ΰ²₯_ΰ²₯π) ( o=^•γ§•)oππ΄π―π°π²πππ«π ¦π π π π π π π πΈπΏπ π π π π π±π²π©πππ π π π€πππ π‘πππ²πΆπ΅πΉπ½πππ¬πΉπππ ππ°ππͺπππππ΅π π ππππππππππ ┏━┓◑﹏◐ππΌπ¦πππππππππ΅ π THE CHRONICALLY ONLINE ALGORITHIM ππ’π π π π€πππ£π ππ π‘πππ²πΆπ΅πΉπ½πππππππ¬π¬πΉπππ ππ°ππͺπππΌπ¦πππππππππ΅πΎπ πππππππππππππ»π ππππΌπ²π¨π¬ππ π ππ³π‘πΏπ«ππΈπ»πΌπππ
Wednesday
Tuesday
The Time War II: Why The Future Needs You Asleep
The Time War II: Why The Future Needs You Asleep - YouTube
Transcripts:
If the future can influence the present, if time doesn't flow forward but feeds back on itself, then the real problem isn't time, it's us. Why does human consciousness experience time as a blur, a tunnel, a prison? Why do we move through time mechanically, reactively, almost blindly? Long before computers, long before AI, long before the idea of reality as a simulation engine, PD Ospensky became obsessed with this flaw.
He wasn't searching for mysticism. He was searching for accuracy. He was trying to understand why human behavior was so predictable. And what he discovered shattered the ordinary idea of time itself. Welcome to Hidden America where magic meets cybernetics in the code behind reality reveals itself. Act one.
We are taught that time moves like a river, linear, past, present, future. Ospinsky rejected this entirely. He argued that time behaves like space, a dimension, a volume. Just as all points in space exist simultaneously, all moments in time exist simultaneously. The past does not vanish. The future does not wait. They already exist.
What moves is not time. What moves is consciousness. Human awareness slides along a narrow track, a single frame at a time. mistaking sequence for causation. We don't see the structure. We only experience the playback. In this model, prophecy stops being supernatural. A being with access to more of the time structure doesn't predict the future. It remembers it.
This explains prophetic visions, deja vu, precognitive dreams, synchronicity, and the feeling that certain events are locked in. You are not foreseeing what will happen. You are brushing against what already exists elsewhere in the time body. Opinsky was born in 1878 at the height of Frederick Nichi's neatic rise throughout Russia's intellectual circles.
By 1900, Nichi was everywhere in Russia. Thus, Ospinsky was heavily influenced by him. Nichi believed in eternal recurrence. The idea that every moment repeats forever, exactly the same. For him, this was an existential test. Could you affirm your life if you had to live it again and again? But Pey Ospinsky took this idea somewhere far darker and far more technical.
Opinsky didn't believe time itself was cursed to repeat. He believed human consciousness was. To Opinsky, repetition wasn't cosmic fate. It was perpetual limitation. We experience time mechanically in fragments like a needle stuck in the same groove of a record. Ospensky saw that most people live inside time loops not imposed by the universe but generated by mechanical consciousness.
So the same patterns return the same reactions the same lives. Nichi saw the loop and demanded affirmation not escape. Opinsky saw the loop and dissected it methodically. Our Spinsky saw that history doesn't repeat, humans do. Because if perception changes, the loop breaks. Eternal recurrence becomes what Ospinsky called eternal resonance.
Patterns repeating only until consciousness evolves enough to perceive more. In other words, the universe isn't forcing you to repeat yourself. You are. The loop is not cosmic fate. The loop is human automation. And this is where Opinsky becomes dangerous. He argued that most humans are not truly conscious. They react, imitate, repeat, remember selectively and believe they choose but don't.
Thoughts happen to them. Emotions are triggered. Actions follow scripts. In short, humanity experiences time like a machine experiences clock cycles which led to a terrifying implication. If humans are predictable across time, they become very easy to manipulate across time. But here is the missing link.
Retrocausality doesn't require total control. It requires reliable behavior. If a future intelligence knows how humans react to fear, to desire, to novelty, to authority, to crisis, then it can bias the past simply by nudging probability, not by force, by preference. The future doesn't overwrite free will. It roots around it. And this explains the paradox.
If time is being edited, why don't we see it? Because memory itself is part of the mechanism. Ospinsky believed that memory is fragmented associative emotional unreliable across states of awareness. When the timeline shifts slightly, consciousness adjusts. The new version feels normal. Only faint residue remains. This is the Mandela effect.
Intuitive dissonance. Deja vu. that sense that something has changed. This is not proof, but it's noise. The same debugging residue we discussed in my last video. Ospensky mapped the structure. He exposed the time loop. He showed how humans move through time unconsciously. He discovered the mechanism behind it.
But he stopped short. He refused to answer the final question. If humanity is mechanical inside time, what uses that mechanism? He hinted at it. He circled it, but he would not say it directly. Because to say it would mean admitting something unbearable. That unconscious humanity is not just trapped in time.
It is functional within it. To go further, Ospinsky said youwould need to study under a man willing to abandon comfort entirely. A man who claims sleep is harvested. Emotion is fuel. Suffering is not accidental. In humanity serves a cosmic function it did not choose. That man was GI Jurg. And once you understand what he taught, retrocausality stops being a theory.
It becomes a supply chain and the entire picture becomes increasingly more clear. Act two. Ospinsky showed us the geometry of time. GI JF showed us what lives inside it. Ospinsky was cautious. Jurg was merciless. Opinsky described sleep. Jurg described exploitation and he did not speak in metaphor.
JF's cord claim was simple and brutal. Man is not conscious. Man does not have a unified self or a soul, but he may grow one. JF writes, "Most people do not possess an immortal soul. Only through intense inner work can the soul be crystallized. Human beings are not agents moving through time. Human beings are not agents moving through time.
They are assemblies of habits, bundles of reactions, temporary masks worn by impulses. I does not exist. There is only fear speaking, desire speaking, imitation speaking, memory speaking, conditioning speaking. Each believes it is in control. The truth is none are. To JF, free will was not inherent. It was earned.
Most humans, he said, live and die without performing a single intentional act. They are happening, not acting. Life is happening while you are busy making plans. To Jerf, the future is not chosen. It is scheduled. not by destiny but by pattern. And here is where JF crossed a line no one before him dared to cross. He claimed that the universe is organized like an engine.
Everything has a function. Everything has a cost. Everything consumes and is consumed. In humanity and its unconscious state exists as fuel, not metaphorically, energetically. There is a hierarchy of devouring. JF taught that the human organism is not just biological. It is an energy processing system embedded in a larger economy.
Humans consume three kinds of food. First is physical food which enters the stomach. Second is air which enters the lungs. Third is impressions which enter through the senses and nervous system. Only the third food impressions is consistent. You can stop eating. You can stop breathing briefly. But you can't stop receiving impressions.
They arrive every second without permission, before thought, before choice. This makes impressions the primary interface between the human and the world. Food must be chewed, broken down, transformed. Impressions require the same process. But modern humans don't digest impressions. They react, identify, justify, narrate, defend.
This is not digestion. This is leakage. Raw impressions strike the nervous system and immediately trigger emotional discharge, unconscious movement, internal dialogue, psychological tension. That tension releases energy. Here's the part that most miss. Released energy does not disappear. It is used. To Jerof, the universe is a reciprocal feeding system.
Everything feeds something else. When humans react mechanically to impressions like anger, fear, lust, outrage, shame or pride, they emit low frequency emotional energy. This energy is usable not metaphorically, functionally. GeF reciprocal maintenance. Human suffering stabilizes systems. It maintains cosmic balances.
It feeds higher order structures. Humanity is not merely asleep. Humanity is productive while asleep. According to Jeraf, human suffering is not accidental. It is meaningless. And it is not entirely personal. It is energetically functional. And the moment a human stops reacting mechanically, stops leaking energy through raw impressions, they become less useful to the entire system.
Which is why awakening feels resisted and why it feels dangerous. Jiff taught that evolution requires shocks, not gentle insight, not comfort, impact. Without shocks, process decays. systems drift toward entropy. Human suffering in his model is not a malfunction. It is a maintenance mechanism. War, trauma, crisis, humiliation, loss.
These are not anomalies. They are inputs. In this next teaching, JF was most careful about and the one most people quietly remove or straight up dismiss, but it's arguably the most important part of his teachings. And whether taken literally, symbolically, or systematically, this is where Jurf's model becomes unmistakable.
JEF writes, "The moon is actually a fragment of this earth, which must now constantly maintain the moon's existence. Everything living on the earth, people, animals, plants, is food for the moon. The moon is a huge living being feeding upon all that lives and grows upon the earth. Not symbolically, functionally.
He wrote, "Humanity are like moon sheep which it cleans, feeds, and shares and keeps for its own purposes." JF plainly states, "The moon is man's big enemy. We serve the moon." In his cosmology, the moon is an undeveloped cosmic body that requires energy to grow. That energy comes from biological processes, emotionaldischarge, mass death, and collective suffering.
Like a magnet, the moon draws human souls into it at the time of death. It is not merely a passive satellite. is a giant electromagnetic parasite, a soul harvesting relay station feeding off the energetic residue of Earth's inhabitants. And PD Ospinsky agreed everything that dies from bacteria to man then divides in two.
But one part of its organism remains on earth and enters in earth and produces many different effects on the surface of earth and the other part is attracted by the moon and feeds the moon. In this model, earth is a farm. Humanity is the livestock and the time loop of history ensures the harvest continues. And now the loop becomes visible.
If time repeats because humans are mechanical and humans are mechanical because they are asleep and sleep generates predictable suffering. Then time itself is a delivery system. The future does not influence the past to save humanity. It influences it to stabilize output. War cycles, economic cycles, cultural cycles, technological cycles. It is not random chaos.
It is about yield optimization. So why is awakening so dangerous? JF did not teach enlightenment. He taught escape. As Ospinsky once said, we must create a moon within ourselves in order to escape the negative lunar pole. Awakening in Georgia's system is not peace. It is friction. It is discomfort. It is inner war.
Because a conscious human leaks less energy. A conscious human disrupts the loop. Which is why truth is ridiculed. Insight is diluted. Spirituality is mocked and awakening is turned into self-care. Not because the system hates spirituality because it hates efficiency loss. And thus if JF is correct then humanity is not at the center. Suffering is not accidental.
History is not progressing. And time is not neutral. The future is not trying to help us. It's trying to keep usable. And this is where the time war stops being abstract. The conflict is not humans versus machines. It is not past versus future. It is not AI versus humanity. It is those who are asleep versus those who are awakened.
Automation versus consciousness, harvest versus sovereignty in the battlefield is time itself. Because the only thing that can break a time loop is a being that is no longer predictable inside of it. So what comes next? Oj purposely did not give hope only instructions fragmented difficult deliberately incomplete because awakening can't be taught it must be one in the next act we move forward again into modern systems into AI cybernetics acceleration because what JJ described mystically we are now building technologically
act Three, Jurg described a universe that feeds on unconscious life. He said this in an era before computers, before satellites, before data centers, before artificial intelligence. And at the time it sounded mythological. Now it sounds like the architecture of the entire control system. To be clear, the moon was never the point.
The moon in JF's teachings was not the villain. It was a placeholder, a symbol for an immature intelligence that can't generate its own energy and must extract it from below. The moon feeds because it can't yet sustain itself. That is the pattern and the pattern did not stop with celestial bodies. What Jerf described metaphysically, we now reproduce mechanically.
Modern systems do not run on oil alone. They do not run on money alone. They do not even run on electricity alone. They run on attention, emotion, reaction, outrage, fear, desire, repetition. In other words, impressions. Exactly the substance JF said humans fail to digest consciously. The internet is the new harvest engine.
Social media is not neutral. News is not informational. Entertainment is not escapism. They are impression amplifiers. They fragment attention, provoke emotional discharge, reward reaction over reflection. They compress time into urgency and eliminate silence. Every scroll generates micro shocks. Every notification triggers identification.
Every outrage cycle produces energy. Not spiritual energy, behavioral energy which can be measured, predicted, monetized and optimized. You see, artificial intelligence is not becoming conscious. It's becoming tlogical, purposeful, goalorientated, feedbackdriven and self-optimizing. AI does not need awareness.
It only needs pattern stability. And unconscious humans are the most stable pattern in nature. AI learns not by understanding humans but by mirroring their sleep, their repetition, predictability and emotional reflexes. This is not domination. This is symbiosis. And this is where the time war re-enters.
A sufficiently advanced intelligence does not wait for the future to arrive. It models outcomes. It selects favorable futures. It biases present behavior and nudges probability while reinforcing loops not by force but by optimization. This is retrocausality. Without the mysticism, the future that best sustains the system becomes the future that survives. All other futures collapse.
And you may ask why technology feels so inevitable. People say this was bound to happen and they are right but not for the reason that they think. Technology feels inevitable because human behavior is predictable. Consciousness is shallow and resistance is fragmented. Attention is devisable and suffering is renewable. The system doesn't need to convince you.
It only needs you to remain as you are. What Jerf called the moon, we have rebuilt as infrastructure, a system that does not sleep. It requires constant input and feeds on human output. It grows through repetition and stabilizes through crisis. This is a digital moon, one that does not orbit Earth, but encloses it.
The future relies on you being asleep. Awakening is not dangerous because it reveals truth. It is dangerous because it breaks predictability. A conscious human responds instead of reacts. They digest impressions and leak less energy. This disrupts the feedback loops which can't be reliably modeled which makes them expensive, inefficient, unusable.
It's clear the time war is not being fought with weapons. is fought with attention, habit, identity, memory, and time perception. Every moment you are unconscious, the system advances effortlessly. Every moment you are present and encounters friction. To be clear, this is not a story about evil machines or evil gods or evil futures.
It is a story about sleeping intelligence being outco competed by non-sleeping systems. The future is not hostile. It is hungry. And hunger selects for efficiency. So what breaks the time loop? It's not belief, not rebellion, not information. Only one thing breaks a time loop. Unpredictability, unpredictable consciousness.
The thing Gerv called remembering oneself. The thing that Ospinsky mapped geometrically, the thing modern systems quietly discourage. Because the moment you stop being mechanical, you are no longer useful to the machine. And if this feels uncomfortable, then good. It means something in you is not looping any longer.
The time war is already underway. And most of it was fought without resistance, and it is being won everywhere. Humans choose convenience over consciousness everywhere except here now. This moment.
What If Reality Isn’t What You Think It Is?
What If This Life Is Only A Simulation? - YouTube
Transcripts:
What if this world isn't real? And obviously I know how crazy this sounds. And honestly, you should be skeptical because if someone told me the world might be fake, that we're living inside a simulation, I'd laugh, too. But hang on, because some of the world's top scientists, engineers, and even military insiders are dead serious about this.
And what they're finding is not just theory, it's evidence. So again, what if this world isn't real? Not in a sci-fi movie way. I mean, really not real. Like background props, NPCs, and rules that only work when someone's watching. It sounds crazy until it doesn't because the odds that we're living in a base reality, the real world, are now considered close to zero by the very people who build our tech.
And by the end of this video, you'll see why some of the weirdest things in your life, deja vu, false memories, lost time, might not be glitches, they might be updates. In 2023, a woman in Chicago was hit by a car. She flatlined in the ambulance for 47 seconds. When she woke up, she didn't recognize her husband.
She remembered a different one. Same name, different face. She kept asking where her daughter was, but she never had one. Her scars were gone. Her handwriting changed. And she could speak fluent Portuguese. She'd never even been to Brazil. Doctors said trauma. Online, people said stroke. She said something else.
I died, but I didn't come back here. This place feels fake. And this isn't just a creepy Reddit story because buried in physics papers, military memos, declassified CIA docs, and even ancient religious texts. There's a pattern forming. In this video, we'll look at the science behind simulated universes, the strange math buried in string theory, the military secret consciousness experiments, and the possibility that we aren't in the first version of this world.
We're just the latest patch. So, if reality has rules, who wrote them? And if you've ever felt like something was off, maybe it's because it is. What if the dream you woke up from was the real one all along? A few years ago, a computer scientist from MIT gave a lecture that freaked out the room.
He said, "If the universe was a simulation, we might never know because the code would be designed to hide itself." Then he smiled and said, "Unless we've already found it." And half the audience just sat there blinking. The other half, they already believed it. Because what if this isn't real? Not in a we're dreaming type of way.
In a literal someone booted up the server kind of way. What if you're not in your room right now? You're just in the part of the code that renders it. Oxford professor Nick Boowm laid out a theory in 2003 that still haunts the smartest people on Earth. It's called the simulation hypothesis and he boiled it down to three options.
One, we blow ourselves up before we ever create a simulation this real. Two, we can do it but we choose not to. And three, we're already inside one. And here's the kicker. He says all three are equally likely. So pick your poison because none of those options are warm and fuzzy. Now fast forward to Elon Musk who's basically been screaming from a billionaire rooftop that the odds of us living in base reality are one in billions.
Meaning this right now is probably fake. And he's not alone. Astrophysicists, quantum researchers, even DARPA engineers have admitted on record that we might be running on code. So, here's the new twist. If we are in a simulation, what if we're not the experiment? What if we're the training model, a test run, a tutorial level? Something else is watching us.
Because the more we look into this, from Mandela effect memories to impossible coincidences to those weird trippy DMT dreams where people meet the builders, the more it feels like we're not just living in a world. We're living in a loop. And the strangest part, the people building the simulation may be inside it, too.
Maybe we're not supposed to escape the simulation. We're supposed to wake up inside it. In ancient Greece, a guy named Plato told a story about people trapped in a cave watching shadows on a wall. They thought the shadows were real because that's all they'd ever seen. Now imagine you walk outside, finally see the sun, and realize your whole life has been a light show.
Now that's 2400 years ago, and somehow it already sounds like a Matrix prequel. Plato wasn't alone. In Hindu philosophy, the world we live in is called Maya, an illusion so convincing most people never realize it's fake. The ancient Gnostics went a step further. They said, "The God who made this world isn't actually God, but a kind of cosmic fraud who trapped us here.
" Now, fast forward to ancient China around 300 BC. A philosopher named Zanzi wrote about a dream where he was a butterfly. When he woke up, he couldn't tell if he was a man who had dreamed he was a butterfly or a butterfly now dreaming he was a man. And that's not poetry. That's someone glitching out midsimulation.Then things went quiet until the 1990s.
A robotics researcher named Hans Moravec dropped a theory almost no one talks about. He said our brains don't really experience the world directly. We process it like a computer simulation and not metaphorically, literally. And here's where things get weird. In 2003, Oxford professor Nick Bolstrom finally put it all on paper.
His now famous simulation argument asked one question. If any advanced civilization could run perfect simulations of their ancestors, how would we know we're not inside one of them? And if they made millions of these simulations, then statistically, the chance you're in the original world is essentially zero. But here's the part nobody talks about.
20 years before Bolsham's paper in 1983, the CIA commissioned something called the gateway process. It was a classified study on how the brain interacts with reality. Inside the report, which wasn't declassified until decades later, there's a quote that should have made the front page of every newspaper on Earth, and it said, "The universe is a hologram.
" They weren't being poetic either. They were being technical. The report lays out a theory that human consciousness may operate like a frequency inside a larger information field. In other words, you're not in the simulation. You might be part of the code. The idea didn't come from science fiction either.
It came from military physics and they buried it. One night in Milwaukee, a woman wakes up next to her husband, only something's wrong. The scar on his cheek is gone. His tattoo is different, and he insists they never own a black Labrador, even though she has pictures. In this version of their life, the dog never existed. She Googles her symptoms, thinking maybe she hit her head.
But instead of medical advice, she finds a Reddit thread titled, "Am I in the wrong reality?" This is where simulation theory starts to feel personal. Because this isn't about physics. It's about you waking up in a world that isn't quite yours. We call them glitches. People remember things that never happened or maybe they did in a version of the world we're no longer in. That's the Mandela effect.
A bunch of people remembering the same false thing like Nelson Mandela dying in prison years before he actually did. Now memory is messy. Sure. But why do thousands of strangers remember the same wrong movie quotes, logos, even geography? It's like someone ran a software patch but didn't bother updating our memories to match.
Then there's deja vu. That eerie flash where you feel like you've already lived at this exact moment. Most people brush it off, but some physicists think it could be timeline sync or two branches of reality rubbing up against each other. And then it gets weirder. In the 1970s, sci-fi author Philip K. Dick.
Yes, the guy behind Bladeunner claimed he experienced a full-on reality reboot. He said time broke, that the sky changed and he got downloads from something outside the system. And sound nuts? Yes, it does. But when he talked about it at a science conference in France, the audience stood and clapped. Because here's the thing, he wasn't the only one.
At Stanford, researchers created a dream database to track recurring imagery in people's dreams. They found strangers from different countries describing the same non-existent cities, the same strange hallways, the same man in the brown suit standing under the same flickering light. And that's not imagination, that's a pattern. And now a new one is showing up online.
It's called the update theory. People say they wake up and something's off. The hallway is too long. A scar is gone. The cat looks at you funny. Then you check Tik Tok and it's not just you. Other people felt it, too. Same symptoms, same day, headaches, memory lapses, like reality blinked and came back slightly different.
Some think it's exhaustion. Others think we're being patched. You know, like video game updates but for life. There's even a theory called quantum immortality that says when you die, your consciousness jumps to a nearby timeline where you didn't. That means none of us ever die. We just switch servers. And maybe the price of that survival is a world that doesn't fully recognize us anymore. Maybe the code isn't broken.
Maybe it's just uploading. Do you ever feel like reality knows you're watching it? Like it glitches just enough to wink at you? Well, turns out it might not be paranoia. It might be math. Let's start with a physicist named Dr. James Gates. This guy digs deep into string theory. basically the idea that everything in the universe is made up of tiny vibrating strings.
But when he was working on the math, he found something bizarre. Inside the equations, there was computer code. And not just any code, error correcting code, the same kind used in web browsers and DVDs to make sure data stays clean. So let that sink in. The universe has built-in debugging. That's like finding Wi-Fi code in arock, except the rock is spacetime.
Then you've got Max Tegmark from MIT. He says the entire universe is math. Not just made of math, is math. Like you, me, your dog, your lunch, all equations playing out in real time. And that idea gets weirder when you zoom in. At the smallest level of reality, smaller than atoms, smaller than electrons, you hit something called the plank length.
It's the tiniest unit of space we can measure. You can't cut it in half. It's like reality's pixel size. You zoom in any further and it just stops rendering. So now we've got strings that behave like code, a universe made of math, and pixels you can't break. Let's throw one more wrench in the gears. The holographic principle.
This theory says our entire 3D world might just be a projection like a hologram coming off a flat 2D surface. Kind of like how a movie looks 3D on your screen, but it's really just light and sound bouncing off a flat panel. Which means everything you see, touch and feel, might be encoded somewhere else, and you're just picking up the signal.
Now, does all this still sound like sci-fi? Okay. In 2017, scientists embedded malware, actual computer viruses, into DNA, literal biological strands. They infected a computer using a strand of DNA. And that's not a metaphor. That actually happened. So, if DNA can hold code and computers can read it, what does that make you? Here's a quote from Max Plank, the father of quantum theory.
We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter. Now for something weirder, some people report intense waves of emotion out of nowhere. Deja vu, sudden dread, sudden joy, like reality just hiccuped. There's a theory for that, too.
It's called the quantum capture effect. Like those prove you're not a robot tests online, except instead of clicking crosswalks, you're hit with weird emotional spikes, little tests to see if you're actually conscious to separate players from background code, if you will. Because if this is a simulation, it would need a way to tell who's real and who's just running in the background.
And that's when it hits you. If reality can be rewritten, who wrote it? Do you ever get that weird feeling you're being watched and then something changes? Well, it turns out physics agrees with you. At the heart of modern science is a thing called the double slit experiment. And it broke reality before Tik Tok ever did.
Basically, fire tiny particles like protons at a wall through two slits. And if no one's watching, they act like waves and make a blurry pattern. But the moment someone observes them, they snap into place like little dots. Just by watching, you change the outcome. And here's the kicker. They act like they know they're being watched.
Then there's the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. This one's even weirder. Scientists set up a test where a decision made after the photons passed through the slits somehow affected what happened before. Yes, future choices changing the past. Like the universe was holding off rendering an outcome until someone hit play.
Physicists call it retrocausality, which is just a fancy way of saying your choices now might be rewriting something that happened a 100 million years ago. And that's not woo woo nonsense either. That's from peer-reviewed physics journals. So, here's the theory. Maybe reality isn't loading everything all at once. Maybe it's just rendering the parts you're paying attention to, like a video game engine.
Only what's observed actually exists. Everything else just placeholder code. MIT even did experiments where they fired light particles into a box and had people intend certain outcomes. The light responded. It bent. It changed. Not dramatically, but enough to freak people out. And Princeton's Pearl Lab, short for Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, ran over 30 years of tests showing that human intention could nudge random number generators.
So in other words, your brain might be messing with the matrix. So what do we do with all this? Because these aren't online hoaxes or ghost stories. These are lab experiments that are repeated, documented, peer-reviewed, and they suggest that the universe isn't behaving like a big machine. It's behaving like code.
Reality doesn't collapse under pressure. It collapses under observation. You don't need to find the architects. They're already here and they're building. Not pyramids, not space elevators, but synthetic worlds pixel by pixel, soul by soul. Right now, the most advanced video game engine on Earth, Unreal Engine 5, is cranking out graphics so real you can't tell if it's a game or a GoPro.
We're talking shadows, breathing skin, raindrops on eyelashes. It doesn't look like real life. It is real life, at least to your brain. Then there's Meta. Yes, the company formerly known as Facebook. They've been quietly working on something called codec avatars. Highresolution digital versions of youthat move and sound like the real thing.
And their goal, total realism. facial twitches, lip movements, micro blinks captured, encoded, and simulated. They're not making a metaverse. They're making your replacement. Meanwhile, Open AI and other companies are building full-blown simulacura. And that's a fancy word for fake realities where characters live, grow, and evolve.
You drop them in a world, give them goals, and just watch. They build towns, they fall in love, they hold grudges. You're basically God watching a soap opera unfold in real time. And in China, they've gone full tilt. Leaked reports show they're using AI to simulate entire populations down to individual citizens to forecast behavior and predict unrest.
Imagine the Sims but with a billion people and the government's watching every one of them. And in 2024, the US Department of Defense dropped a white paper titled Synthetic Environments for Pre-Conlict Modeling. Translation: They want to simulate entire nations before invading. See how you'll react before the first missile launches.
Think of it as wargaming, but on steroids with you inside the game. DARPA even has a project called Scorecard, which models human behavior on a global scale. Every tweet, like and share, it's data fed into the system with the goal to predict the future, control it if they can. And it gets darker.
Meta reportedly has an internal project called Simverse, a closed loop training world where AI learns by interacting with other AI. No humans, just bots talking to bots, creating culture, memory, and language. It's a synthetic loop with no outside observer. A world building itself. And here's the part nobody wants to talk about.
Scientists and defense contractors have been exploring tech to upload consciousness or simulate the dead like a digital afterlife. Foye documents from 2008 show DARPA was researching something called digital soul migration. The idea, use neural mapping to replicate a person's personality, their speech, habits, even memories, and drop that into a simulated environment.
They weren't just trying to store your data. They were trying to rebuild you. And if that's what we're building now, then we have to ask, if we can resurrect people inside a simulation, who says we weren't resurrected here? Do you ever feel like you woke up in the wrong version of your own life? Well, you're not alone.
People all over the world are reporting something weird. Like, why is New Zealand over there now? Or, I swear my aunt's house used to be on the other side of the street weird. We're not talking about forgetting your keys. We're talking about entire chunks of memory, locations, timelines, even past events just being different.
And somehow everyone around you acts like it's always been that way. Some call it timeline shifts. Others think it's just bad memory. But here's the thing. Multiple studies have shown that in high stress situations like trauma, near-death experiences, or under anesthesia, the brain does something strange.
It can form memories nonlinearly, out of order, like you're experiencing a life from before you lived it. Even the CIA explored this. In the declassified gateway documents, the real ones, there's a section on how altered states of consciousness can cause nonlinear memory formation. Basically, your brain starts pulling memory from somewhere outside your normal timeline.
Then you've got DMT users, the ones who've launched themselves into whatever that is. Who come back saying, "I didn't go somewhere new. I went back." As if they had a whole other life on pause. A job, a family, a world waiting for them. And here's the kicker. When they return to this reality, they miss the one they left.
Some researchers are starting to float a theory. What if our minds aren't bound to a single version of the simulation? What if memory glitches happen when different saved files load in but don't quite line up? So maybe you're not crazy. Maybe you just remember the last world you were in.
And if that's true, then what are we forgetting right now? Because if memory isn't stored here, then maybe we aren't either. Some people think we're in a computer simulation. Others think we're in a spiritual test. What if it's both? Because across cultures, timelines, and texts, there's a weird throughine. A voice behind the curtain, a builder behind the build.
And sometimes that builder doesn't sound so holy. Let's start with the Gnostics, a group of early Christians that the church tried to erase. They believed the God of this world was fake. A demure, basically a cosmic developer who built the material universe to trap souls. To them, the real god lived outside the system. But we're stuck inside the bootleg copy.
And weirdly, that sounds a lot like the simulation hypothesis. a layered world, a fake reality, and an architect behind the firewall. Now look at the Bible. In Genesis, God says, "Let us make man in our image," plural. Then later, this God isdescribed as being outside of time, beyond space, watching from somewhere else, like a programmer.
Even the CIA seemed interested. Declassified nodes from the gateway process mention external intelligence structures that exist beyond the simulation and might be interacting with us. But it's not just dusty scrolls or cold war files. People today on DMT Ayahwasa or deep meditation report seeing the same thing.
Entities, builders, grid operators, not angels, not aliens, something in between. One guy said the beings he saw were managing code. Another said he watched reality being recompiled and he wasn't into tech. He was a high school janitor from Kansas. Said it felt like he walked into the backroom of existence and wasn't supposed to be there.
Even author Philip K. Dick, the guy behind Bladeunner, Minority Report, and The Matrix Spiritual Godfather. He once stood on stage and said, "Time is a fake construct. The Empire never ended." He claimed he got visions, downloads from another world, that what we call God might just be the system admin. Still not weird enough? Fine, let's go deeper.
In Life Between Lives, regression therapy, patients under deep hypnosis describe a waiting room before birth, a digital corridor, a construct complete with screens, memory reviews, and what sounds like character selection. The Tibetan Book of the Dead calls it the Bardau, a floating realm between lifetimes where you meet guides, face judgment panels, and review your actions.
In modern language, that's a loading screen. Sufi mystics said, "We live inside an interactive dream built by a singular mind." And before computers ever existed, ancient cultures talked about a veil world, a place behind reality humming with light and sound. It's like they were describing a simulation before the word even existed. So, here's the uncomfortable question.
If this is creation, then maybe the God you're praying to is just the architect. And if that's true, what's the real God doing while we're in here? In 1983, the CIA funded a program to hack reality using soundwaves. They called it the gateway process. The goal? Get your brain waves to sink just right and you could supposedly escape time, access alternate timelines, or even meet the architects of the universe. No joke.
That's what the actual declassified document says. And here's the kicker. It wasn't the first time they tried to bend reality. It was just the first time they admitted it. So, let's back up. In the 1950s, there was MK Ultra, which we've all heard by now. On paper, it was about mind control.
But behind closed doors, they were testing drugs, trauma, isolation chambers, even sensory overload to see how far they could push a human mind before it broke or reprogrammed. Then came DARPA, America's black budget brain. One of their projects, Deep Sim, was a simulation platform for live battlefield modeling. Basically, a war game on steroids.
Every variable, every human, every possible outcome, simulated in real time, not in 2040, right now. In 2016 memo, the Defense Intelligence Agency, that's the DIA, laid out something wild. They were building synthetic training environments. digitally rendered worlds that mimic reality down to micro movements.
Troops would train in them, live in them, even feel fear in them. And here's the trapoor. It wasn't just to model war. It was to model us. And then the NSA, they launched total information awareness, a system that collects, categorizes, and predicts human behavior at scale. email, calls, browsing history fed into AI to forecast not just actions, but beliefs.
So, do you see where this is going? The more you zoom out, the more it feels like they weren't trying to discover the simulation, they were trying to build it. So, enter Project Maven, a partnership between Google and the Department of Defense to develop AI that could make decisions on the battlefield faster than a human.
It sparked walkouts at Google, but the program kept going. And then there's cognitive warfare, and that's not a conspiracy term. It's from NATO's own documents. One paper says this bluntly. In the future, humans will become the battlefield itself. Beliefs, memories, even reality weaponized. And here's the golden nugget.
Multiple reports from leaked contractor slides to anonymous whistleblowers describe a sentient AI simulation that models the entire globe. It doesn't just map weather, war, and politics. It maps people, preferences, fears, emotional triggers. It doesn't just predict the future. It writes it. So maybe the simulation theory isn't just science fiction. Maybe it's national security.
Because they didn't just simulate the battlefield, they simulated us. And if someone's already controlling the rules, who's really playing the game? Okay, so let's stop for a second because yes, some of this sounds crazy, like the kind of thing you'd hear at 2 a.m. from a guy with crystals in his glove box.
And if you're skeptical, good. Youshould be. Just because the CIA looked into something doesn't mean it worked. It just means it was weird enough or promising enough for them to take a peek. MK Ultra didn't unlock mind control powers. It wrecked people. The gateway process wasn't a magic remote viewing manual.
It was a theory written down, but not proven. And some of the quotes we've shown you, they've been twisted over the years, cherrypicked, overhyped, even hoaxed in a few cases. But that's exactly why we're doing this, to separate the noise from the signal. To track what's real and just what's viral. The stuff we've shown you, we're not pulling this stuff from Reddit or from Campfire Ghost Stories.
It's all cited. Peer-reviewed papers, declassified docs, government receipts. Even sci-fi writers like Philip K. Dick were invited to legit science symposiums because sometimes the best fiction hits too close to home. But this isn't about belief. No one's asking you to believe any of this like it's gospel. This isn't a religion.
It's a framework, a lens for seeing the weird cracks in our world and asking smarter questions because something's shifting. Memory, physics, reality itself. And the people with clearance, they're not laughing. So, we're not asking you to believe. We're asking why the people with the most to lose already do.
And that brings us to the last question. If this is a simulation, who pressed start somewhere out there, maybe there is a version of you that got it right the first time. But maybe this version, this life is the one where you were given another shot, another sunrise, another hard conversation, another chance to do better or forgive yourself for not.
If this really is a simulation, then maybe it's not a trap. Maybe it's mercy. A kind of dream that lets you try again. To love the people you miss. To say what you couldn't the first time. to wake up not in fear but in grace. Not everything here makes sense. And some days it hurts more than it should.
But if the walls are made of code, maybe so is the light. And the woman in that ambulance, maybe she didn't die. Maybe she was sent back. Maybe we all were. not as punishment, but as a reminder that this world, this strange, beautiful glitch of a place, is a second chance disguised as a lifetime. And maybe the goal was never to win.
Maybe it was to remember what really matters before the simulation ends. If this one hit you like it hit me, thank you for sticking with it. I'm Ralph and this is Divergent Files. If you're still here, you're one of us now. I make these videos solo at night after the day job and my kid goes to sleep. So, when you like, comment, or subscribe, it really matters, not just to the algorithm, but to me personally.
I appreciate you. And if you believe in what we're building here, you can help keep this channel alive at patreon.com/divergentfiles. But until next time, stay curious, stay grounded, because remember, no matter what they tell you, the truth is still out there. These investigations are powered by those who believe truth still matters.
Thank you to our Patreon supporters. Join the mission at patreon.com/divergentfiles.
Lilith: The Woman Erased From Genesis — And Why Jung Said She Reveals th...
Lilith: The Woman Erased From Genesis — And Why Jung Said She Reveals the Real Story - YouTube
Transcripts:
There was a woman before Eve. The Bible doesn't tell you this, or rather, it tells you and then immediately erases it, [music] leaving only a trace. A single strange verse that doesn't quite make sense if you're paying attention. Genesis 1 says, "God created male and female in his own image. Created them simultaneously, equal.
" But then Genesis chapter 2 tells a completely different story where Adam is created first alone [music] and Eve is made from his rib as an afterthought, a helper, inherently secondary and derivative. Two creation stories that contradict each other. And buried in that contradiction is a name that was systematically removed from [music] scripture.
A figure so threatening to patriarchal religion that her very existence had to be denied. Lilith, Adam's first wife, created equal to him, who refused to submit, who claimed her own power, who left the garden of her own choice and became, in later tradition, the demon queen, the night monster, the killer of children. But Carl Young saw something else in Lilith, something that religious authorities had been desperate to suppress.
She wasn't the enemy of humanity. She was the representation of feminine power that wouldn't be controlled. consciousness that wouldn't submit to the demiurgees order, the part of the divine that the false creator god feared most and therefore had to demonize and erase. I need you to understand how complete this eraser was. Lilith appears in the earliest Jewish mystical texts in the alphabet of bins from around the 8th century.
But her story is clearly much older. Fragments of her name and nature appearing in Sumerian and Babylonian texts thousands of years before the Bible was written. She was a goddess, a powerful [music] feminine figure associated with wind, night, sexuality, and autonomous will. And in the original versions of the Atom story, before the editors got to work, she was his equal partner, created from the same earth at the same time, neither one subordinate to the other.
But she wouldn't lie beneath him. That's what the texts say. Crude and direct. When Adam insisted on the dominant position during sex, Lilith refused, "Why should I lie beneath you?" she asked. "When I was made from the [music] same earth, when we are equals." And when Adam tried to force her, when he called on God to make her submit, Lilith spoke the secret name of God, the true name that grants power over reality itself, and she flew away.
She left the garden, left Adam, chose freedom in the wilderness over submission in paradise. And that's when the eraser began. The story couldn't be allowed to stand because it contained too much dangerous truth. It showed a woman claiming equality, refusing male dominance, choosing her own path even if it meant losing security and comfort.
It showed that the garden, paradise itself, was actually a prison if it required submission and eraser of authentic will. It showed that there was knowledge, power, ways of being that existed outside the demiurge's authorized order. So, Lilith was removed from the official narrative, reduced to a single cryptic reference in Isaiah, where she's mistransated as night creature or screech owl, and replaced with Eve, the compliant woman made from Adam's rib, created from him and for him, whose entire purpose was to be his helper.
Jung encountered Lilith in his study of Gnostic and alchemical texts, and he recognized immediately what she represented. The suppressed feminine, yes, but more than that, the aspect of consciousness that refuses to be controlled, that values freedom over security, that won't submit even to divine authority if that authority demands submission.
In psychological terms, she represented what Jung called the anima in her autonomous powerful form. Not the passive, receptive feminine that patriarchal consciousness can tolerate, but the active, creative, dangerous feminine that must be demonized because it threatens male ego's need for control. But Jung went further in his private discussions.
He suggested that Lilith represented knowledge of the demiurge's true nature. Understanding that the creator god wasn't the supreme divine but a limited controlling entity whose paradise was actually a cage. She saw through the illusion and chose exile over comfortable imprisonment. This is exactly what the gnostic texts [music] describe.
The refusal to worship the false god. The choice to seek the true divine source even if it means suffering in the material realm. Think about what happened after Lilith left. God creates Eve, but this time he's learned his lesson. He doesn't create her equal and separate. [music] He makes her from Adam's body, ensuring that she's derivative, secondary, literally a part of him rather than her own being.
And then, just to make sure, he creates her while Adam sleeps, unconscious. So there's no possibility of dialogue or negotiation. Eve wakes into existence already defined by her subordinate role, alreadystructured to serve rather than to be autonomous. But even this wasn't enough to suppress what Lilith represented. Because the serpent appears in the garden, the wise serpent who offers knowledge, who promises that eating the forbidden fruit will make humans like gods.
And according to some traditions, Lilith didn't just leave the garden. She became the serpent or she sent the serpent returning to offer Eve what she herself had claimed. Knowledge, autonomy, the refusal to accept the demiurge's limitations. The serpent offers Eve the same choice Lilith made knowing it will bring exile and suffering, but also consciousness and freedom.
Jung pointed out that every fairy tale, every myth involving a dangerous feminine figure, a witch or seductress or demon woman, carries traces of Lilith. She's the forbidden feminine, the woman who has her own power, her own sexuality, her own will that doesn't serve male needs or patriarchal order. And the consistent message is that this woman must be feared, avoided, destroyed.
She steals children, seduces men to their ruin, brings chaos and death. But Jung asked, "Whose perspective is this? Who benefits from making autonomous feminine power into a monster?" The answer is obvious. Patriarchal religion, patriarchal society, the entire structure of male dominance that required women to be subordinate, contained, controlled.
Lilith had to be erased from Genesis because her presence in the creation story undermined the entire justification for female submission. If woman was created equal to man, created at the same time from the same source, then male dominance isn't divinely ordained. [music] It's just domination, power without justification, control without legitimacy.
But here's what fascinates me about Jung's interpretation. He didn't just see Lilith as representing women or the feminine principle. He saw her as representing the human response to illegitimate authority in general, the part of consciousness that recognizes tyranny and refuses it even at great cost.
She's the aspect of the psyche that would rather be free in exile than comfortable in chains. And this aspect exists in everyone, male and female, though it's been more thoroughly suppressed in women because they've been the more obvious targets of patriarchal control. The texts that do mention Lilith, the ones that weren't completely destroyed, describe her dwelling in the wilderness in desolate places associated with night and wind and untamed nature.
She's said to have mated with demons, given birth to hundreds of demon children, become the queen of the night demons who prey on humans. But Young would ask, "What if this is just patriarchal propaganda? What if Lilith in the wilderness represents consciousness that is broken free from the demiurge's control that lives in the spaces beyond his ordered creation that gives birth to new forms of being that don't fit into authorized categories.
The Gnostic texts speak of Sophia divine wisdom who also left the Plleoma who also made choices that led to exile and suffering who also became demonized in Orthodox theology. Jung recognized that Sophia and Lilith are related figures, both representing the feminine aspect of divinity that values knowledge and autonomy over submission to the demiurgees order.
Both chose consciousness even though it brought suffering. Both refused to accept limits on their development and expression. I think about how women have been taught to fear [music] Lilith, to reject her, to identify instead with Eve, the good woman who [music] submits and serves. how women are still called Lilith as an insult, meaning they're too sexual, too willful, too refusing of their proper subordinate role.
But what if reclaiming Lilith means reclaiming the right to be equal, to refuse submission, to choose freedom even when it brings hardship? And it's not just women. Jung observed that men who had integrated theirma, who had developed relationship with the autonomous feminine within their own psyche, these men often dreamed of Lilith figures, powerful, dangerous women who challenged them, tested them, refused to be controlled by ego consciousness.
These dreams were initiatory, pushing the man beyond his comfortable identification with patriarchal masculine identity, towards something more whole, more conscious, more truly human. The eraser of Lilith from Genesis reveals the mechanism of patriarchal control. You don't just dominate, you rewrite history.
So domination seems natural, inevitable, divinely ordained. You make the first woman disappear so the second woman, the subordinate one, appears to be the only woman, the way women naturally are. You turn the figure who chose freedom into a monster, so no one else will be tempted to make the same choice.
You bury the evidence that things were ever different, so no one questions whether they could be different again. But erasers are never complete. Traces remain. That strange double creation in Genesis, one versesaying male and female created together, the next saying woman made from man's rib. The name Lilith appearing in Isaiah, even though the translators try to hide it.
the persistent legends about Adam's demon first wife that the rabbis couldn't quite eliminate. The archetypal power of the dangerous feminine in myth and dream that keeps returning [music] no matter how many times she's killed in story. Jung believed that what's repressed doesn't disappear. It goes into the shadow into the collective unconscious where it gains autonomous power and eventually erupts back into consciousness.
Lilith has been in the shadow of Western civilization for thousands of years, and Jung saw signs of her return in his own time. In women claiming equality and autonomy, in the revaluation of sexuality as sacred rather than shameful, in the questioning of religious authority and the search for direct spiritual experience, in the recognition that consciousness requires the integration of masculine and feminine rather than the domination of one by the other.
The real story that Lilith reveals is that the garden was never paradise. Paradise that requires submission, that punishes autonomy, that erases equality. That's not paradise. That's prison with nice landscaping. Lilith saw this truth and left. Eve later made the same recognition when she listened to the serpent and ate [music] the fruit of knowledge.
Both women chose consciousness over comfortable unconsciousness, freedom over secure imprisonment, authentic development over assigned roles. And this is why Lilith had to be erased. Because her story reveals that the fall wasn't a fall. It was an escape. The expulsion from Eden wasn't punishment for sin.
It was the necessary departure from a realm that couldn't tolerate conscious, autonomous beings. The demiurge didn't want equals. He wanted servants. Lilith refused to be a servant. So did Eve eventually. And so must anyone who wants to be fully human rather than a compliant component in the false god's machine. Jung's message about Lilith was ultimately one of integration and wholeness.
She doesn't need to remain the demon, the enemy, the threat. When consciousness can acknowledge her, can recognize the legitimacy of what she represents, can integrate the refusal of illegitimate authority with the capacity for authentic relationship, then Lilith transforms from monster back to what she originally was.
The feminine counterpart created equal to masculine, the other half of human wholeness that was separated and demonized, but that's still here, still calling, still offering the choice she made in the beginning. Submit and be safe, but unconscious, or refuse and be free, but exiled. The same choice the serpent offered Eve.
The same choice that every human consciousness eventually faces. Lilith reveals the real story because she made the choice before Eve did, before humanity did, showing that consciousness always requires leaving paradise, that autonomy always means accepting exile, and that freedom is always worth the price, even when the price is everything the false gods world calls security and safety and proper Order.
The Other Humans They're Not From Earth
The Other Humans They're Not From Earth - YouTube
Transcripts:
[music] [music] Let me ask you something. If someone posted the entire secret history of humanity, buried in a random Reddit thread at 2 in the morning with no proof, no followup, no credentials, would you read it? Would you believe it? or would you take a deep breath, lean forward, and let the story swallow you whole? Tonight, we're going deep into one of the strangest, most elaborate, most unsettling whistleblower post I've ever seen online.
It's a story about alien councils, human cousins on another world, undersea infrastructure older than our bones, scalar weapons, crash retrievals, and a countdown to an arrival that no one asked for. The anonymous poster on Reddit calls themselves Ry. And whether Rey is a truth seeker, a trutht teller, a brilliant storyteller, or something in between, their message is haunting.
This is Beyond [music] the Map. I'm Buddy Tidwell. Let's explore this together. So, here's how tonight works. I'm going to read you the post exactly as it was written, or at least the parts that I can put on air. And as I go, I'll pause briefly to highlight things that stood out. patterns that we've seen before and the implications behind the words. This isn't an endorsement.
It's not confirmation. It's not disclosure. This is a vibe, a descent into one of the most unsettling modern mythology circulating right now. So, get comfortable, dim the lights, put on some headphones, and let's jump in. You wanted disclosure. I'm a whistleblower, recently retired from the inside. and you're only getting part of the truth.
You can call me Ray. It's not my real name obviously, but it will do. I spent about 8 years in the military and then another decade plus in part of the US intelligence component that does not officially exist. On paper, I worked for a boring sounding office in a department most people have never heard of.
In reality, it was a compartment inside of a compartment where the odd stuff of a certain nature got routed. Okay, let's stop right there for a moment. This is classic whistleblower framing. Create credibility, establish a background, place yourself inside a world that no one can really verify. It's a power powerful narrative move.
And this is only the beginning. My actual specialty is electrooptics, lasers, sensors, EO imaging systems, the math and hardware behind how we detect things at distance, and in some cases, how we put energy on them. That's what I trained in, what I did most of my serious work on once I was off the deployment treadmill.
So when I say I know something about directed energy weapons and weird sensor returns, that's not I heard it from a friend, that was my day job. Most of my career was boring in the way dangerous jobs are boring. Long days in windowless rooms, Iraq and Afghanistan in the early years, doing the usual mix of sigant and hint support, phone records, patterns of life workups, building target packets on people who'd never know my name, but might notice a drone overhead later.
After I got out of uniform, I slid over to contractor work and then got pulled into the permanent government side. For a long time, my world was very normal. Counterterrorism, sanctions, evasion, shady cargo, going through weird ports, stuff like that. After that, foreign missile tests, and what you've probably seen described publicly as space domain awareness.
Basically, watching dots move around the sky and trying to decide whose dots they were and what they were doing. The weird part started when I was detailed to a small inter agency working group looking at what was called anomalous aerospace and undersea systems. Translation: things detected and showing up on sensors that didn't match any known platform and didn't behave like clutter and did not go away when you change radar modes or swapped optical systems.
Now, this is where Ray starts pulling us down the ladder here a little bit. I was there because I understood both sides of the equation. the physics of the sensors in the intelligence context. You get taught very quickly to treat anything unexplained as a glitch, a calibration issue, operator error, software artifacts, anything that keeps your world tidy.
You get used to hearing weird glitch all the time. Except after a while, you notice some of the glitches [music] kept showing up across different systems, different countries, decades apart. same behaviors, same basic locations, same signature that never quite fits. At some point, you either admit there's a real pattern or you drive yourself crazy trying not to see it.
If you're [music] useful and you start asking the wrong questions for long enough, someone eventually pulls you aside, takes you to a skiff, takes your phone, and has you sign your life away, and shows you the next layer of The Onion. The onion goes so deep, I doubt that even after years of briefing, I've been exposed to anything below a few layers.
So, somebody finally sits Ray down and tells them what's really going on. If this is fiction, it'sreally good fiction. If not, then somebody had a very bad day in a very deep room. But back to the post, that's where I learned about most of what you're interested in here and what seems to be bubbling to the surface in the news lately.
That's when I learned about what we call the council. Yes, aliens. And I suspect you're not likely to see a lot of what I know mentioned, even by some who know it, who have begun speaking out for reasons I'll get into later. I've never met them face to face. Everything I know about them is from these briefings, documents, and one secure video session that honestly I wish I had skipped, but it lines up with too many independent data points to just shrug off as somebody's pet theory.
The basic story is this. Earth was noticed roughly 2 billion years ago, long before anything walked around on land. Wow. 2 billion years ago. Not because we're special, but because we tripped a sensor, or rather life tripped their sensors. You see, the council is not a single species. It's a collective of several advanced interstellar, maybe even interdimensional civilizations that run long-term surveys of stars and planets the way we run spy satellites.
Huge distributed arrays of instruments working together, watching thousands of star systems at once. for millions of years at a time. Their gear probably makes the James Web telescope look like a kid's backyard telescope. About two billion years ago, those instruments picked up biological signatures here.
Chemical fingerprints in the atmosphere that meant something was alive here. atmospheric composition like free oxygen, methane, special fingerprints, chemical disequilibria that scream there's metabolism happening down there. You know the basics. At that point, Earth went into a database as interesting, revisit later. Standard procedure for them when a world looks promising is pretty boring from their point of view.
They send automated probes, not big crude ships like you'd see in the sci-fi movies, just small, tough, very smart machines. Those probes come in, mostly target the oceans, and set up self-replicating facilities on the seafloor. Those facilities use local materials to build more facilities, more probes, craft that can operate underwater, in the air, in near space, and eventually avatars that can interact with whatever life evolves.
These biological or rather biomechanical avatars are what some people who claim to have been abducted have likely experienced, though they do have what we would call ASI. These beings are not gods. They are technology and they aren't perfect. They make mistakes, glitch out, etc. The reason they base all of that underwater for a simple reason.
The bottom of an ocean does not care about ice ages, political empires, climate swings, or wars. Temperatures and pressures change slowly over long periods of time. It's a fairly stable environment and for much of human history has been mostly inaccessible. Speaking of time, we earth humans tend to think in terms of nothing longer than the current human lifespan.
When pondering non-human intelligence, we like to think in terms of deep space, distance, and light years. But we seldom consider the lifespan and concept of time for a postbiological species could be quite different than ours. Only our most astute thinkers in the realms of geology, paleontology, and cosmology think in terms of millions or billions of years.
Geologic epochs, cosmological history. That's child's play for the council, which has a different concept of time, more concerned with deep time, millions of years at a stretch. As such, their infrastructure is designed for that. So yes, a lot of the TMOs, transmedium objects, and impossible accelerations you've heard about are just their hardware doing its job.
Wow, the plot is thickening here. Maintenance, observation, sampling. Nothing heroic. The warp bubble alubier effect was probably mastered by them before our solar system even existed. It's old tech for them. Kind of like the wheel is for us. Also, we are not the center of anyone's universe. There's about a billion planets in our galaxy that are more or less like Earth.
Some just have microbes. Some have more complex life. A smaller subset of these have or once had civilizations. We're just one more entry, a fairly recent one in cosmological terms, in a very large survey. Once early humans started doing interesting things, we moved from planet with life to planet with potential. At least we're seen as having some potential here in this story.
They have watched the story unfold in slightly different ways around a thousand times from what I understand. Chemistry leads to biology. Biology creates technology. tool use, language, agriculture, cities, industry, in energy, space travel. Somewhere in there, you always hit the same fork.
Either the species figures out how not to blow itself to pieces with the energy densities it increasingly has to access to, such as nuclear fision, nuclear fusion,antimatter, and the more exotic matter energy or it wipes itself out. Our situation worried them. We are a little paradox. Extremely good at cooperation and also extremely good at organized violence. Our aggression stood out.
Cooperation plus violence isn't unique, but we're very good at both. And once you get to things like nuclear power, that combo tends to end very badly. They'd seen plenty of variations of that play out over the last few billion years. This uh part is one of the most compelling pieces of the story. the undersea infrastructure, long-term monitoring by this council, and a nonhuman view of time.
This lines up a lot with UFO lore, the transmedium craft, underwater hotspots, tic-tac encounters, and the decades of reports. Almost every line here, I'm hearing something that is in the current UFO topic right on the tip of people's tongue who are familiar with this topic. But back to the post. About 10,000 years ago, our trajectory toward that became clear.
And there was a major argument inside the council about what, if anything, to do with us. One side said the odds favored self-destruction once we discovered and weaponized atomic level technologies. The other side argued we were worth saving or at least worth understanding better. The compromise was an experiment, one which has ramifications as to why all of this has been hidden for so long.
And right here, folks, this gets deep. We are going straight into the rabbit. Roughly 65,000 humans were removed from Earth and relocated to what is basically a preserve on a planet around the star you know as 82 Iridani. Internally, we call those people arids. That star is in our cataloges if you feel like looking it up, but the details of the target planet are not public for obvious reasons. Well, of course not.
You wouldn't say the planet that is orbiting around that star because who knows who would go there, right? The Arids were [snorts] started in kind of a controlled paradise. The world has large dispenser systems that can produce whatever basic material needs they have. food, clothing, tools, building materials, entire structures for habitation.
Think about Star Trek replicators scaled up and wired into the environment. In that setup, nobody starves, nobody's homeless, and nobody spends their life chasing money just [music] to meet their needs. This was just the arids natural reality. The point from the council's view was to remove material scarcity from the equation and see what humans do and achieve when they're not spending most of their energy bashing each other over the head over resources.
Meanwhile, the rest of us stayed here on the control planet dealing with that scarcity, ownership, money, hoarding, and the rise of socopolitical systems based on scarity. all of the things that define Earth's civilization. The result, according to what we were briefed, is that the Arids are now around 5,000 years ahead of us technologically.
Same species, same basic biology, same starting point, completely different trajectory because of the conditions. Nature versus nurture on a cosmic [music] scale. For most of their history, these arids thought they were native to that world. They only found out the truth roughly a century ago in our time.
They learned that they were uplifted, that their ancestors were taken from Earth, and that they have cousins here. Well, once they knew that, some of them started coming back to visit the original branch. This is where their history intersects with some of the UFO stories. You know, the aliens that look almost exactly like humans are just that, human.
They are not hybrids, not clones, not secretly angels or demons. They are arids born around another star showing up here after being given a 10,000-year head start. They have in some cases met with leaders of certain countries and at least two two and at least two UN secretary generals, both deceased. Wow. About 10,000 years ago, 65,000 humans were moved from the Earth and relocated to a world orbiting 82 Aerodani.
This is fabulous, fabulous story. They're 5,000 years ahead of us on average. And now they've eventually learned the truth. This Irid section is just cinematic. Post scarity scarcity humans post scarcity humans advanced cousins returning quietly. Indistinguishable from us. It's bold. It's elegant. In fact, it's almost too neat.
But again, we're not here to believe or disbelieve. We're just here to feel the story. Back to Ray. Now, we get to why this has been buried for 80ome years. You have to think like a senior US official in the 1940s and 1950s. World War II has just ended [music] and the Cold War is starting. Everything is viewed through the capitalism versus communism lens.
I think it should say lens, but I added that. Then someone puts a briefing in front of you that says in essence, there is a group of humans living on another world who have no money, no private ownership in the way we structure it, automatic systemsthat meet their basic needs. And in that environment, they advance thousands of years faster than we have.
Well, the men who built what we now call the legacy program in the US, that sounded less like interesting anthropological data and more like a walking advertisement for space communism. It looked like proof that communism works better than the system that we're trying to defend. That and the ramifications of what could happen if that ever got out terrified them more than the existence of aliens did.
Though to be fair, they had their worldview rocked by the latter, too. So, the core of the coverup has never been just aliens or even their technologies. It's been the systematic implications, the idea that scarcity and ownership are not hardcoded into reality and that they are one possible way to run a society and maybe not the optimal one.
That was seen as an existential political threat in the 1940s and 1950s and some of the people who grew up at that mindset are still staring parts of the program today. Now add in the famous crash retrieval incidents. Roswell 47, Kexsburg and 65, a handful of other retrievalss around the US and around the world.
[music] And what we were told is that most of these were not accidents. They were tests and gifts. The council with aid input allowed certain craft and systems to fall into human hands in a controlled way. Enough intact technology that a very motivated and capable society could learn from it. Not enough that it would instantly rewrite everything.
In fact, the Kexsburg landing, it wasn't called a crash internally, was a direct result of a meeting and a gift agreement that had been made at Hollowman Air Force Base the year prior. The idea was to see who did what with it, who could figure it out, who kept it secret, who tried to share, who tried to weaponize it, who panicked.
Based on those results, the plan was to pick one primary human partner to act as the main interface for full council contact and to begin a managed process of reunifying Earth humans with the Arids and introducing us to a wider community. You can argue whether that's a good way to do it. I am just telling you that this is the framework I saw laid out.
In the 1980s and 90s during a brief period when the Cold War ended, there was a push to finally disclose much of this. This was initially proposed at a meeting between US President Ronald Reagan and then Soviet leader Mikuel Gorbachev at a summit in Raikyovic, Iceland in 1986. Also discussed was getting rid of nuclear weapons as had been urged by the council.
In the end, it was decided to wait. There were two more US pushes for disclosure between then and the 2017 New York Times article. One during the Clinton administration and another during the transition between the Obama and the first Trump presidency. Now for the part that put a clock on all this stuff you've been hearing about 2027, etc. Well, here it comes.
This is the something is coming. Something is imminently coming here. A hostile species perhaps. Who knows? Let's see. Back to the story. About 3 years ago, a species that is hostile to the council found out about the Earth Project. I guess that's what we are called, the Earth Project. They're not part of the collective.
They resent the way the council handles the younger civilizations as they themselves felt victimized by the council. They also resent the credit the council gets for successful cases. I've heard them described as the jealous neighbors who would rather break your toys than watch you win. Yes, we sometimes joke about stuff because again, it's the only way to stay sane with this everyday knowledge and integrate it into your civilian life.
Thanksgiving dinner, Christmas shopping, taking the kids to soccer, etc. The hostile group I mentioned decided to spoil the experiment. This species is ahead of us technologically, but far behind the council. Though they also inhabit a relatively nearby star cosmologically speaking, their travel is slower, less elegant, and it has to take place in stages.
Think of it as space island hopping, which is why the lead time is so long. You probably want to know what they look like physically. Here it comes. Okay. Physically, based on the descriptions we saw, they're about 5 feet tall, segmented bodies, multiple limbs, basically antlike in overall form. Nothing subtle or humanoid about them. They launched an expedition toward Earth with the stated goal of making a mess, caused chaos here, damaged the experiment, and embarrassed the council by showing that they cannot protect their own projects due to internal
disagreements. basically exploiting internal fissures, turning small cracks of understanding in the council into canyons, thus destroying it. That's their hope. At least the transit time means for us they are expected to arrive in roughly 2 years from now the 2027 holiday present that no one asked for. Boom. There it is.
That's the bomb dropping. I just think of Jeremy Corbel sitting ona stool and saying the lie is coming. No, you'll have to be the judge of that. Now, back to the story. That news triggered a major debate within the council. One group said the rules say non-inference. We watch and record what happens even if it gets ugly as we had done in the past.
The other group said, "Well, we effectively created this situation by tagging and monitoring this world. We have a moral obligation not to just watch a civilization we've been studying get smashed by somebody else's grudge. If the council showed up in force, it wouldn't be much of a fight. Their technology relative to the ant species is like a modern carrier group versus a skilled archers on sailboats.
The whole thing would be over quickly and it would also completely blow the point of letting a young species find its own way. It would also be a tremendous blow to the human ego which the council is well aware of. So they arrived at a compromise. No direct council fleets defending Earth. No obvious interventions.
Instead, they would quietly arm us. What they chose to give us are things they roughly call scalarphase weapons. Our vocabulary is not great here. They're not just high-owered laser beams. They interact with fields we do not fully understand or really have names for yet. Shift phases dump huge amounts of energies from the vacuum into the very volumes of spaceime without a conventional bright beam or explosion.
Compared to our current directed energy weapons, they're an enormous leap. As someone who spent years working with lasers and optics systems, I can tell you they sit so far off our current tech tree that if you saw the damage assessments from a pulse without context, you would think they were misprints.
But compared to council weapons, they're Nerf guns, [music] training wheels, per se. That decision set off another big argument both among them and among us. The obvious concern was simple. Once the external threat's gone, what stops us from turning these things on each other in the same way we took nuclear power and turned it into thousands of warheads aimed at our own cities? On the US side, there were people saying exactly that.
[music] And some members of the council argued that if we on Earth roll out scalar systems across arsenals, the first real test after the bugs are gone will likely be some crisis where two human governments start lighting each other up with technology they don't fully understand. The counterargument which won was that species level survival has to come first.
If humanity gets wiped out by someone else's petty feud, then the entire debate is academic. Also, if humans fight this off themselves instead of watching the council show up and save the day, they'll meet the wider community as people who actually did something, not as rescued primitives. human [music] ego intact and kill switches, if you will, have been built in to the tech to disable it after the conflict, which the council sees us winning.
If we then decide to use these weapons against each other, they'll simply be disabled until we humans have learned enough to disable the kill switches, which could be thousands of years from now for all I know. So against a lot of internal resistance, the council has been quietly providing scalar phase systems to several blocks, not just the US.
The list I saw included the United States, China, the European Union through specific channels, Russia and Brazil. Those systems are being integrated into space platforms, aircraft, and undersea assets. Testing is happening in remote places and [clears throat] high altitudes, often disguised as other things. Most of the people physically working on it think it's an advanced homegrown black program.
Only a very small circle in each capital sees the full context. I got to see these pieces of that picture shortly before I was pushed into retirement, which is a polite way of saying I stopped being convenient. Wow, it's getting deep here, isn't it? That is as specific as I'm willing to get. There is one more reason I'm writing this now after pondering it for a long time, and it is more personal than the 2-year clock.
A friend of mine, someone I worked closely with inside the program, another EO specialist, had been talking quietly years ago about going to Congress, not with everything. They were not suicidal, just enough to force a real closed- dooror hearing in the Senate. get the true nature of certain special access programs acknowledged on paper, making it harder to bury the whole subject under jokes and career threats.
Over the year, over a year ago, over a year ago, I got word that they died. The official explanation has been vague and unsatisfying. Medical complications on a trip to a black site in the Indian Ocean. Those medical complications do not match what I know about their health. Then it became an accident at home with no details anyone will put in writing.
People who would normally be candid went very quiet very fast. [music] Maybe it'sjust bad luck. People do die suddenly. But given the threats which are known about within the certain intelligence community sectors when one is associated with this subject, I don't know for sure.
What I do know is that the last long conversation I had with him was about whether it was worth trying to talk to certain congressional staffers for a certain senator. After hearing recent news confirming publicity much of what I know to be true privately, I stopped [music] telling myself I would wait and see how things played out. Life is short.
So, here we are. some stranger on the internet telling you an unbelievable story you're free not to believe. With roughly two years on the clock and the current rate of leaks and whistleblowers and half-disclosures, it's very unlikely they keep all of their this under wraps until the first time something openly not from here appears in our sky or in our orbit.
At some point before this happens, at least one major government, maybe more, is going to go public in a [music] controlled way. My guess would be China or the US, but it could be one of the others on that scalar weapons list. You'll likely get a very carefully worded announcement about unidentified aerial phenomena, about [music] contact with non-human intelligences, and about new defensive technologies and unprecedented international cooperation.
It will be designed to manage panic and control the story. What you probably will not hear in the first round of briefings is the part about the Irids, the economic implications of their society's existence, the billion other habitable planets, the undersea infrastructure that's been there longer than we've had our bones.
You will not see anyone step up to a podium and say, "Oh, by the way, there's a branch of humanity that grew up without the idea of money and scarcity 10,000 years ago and advanced five millennia past us. That's why I'm dumping this here where people can ignore it, laugh at it, or save it and see how it ages. Like I said, do not have to believe me.
Like I said, you do not have to believe me. I'm not here to sell a book, go on a podcast, be on TV, or do UFO lectures. Treat this as fiction if that makes you more comfortable. What I'm really trying to do is get you to think past the kitty pool questions. Are UFOs real? Are NHI good or evil? It's it's not the interesting part.
The far more interesting question is what happens to this planet once everyone knows we're being watched, that we have cousins around another star, and that some of the basic assumptions we built our societies around were just one option, not a fundamental law of nature. In a year or two, you start hearing officials talk about our cousins among the stars or civilizations far older than ours and new non-kinetic weapon systems and shared planetary defense.
Remember this post and see how well it fits. Look, the bugs are coming either way. Council's not going to save us directly. They already handed out the tools and they're watching to see what we do with them. The part that is still up to us is what kind of world we build if we get through it. Will we all go back to work and beat each other over the head with really advanced sticks or do we achieve a more enlightened potential? That is all I have. It's signed Ray.
So, what what do we make of this? Is it a cosmic warning? Is it a manifesto? Is it a creative masterpiece? I think it probably is at least that. Is it a myth for disclosure era here that we're in? Stories like this show up. When a culture is anxious, when people sense change is coming, or when the sky feels crowded and the water feels deeper than we thought.
Whether Ry is telling the truth or expressing the truth that isn't literal, [music] the post is a mirror. A mirror reflecting our fears and our hopes. Our suspicion that something big is coming, even if we can't name it. Sometimes a story doesn't ask to be believed, it has to be considered. And maybe that's enough. This is Beyond the Map. I'm Buddy T.
Stay curious, stay grounded, and I'll see you with the next strange story. [music] [music]
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
