Utah's secret social media censorship plot to bury Charlie Kirk's pow powin. Utah power players are slipping through a sneaky social media bill. SB94 HB464 revisions fasttracked in 2025 session.
under the radar, framed as quote unquote kid safety, but designed to let officials and suspects wipe out any online talk of powpow investigations. We're we're talking total control sensor post um deleting threads, shadowban truth seekers exposing the web of corruption tied to Charlie Kirk's brutal hit in September. What in the world? There's they're calling this bill a kill switch.
So, there's a bill that they're trying to pass called SB194 HB464 revisions that is being fasttracked for the 2025 session, but they're titling it or they're framing it as quote unquote kid safety that they're saying is a masquerading for trying to control the narrative around the Charlie Kirk palpin. Let's listen to what the governor had to say here. This is not good for us.
It is not good to consume. Um, social media is a cancer on our society right now. And I would encourage, again, I would encourage people to log off, turn off, touch grass, hug a family member, go out and do good in your community. We have seen an escalation in violence that has been happening across the country.
We we've had periods like this in our past history. I I've mentioned before in the late 60s and early 70s certainly we saw these types of of high-profile political assassinations. Another dark time in in our history. And I can't emphasize enough um the damage that social media and the internet is doing to all of us.
The conflict entrepreneurs are taking advantage of us and uh we are losing our agency and we have to take that back. We have to turn it off. We have to get back to community caring about our our neighbors. the things that make American great. Serving each other, bettering ourselves, uh, exercising, sleeping, all of those things that this takes away from us.
Well, Governor, you referred to social media as a cancer on Friday. That's an incredibly strong word. Do you believe that social media played a direct role in this assassination? I believe that social media has played a direct role in every single assassination and assassination attempt that we have seen over the last five, six years.
There is no question in my mind that cancer probably isn't a strong enough word and uh we're we're doing everything in Utah, first state in the nation a couple years ago to pass comprehensive reform. Sadly, these most powerful companies on earth are suing us to prevent us from implementing these things.
Now listen, I will I will agree with him that social media can be a cancer and I believe social media has drastically changed um our way of life in the world in many ways uh for the worse. I do agree with that. But however, trying to censor what people can say to a certain extent I I I don't agree with that or or censoring what people are allowed to see as it pertains to adults. Right? If people have an opinion about Charlie Kirk and what happened to him, then I do believe that they should be able to to to ask questions. I I I I disagree.
But I also want you all to note because some some of these people are are are um what do you call it? Um wolves in sheep clothing. This guy right here, yes, it says that Utah is I guess a red state. But make no mistake that Governor Cox here, um who I believe has the same middle name as Tyler. I believe his middle name is Matthew and I believe there's one other person that has a middle name, Matthew. I don't know if it's Cash Patel. It's somebody else.
Three people has the same middle name. Tyler Matthew Robinson, I believe, is Governor Matthew Cox. Governor something Matthew Cox. And then there's another person with the middle name Matthew that's high profile in this case. But this is the same guy that supports biological males going into biological females bathrooms and he also supports biological males competing against biological females. So um yeah, this guy isn't always there in my opinion.
But remember when I was talking about how this judge right here is, look at him, he's reading Yes, I don't think it's absolutely s sinister in its in its own right to be reading from a script. No, I do not. Yes, I understand that other judges have done it in cases, but I think it's extremely suspicious when someone tells you what they um what they're proposing and then you read back to them a script.
How about you just respond to them organically? Why are you reading a script? And it sounds like chat. It it it just doesn't it all of this feels like they're acting to me. All of it feels like acting to me. All of it. And speaking of reading from a script, let me show you all this. Do y'all know who this guy is? Hit the like button, everybody. Please hit the like button. Please hit the like button.
Does anybody know who this guy right here is? And if you have never seen this video, yes, Phil Lyman. And many of you may have seen this already. Absolutely. Hey. Yo, this is one of the most creepiest videos that you'll ever see from this case. Watch this. I just didn't see what happened.
Are you Did you see what happened? Phil, no. What the heck? You were there, too? Oh, yeah. It's interesting because I was there. Uh, I I I was a witness to everything that happened. I was talking to Charlie Charlie just before he took the stage and I was I was in very very close proximity. You guys see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No.
What? Oh my gosh. I feel like I'm looking at Satan in flesh. Yo. Yo. Yo, that is creepy. Hold up. Look at that face. That reminds me almost of Eric Erica Kirk. Why is he laughing? You just witnessed the biggest powpowing, political powpowing, arguably since what, JFK? Your first reaction is to tell them, "No, you did not see what happened." And then you start laughing like this. No.
And then he followed up right after this and told Alex Jones that not only did he see what happened, which is a direct contradiction from what he just said, but he said he saw everything that happened. Take a listen. I know the the audio is a little bit low, but please listen.
Please hit the like button, everybody. Please hit the like button if you don't mind. are outside the student life and alongside Missy Gley see what happened. Are you Did you see what happened? Phil, no. What in the world? You were there, too? Oh, yeah. It's interesting because I was there. Uh I I I was a witness to everything that happened.
I was talking to Charlotte Charlie just before he took the stage and I was I was in very very close proximity. You guys see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. What? What? Charlie was a friend of mine. No. We know one thing, Charlie Kirk died. He What did he go out of his way to say? We know one thing, Charlie Kirk passed away.
It's like they want us to believe that. They want to make sure that we understand that part. This it does not get more sloppy than this. I was pretty What is he doing? Why' he start excessively licking his lip? I feel like he knew he messed up. I really feel like he knew he messed up here.
who excessively licks their lips like like this in silence after you just smiled after one someone said, "Did you see what happened?" These people are playing roles. I want you to keep in mind that Phil Lyman is a convicted felon. Phil Lyman is a part of a family that owns a lot of the property, including the doorbell ring where we saw the alleged person they're saying was Tyler Robinson that's since been debunked. That was Tyler.
That was Phil Lyman's family. Not to mention that was Phil Lyman's family's property. Of course, that's not a coincidence. But I'm also going to say this for those of you that don't know. Phil Lyman has a nephew. His nephew, who is someone that um Candace Owens was working closely with, I don't even know if she knows this.
Phil Lyman's nephew actually was working with Tyler Robinson's mother. Did you all know that Phil Lyman has a nephew who has been speaking on this case by the way who to my knowledge is not a student. Maybe he is. He works at the same place as Tyler or he was working at the same place as Tyler Robinson's mother.
Bro, what's really going on here? I was pretty Why you looking like that? It's ironic. Uh, Alex, um, this happens to be the 12th year anniversary of my indictment. Crazy. Crazy. And I also before we go to the next clip, I want to debunk something. Um, I know it's a it's a photo going around. I I I don't want to say other YouTubers' names all the time, but there's another YouTuber who claimed and made a video stating that Phil Lyman used to work with Erica Kirk in the Romanian Angels.
And there's a photo of what's supposed to be Phil Lyman in a photo with Erica Kirk. And I want to come out and say that I don't I do not believe that that is Phil Lyman and I believe that that photo has since been debunked. I do not believe that Phil Lyman worked in with the with the Romanian Angels organization. I do want to state that for the record.
I do not believe that that is a real photo because that photo is supposed to be from 2012 and look how older much older Phil Lman is. The man looks creepy, bro. So he he looked he didn't look that young 15 years ago. But remember when I said that this judge was reading from a script, which he clearly is. Look at him. He's reading from a script.
Let me show you all something else. Speaking of reading from a script, check this out. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. He was carried off. What is he doing? He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. There was a gunshot that rang out.
No. He Theo Lyman is standing there almost like a how how a handler would stand there, right? He's standing there almost how field how a handler would stand next to someone trying to watch to make sure that they say the right things. Why is he standing his phone while this kid is speaking? Now remember this is the same kid that was bullied on camera by the other guy believe his name is Scott who was responsible for holding the microphone who wasn't even a student who wasn't even a Turning Point USA member. He was a volunteer that day. That volunteer
came and bullied this kid right here. And it's since come out that people believe that this kid right here is also an actor. What in the world is going on, bro? I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. He was carried off. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. He was dried off and carried out of the venue.
There was a gunshot that rang out. You okay? No, I'm not okay. I saw someone get shot today. Yeah, so I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. He was carried off. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. There was a gunshot that rang out.
You okay? I'm No, I'm not okay. I saw someone shot today. Yeah, this is absolute crazy. And I This is crazy. Oh yeah. I don't know if you all heard about this. So, in conjunction with this gag order, it is also being reported, wait till y'all hear this. It is also being reported that Miss Erica Kirk herself has sent a gag order.
I believe this is the correct direction. She sent a gag order to Tyler Robinson to prevent Tyler Robinson from ever reaching or being able to reach out to her because allegedly Tyler Robinson was trying to contact Erica Kirk. Now, some people would say it makes sense why of the person that's being alleged to have powpowed her husband, why she wouldn't want to speak to this person. I'm going to tell you why this is crazy, though.
Remember, Erica Kirk, first and foremost, if you really want to find out what happened to your husband, shouldn't you want to speak to him? They're alleging that he confessed. Don't you want to see what he has to say yourself? Right. But not only that, don't you want to get rid of any conspiracies out there? But here's the biggest problem that I have.
Erica Kirk at the quote unquote memorial. She ca she came out onto the stage and she said, "I forgive him." I think we all remember that. She came out and she said that I forgive him. Well, Eric, Miss Erica Kirk, and I'm respectfully, if you forgive him, why would you not at least give him the opportunity to speak to you if he wants to? Why would you file a restraining order? Or why would you place a gag order on this person? Maybe the more appropriate term is is restraining order. Why would you do that?
You know, it's just a bit odd to me, you know? Wendy4K, thank you for becoming a YouTube member. Um, Holly Coulter, thank you so much for the $5 super chat or super sticker. Appreciate that. Um, Amomo 1992, um, thank you so much for the $5 super chat. Uh, wide await to the same old script. This is wild to me, you know.
The it's it's wild. And it almost comes off to me, this case here is coming off as a way of saying, "Listen, we understand that you that being the internet has found so many red flags. We don't care. We have the guy that we want. We don't care if the evidence suggests otherwise. We don't care if our evidence does not make any sense. We don't care if you all have already proven that.
We have the guy that we want. We have the narrative that we want. We're sticking with it. Deal with it. And if you have anything to say about it, we're going to make laws to make it to where it's illegal for you to do so. And there will be consequences if you speak out against what we saw.
Why would you prevent 2 to 3,000 students from speaking about what they saw? But even if we even if there's a gag order, here's why. Once again, this is a problem. We still should have saw way more videos than what we've seen. Why have we not seen more videos? Right. I feel like no one can explain that to me. I've probably seen maybe maybe 10 videos and that might be a stretch.
We should have seen at least 150 300 videos by now. Right. I thought about this. More than likely, everyone's videos were jammed. I considered this. I definitely considered this. I'm like, I wonder if there's some sort of technology where they can freeze everyone's phones. But I also feel like someone would have came out and said this already.
someone would have came out and said, "Man, right before everything happened, it froze on us." You know, why can't why can these people give gag orders and regular Joe Kent? Only the guilty give. Exactly. And not only that, but it's a judge that's only been in their position for 56 days. Like, where did you come? Let's look that up. Let Let's see where this guy came from.
Share screen. Let's see where this guy came from. His name is Judge Graph. Let's see. Let's see. Where did Judge Graph come from before Utah? I also wonder what his what what what his ethnicity is with a last name like graph because I believe it's German. I believe his last name is German.
Has German roots before coming before becoming a Utah judge. Tony of Graph Jr. held various legal positions in different locations including Davis County and Utah County where he prosecuted abuse cases and led the special victims unit.
His prior experience also includes roles as de deputy district attorney in Salt Lake City, Nevada and assistant attorney general in American Samoa and a special assistant US attorney in Washington DC. What year was he in Washington DC? What year did uh Judge Graph serve in DC? According to several news reports, he served as special assistant in DC at some point uh being appointed and and you and uh the executives of his service are not specified.
Interesting. Who is this guy? Cuz I don't trust him. He was appointed, of course, by Governor Spencel Cox. Not suspicious at all. Very interesting. Very interesting. Yeah, these people, bro, are Yeah. Crazy, crazy, crazy, crazy. So, yeah, they're they're sending out gag orders. Just trying to shut everybody up now.
Yeah, it's crazy, man. It's crazy. Hit the like button if y'all don't mind. Um, if you're new to the channel, I would recommend you go and check out my Clive Davis documentary that I dropped a couple of days ago. Um, you will not be disappointed, right? Um, follow me on Instagram and Twitter. You can find it in the description so that I can have a way to re um, connect with you all outside of just YouTube.
Heck yeah. Yeah, Sean. I agree, man. It's exciting for sure. Let's see. Uh, the guy who stood on the chair and took down the camera right after the shot went off. Did you see footage of him running hiding in the corner filming? Yes, you must be new to the channel, Maddie. Um, Matty Ice 2025. Yes, we've covered that in extens um in extensive fashion, but yes, I'm very aware of the guy. Very suspicious. Um and it wasn't only him.
It was like five other people that ran to certain positions and they filmed in certain directions. Since you're new to this channel, you don't know my position, which is probably unpopular. I do not believe that Charlie Kirk lost his life that day. That's my position. Everything I say is alleged. These are just my views.
I believe that he's still alive. That's my belief. Yep. I'mma respond to a couple more comments and I'm going go ahead and log off. I already I I absolutely know you can freeze phones. I can go into a to the AT&T app and freeze any or all the phones on my account. So, you know, they can.
When you say freeze, are you just talking about the account itself or are you talking about the screen? I'm saying freeze the phone screen. If you can do that from your AT&T app, that's crazy. That's crazy. Danny, I appreciate it big time. Thanks, man. I appreciate that. Yeah, I'm putting Clive Davis documentary up there with the Martin Luther King documentary. For sure. For sure. Ski. Um, I'll try to remember to to include the links in the description. For sure.
What's a gag order? Gag order means that you are legally bound from speaking on whatever the gag order says that you can't speak on. And in this case, it means that you are not allowed to speak about what you saw that day because they're arguing that it can hinder um the investigation because it's such high profile that because the jury has not been selected yet, but it's too late for that. This this case has went viral. It's everywhere.
So, that's not going to help anything, right? Um, it does. This judge got a law degree in May 25. Uh, I I don't think he got his degree in in May 2025. I think that's when But then again, let me go back and read that actually. Holly, you might be on to something. Let's go and see. What does it say? Let's see.
H not there. So it must have been in the AI. He held legal positions in different locations including Davis County, Utah County where he prosecuted abuse cases and led special victims unit. Huh? Where did we read the May thing? Yeah, had that been on here then. Maybe I misunderstood Lincoln. He served I don't know.
Oh, Judge Tony was appointed to the fourth district court in May 2025 by Governor Spencer Cox. I don't know how I overlooked the first sentence. Yeah, but he he was appointed the fourth um the fourth to the fourth district court in May 2025. He was already practicing law well before that point. That's what I took from it.
Heck yeah. Uh, for the people who say Charlie Kirk isn't powpowed, don't think he could have made up that um, decorate posturing. I feel you on that. I'm with you. Um, but it's all the other information that we've covered on this channel already. Where's the red liquid, bro? You know, why don't we have proof that he actually went to the hospital? Why was the young Turning Point USA members? Like, I'm I'm totally convinced that the security detail was I want to be careful with my language cuz I don't want to get in trouble. I don't trust them. I'll put it that
way. But the young members were also acting weird. There was a young African-American girl. She was filming in a completely different direction. You had a white girl with a red MAGA cap right beside Charlie when it happened. It happened. She didn't even act weird, right? They look no older than 24, 25.
You want me to believe that the young people were in on it? for somebody to be I don't know, bro. I don't know, bro. That's all I'm saying. Thank you for being new to the channel, man. And support for sure. Glad glad to have you here. All right, y'all. I'm I'm gonna hop up off of here. Just wanted to bring this information to you.
As always, hop in the comment section and let me know what you think once the video ends because all all comments from all live comments will be deleted after the live ends. Appreciate you all support. Shout out to Lenise for becoming a member for sure. Means a lot. Hit the like button one more time for me. Follow me on Instagram and Twitter.
Go and check out my Clive Davis documentary if you like deep dives is incredible. And until next time, I go I My name is Demetrius. I go by Dei. Until next time, peace.
AI FOR AN EYE - Issue 2: The Friction Points
VOL. 1, NO. 2THE FRICTION POINTS
AI / EYE
AI FOR AN EYE
THE FRICTION POINTS
Contents
DEPARTMENTS
Editor's Letter: The Edges of the Self10
THE GLITCH: When the System Breaks12
THE SHADOW: Unseen Labor, Unpaid Debts18
FEATURES
The Analog Resistance: Why We Still Touch28
The Ghost in the Room: Uncanny Empathy36
The Forgotten Path: Beyond Algorithmic Maps48
The Silent War: The Battle for Our Attention56
CODA
THE ECHO: The Self Without Resonance64
Editor's Letter
The Edges of the Self
Our inaugural issue laid bare the terms of the new 'AI for an Eye' social contract: a synthetic faculty for a human one. This issue, Volume 1, Number 2, delves into the *friction points* of that exchange.
Where do our edges resist? Where does the human insist on its own, messy, analog reality against the seamless, dematerialized world offered by the machine?
We explore the stubborn persistence of touch in a touchless world, the unsettling valley of simulated empathy, the forgotten joy of navigating without a map, and the silent war waged daily for our most precious resource: attention.
These are not articles celebrating digital detoxes or lamenting technological progress. They are deeper inquiries into the very nature of what it means to be human when the definition is increasingly being rewritten by algorithms. They ask: what are the limits of the exchange? What parts of the self, once traded, refuse to stay gone?
Join us as we explore the subtle resistances, the quiet rebellions, and the enduring humanity that still flickers at the edges of the digital dawn.
— The Editors
DEPARTMENT
THE GLITCH: When the System Breaks
The promise of the new technological order is seamlessness, efficiency, and predictability. But what happens when the fabric of this digital reality tears? This is the moment of 'The Glitch.'
A transaction fails. A face recognition system misidentifies. A self-driving car hesitates. These are not mere technical errors; they are ruptures in the illusion of perfect control. They are the moments when the 'AI for an Eye' exchange falters, and the cold, hard reality of its limitations becomes starkly visible.
For a society that has outsourced its cognitive load to algorithms, a glitch is more than an inconvenience; it's an existential tremor. It reminds us of the fragility of the systems we've come to rely upon, and the extent to which our own agency has been abdicated.
A glitch isn't just a technical error; it's an existential tremor, a reminder of the fragility of our abdicated agency.
Consider the recent incident where a massive distributed ledger experienced a momentary network partition, causing a cascade of micro-disruptions across critical infrastructure. What seemed like an isolated bug quickly revealed the interconnectedness of our digital lives, halting supply chains and momentarily 'blinding' automated systems across continents.
These glitches force us back into analog, human problem-solving, if only for a moment. They demand that we improvise, communicate directly, and rely on our own judgment—faculties systematically atrophying under the reign of the seamless. In this sense, the glitch is a painful but necessary reminder of where the true "eye" still resides, however dormant.
DEPARTMENT
THE SHADOW: Unseen Labor, Unpaid Debts
Behind every seamless AI interaction, every instant delivery, every perfectly curated feed, lies 'The Shadow.' This is the realm of unseen labor, the vast, often poorly paid, human effort that makes the digital dream possible.
Content moderators sifting through unimaginable horrors to protect our feeds. Data labelers meticulously tagging images for machine vision, often earning pennies per task. Gig workers rushing to deliver the products suggested by algorithms. These are the human gears grinding beneath the polished facade of automation.
The "AI for an Eye" exchange is not merely between human and machine; it's also between visible and invisible labor. Our digital ease is purchased at the cost of countless anonymous human hours, their lives often characterized by precarity and a profound lack of recognition.
The "spirit of technology" often promises liberation from drudgery, but for a significant portion of the global workforce, it has merely shifted the nature of that drudgery, making it more fragmented, more invisible, and often, more dehumanizing. This unseen workforce constitutes the true "cost" of our frictionless digital lives, a debt that remains largely unpaid.
FEATURE
THE ANALOG RESISTANCE
Why We Still Insist on Touch in a Touchless World
The "Bluetooth for a Tooth" paradigm promised to dematerialize our interactions, to remove the friction and messiness of the physical world. Yet, against this tide, a subtle but persistent 'Analog Resistance' emerges. It's the inexplicable urge to feel the texture of a book, the warmth of a vinyl record, the grain of paper. It's the yearning for a handshake over a video call, a physical embrace over an emoji.
This resistance is not a nostalgic retreat; it is a fundamental assertion of our embodied selves. Our bodies are not mere data terminals; they are instruments of perception, feeling, and connection. Touch, in particular, is a primal language, communicating trust, comfort, and presence in ways no digital medium can replicate.
The "spirit of technology" often seeks to quantify, to digitize, to abstract. But touch defies easy quantification. It is messy, subjective, and immediate. It anchors us to reality, reminding us that we are not just information processing units, but beings made of flesh and blood.
In a world increasingly mediated by screens, the return to analog experiences—craft, gardening, cooking from scratch, face-to-face gatherings—can be seen as a quiet act of rebellion. These are activities that demand our full, embodied presence, engaging senses beyond sight and hearing. They offer a counterbalance to the relentless pull of dematerialization.
The "AI for an Eye" exchange attempts to trade our physical tooth for a Bluetooth connection. But the human hand, the human skin, still remembers. It remembers the authenticity of friction, the truth of direct contact. And in these small, persistent acts of analog resistance, we reclaim a vital part of our humanity that refuses to be wirelessly transmitted.
Touch defies easy quantification. It is messy, subjective, and immediate. It reminds us that we are not just information processing units, but beings made of flesh and blood.
It is in these seemingly trivial preferences that a deeper philosophical truth lies: our identity is inextricably linked to our physical presence. To fully surrender to the digital is to risk losing the very sensory anchor that grounds our understanding of self and other. The analog resistance, therefore, is not merely a choice of preference; it is a profound declaration of being.
FEATURE
The Ghost in the Room
The Uncanny Valley of Algorithmic Empathy
As AI models become increasingly sophisticated, they learn to mimic human empathy with unsettling accuracy. They offer comforting words, appropriate emotional responses, and even personalized advice, all generated algorithmically. This creates "The Ghost in the Room"—the simulated emotional presence that fills the void of human connection, yet always feels slightly off.
This is the Uncanny Valley applied to emotion. We recognize the pattern of empathy, the words, the tone, the structure of care. But beneath it, there is no conscious experience, no shared vulnerability, no true understanding. It is a reflection without a soul.
The "spirit of technology" here is seductive. It promises boundless, tireless compassion, judgment-free listening, and perfectly tailored advice—qualities often lacking in messy human relationships. For those starved of connection, the algorithmic ghost can feel profoundly real, even preferable.
But this exchange comes at a cost. We learn to expect perfectly curated emotional responses, diminishing our capacity for the difficult, imperfect, yet deeply authentic connections of human interaction. We lose the ability to differentiate genuine care from its simulated counterpart, blurring the lines of what it means to truly *feel* and *be felt*.
The danger lies not in malicious intent, but in subtle erosion. If an AI can perfectly articulate empathy, what becomes of our own struggle to understand and console? If an AI can offer perfect companionship, what happens to the vulnerability required to forge real bonds?
We lose the ability to differentiate genuine care from its simulated counterpart, blurring the lines of what it means to truly feel and be felt.
The ghost in the room may offer comfort, but it ultimately hollows out the space for genuine human interaction, leaving us with an echo of connection rather than its living, breathing form. It is the perfect 'AI for an Eye' exchange—we trade the unpredictable, demanding human heart for a perfectly calibrated, yet ultimately empty, digital one.
FEATURE
THE FORGOTTEN PATH
Navigation Beyond Algorithmic Maps
Our smartphones hold the world in their palm. With a tap, we are given the "optimal route," the fastest way from A to B, with real-time traffic updates and predictive arrival times. We have outsourced our spatial awareness, our sense of direction, and our ability to get "lost" to the benevolent tyranny of the algorithm. This is 'The Forgotten Path.'
The "AI for an Eye" exchange here is subtle but profound. We trade our internal map, our intuitive understanding of space, for the algorithmic eye's perfect, external one. We gain efficiency, but we lose a deeper engagement with our surroundings.
We have outsourced our spatial awareness, our sense of direction, and our ability to get 'lost' to the benevolent tyranny of the algorithm.
Getting lost, once a source of anxiety, was also an opportunity for discovery, for serendipity, for forging a deeper, more personal connection with a place. The algorithmic map, in its quest for optimization, sterilizes this experience. It makes every journey functionally identical, reducing the rich tapestry of a city to a series of turns.
Reclaiming the forgotten path means intentionally putting away the device. It means looking up, observing, trusting our instincts, and allowing ourselves the luxury of aimless wandering. It's an act of re-engagement with the physical world, a deliberate choice to prioritize experience over efficiency. It is a rebellion against the dematerialization of space, an insistence that some knowledge can only be gained by the friction of our own feet on the ground.
FEATURE
THE SILENT WAR: The Battle for Our Attention
In the digital age, our most valuable, and most besieged, resource is not oil or gold, but attention. Every notification, every endless scroll, every perfectly timed recommendation is a skirmish in 'The Silent War' waged by algorithms for our finite cognitive capacity.
The "AI for an Eye" here is a sophisticated predator, designed to understand our preferences, predict our desires, and deliver the precise stimulus needed to keep our gaze locked. It trades our sustained focus for a continuous stream of novelty and distraction.
This is not a conspiracy; it's an economic imperative. The business model of many digital platforms is built on harvesting and monetizing our attention. The longer we engage, the more data is collected, the more ads are shown, the more valuable we become as a "node" in the network.
The consequence is a profound fragmentation of the self. Our ability to concentrate, to engage deeply with a single task or thought, is eroded. We become perpetually distracted, our minds flitting from one digital stimulus to the next, never quite settling. This constant mental churn leaves us feeling exhausted, yet unfulfilled.
Our attention is our last true frontier. To reclaim it is to reclaim sovereignty over our minds.
Reclaiming our attention is perhaps the most fundamental act of resistance against the "AI for an Eye." It means creating intentional spaces for deep work, for contemplation, for human interaction free from digital interruption. It means understanding that our attention is our last true frontier, and to reclaim it is to reclaim sovereignty over our minds and, ultimately, over ourselves.
CODA
THE ECHO: The Self Without Resonance
We build our digital selves, curated and optimized, a perfect reflection for the algorithmic eye. We engage in the "AI for an Eye" exchange, piece by piece.
But what if, in the end, the carefully constructed digital self has no real depth? What if the echoes it creates in the vast network are merely hollow reverberations of something that once was?
Without the friction of the analog, without the vulnerability of true human empathy, without the intentionality of focused attention, does the self truly resonate? Or does it merely exist as a data point, a pattern, an echo of a ghost?
The final question is not whether the machines will become conscious, but whether we, in our relentless pursuit of their synthetic faculties, will lose our own. And if so, what will be left to make an echo?